Airport security can be better — and here’s how

1-IMG_0461It’s been more than a decade since the creation of the Transportation Security Administration, the agency assigned to protect America’s transportation systems.

Almost from the beginning, a small group of activists have kept a vigilant eye on the agency. When TSA agents pilfered your luggage, they spoke up. When the blueshirts forced us through inadequately tested scanners, they said something. When agents treated us like prison inmates, they fired up their laptop computers and they wrote.

Today, those watchdogs — and I include myself in the group — are at a crossroads. Some of our closest supporters are gently advising us to give it a rest. They say our relentless criticism of an agency that is just trying to protect us makes us look shrill and unreasonable.

Besides, every dog needs a break.

I know that’s true. I had an opportunity to take my sons, ages 8 and 10, dogsledding a few weeks ago in Lake Louise, Canada. Our two lead dogs, Linus and Sally, reminded me of the friends I’ve worked with who are united by a concern about the TSA. They want to move forward no matter what.

Our guide told us his dogs would keep running despite their injuries.

But if you’re racing sled dogs, you know that’s impossible. You have to give the huskies a break and feed them. A sled dog can consume between 10,000 and 12,000 calories per day. If you don’t stop every few hours to allow them to recover, your team will get run down and lose the race.

What do the TSA’s watchdogs want?

If you rewind to 2010, when the agency began secretly installing poorly tested body scanners in America’s airports, and then forcing passengers to use them or face a prison-style pat-down, the watchdogs have a lot to be proud of. Thanks to their advocacy, the TSA quickly abandoned its “one-size-fits-all” approach to aviation security.

Today, a select few passengers don’t have to subject themselves to an invasive scan or a humiliating pat-down because the watchdogs said something — even as others insisted that this was the price we had to pay for keeping America’s skies safe. Yet a majority of passengers must still be screened in a way that critics claim is unconstitutional.

We’re not there yet

Here’s what the watchdogs want:

Decommission all full-body scanners. The technology is unproven and potentially dangerous. The expense can’t be justified to the American taxpayer.

Fix the screening process. Every airline passenger should be checked in a way that is non-invasive, doesn’t involve harmful radiation, and respects their civil rights and the U.S. Constitution. We know the current system doesn’t do that. Let’s find something that does.

Kill VIPR. The TSA’s Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response team, which patrols roads, NFL games, and political conventions, needs to be shuttered now. No one asked for these ad hoc teams of TSA agents, and no one will miss them.

Restructure the agency. The TSA needs to trim its $8-billion-a-year budget by eliminating a vast layer of ineffective middle management and reducing the size of its force, which is often referred to as “Thousands Standing Around.”

Retrain TSA’s workforce. Frontline TSA agents like to see themselves as the last line of defense against terrorism. They aren’t. Rather, they are the face of the federal government, and at the moment, it’s not a good one. Agents need basic customer-service training, and they need to be aware of the civil rights and disabilities concerns of passengers.

The TSA’s critics have a vision of what the agency could be: rather than the paramilitary organization that strikes fear in the hearts of law-abiding Americans, an agency focused on excellent customer service that helps Americans travel safer.

I’ve seen glimpses of this organization from time to time when I fly. It is the TSA agent who smiles and helps an elderly passenger in a wheelchair through the screening area instead of barking at her. It is the more common sense security line afforded to TSA Pre-Check passengers and airline crewmembers.

And I think: It could be this way for all of us. It should be.

When it is, this watchdog will rest.

Can airport security be improved?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Update (5 p.m.): I should have known better than to fly on the same day one of these columns posts. Let’s just say today’s trip from Denver to Reno could have gone better.

A stone-faced TSA agent tried to force me through a scanner, which would have separated me from the rest of my family. I politely opted out of the machine.

My screener, Officer Johnson (I’m not making this up — that’s his real name) was, um, very enthusiastic. He nearly succeeded in pulling down my pants twice.

In fact, all of the agents at the screening area seemed happy to see me patted down. I asked my son to take pictures of the event. Yes, that expression on my face is one of annoyance. What are these characters protecting us from, again?

1-photo (1)

  • Daisiemae

    EdB,

    Can you believe the moderators deleted my funny post back to you where I talked about being a Southern Belle and that you really are a true gentlemen? How ridiculous is that? What, am I giving away secret battle plans?

    In the meantime, this Southern belle will say again that you are a lovely man and a real gentleman. It’s been fun talking with you. Hopefully, we can do it again sometime. If the moderators allow it.

    Edited: Blogger Hal below reminded me of Hanlon’s Razor, and I have to say, I think he may be right. After I re-read the entire thread, I’m thinking the particular moderator who deleted my post to you may have read the entire thing literally and then deleted my post accordingly.

    I’ll soften my position that they are waging a personal war against me if that is the case. I’m willing to accept that it may be a case of misunderstanding rather than malice.

    But if is true that the moderator did indeed take my words literally, really, shouldn’t moderators be chosen from among people who are capable of comprehending irony and satire?

  • Daisiemae

    TSAisTerrorism,

    Again, I don’t think anybody will understand your comment since the one I made before it was deleted.

    For those who are reading this thread the first time, I did not attack or insult anybody. I told EdB the previous poster that we make a great comedy team. I asked him if he is my sidekick or am I his sidekick.

