Airline seat fees separate mom from five-year-old twins By Christopher Elliott | December 13, 2012 | 3 Comments Ever since airlines added new economy-class seat reservation fees, they’ve insisted that the new charges would not lead to families with young kids being separated. And I believed it — until I heard from Vicki Wallace. Wallace was flying from Philadelphia to San Diego on US Airways recently, when the fees led to her being separated from her five-year-old twins, she says. Her case is important because airlines have insisted they aren’t forcing their customers to book these “choice” seats for their kids, and that they’ll do everything in their power to make sure families with young children are seated together on a flight, whether they paid more for their seat reservations or not. It all began when Wallace started planning the trip to Philadelphia for Thanksgiving. I reserved my seats ahead of time and was peeved to find I had to pay $67 for a “choice” seat in order to pick four adjacent seats for my family. Okay, not too big a deal. However, when I checked in the night before, I found that my “choice” seat was worthless, since they moved the other three seats all over the plane – all separated from one another. Eventually, she remedied the situation by paying more to reserve better “choice” seats. But it came at a price: Wallace says she paid $112 extra for the initial reservations and then another $180 after her “choice” seats were reshuffled. That’s on top of her $675 airfare. But the real seat problems happened on her return flight. “The flight was full, so there was no option to even purchase adjacent seats,” she says. The family was separated — one member was sent to row 35 and the others were in rows 8 and 9. “I asked the agents at the gate about getting seats together and they told me they could not help and to ask the flight attendants,” she says. “Of course, once on the plane, the flight attendants were of no help and we were told to ask passengers to swap seats.” She continues, My husband disappeared to his seat in row 35 while I hovered around rows 8 and 9 and reached out to passengers to swap seats. One was an even swap for one aisle seat to another aisle seat, so that was easy. Another woman was not willing at all to move over one seat so we could be adjacent and another by the window was not initially willing, but later changed her mind as I sent the one five-year-old to her seat between two strangers. So, to recap, Wallace paid the “choice” seat fee on her outbound leg, but the airline moved her seats anyway, forcing her to pay even more in order to sit with her family. Then, on the return, it didn’t offer her any “choice” seat options and separated the entire family again. And for at least a short amount of time, one of her five-year-old twins sat between two strangers. Wallace thinks the airline seat fees are out of control. “I am outraged that I can no longer expect to sit with my young children on a flight anymore,” she says. “We travel from one coast to the next at least three times a year. It is already expensive. Is there any way you could help me get either a refund for the extra fees — especially the ‘choice’ seats I never used?” Of course. I asked US Airways to review her case. Here’s what a representative said: Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We got with the customer … gave her some tips on how to book together, and offered a refund of her choice seat fees – which she accepted. As you know, we work really hard to accommodate families traveling together — whether with small kids or not — and the vast majority of the time it works out just fine. Then we can always try at the gate with no-shows or with other volunteers … lastly, on the aircraft itself. I’m happy this was resolved, but I’m troubled that this case even came to my attention. Airlines have long insisted that they won’t separate families, and that there’s no need for the government to regulate their seating policies. I’ve agreed with this position, citing a lack of evidence that young kids are being separated from their parents on planes. Wallace’s case makes me wonder if I’m on the right side of this argument. Should the government require airlines to seat families together? Yes. No. View Results Loading ... Christopher ElliottChristopher Elliott is an author, journalist and consumer advocate. You can read more about him on his personal website or contact him at *protected email*. Got a question or comment? You can post it on the new forum.More Posts - Website - Twitter - Google PlusFacebookTwitterLinkedInGooglePinterestReddit smarterthanthisguy I know this is an old topic but I am dealing with this right now my wife, daughter, and mother are on a flight back from new york tomorrow that I booked back in april it is now the end of july and they scattered them all over the plane the closest two of them are together is 4 rows apart I still consider my daughter, who just turned 9, a minor and I think I booked way ahead of time and they could of put them together but they spread them as far apart as they could as if to force me to buy choice seating. This is on US airways Ellen Henak What would your parents have done if the flight out to that funeral had appropriate seating and it was not until the return flight that three-year-old you was separated from them? Kate Carey In my opinion, if an airline is going to charge extra for me to send my unattended child on a plane then if I pay for a ticket to attend to them I should be seated with them. They are trying to play both sides of this child coin.