What hotels will resort to for a good review

Oh, the things hotels will do for a good review.

It’s not enough to ask guests for a write-up on a popular site such as TripAdvisor or Yelp after they’ve checked out. Lately, some innkeepers have been pressuring their customers to say positive things online — in extreme cases, even before they’ve checked in.

Take what happened to Pam Stucky when she recently made a reservation at a small hotel in Scotland. Before she arrived, the owner sent her an e-mail soliciting a recommendation on TripAdvisor, even though she’d never been to the hotel.

“Two or four guests staying together can send two to four independent reviews,” the innkeeper wrote. “Different pseudonyms should be used.”

Stucky, a Seattle-based writer, was uncomfortable with the come-on.

“He hounded me to give him a positive review,” she said. When she arrived, the owner told her he was trying to get TripAdvisor to remove some of the less flattering write-ups about his property, while persuading guests — and future guests — to say nice things about his business. She says the hotel was “fine,” although her quarters were somewhat cramped.

At a time when properties from the largest chain hotel to a two-room bed-and-breakfast are engaging in a practice known as reputation management, the latest tools of the trade are you, their guests. Marc Karasu, the president of MeasuredUp.com, a reputation management company, says that hotels see the importance of encouraging happy customers to post their experiences online to enhance the hotels’ reputations and draw bookings. “But it’s easy to cross the line,” he added.

Where is the line? It depends on whom you ask. TripAdvisor, the largest and arguably most credible of the online review sites, takes a dim view of resorts that try to spin their own ratings. The site’s policy, which has been in effect since 2006, is clear:

“Property owners are welcome to encourage their guests to submit user reviews upon their return home, but they are not allowed to offer incentives, discounts, upgrades, or special treatment on current or future stays in exchange for reviews.” In other words, the reviews have to be legitimate and not motivated by any special offers.

“Whenever a traveler reports that they’ve been offered an incentive, we follow up with the property and, where appropriate, impose penalties,” said April Robb, a TripAdvisor spokeswoman. Those can include dropping a property on the site’s popularity index, excluding it from its Travelers’ Choice awards or posting a warning next to a listing that its reviews are “suspicious.”

Chris Brusznicki, the president of GamedayHousing.com, a sports vacation rental Web site, says that online reviews are so important to his business that he personally calls guests to ask them for a review on Yelp and Facebook. “Reviews are a huge differentiator for properties and help future guests become more comfortable with a rental decision,” he said.

But hotels that are on the up-and-up are reluctant to tell guests what to write online. Bill Chamberlain, who runs the Blue Heron Inn in Darien, Ga., says he takes a hands-off approach to the ratings. “We have never asked a guest to leave a positive review,” he said. “We simply ask them to post a review on either TripAdvisor or Bedandbreakfast.com in a thank-you note that is e-mailed to every guest a day or two after departure.” Although the property’s TripAdvisor reviews are mostly positive, one guest complained about lax housekeeping and security.

“There is no shortcut or marketing ploy that can do as much for you as good old-fashioned hard work and being truly passionate about providing genuine hospitality,” said Adele Gutman, the vice president of sales and marketing for HKHotels, which owns several properties in New York that have received high marks online.

And yet for every HKHotels or Blue Heron Inn, there are thousands more that believe the Internet can be manipulated to their ends. They don’t talk about their actions in public, but from time to time someone will post an anonymous comment on my travel blog, complaining about a tactic their competitors have used to boost their online ratings. Those strategies usually include asking someone connected with the hotel to post a fake review or offering free rooms or discounts to guests who write something nice.

It was only a matter of time before the backlash. In January, Brett Birman, a salesman with a New York finance company, launched a site called AvoiditNYC.com. He did it “because I have had bad experiences in the past and felt that my negative reviews on other Web sites, like Yelp and Citysearch, are often overlooked,” he told me. So far, AvoiditNYC.com is home to only one hotel review — of a small property on West 29th Street, in which a guest complains about the “dark and sketchy” neighborhood.

So what does all this mean to you? Obviously, hotel executives don’t think twice about leveraging guests like you to improve their online reputations. But if it’s happening to you, it’s probably happening to tens of thousands of other hotel guests every day. How many of them are being asked to endorse a hotel they’ve never stayed in, or have been offered a free night in exchange for a glowing write-up? And how many are doing it?

What does that say about the overall reliability of user-generated hotel reviews? Well, let’s just say that it doesn’t exactly enhance their reputation.

(Photo: orvaratli/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • GSA

    I worked at a very nice, upscale resort in upstate new york, where “travel writers” (I use the term loosely) would get free stays, including meals and spa treatments in exchange for good online reviews on tripadvisor and similiar sites.

