Travelers say they’ll skip the airport and hit the road in 2011

How are you traveling in 2011?

In some ways, like you did this year. And in some ways not, according to a new survey.

Asked what mode of transportation they planned to use in 2011, most respondents indicated they would stay the course by cruising, driving, flying and using mass transport roughly the same as they did in 2010.

However, a significant number of travelers said they intended to fly less and drive more.

The poll of about 500 travelers, conducted last weekend by the Consumer Travel Alliance, suggests next year could be a busy one for motorists, while demand for air travel could weaken slightly.

When it comes to air travel, a majority — 47 percent — said they planned to fly “about the same” in 2011. About 35 percent said they’d fly less, and only 17 percent said “more,” giving air travel the most negative numbers of any mode of transport.

Driving, on the other hand, had the highest positive ratings of any mode of transport. Nearly 40 percent of respondents said they planned to travel more by car next year. Again, a majority (49 percent) answered “about the same.”

Mass transit had the highest “about the same” numbers — roughly 68 percent.

Cruising may have a choppy year, too, if these numbers are any indication. While about 60 percent of the respondents are staying on course, 27 percent say they plan to cruise less in 2011.

So what’s behind these results? I asked.

Travelers who don’t want to fly are upset, for the most part, by the Transportation Security Administration’s new screening techniques.

“The new TSA scope-n-grope has finally pushed me too far,” says Katharine Chestnut, a marketer and frequent flier based in Atlanta. “I will limit, as much as possible, all travel by plane. I’m sorry to see the air travel industry suffer over this but it’s time for the US public to stand up for our rights and say, enough is enough.”

Vicki Stone, a virtual assistant from Fort Worth, Texas, says she’s already made the switch.

“My husband and I are already not flying,” she says. “We drove 80 hours round trip to visit Prince Edward Island, Canada instead of flying there, as we had in the past.”

Stone says it isn’t just the TSA’s aggressive new screening techniques, but the airlines’ business practices and dismal customer service.

“The airlines just added fuel to the fire when they started charging fees for luggage,” she says.

Bunnee Butterfield, a retiree from Lakewood, Wash., says she’s already canceled a trip planned for March, in part because of the pat-down problem.

“I will have to go to Boston in the spring, but have given some thought to leaving from a smaller airport with no scanners — yet,” she says.

Mary Graham sums up the feelings of a lot of travelers, which is that a combination of the TSA’s screening techniques and a lack of customer service are pushing her away from air travel.

“I got to a boiling point this year when the airline industry peaked at being sneaky about all their lovely fees and horrible customer service to boot. I decided to stop flying as my small effort of protest,” she says. “Then came the abusive, touchy-feely TSA agents and their radioactive porn machine. Oh my goodness, I saw the steam coming out of my ears and I knew it was all over for me.”

What would cause travelers to return? One place to start is by unplugging the scanners, says Rachel Kingman, a hotel manager from Hartford, Conn.

“I am going to fly less and drive and use mass transit more,” she says. “My local airport has the body scanners and I am not going to fly unless absolutly necessary until they are gone. I have the right to choose who sees me naked and I refuse to allow a random person to molest me just for the convenience of flying.”

  • Geoff

    I flew to my parents for Christmas this year. My next trip may very well be by train. I took Amtrak cross-country and, other than the twin annoyances of a non-retrofitted train car with no power at the seat and my own troubles with sleeping while sitting up, it was a pretty good time. Given the opportunity, and a bit more money for a sleeper, it might be less irritating. Plus it would really help deal with some of the issues with the time zone changes.

    Leaving Seattle for Philadelphia on a Saturday would have gotten me there the same time that leaving at 12:35 AM on Monday morning would, with the flight delays – about 4 PM on Monday.

  • http://www.sanibel-rentals.net Sylvia

    We’ll fly when no alternative is possible. But why go through that hassle when our nice comfortable car stops at our leisure and offers totally flexible travel routes and genteel, respectful company?

  • Dave

    Even though I love to fly when I can afford it, I’m not giving up my 4th Amendment rights just to fly. For 2011, I am going to have to forgo one trip completely and look at a getting a rental car instead for the other.

