Where does the clever hotel wordplay cross the line?

The surcharge seemed like nothing to Andy Fixman — a “trivial amount” he says. But it meant everything to him.

Actually, it should to every hotel guest.

Fixman, an engineer based in Seattle, found an item in the fine print of his bill at the Westin Bayshore Hotel in Vancouver, where he stayed recently. His daily edition of the Globe and Mail newspaper was “complimentary,” it said.

“If I refuse the newspaper delivery, a credit of between $1 and $2 a day would be applied to my account, depending on the day of the week,” he says. “This one really annoys me.”

Huh?

If something is free then refusing it shouldn’t result in any credit if you refuse it. Because, you know, it was free.

The hotel seemed to be engaging in a little clever wordplay. What it actually should have said was, “We’re charging you between $1 and $2 per night, depending on the day of the week, for the newspaper. (It actually costs us far less, because we buy the newspapers in bulk and distribute them ourselves.) If you don’t want it, fine. We’ll give you a credit.

Daniel Burrus, author of the book Flash Foresight, says it’s fine print at its finest.

“They know that the vast majority [of guests] will never read the additional fee section and if you are an aging Baby Boomer, it’s likely that you won’t even be able to see the small type much less read it,” he says. “Airlines and their baggage fees are well-known examples.”

That’s where, ahem, sites like this come into play.

“Thanks to social media, it is very easy to spread the word about a non-disclosed fee and create a minor revolt that can often spread to major newspapers and network television,” he says.

I asked Starwood, which owns the Westin brand, for its side of the story. Helen Horsham-Bertels, the company’s senior director for consumer affairs, told me the verbiage Fixman shared with me is printed on his bill, also known as folio.

“Upon checking in, guests receive their key packet, on which the verbiage below is communicated,” she says. “The folio is more of a reminder that if the guest had in fact refused the newspaper, the credit would be applied to the bill, as stated on the key package packet.”

But what about the wording — specifically, the “complimentary” part?

“We understand from the guest’s remarks that the word ‘complimentary’ may have been the concern,” she says.

Look, I don’t want to make a mountain out of a molehill, as my mother likes to say. And Starwood is a squeaky-clean brand, when it comes to customer service.

But this one really annoys me, too.

Customers want businesses to give it to ‘em straight. That’s why people are so upset when they encounter “gotcha” fees on their airline tickets and wireless phone bills. They feel as if they aren’t getting the whole picture, that somehow the company is trying to pull a fast one.

It only took a few years for airlines to go from customer service leaders to laggards. The same catastrophe is within easy reach of any industry, including hotels. (And once you’re there, recovery is all but impossible.)

I hope this fee is an aberration. Starwood, for its part, say it has already contacted the hotel and recommended removing the word “complimentary” from its fine print.

  • http://blogs.ocweekly.com/stickaforkinit Dave Lieberman

    Some small print is worth complaining about.

    This one is incredibly petty. He could have got a copy of the Globe and Mail—the USA Today of our northern neighbours—and kept it. Or he could decline it and get a credit back.

    The small print was fine. It said exactly what it needed to. He needs to settle down and pick his battles a little better.

  • emanon256

    The paper is complementary as in relating to or included in your room rate.  It is not complimentary as in it’s a free item you get in addition to you room rate.  Two very different words.

  • Jeanne_in_NE

    That’s rather insulting.  Think how many times situations involving large dollar amounts show up on elliott.org, all because adherence to the precise meaning of a word or phrase means a travel insurance claim was denied, or a customer bought an upgrade believing one thing when the airline meant another, etc.  Although this is pretty picayune, stuff like this makes *me* distrustful of the hotel and hotel chain, so I avoid properties that do stuff like this. So, I voted yes.

    Complimentary means “free”.  Not included in the room rate, “free”.  Don’t call it “complimentary”.  Leave that wording out totally and let the customer check a box at check in, saying something like, “The daily newspaper has been included in your room rate for $1 weekdays, $2 Sundays.  Check here if you’d like NOT to receive a paper and receive a credit on your room rate.”

    Exactly the same thing, ultimately, as the situation outlined in the article, but without the willful abuse of the English language.

  • dsliesse

    I voted No because of the specific circumstance — show me a hotel chain that DOESN’T do this!  What gets me is that they don’t take the charge off automatically on weekend mornings when they don’t bother to deliver a paper (because USA Today isn’t published on weekends).

