Travelers need fast, free Internet connections — why can’t they get it?

I’m writing this from the Vista Café on Deck 4 of the Disney Dream. But it’ll probably take half an eternity to post it, because the “high speed” wireless connection on the ship is significantly slower than what I’m used to on dry land.

Actually, that’s being generous. I’d give anything for a reliable a dial-up connection right now.

No disrespect to the ship. After all, only a few years ago, you couldn’t get online from a cruise ship. But it got me thinking about travelers and Internet connections.

I’ve been on the road for the last month. (My cats don’t recognize me when I come home, or maybe they just refuse to.) If there’s one thing that all of the destinations have shown me — from Northwest’s Florida’s Beaches of South Walton to Castaway Cay in the Bahamas, where I am now — it is this: There’s no such thing as too much bandwidth.

I was reminded of how dependent we’ve all become on fast wireless Internet access while staying at the Indian Springs Resort in Calistoga last week. They have very fast Wi-Fi access in their rooms, but on my first evening, everyone wanted to log on, and suddenly the signal went from terrific to terrible.

No, the other guests weren’t just checking email – these folks were streaming videos, making Skype calls and downloading God knows what onto their laptops, all at exactly the same time. The resort doesn’t charge extra for Internet access in its rooms, thank goodness.

And wouldn’t you know it, the next morning it was smooth sailing online.

There are hotels that take advantage of our bandwidth appetite. At the casino resort we stayed at in South Lake Tahoe, they charged $11 per day per device for a so-so wireless connection. When I pointed out the absurdity of paying an extra $50 for two nights, a manager shrugged and said the access was provided by an independent company, and that if they removed the charges from the bill, the hotel would be on the hook for it.

I didn’t believe it.

I know, I know. Why not get a card and be done with it? Well, that’s problematic, too. Some forward-looking wireless carriers either offer a wireless card with your cell phone as a bundle, or they let you tether your phone to your PC.

But my carrier (AT&T/iPhone) has resisted, until recently. The latest version of the iPhone operating system allows tethering, but as of now, no one knows how much it will cost.

The correct answer: It should cost nothing extra. I’m already paying for the signal, and should be able to use it on any device I want.

Anyway, none of that would matter while I’m at sea. My iPhone woke me up this morning with a text message saying I was outside the United States, and that an outrageous international rate would apply to all calls.

Thanks, guys.

In an always-on world, travelers require reliable high-speed wireless access, 24/7. They don’t want to be nickel-and-dimed every time they power up their cell phones or computers, and increasingly, they won’t even put up with a slow connection.

Parts of the travel and hospitality industry are standing in the way of progress by charging for wireless Internet access or providing sluggish connections.

I’m not an historian, but I can imagine hotels making a similar argument when indoor plumbing and electricity were new and considered “amenities.” Even color TVs used to be considered a premium, as was cable TV. That argument being that Wi-Fi is an amenity for which you have to pay more.

Today, no one would argue that a TV or electricity or indoor plumbing should cost more in your room.

There’s also a technological solution, which will be the next generation of wireless broadband. A single hotspot can connect a city, and there’s hope that a forward-looking technology company like Google will build such a network, turn it on, and let the bandwidth be free.

Such a move would end the hotel industry’s wireless exploitation of guests and could even shut down the American wireless industry. That could be interesting.

But back to the Disney Dream. It’s a huge ship, and I’m on her christening cruise with my son. The centerpiece of the vessel is a waterslide/rollercoaster called AquaDuck, and I’ll be writing something about it for National Geographic Traveler’s Intelligent Travel blog this afternoon.

Until then, I am dreaming – of a faster Internet connection.

(Photo: a grof fman/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • http://www.thetravelinggiraffe.com Crissy

    I’m hoping that internet providers and hotels are just trying to get the last of their money out of people before the competition starts to really push prices down. I’m just hoping this happens sooner then later.

    Enjoy the Disney Dream, can’t wait to hear about the ship.

  • http://geektravelblog.com/ Josh Chandler

    Christopher,

    I totally agree, the fees we are charged for these mobile internet connections are obscene.

    However, perhaps there is a hidden benefit to having a slow internet connection on a boat. You have the time to disconnect and enjoy your trip.

    On dry land, it is great to stop at a local internet cafe and check email once or twice.

    However, your holiday is the ideal time to get away from that.