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392 Mark

    Excellent! Sounds like more people are joining us.
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392

  • Rich

    On recent mornings I’ve seen people with jackets marked “TSA Inspector” hanging round the Metra (Commuter) rail station in Naperville outside Chicago. I wonder if they’ve got pat downs and searches planned for train commuters in 2011. If so, then I for one am going to refuse.

  • Cliff Woodrick

    Being retired we travel 23 – 25 weeks per year and because of the airport hassles ( not airline as we fly Jet Blue) we have planned only one flight next year. I also object to all the taxes, fees whatever on rental cars and hotel rooms.

    So we will take our Highlander and drive. We will use our 23 weeks of timeshares to take cross country trips staying a week or two at a location and them move on. However now in St Martin they have imposed a $50 per week usage tax so even this is taxed.

    Have a wonderful day & a HAPPY NEW YEAR – Cliff

  • Bill

    I fully support the don’t fly movement by those who feel offended that they might be searched.
    Please drive or take the train.
    I applaud you for standing up for what you believe.

  • Jen

    Our son flies to NY from NC every August to visit his grandparents. He’ll be 12 this year, so subject to pat down according to CLT TSA. So, we’ll be driving to meet my parents in Philadelphia 2x for this & future visits. We are driving instead of flying in March to visit NY also.

  • Carver

    THis article lacks context. Yes, some people are choosing not to fly for a variety of reasons. But without some context, little information is truely conveyed.

    Is it just the lunatic fringe, or is it a mainstream trend? What are the numbers.?

    There’s a reason why anecdotal information is considered the least credible type if information and rarely acceptable in scientific or legal circles.

  • Lauri

    I fly when other options are unreasonable, but taking our camper remains the first choice. It stops whenever we want, and I know who cleaned it last.

  • Sommer Gentry

    Carver, I take exception to your calling me “the lunatic fringe”. I think the true lunatics here are the cowards and TSA apologists who line up to let total strangers sexually assault them. Have you people all completely lost your minds? It’s okay to let the government take naked pictures of you? It’s just fine if your teenage child’s first sexual contact is forced on them by a blue-shirted degenerate? There is no possible threat worth being treated in such a de-humanizing, disgusting manner. And by the way, airline terrorism is not really a possible threat. There’s a thousand-fold higher risk of dying by inhaling something that blocks your airway. Irrational thinking is a curse – TSA’s violent abuse of our bodies is the symptom.

  • Carver

    @Sommer

    I didn’t call you the lunatic fringe. I don’t know you. In fact, at the time of my post, you hadn’t even posted yet so why would you assume that I am talking about you.

    Proverbs 28:1

    -or- see Carly Simon’s hit song

  • Jeanne in NE

    @Carver: I was one of those who said we’d be driving more and flying less, and posted my comments at the time. Synopsis: Adding the time to get to the airport, through security and actually flying comes up with a number of hours that can get me closer to my destination by car. Car travel isn’t as fast, but I can pack what I like, stretch out my legs and see some scenery I wouldn’t have otherwise seen if I flew.

    I assume that most of the survey respondents are the same as or overlap with Chris Elliott’s various blogs. Hopefully that provides a little more context for you. As to lunacy on my part – that’s variable. :)

  • Carver

    @Jeanne

    Driving by car or other means can be a perfectly legit way to travel. It all depends on each person’s individual circumstances. As far as lunacy, we all have a little bit. That makes life fun :)

  • Carrie Charney

    So, if the TSA is driving more people to, well, drive, they are actually causing more deaths and injuries (from road accidents?) than they are preventing (zero?).

  • Ed

    Unfortunately, Gasoline prices are already climbing and with estimates of $4/gallon gas for this summer…this doesn’t make driving any better! Remember when gasoline got this expensive a few years ago, driving for pleasure and vacations was drastically cut and this led to the “stay-cation”.
    There’s even some talk in the industry that gasoline prices may go above $4/gallon!
    All we can do is wait and see.

  • Tom

    More people are flying now than last year and more will fly in 2011 than in 2010. There are always people who decide not to fly and perhaps drive or take the bus. But there are others who start flying, or fly more. Travel has always involved some stress and difficulty. If you find it overwhelming to fly or no longer feel up to flying, there’s no shame in staying home or taking a driving vacation.

