Yes, I have a “do not quote” list – here’s who’s on it

By | October 21st, 2013

Who do I trust?

The answer may matter to you more than you think, because the folks I call my sources become your sources. They add credibility and context to the customer service stories that you read on my consumer advocacy site.

Last week, you’ll recall, I mentioned some of the “do not mediate” cases, and let it slip that I also have a “do not quote” list comprised of characters I’d never knowingly include in my stories.

Admit it, you’ve waited a whole week for me to reveal that list.

Let’s get right to it, then. Here’s who I try to avoid quoting:

The overexposed.
Is it just me, or does it seem as if the same dozen sources are recycled over and over in mainstream media? This lazy Rolodex syndrome, which no journalist is immune to, infects news coverage no matter where you look. (Try searching for the next quoted source you recognize and watch that person’s name pop up under everyone’s byline.) In the travel world, airline and frequent flier program expertise seems to be limited to the same five people. I refuse to participate in that game. They’re banned.

The apologists.
Among consumer advocates, an “apologist” is code for someone who supports a company no matter what it does, and no matter how awful the consequences are for customers. Many industry apologists run blogs or consultancy companies, rarely revealing their close ties to the businesses they supposedly cover. Apologists love to take media calls because it means they’ll be presented in a publication or on TV as an objective source, when in fact they would defend a company regardless of its actions. Some even write for media outlets on a regular basis, when in fact they should be handling the company’s PR. For your convenience, I’ve blacklisted them.

Related story:   The health-care gap that traps travelers

The fakers.
I’ll admit, I’m not very good at spotting a faker. I have a few notable corrections to prove it. It took me several years to figure out that one well-known consumer advocate was not interested in advocating for anyone. By then, it was too late — I’d already endorsed her and supported her issues, until one day, after failing to take the side of consumers in an important debate, I realized that she only had one cause: herself. The world is full of fakers, and I do my best to leave them alone. But quote them in one of my stories? No, thanks. I have a duty to protect you, my readers, from the phonies who would distort the facts and mislead you.

The ignorant.
Sources who claim to know a lot about a subject but actually don’t are probably the most difficult to ferret out. Why? Because they can come across as authoritative and educated. Often, you don’t discover you’ve quoted an ignoramus until you watch that source get picked apart in the comments, and by then it’s too late. I’ve eliminated several know-nothing sources from my database after discovering that they could very eloquently articulate a half-truth, if not an outright falsehood.

OK, but who are these people?

Ah, you want me to name names, don’t you? Well, in my younger days I would have called out these incognito PR operatives, shills and posers, but I find that’s highly counter-productive. Sure, I slip up a time or two and call someone an apologist, but that hardly ever happens. Besides, they know who they are, and I imagine they’re breathing a sigh of relief right about now. By the way, you’re welcome.

Related story:   Should fee-hungry airlines profit from your kids?

If you’re really curious, I’d urge you to read my stories and notice who isn’t cited. For example, the next time I write about airline fees, compare my article to another mainstream media story on the same topic. See who I quote. See who they quote. Some names will match up, others will not.

Aha! Chances are, they’re on my list.

It’s a long list, and I make no apologies for it.

Should I have a "do not quote" list?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.