My dog needs to have surgery. No, seriously.

Pixellating Dachshund. / Photo by Mr. T - Flickr
Question: I booked a trip a few weeks back to Regent Palms in the Turks and Caicos through a website called SniqueAway. It didn’t allow for any refunds or changes. The booking appears to be made through a company called Classic Vacations.

Last week, our dachshund ruptured a disk in her back and had to have major surgery. As a result, we need to stay close to home for a few weeks while she recuperates.

I asked Classic Vacations if we could reschedule for an open date later in the summer. They said they contacted the hotel, which declined. I’ve since contacted the hotel and the chain directly via email, but have gotten no response.

I used to work in the travel industry, so I got to thinking about the economics of this decision. While the hotel is completely within its rights to refuse my request, is it a good idea?

There are numerous ways to improve customer yield at a hotel, particularly a higher-end resort. Once you add up food, beverage, spa, excursions, beach rentals and gift shop purchases, it could easily be a significant portion of the room rate by the time all is said and done.

By declining my request, their gain is whatever marginal cost is associated with the room not being occupied for a few days, and we both know that isn’t very much. Why would a customer forced to choose between caring for a sick dog and going on vacation consider that chain in the future? — Allan Keiter, Atlanta

Answer: That’s an excellent question. First, let’s be absolutely clear: You’re not entitled to a refund or an exchange, at least according to SniqueAway’s terms, which you agreed to when you booked the room.

Specifically, its rules say “All bookings are final and cannot be changed, refunded, exchanged, canceled, or transferred to another party.”

But I thought you were entitled to an answer from the Regent Palms, if for no other reason than to reiterate its insistence that your room couldn’t be changed. Rules are rules, but there’s no excuse for giving a customer the cold shoulder.

I thought it might be a good idea to check with SniqueAway first, to make sure this request had gone through all the right channels. By your account, this booking was a little complicated. It’s being handled through several parties, including the site, Classic Vacations, and finally, the resort.

By the way, I also agree with your point. When it comes to a luxury hotel like the Regent Palms, it stands to make as much money on you through food and beverage purchases or spa treatments then it did from your room rate, and maybe more. But it’s risky. If it allows you to switch dates and your original room is unoccupied, it would have to be reasonably assured that you’d spend more money than the room rate on extras, in order to recoup its loss.

Given your circumstances, I’m not sure if you booked your vacation at the right site. Had you known that your dog would be injured, you might have gone to a traditional travel agent or booked directly with the hotel. And travel insurance might have covered any loss from your missed vacation. Unfortunately, an injury to your pet is impossible to predict.

SniqueAway allowed you to change your reservation at no additional cost.

  • TonyA_says

    I guess he also [conveniently] forgot the up to 50% discount he got from SniqueAway. You don’t have to be travel industry insider to know that.

  • jet2x2

    I love my pets, I have lost money on non-refundable things because a pet got sick and I decided to stay home, and I still voted no.  I have accepted that I will probably have some financial “mishaps” because of my pets and have chosen to have them anyway.  I do think it’s OK to ask for a refund (not demand, not expect) but they don’t have to give one. 

  • travelagentman

    Read the rules, sign the rules, and live with it.

  • bodega3

    But what about the online company and their strict policy?  Whatt has tjhis done for them?  It shows that their nonchangeable policy doesn’t mean a thing!! 

  • TonyA_says

    So what do you call it? An exception? Sounds like speak from Washington D.C.

  • TonyA_says

     Agree. Like x 100.

  • bodega3

    That isn’t the issue IMHO.  They broke their own policy of nonchangeable.  Yes, it was nice, but now, how can they tell others, no?  They have zero back bone to their policy.

  • SooZeeQ

    I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ACCESS TO THIS EMAIL ACCOUNT UNTIL JUNE 4th.

    **** PLEASE **** DO NOT SEND ANY – THANKS!!

    EVERYONE – THIS IS A GENERIC “AUTOMATIC REPLY”

    SEND JOKES, ETC. TO MY WORK EMAIL – PLEASE.

    THIS IS FOR COMMUNICATION.

    IF I CANNOT OPEN, I WILL FORWARD BACK HERE.

    THANKS!

  • Joel Wechsler

    Agree 1000%. I have zero sympathy for the OP. It’s not clear whether SniqueAway did this on their own or if Chris intervened. I hope it was not the latter.

  • Nigel Appleby

    When did non-refundable become maybe refundable? Having said that it never hurts to ask, but when the answer is no, accept it with good grace or have cancellation insurance (which in this case might or might not have covered the situation).