  • http://www.habitationofjustice.com Lincoln Adams

    Because of the Gestapo behavior of the TSA I’m more inclined to drive now instead of fly. In fact I took a road trip from New York to Arkansas last October and loved it.

    The only problem however is time. I have another trip scheduled to Texas and to drive there would force me to take precious vacation time off from work in order to account for the added time needed to make it there and back by car. And unfortunately since I travel by myself, I can’t split the driving with a road trip buddy either. I would lose a lot of time on the books which I could have used for other travels.

    I am exploring the possibly of traveling by train though. From New York to Austin would be roughly 29 hours, which would cut the travel time by roughly half compared to driving. It’s not ideal, but better than nothing. I may do it just to have the experience of taking a train cross country and see if it’s something I can do on a semi-regular basis.

  • Sommer Gentry

    Tom, yes, there is shame, enormous shame, in handing over without even a struggle the Constitutional rights that your countrymen fought and died for. Shame on the traitors who are still flying while these brainless thugs use the Bill of Rights as their toilet paper.

    The TSA will certainly kill people with this horrific nonsense. I suffered a larger risk of dying because I abandoned my AirTran tickets and drove nine hours today, but I’d sooner die than let John Pistole’s eyes linger all over naked images of my body. Janet Napolitano can go finger her own vagina, because mine is off-limits to government perverts, and I’m willing to risk my own death to keep it that way.

  • Sommer Gentry

    @ Lincoln Adams,
    Do try the train travel route. I use Amtrak exclusively and I never drive or fly within the Northeast corridor and I think it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. You almost never stand in lines, you can use your cellphone, and you don’t have to be poked, prodded, irradiated or molested.

    Although the train takes longer, you can easily read, work, and sleep on the train so it’s really not “lost” time. I’m taking Amtrak from Baltimore to Orlando, 24 hr trip, next week and I’m looking forward to it. Try to get a sleeper car – pricey, but if you also get an Amtrak Rewards credit card, your trip might be free! I just cancelled my Southwest credit card and told them that the TSA’s over-reach is the reason why.

  • Glenn

    Just completed my yearly Thanksgiving trip from Pennsylvania to Missouri to visit my mother who is in a nursing home. I usually fly from PHL to STL but this year decided to drive.

    My reason; fisrt, I have to drive 2 hours to get to PHL. Once there I have park the car for the week (usually around $70.00), shuttle over to the airport (about 30 minutes), jerk around the airport checking bags, going thru security & sitting around waiting for my flight (about another 2 hours). Next I take a nice quick flight to STL via DTW (about 5 hours + $200.00), then hang around the baggage belt (depending on airline up to an hour), shuttle over to the rental car place to get my car (about an hour + $140.00 for the week), and then drive 3 hours to my final destination.
    From door to door, about 14 hours and 30 minutes.

    So this year I drove. 16 hours + 3 tanks of fuel for the Escourt ($75.00) + 1 night in a Super 8 ($39.00) X 2. Had to rent a motel in Missouri for the week but would have had to do that with flying also. Had a wonderful trip, seen lots of stuff I wouldn’t have seen from the plane, was able to stop & get what “I” wanted to eat along the way, was able to take as many bags as the Escourt would allow, & didn’t need to be searched & scanned, etc.

    1000 miles is about as far as I would want to do this so my longer distance trips (my son lives in LA, uggh!!) will have to be by air or placed on hold until he moves at least 2000 miles east.

  • http://www.caribbeantraveltalk.com Chris

    I love to travel by car. It reminds me of when I was a child taking long drives in the station wagon and asking, “Dad, are we there yet!”.

    Even though plane is faster, there is nothing like hitting the open road to see the country.

  • y_p_w

    I love traveling by car if the distance is reasonable. Part of it is the car. I’m far more familiar with my own vehicle (it’s got more performance than any car I’ve ever rented) and I don’t have to worry about a rental agency dinging me for some dent that I didn’t notice and may not have even happened in my care.

    I also have a kid now and I’d rather not go through the hassle of trying to fit a child seat on a plane. The final thing is that I like to do a lot of outdoor stuff (camping and hiking) and all that equipment is hard to take on a plane (and propane is a definite no-no although it’s possible to buy it at the destination).