A flight attendant took my camera and I want it back

The camera never lies. / Photo by Hunter – Flickr Creative Commons
Question: I need your help with a missing camera. I flew from Boston to Minneapolis on US Airways. When I boarded the flight in Boston, the overhead bins were full. A flight attendant told me I would have to gate-check my carry-on bag.

I didn’t have time to remove my camera — the attendant just asked me where I was going and took the bag from me quickly.

When I arrived in Minneapolis, the camera was gone. I filed a report with US Airways, but it now says it won’t reimburse me for the camera, because it isn’t liable for the loss under its contract. That doesn’t seem fair. Can you help? — Haijun Shan, Minneapolis

Answer: You’re right, it isn’t fair. US Airways, like other major airlines, has a provision in its domestic contract of carriage — the legal agreement between you and the airline — that it isn’t liable for electronics in your checked bag. So if you had willingly checked your camera in your carry-on, you’d be out of luck.

But you intended to carry your camera on the plane. So basically, US Airways was forcing you to check an item for which it wouldn’t assume responsibility. That’s not an ideal situation.

I mediated a similar case with US Airways years ago, and it got me into all kinds of trouble. A flight attendant had also forcibly gate-checked a bag that contained valuables, which were then pilfered. The airline refused to replace them, citing its contract. Eventually, the airline compensated the passenger, but only after a public and very messy fight with yours truly.

Let’s take a moment to understand what probably caused this problem: luggage fees. If airlines included the first checked bag in the price of their tickets, then more passengers would check their bags, freeing up overhead bin space.

If you’re ever in a situation like this again — and I hope you aren’t — try to slow things down. The attendant is in a hurry, preparing the cabin for departure. But you aren’t. Don’t let go of the bag until you’re sure all of your valuables are with you.

I reviewed the correspondence between you and US Airways. The customer service representatives responded to your inquiry with a series of form letters that invoked their contract. You were getting nowhere.

I contacted US Airways on your behalf. It has agreed to cover the lost camera.

  • Brian Janis

    I’m a professional photographer who travels with a bag that fits in the overhead bin. About $10,000 worth in there. I’ve been asked at the gate to check it, as the bins were full they said. I asked if they were going to cover $10,000 worth of electronics, which i know from their website they will not, and FA says “No.” I refuse to check it and they find the space. Remember people, they take NO responsibility for any kind of valuable. Read the contract.

  • John R. Strohm

    From PERSONAL experience: The DC-9 Super 80 does not have enough space in coach, because of the narrow fuselage and 3/2 seating. The left side overheads are not deep enough for the standard bag. The right side overheads are perfect.

    The Boeing 737 and 757, with 3/3 seating, have sufficient space.

    The Boeing 777 may or may not, depending on seat configuration. The narrower seats on some airlines, to get more people in, make it difficult for the middle section. Other airlines don’t cram in quite as many seats, and the bin space is adequate. Depth is MARGINAL on the inboard bins: my standard size carry-on is about 1 inch too long for the inboard bins, but fits perfectly in the outboard bins. (American Airlines International Business Class on the 777 has PLENTY of space, and I usually manage to get the upgrade when I fly DFW-NRT, either way.)

    The JAL Boeing 767 seems to be OK, although under-seat space is limited and seat pitch is TIGHT.

    I haven’t flown coach in a Boeing 747 since JAL retired theirs. I never had a problem, but JAL was not running 100% load factors in those days, and, because I’m a big guy, they would try very hard to block a seat open next to me. AA, on the other hand, has been running 100% load factors on a routine basis for quite a while now, with no end in sight. I was really looking forward to the day when they retired their Super 80 fleet, and replaced them with 737s.

    I haven’t flown the 787 yet.

    I avoid Regional Jets (RJ-145, CRJ-700) like the plague. RJ-145 has nowhere near sufficient space.

    I cannot comment on Airbus. “If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going.”