    I am one of the majority who would book through a real live travel agent, and, as I’ve said before, ours saved us money compared to the Internet rates from any source on our last 2 trips.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alan-Gore/100000957978287 Alan Gore

    Today’s survey question avoids the real issue. It’s less a matter of how to prioritize a pet emergency relative to a human emergency than it’s about why the travel industry is pushing so relentlessly for the non-changeability and non-refundability of absolutely everything.

    Travel of the kind being discussed here is mainly a discretionary activity. We used to schedule vacations and brief getaways because such things were fun. When life threw curves at us we could adjust our plans; because we could do so, we took chances on travel – further perhaps, for longer, new kinds of places.

    Now that the travel industry whacks us with the rulebook for every perceived infraction, we have come to look at travel as we view dental work: we’ll go to that wedding when we absolutely have to, but to avoid angering the desk clerks and gate agents who control our lives with their arbitrary decisions, we no longer take risks.

    Because I run a small business myself, I understand customer retention. Treat them humanely and empathically, and they’ll come back. Why hasn’t the travel industry figured out my incredible secret?

  • TonyA_says

    In the bottom section, related stories [google] had cute dogs and delicious hot dogs [side by side]. I don’t know what they were trying to suggest.

  • bodega3

    You bring up a valid question and with 3 decades of selling travel under my belt I have seen the changes.  Other businesses are having to made adjustments to their way of doing things, too, because people lie, flake out and take advantage of others now more than ever. 

    I always use the example of planning a catered party.  Ever do that?  I have and I hate it.  You ask for an RSVP and people don’t bother to respond, so you don’t know who is going to show up or not and you have figure out how much food you need.  I was just a two different sit down weddings where 2-5 people per table never showed up even though they said they were attending. How do you handle this?

    We all have reasons for changing our plans, but the company/person who is expecting you has expenses to plan for.  There never use to be change/cancel fees when I first starting selling airline tickets.  Nobody use to change their plans/minds.  A commitment was a commitment, but these days, screw that, it is me first.

  • TonyA_says

    I can understand if you are poor, but read on …

    This 72 room resort is rated 9 out of 10 by TravelWeekly. The current Best Available Rate (BAR) for Junior Suite is $625 per night. For a One Bedroom, $850-1150 per night (depending on the view). They currently offer a 25% discount on the Junior Suite, and that deal costs $468.75 per night (see pic). These are Regent Palm’s PUBLISHED rates according to my GDS (not Expedia’s Merchant rates). The hotel has a 21 day prior cancellation policy.

    I don’t know about you, but for me, if you can afford to stay in one of these palaces, you really have no business using an advocate. And if you worked (or currently work) for the travel industry, you know what a 9 hotel class rating is, you know what 21 day cancellation means, and you know that Expedia Affiliate Network discounts their merchant properties but you must prepay and the rate is non-refundable (nor changeable). [SniqueAway is an Expedia related company.] So you get this super rate (probably lower than the hotel’s $469 offer) from SniqueAway and you wiggle your way out of a commitment. No wonder fewer and fewer people trust those who work for the travel industry.

  • TonyA_says

    Joe notice he said

    I’ve since contacted the hotel and the chain directly via email, but have gotten no response.

    as if he booked the room from the hotel. Nope, the OP booked with Expedia (aka Classic Vacations). It is the merchant on record and the OP should be dealing with Expedia directly. But he made it sound like the hotel was GUILTY of IGNORING him.

  • Raven_Altosk

    It was the highlight of this case :D

  • bodega3

    I can see why he isn’t in ‘travel’ any longer!

  • TonyA_says

    Alan, because we have this great thing called the internet, people can buy and vendors can sell WITHOUT HUMAN INTERACTION anymore. It makes us care less about relationships.

  • TonyA_says

     He introduces himself as:

    Allan Keiter is the founder and president of MyRatePlan.com, LLC. After earning his MBA from Columbia University in 1991, Mr. Keiter embarked on a career path that would have him spend the next 8 years directing the pricing and revenue management strategy and tactics for large service companies, including United Parcel Service, Continental Airlines and BellSouth Cellular.

    Of all people he should know why SniqueAway charges up to 50% less than standard rates and expects buyers to understand that the rooms are NOT REFUNDABLE NOR CHANGEABLE.

  • TonyA_says

    Raven, I need your snark genius on this.

    From Gawker:
    http://gawker.com/196149/google-bitches-day-celebrating-victims-of-the-worlds-biggest-search-company

    Google Bitch #1: The Clueless Retailer

    Our first featured whiner, entrepreneur Allan Keiter, tells the sad story of losing a high Google search rank.