  • Heidi

    As GSA points out, at some level, this isn’t a new problem. For decades truth in the world of newspaper and magazine travel journalism was held hostage to cozy relationships between travel writers and property owners. Writers typically got free food, transport or accommodations from the establishments they wrote about. They then tended to have great difficulty writing critically about those same establishments, particularly if said establishments were generous with their advertising budgets. (Guidebook writers tended to be more objective, and their writing had fewer ads and cost proportionately more.)

    Now that everyone can be a journalist, the problem’s nature has changed, but only a little. Hotels and restaurants are as willing as ever to sweeten the pie of those who promise to write about them. The plus side is that with reviews of each establishment numbering tens, hundreds, or even thousands, there are more voices out there. A Trip Advisor listing with a large number of reviews gives a much more accurate view of an establishment’s quality than an old-style magazine article or even a single guidebook review.

  • http://www.HospitalitymarketingBlog.com Madigan

    There are plenty of clueless general managers from places like the small hotel in Scotland trying to manipulate the system without really understanding the ins and outs of review sites. As Forrest Gump would say, “Stupid is as stupid does.”

    They are a fact of life and there’s no getting around it. Unfortunately they taint the service. But travelers should resist posting reviews of hotels before they actually experience the hotel or they are no smarter than the Scotland GM and exacerbate the situation.

    Review sites like TripAdvisor, CNET and even Angie’s List are becoming increasingly influential in shaping people’s perceptions and purchase intent of products and services. You can’t fault a company for trying to make sure they are presented in the best possible light – as long as they play by the rules.

    It’s when some don’t play by the rules, posting fraudulent reviews or worse – negative reviews of competitors – then things could get out of hand.

    But they really haven’t as yet. With over 30 million reviews, TripAdvisor, does an excellent job of policing them. You’ll hear a lot of hoteliers whining about fraudulent reviews, but I have never seen anyone really quantify the extent of the problem.

    Until someone does I have to think the overall reliability of user-generated hotel reviews will remain pretty high. Research has shown people believe online reviews almost as much as they do the opinions and recommendations of friends and relatives. And word-of-mouth is the most influential advertising a hotel can have.

  • LeeAnne

    The smartest thing that hotels can do is to keep an eye on their reviews, and make use of that “manager’s response” option. This really does make a difference – and it can be a huge one.

    Last year I was planning a trip to Stockholm, and I was interested in a small boutique hotel in the old town. It had mostly good reviews, except for the two most recent in which customers complained that the breakfast was bad – not enough selections, ran out of things very early, etc; there were also a couple of compliants about unfriendly front desk staff.

    The hotel used the “manager’s response” feature, and wrote that they apologized for the unsatisfactory breakfast, and would make immediate changes to both the selections and the quantity they prepare. They also promised to make changes with their front desk staff. Based on that response (which had just happened), I booked the hotel. I was happy to find not only extremely friendly and helpful front desk staff, but a grand and sumptuous breakfast buffet! Naturally I wrote a glowing review upon my return in which I stated that whatever problems had been there in the past, were clearly resolved.

    Another example: a couple years ago I was planning a trip to Belize. The hotel that I had my eye on suddenly received a really horrific review, which made me question whether I should book them. The manager quickly responded with the TRUE story: the couple decided on the day of their arrival to change to another hotel where they had friends staying, and asked for a refund for their pre-paid stay…which the hotel refused, since their refund policy clearly states they must cancel within 48 hours (it’s a tiny island with little chance of walk-in business to fill the room). So they stayed there for one night, then trashed it in a review with a bunch of lies. I had a feeling it wasn’t a valid review, as none of their complaints matched up with any of the previous reviews, but it was helpful to hear the explanation from the proprietors, which rang much more true than the bad review.

    I also remember seeing a bad review in which the hotel management’s response was “this appears to be a fake review – we have no record of this person staying here.” I believed them, because this hotel also had a couple of negative reviews in which they acknowledged the complaint and promised to resolve the problems. So it was obvious that they weren’t just responding to every bad review with “this person never stayed here”.

    If hotels stay on top of their reviews, they can catch false reviews immediately, and respond appropriately to negative ones. The very fact that the management of that Stockholm hotel responded in the way they did – acknowledging that they’d not met their customer’s expectations, and saying what they were going to do in response – was a selling point right there. And then, to go there and find that they did exactly what they said they would do, increased my esteem for that hotel even more. I will never again visit Stockholm without staying there.

    This is a FAR better methodology of managing one’s online reputation than posting fake reviews, either on your own hotel, or on competitors’. Rather than using deception and devious practices, these hotels are using fairness, honesty and true customer service to manage their online presence. They are role models for the rest of the industry.