I then contacted Bank of America customer service and the representative assured me that if I did not receive any funds then my account would reflect this the following Tuesday.
To my obvious disappointment, the transactions indeed posted, causing a chain reaction of filing a claim with the bank and a lot of time spent on the phone attempting to resolve this issue. In short, there were 5 or 6 transactions totaling $990 and the bank temporarily credited that amount back to me while the claim process was in effect and was being looked into by their investigators.
I assumed everything was settled after not receiving any correspondence for multiple weeks. Then I received word that Bank of America ultimately determined that the “transactions” were legitimate and they pulled the funds back out of my account that they reimbursed.
As you can imagine, I feel pretty alone in my fight. If I did receive these funds, I would have just moved on. However, I certainly did not, which is why I have invested so much time and been so persistent. You are somewhat of a last resort and I would greatly appreciate any help I could get. — Tim Crawford, Waterloo, Iowa
Answer: The ATM should have dispensed the cash, as requested. If it didn’t, then your bank account shouldn’t have been charged for the withdrawal. But figuring out exactly what happened is no easy matter.
You sent me your correspondence between you and Bank of America, your bank. And it appears the bank initially sided with you, crediting you for the $990, and then sided with the company operating the ATM. But it offered no details about why it changed its mind.
I contacted both Bank of America and the company, Columbus Data Services. A Bank of America representative contacted me immediately and agreed to review your case. A day later, she called me back to explain the review process.
When an ATM transaction is questioned, the company operating the automatic teller reviews its records, which includes video surveillance and an audit of the cash in the machine. If the review determines that you didn’t receive the cash or that somehow the money wasn’t dispensed — for example, if the bills stuck together — then the company will notify your bank, and the provisional credit becomes permanent.
If, however, the video surveillance shows that you accepted the money or if the machine is $990 short, then the credit is reversed. And that’s exactly what the review showed, according to Bank of America. It says you got the money.
For what it’s worth, I believe you. I think something went wrong with your transaction, but I don’t know what happened. Bank of America won’t give me details, citing privacy considerations. I am still waiting to hear back from Columbus Data Services.
I think the only way you’ll be able to find out what Columbus and Bank of America know is to sue them in small claims court. The companies will have to show the judge the video footage and ATM records from the day you allegedly made your withdrawal.
I wish I could do more to help you, but I’ve taken this as far as I can.