    I know it is very cliche, but it’s true. :)

  • David Emery

    A lot of hotels have crappy Internet. (I’ll mention the Hampton Inn Cypress CA as a place that I have stayed at frequently, despite the nearly unusable internet connection.)

    A ship might well have the plausible excuse of “slow satellite connection for internet.” Of course, they get what they pay for. But for hotels in major urban/suburban area, there’s no excuse for unreliable or slow connections. And blaming the hotel chain/corporate contract with ISPs is an unacceptable “pass the buck” response.

  • http://www.advicegoddess.com Amy Alkon

    I’m a newspaper columnist and need to have access at all times to the Internet (in case somebody doesn’t get my column and needs it resent), so I have Verizon mobile broadband.

    The thing is, even though I have bring-my-own-access service, and use it at hotels that charge for WiFi, they start out on a very bad foot with me for the nickel-and-diming. If somebody charged PER DEVICE, that somebody would be somebody never getting my business again. Goodbye! So…lose hundreds or thousands of dollars over a few ten-spots? Genius.

  • Bill

    Chris,
    I remember when Motel 6 wanted an extra 75 cents a night for television…and I believe it was black and white. Some hotels in the UK charge extra for air conditioning.

    As for the hotel and their internet “per device”…believe it. I expect that they got that “other company” to put in their internet and the hotel didn’t put out a dime for it. They likely get a commission. Buy yourself a pepwave mini, you can make that single connection into a multi device one. Or there’s software you can use on your laptop also which makes it into a hotspot.

    I’m sure that the cruise ship isn’t charging for internet now, or you wouldn’t be complaining only about the speed! I’ve never heard of a cruise ship yet that didn’t charge outrageous prices for their internet. Of course, if it were free, they’d have 2000 people on their satellite feed..which wouldn’t work either.

  • SirWired

    I hate to say this Chris, but you need to stick to travel and away from technology ramblings.

    AT&T has resisted tethering, and will charge extra for it, for the simple reason you should have been able to deduce with your experience at the resort. When something is “free” (as in, included in a price you are already paying), people use it with abandon. It costs AT&T real money to provide the additional bandwidth to provide additional services. Your phone having a signal does not mean it has some sort of reservation for a certain amount of bandwidth, which will go to waste if you don’t use it; the phone must share the available bandwidth with the other phones in your network that happen to be sharing the same cell-phone-tower antenna.

    Cruise ship internet is neither fast nor free for the simple reason that the cruise line is literally charged by the kilobyte by whomever they use for satellite internet access. It’s slow because HTTP (which you are using to access the web) involves a LOT of back-and-forth transmission with the web server, and all that back-and-forth simply takes time as your signal travels up into the sky and back. (The speed of light is a real limitation at such distances)

    And no, there will not be any kind of forthcoming wireless technology where a single hotspot that serves an entire city cheaply. At least not in the foreseeable future; there simply is not any sort of technology on the boards right now that could even come close to doing this. (A single WiMax transmitter station can cover an entire city, but it could cannot possibly provide sufficient bandwidth for more than a tiny fraction of the population using it at once.)

    I happen to agree that WiFi should be included in the price of a hotel, but I operate under no illusions that providing decent service is cost-free to the hotel. (Although it doesn’t cost $11/day/device…)

    Lastly, look into Virgin Wireless pre-paid wireless internet. $80 antenna, and you only need to pay when you need the service; you can just leave the thing in your desk drawer the rest of the time.

  • Jose

    Chris,

    If I am not mistaken you can use the bluetooth function to tether without having to go thru at&t.

  • http://frequentlyflying.com Darren

    I absolutely agree we should get fast & free wireless connections at hotels. I ended up becoming brand-loyal to Radisson due to their free wireless internet for all, and although it isn’t the fastest, it kept me coming back.

    One non-Radisson property I stayed at (can’t remember which one) offered “free wireless”, but the connection was the worst I’ve experienced since dial up. They had brochures and cards handy right there on the in-room desk stating something to the effect of, “Connection too slow? Upgrade to a faster connection…”. Amazing & a little bait-and-switch if you ask me.

    I think charging for internet access is just one way hotels are unbundling like the airlines. I hate it!