    Where is the insult or attack in that? Who did I offend?

    Or is it possible that the deletion was actually petty revenge on the part of “out of hand” moderators angry because I have been shining a spotlight on their bias?

    What do you think, TSAisTerrorism?

  • Daisiemae

    TSAisTerrorism,

    Again, I don’t think anybody will understand your comment since the one I made before it was deleted.

    For those who are reading this thread the first time, I did not attack or insult anybody. I told EdB, the previous poster, that we make a great comedy team. I asked him if he is my sidekick or am I his sidekick.

    Where is the insult or attack in that? Who did I offend?

    Or is it possible that the deletion was actually revenge on the part of “out of hand” moderators angry because I have been shining a spotlight on their bias?

    In reality, deleting innocent posts shines the spotlight even more brightly on the actions of the moderators. What does that spotlight reveal?

    What do you think, Readers? What do you see in that light?

  • Daisiemae

    Markie,

    They are still slapping my hand by deleting my non-offensive comments. Three of them so far.

    A reprimand and now three deletions? It appears the deletions are the “answer” to our questions about why the moderator admonished me.

    Periodic house cleaning? Looks like I am the one being swept out with the trash.

  • Daisiemae

    Markie,

    They are still slapping my hand by deleting my non-offensive comments. Three of them so far.

    A reprimand and now three deletions? It appears the deletions are the “answer” to our questions about why the moderator admonished me.

    Periodic house cleaning? Looks like I am the one being swept out with the trash.

    But one person’s trash is another person’s treasure. Several people read those comments and upvoted them before they were deleted.

  • Daisiemae

    Markie,

    I have just noticed that you argue against injustice and intolerance regardless of which side of the TSA debate the other bloggers take. I really admire that trait.

    At this point, I have no idea what your stance is with TSA, but what I do know about you is that you do not like intolerance and injustice. I’m totally with you there. Those are two things I do not like either.

    You have my respect, lady!

    PS: I also do not like hypocrisy. How does hypocrisy affect your aggravation-o-meter? It makes mine go BOINGGGG!

  • Daisiemae

    Markie,

    I have just noticed that you argue against injustice and intolerance regardless of which side of the TSA debate the other bloggers take. I really admire that trait.

    At this point, I have no idea what your stance is with TSA, but what I do know about you is that you do not like intolerance and injustice. I’m totally with you there. Those are two things I do not like either.

    You have my respect, lady!

    PS: I also do not like hypocrisy. How does hypocrisy affect your aggravation-o-meter? It makes mine go BOINGGGG!

  • Daisiemae

    Well, Markie, for someone who has never launched a personal attack, it appears that I am a favorite target of the moderators. They have already deleted three of my posts, non-attacking as they were.

    What a warlike group! I wonder what will happen to me by the time they finish? Do you think they will settle for banning me from the blog? Or will they demand blood?

    Tune in next week to find out! Same time, same station.

  • Daisiemae

    Well, Markie, for someone who has never launched a personal attack, it appears that I am a favorite target of the moderators. They have already deleted three of my posts, non-attacking as they were.

    What a warlike group! I wonder what will happen to me by the time they finish? Do you think they will settle for banning me from the blog? Or will they demand blood?

    Tune in next week to find out! Same time, same station.

  • Hal

    At times like this, it might be helpful to remember Hanlon’s razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

  • Hal

    At times like this, it might be helpful to remember Hanlon’s razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

  • Daisiemae

    Oh, Hal, you naughty, naughty boy! You know, that thought did occur to me after I posted the comment. I re-read everything, and I thought to myself, “They totally read everything literally! That’s why they deleted it!”

    Well, maybe I am not the object of persecution after all. Maybe I am the amazing alien dazzling and confusing the humorless and literal. Maybe I am the swarm of gnats aggravating the blind.

    Now I am laughing myself sick, and it’s all your fault! What have you done?

  • Daisiemae

    Oh, Hal, you naughty, naughty boy! I keep forgetting that not everybody has the same keen appreciation for the ridiculous that I have.

    That same thought occurred to me after I posted my comment. I re-read everything, and I thought to myself, “They totally read everything literally! That’s why they deleted it!”

    Well, maybe I am not the object of persecution after all. Maybe I am the amazing alien dazzling and dumfounding the humorless and the literal. Maybe I am the swarm of gnats aggravating the blind and one of their swats accidentally hit me.

    Now I am laughing myself sick, and it’s all your fault! What have you done?

  • Mark.S.London

    Fly a LOT and never had a problem with the TSA.!!

  • Mark.S.London

    Fly a LOT and never had a problem with the TSA.!!

  • Shreddie

    Uh huh…

  • Shreddie

    Uh huh…

  • Mark.S.London

    I don’t live in the USA but travel to the USA rather often. Never once have I experienced anything but polite professional conduct from the TSA. They have a job to do and as I say not once have I ever experienced anything I would question. I find them very professional!

  • Mark.S.London

    I don’t live in the USA but travel to the USA rather often. Never once have I experienced anything but polite professional conduct from the TSA. They have a job to do and as I say not once have I ever experienced anything I would question. I find them very professional!