Oh really? 5 things companies assume about customers, but shouldn’t

They steal. They’re overgrown children. They only want a deal.

Oh, the things companies think of us, their “valued” customers!

I recently looked at some of the assumptions customers make about the company they do business with. Today, let’s look at the other side of the equation: What companies assume about us.

1. You’re thieves
Many businesses assume their customers would either be dishonest or steal from them if left to their own devices. No wonder: Shoplifting costs American business upward of $25 million a day, according to one survey. But when you believe all customers would steal from you, it becomes much easier to steal from them by making dishonest or disingenuous product offers and compelling them to pay for a service that should come with a product, like technical support.

2. You’re big babies
Corporate America routinely underestimates the intelligence of its own customers by making offers that insult them. For example, it isn’t uncommon for a grocery store to price a buy-one-get-one-free offer at a steep markup, which makes it less advantageous than simply buying one. The store assumes customers will see “free” and turn off their brains. It doesn’t help when they actually do. Underestimating their intelligence only encourages employees to treat customers like kids – or worse, sheep who will blindly follow any order.

3. You only want one thing
Entire industries have changed their business models because they assumed people only want one thing: cheap products. Often, they blame these decisions on customer surveys which say, time and again, that they only want cheap products – whether they’re airline tickets or electronics. But the surveys mislead them. Customers may be price-conscious, but they also care about quality. They don’t want to be nickel-and-dimed with fees when they buy an airline ticket, nor do they want their gadgets to break down after a few months. No, customers don’t only want one thing.

4. You’re fickle
Here’s another dangerous assumption: That customers are basically not loyal. In order to keep them, you have to either remove essential services from your basic product (like airline tickets) and then give them back to only your most loyal customers, like elite-level frequent fliers, or you have to trap them with an onerous contract, like cell phones that force you to sign two-year contracts. That’s absurd. Providing a good service will keep customers coming back, as ever. Take too much away from the product, or make it too restrictive, and it will only drive customers away.

5. You don’t understand we have a business to run
“We’re not a nonprofit. We have a business to run.” How often have you heard that? It’s repeated so often to me, as a consumer advocate, that I’ve lost count. But there’s an assumption that customers just don’t understand the basics of business. And indeed, many don’t. When they have a grievance, they often ask for the world, which suggests they have no understanding of how a business operates. Again, that’s not necessarily true. Many customers do understand, but use an over-the-top request as a bargaining tactic. No, not all customers have MBAs, but they do understand that businesses aren’t charities.

So what’s the point of covering these unfortunate assumptions? Because, as a customer, it’s useful to know what you’re up against when you go shopping. Owners and employees may believe you’re dumb, dishonest, cheap, disloyal and ignorant.

And as you know, nothing could be further from the truth.

  • Erica

    As someone who works for a non-profit, I have to note that sometimes these assumptions are true. You see, we have a business to run as well (we have to pay our employees to assist our clients) and yet somehow they don’t understand this. So when we raise the prices of what we have to sell to raise money to help them, its like all hell breaks loose.

    I wonder (and if you know, please let us know) if there’s a blog out there about clients/customers of non-profits and how to create good customer service in the non-profit industry. If not, maybe you should get on that! :D

  • Samuel

    I would suggest the author work retail or fast food. Assumptions one through three are correct. Or to put it another: The customer is always wrong.

  • steve schmandt

    On Dec 10, in column about ‘call center script hell’ you wrote the below. I can’t find the suggestion you said you would publish ‘next week’ of how to deal with this situation. Can you pls point me to where you published the follow-up?

    “I had convinced the call center employee to go off-script, which may be one of the best ways of getting the customer service to which you’re entitled. Next week, I’ll show you how I did it.”

  • Joe

    In response to the excerpt that steve had posted:

    I work in a call center. While I am sure it is very amusing to try and get us to say or not say different things, I hope that you understand that we actually get in trouble for not reading passages that we are given to read and it frustrates us as much as you. Some of these passages are actually required by law as well. (please not the word “some”)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=530479200 Dana Scheider

    I don’t think the point is to amuse oneself or get anyone in trouble, at least not for me. The issue is that often, the scripts simply don’t resolve our concerns. I used to try to give reps an out by asking for a supervisor who might have more authority to help me than the person answering the phone, but then I found out that I’m often just getting handed to a colleague. I felt really deceived and taken advantage of when I learned that. Somewhat later, I learned reps do this because they’ll get in trouble for handing the call to a supervisor.

    I’m sorry, Joe, I’m sure your job is no fun and I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes. But I don’t think it’s the customers who are screwing you.