  • flutiefan

    when i order a sandwich from a restaurant or shop, it usually comes with things like lettuce, tomatoes, mayo, cheese, onions, etc.
    These items are “complimentary” and come with the sandwich.  If i opt out of the tomato and onions, i don’t get a discount. (But i sure would love one!)

    Why is this different?
    The newspaper cost is part of your room rate (or the cost of your sandwich). If you don’t take it, they credit you the value  (like i wish a restaurant would do when i don’t take the items that come with the sandwich rate).

    THAT’S IT, CHRIS… GET ON THE CASE OF SUBWAY, BLIMPIES, AND THE ENTIRE RESTAURANT TRADE IN AMERICA!

  • flutiefan

     that may be the 1st listed definition, but it isn’t the most common use these days.

  • flutiefan

     IT’S NOT A SURCHARGE. it’s already included in the room rate you had already agreed upon. nothing extra, nothing more.

  • MarkKelling

    Every hotel I have been in lately gives the option of not having the paper delivered to your room daily and get a credit.  Yet all of those hotels have stacks of the very same newspapers available for the taking in the lobby.  So is the $1 or $2 really the delivery charge and not a charge for the actiual paper? So the paper itself is truely complientary, you are just paying to have it delivered like room service.

    I think the wording should be “A newspaper is delivered to your room daily, check here to not have the paper delivered and have $1 credited to your bill.”

  • MarkKelling

    I think it depends on the newspaper, the hotel and the location as to if there is any credit given for returns.

    At the Marriott in Honolulu when I was there last November, every evening right after midnight, a hotel employee would collect all of the stacks of newspapers left in the loby and toss them into a garbage bag. One night I asked about that and was told they got zero credit for leftovers and they just sent them for recycling with the rest of thetrash.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     Do you find the use of the term “free” or “complimentary” deceptive when a hotel offers complimentary parking, breakfast or wi-fi.  All of those are also included in the room rate. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000411983318 Jen Goodman

    Actually, if you go to Chick-Fil-A, and don’t want the tomato or lettuce, they give you between $.05 & $.20 off.

  • BillCCC

     And the most common use would be ….

  • flutiefan

     that’s awesome! too bad i don’t patronize Chik-Fil-A for personal reasons.

    CHRIS: YOU MAY ELIMINATE CHIK-FIL-A FROM OUR VENDETTA.

  • flutiefan

    easy. definition #2. The manner in which something is expressed in words.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shannon-Duane/727596077 Shannon Duane

    But most of the time you don’t get a credit if you don’t use them.  That’s the difference.  Honestly, as an attorney (and I don’t mean this to be insulting), I would think you would agree that the word COMPLIMENTARY does in fact mean “NO CHARGE.”  This is what we do as attorneys… we argue over the definitions of words at least half of the time.  If I am getting a refund for something, it wasn’t complimentary; it was “rolled into the room rate” and thus I PAID for that item.  It’s like going into a bank and having “complimentary” cookies and coffee sitting there and them telling you that they will give you 10 cents in your account if you DON’T eat or drink.  Complimentary means something is being given as a benefit… something you didn’t ask for… something that they are giving you because they want to provide customer service.  It doesn’t mean that I’m paying for it up front just to get a rebate on it later if I decide I don’t want it.  That’s what this was… it was a rebate, basically.  My issue isn’t with the $1 or $2 charge, or getting it back.  My issue is with the bastardization of the word “complimentary.”  It’s like saying the “gym” is “complimentary” and then giving money back for not using it. In that case, use of the gym isn’t actually free… it’s an additional charge that I’m now choosing not to incur.  Just call this was it is – it’s an additional charge, bottom line.

  • Jeanne_in_NE

    Oh my goodness, @facebook-727596077:disqus said exactly what I was thinking!  I agree with your examples; the situation the OP outlined doesn’t *increase* the contracted price, like those fershlugginer “optional” in-room safe fees that are automatically added to the bill.  In the end, the “complimentary” newspaper issue is merely a tempest in a teapot.  But I hate pretending things are “complimentary” when they’re really amenities granted with the room rate.

    Thanks for making me think!  :)

  • jim6555

    Or how about a credit if you don’t use the hotel’s pool or health club facilities.