  • Sadie_Cee

    Opportunity cost.  Trade-offs.  Disappointment.  Bad luck.  This is life!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    100s of thousands of nonrefundable flights occur daily.  100s of thousands of hotels rooms sold daily.  Chris prints 1 may 2 stories a day.  The number of cases that reach the net are an infinitesimal number. 

    Moreover, hotels and other business are quite capable of figuring out where to draw the line.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    That’s just mathematically silly.  Making an exception hardly means that a policy doesn’t mean a thing.  That’s an indefensible position.  Unless a company routinely bends or breaks a rule, a one oft exception is neither a precedent not an admission.

    Consider Hotwire/Priceline.  Their no refund policy is pretty ironclad.  As a rule, they make one good will exception and that’s it.  For the vast majority of folks they will not get a second exception, yet sometime a high level review will make another exception.  This hardly vitiates the general nature of the no refund policy.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

      Has it gotten to the point where all you have to do is make a big
    enough fuss on sites like this to get something to which you’re not
    entitled?
    ———————

    Really? Do you really think that the very few cases that Chris and his colleagues publish generally affects the nature of nonrefundable bookings?  Its called an exception for a reason.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    This is an exception. Calling it a precedent would be the politicians doublespeak.

    The very nature of a precedent is that it is binding upon future occurrences.  An exception is not.

    These words are clear, unambiguous, and one should never be used for the other under any circumstances.

    The only reason to call this a precedent is to advance a particular viewpoint when the facts to not support the desired conclusion.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     I don’t understand the logic.  If rich people didn’t need advocates I’d be out of a job.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     Except that old adage, there are exceptions to every rule. Travel providers invoke it all the time.  It is inconsistent to claim on one hand that a nonrefundable, non changeable rule can never be broken, but on the other hand, if the hotel is sold out, or otherwise doesn’t have a room to sell, it can walk you.

    Once you accept that premise, then the entire rigidity of the contract changes.

    I might have a different perspective if hotels and other travel providers were not permitted to overbook.  But I have a very hard time understanding why “what’s good for the goose, isn’t good for the gander”

    As long as travel providers aren’t really bound by the non-refundable/non-changeable terms in the contract, I see no ethical reason why the traveler shouldn’t have the same liberty.

  • Rosered7033

    And so would Christopher Elliott…

  • TonyA_says

    But  the “justification” (about room economics) argued by the ex travel industry worker applies UNIVERSALLY to anyone who rents a room. That itself makes this NOT an exception. A renters dog requiring surgery is not such a unique event either so how can that be an exception. Finally WHO gets an exception? Only those who complain to Elliott?

  • Extraneededmail

    Thank you for the best summation here though I realize this column has become some folks personal snark-fest opportunity. (Better here than, say, aimed at someone face-to-face?) Traveler buys non-refundable trip, accident happens, asked if he could re-book, property eventually said okay. Case closed.

  • Raven_Altosk

    Agreed. Socio-economic status has nothing to do with needing an advocate.

  • Raven_Altosk

    Seems like Mr. Keiter who is sooo intelligent and runs his own business can’t take responsibility for his actions! Really, are meta-tags and referrers that hard to understand? Could this GENIUS not hire someone to help him out?

    Or maybe he’s not really a businessman after all…rather than just a crappy one looking to blame someone else for his problems.

    [Best I could do on one cup of coffee, bro!]

  • bodega3

    Had they done this in private, nobody would have known.  Now it is out on the internet and I would think  this situation could be used to others who book with the company to get around their nonrefundable, nonchangeable policy.  While I would have walked through coals for my dog, I could have easily boarded her at a vet hospital to complete my contract for the hotel booking that was nonrefundable/nonchangeagle.  This company not longer has a back bone in their policies IMHO.

  • bodega3

    Yes and of those that don’t come to Chris, the travelers are stomping their feet at the counter, yelling at the employess, threatening to sue because they can’t get their way as they know these companies have bent the rules for others.  When I worked in corporate travel, believe me I experienced the temper tantrums of those who know that can be and don’t like what they are told they can’t do. 

  • Joel Wechsler

    You missed my point. I did not suggest that the cases published by Chris and others affect the nature of nonrefundable bookings.What I said was that anyone who complains loudly enough to get Chris involved will, in most cases, get an exception which they don’t deserve.

  • Joel Wechsler

    Once an exception has been made it would be difficult not to grant one in the future and thus the exception becomes a precedent. I think your approach is too legalistic.

  • http://twitter.com/miltonrai1 abhishek rai