  • sirwired

    But the paper IS free, if anything a business gives you could be considered such.  It does come at no cost to the customer over and above the agreed-upon room rate.

    Are you saying the hotel should be labeled as having “misleading” advertising for passing some possible cost savings to the customer, but if they just pocket the money, they’d avoid the “misleading” label?  How does THAT make sense?  That isn’t exactly a great way to encourage customer-friendly behavior by businesses.

  • har73

    Another aspect to consider, is that when I travel for business, my company would cover the cost of the hotel room and whatever may happen to be “included” in the rate, however if there was a separate itemized charge for a newspaper, movie, or optional item, this would not be a reimbursible  or covered expense.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     Actually Shannon  as an attorney ( and I too don’t mean to be insulting) you understand that it is basic contract interpretation that there is a hierarchy in determining the meaning of words.  If there is an industry standard for the use of a word, that standard completely  trumps the common every day meaning, rendering it irrelevant to any further discussions.  That’s what we have here.

    For example, if I sell you an ounce of gold, its means a troy ounce, not a “regular” ounce.  No further disclaimer or notice is required even though the use of troy ounces is infinitesimal in common parlance as compared to regular ounces.

    In the business world, free/complimentary means that there is no further charge for an item. Nothing more.  Common experiences shows us that the business world is replete with examples.

    If we accept your premise that free means that the business is not bundling the cost of the item into the price, then a business would only be able to advertise something as free if no money were required to exchange hands in order to acquire the benefit.  Some examples would be free air/water at a gas station.  This is available to all motorist (in CA at least) without the necessity of purchasing gas or any services from the gas station.

    For example, Southwest lets two bags travel free.  It is axiomatic that Southwest, as a for profit business, is factoring in the price of the bags when it sets rates though it uses the term free.

    Many hotels offer complimentary breakfast.  Of course the cost of the breakfast is factored into the rate.  

    My objection is the failure to understand the salient business point that business do not give away things for free.  You have paid for every benefit you received.  Yet no one objects to the term free as applied to bags, breakfast, or wi-fi.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     agreed.  See point #2.

  • http://www.facebook.com/suzanne.clar.5 Suzanne Clar

    If a hotel (or any merchant for that matter) will cheat on the little things you can see (such as this use of “complimentary”), they’ll cheat on everything.  That means you’ll be nickel and dimed for everything, cleanliness will be spotty, the employees will be unhappy, the food will be poor, etc., etc.  If I discover a vendor cheating like this, I don’t deal with them if at all possible.

  • Lindabator

    Some people are just never happy – they want everything included, but the price to be ridiculously low — and they are the ones who ruin it for the rest of us who APPRECIATE the amenities and services included in the reservation!

  • Lindabator

    Actually, in this case, it does mean free.  They do not charge more for the service – but over the years, and with more folks on the internet, they get more tossed unread papers than before.  So to avoid this, they offer you and opt-out, and pay you for saving them the cost and work involved

  • Lindabator

    And it helps them maintain a “green” rating, but letting you opt out – and you can also do so with the room cleaning, and get a refund – I don’t have a problem with getting money back, either!  :)

  • Lindabator

    One reason they’ve offered the opt-out option.  Can’t argue with money back, either!

  • Lindabator

    THESE are the people who’ve caused us to suffer with the airlines — they think everything should be charged out – but then whine when they have to pay for those too!  It was included in the cost, but can be refunded if not wanted – so where’s the problem????

  • bodega3

    Cheat?  You read that in this article?

  • Lindabator

    That would work well – nice suggestion!

  • davidglass

    Most mid to high-end hotels make papers available at the front desk or in the elevator lobby on each floor. If you want one, take one. If not, don’t. It’s underhanded because the majority will never know they paid more. It’s a version of the old “you’ve got to opt out to avoid the charge” trick.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     Alas, pools and health club facilities are primarily fixed costs, Maid service and newspapers are variable costs which can be saved through nonuse.

  • BMG4ME

    My peeve is the donation for charities that show up on hotel bills in Europe.  The biggest chutzpah was my recent stay in a country which is the target of hatred from the charity that they wanted me to donate from – needless to say I declined to donate to them.  Nevertheless I wouldn’t let something like this ruin my stay.