  • Sara

    My boss also uses AT&T, and when he goes on international vacations – while the calls costs what they cost, his data service had a flat fee of $20 (per phone on the account using it, per month)(on top of the regular data fee), with all you can eat data, so he could still use it for all his e-mail, browsing etc.

  • BucksterSF

    I can understand the ship having limited bandwidth, as they have to route signals through satellites. And that bandwidth can get expensive.

    No excuse for the land-lined hotels. They probably have one connection for the whole property, instead of a connection / account for each room. I would pay extra per night for the room-specific connection, but not a shared property connection.

    But a bigger question is, what are people doing surfing the web on a vacation? Get directions or download a map, OK. But streaming video and Skype? There’s just something fundamentally wrong with that.

  • MeanMeosh

    “My cats don’t recognize me when I come home, or maybe they just refuse to.”

    Oh, trust me, your cats recognize you. They’re just giving you a ‘tude for dumping them. I grew up with a bunch of cats, and they’d always go on “strike” whenever we’d come back from vacation!

  • Monica

    OMGZ I’m jealous! I’ve got reservations for the Dream May 1st. I can’t wait. I’ve already been on the Wonder. My mom sent me pictures the day she docked in Canaveral the first time, then again at the christening ceremony. It dwarfs the other DCL ships. I can’t wait to get on the AquaDuck. Have a great time!

  • y_p_w

    I recently booked a room where the “resort fee” supposedly pays for the wireless and wired internet access. I’ve also stayed in some places where direct internet access didn’t even pay for that. I looked up a local dial-up number and used my modem (which my latest computers don’t even have built-in) on the older notebook computer I travel with. I also remember one place with bandwidth limited (I think 768k) wireless access, but with maybe 3000k access for an additional daily fee. The basic free access was acceptable for email or simple web surfing.

    I’ve also had some great “no extra charge” internet access at some locations with superb service. At one place I accidentally pulled too hard on the ethernet plug-in device (the short cable was on a retractable reel and I thought it was longer), and a quick call to the front desk and the hotel handyman was up in less than 10 minutes with a new one hooked up in under 30 seconds. I would also give praise to the (no extra charge) wired connection at Candlewood Suites in Miami. I couldn’t connect because of some technical problem, and the front desk had the phone number of the provider handy. I was on the phone with some guy with a French accent (turns out their provider was based in Quebec) and he stayed with me for maybe 15 minutes figuring out what the problem was.

    However – free can sometimes mean lousy. I found out that Jackson Lake Lodge at Grand Teton NP had free WiFi in their main lobby. I grabbed my computer and headed for there. I basically waited two minutes to load a simple web page. There were maybe 30 people there using the system, which I’m guessing was something like a 1500k connection shared among way too many people.

  • y_p_w

    There might be legitimate reasons for internet use on vacation. Some people have extensive investments and want to track them even on vacation. Skype is great for people who would normally call a friend or relative who’s checking on their home. Mr. Elliott here obviously travels a lot because he is on business (even on a cruise ship).

  • Joe Farrell

    Why is it when I’m on the road and stay in a cheap or moderate level hotel – all this stuff and coffee and a basic breakfast is free- but when I spend $400 a night for a room they think that internet is a charge and orange juice and coffee needs to be $30? I stopped all that nonsense and now call a hotel directly and tell them what I need and want – and expect if I’m not staying at Hampton Inn . . . since it seems Hamptons actually know what people want now and again and actually deliver it simply without asking.

    Honestly – I call the fancy expensive hotels and simply ask for an upgrade to the concierge floors where this stuff is included in the rate – since I’m usually paying a retail rate I also usually get what I ask for. But then if more people tried that then I’d get upgraded fewer times. . . .

  • Joe Farrell

    oh, one last point – you can easily get an app for an iPhone that turns the 3g connection into a wifi hotspot. Not from the App store however. I have an Android phone that works as a wifi hotspot- NOT as a tether – thus – my carrier only sees the 3g signal and not the wifi hotspot and my computers and iPad easily become 3G accessible via hotspot instead of 3G – thereby getting around all the crippling done by the wireless company, Apple and the other computer companies all of whom want to be paid extra for simple accessing internet in a slightly different format than on my PDA . . .

  • Ed

    About tethering…if you want it, dump your iPhone…the iPhone is the phone for dummies…get any other smartphone and it will do tethering with no issues…although I hear the the Windows Mobile 7 phone has issues with tethering as well…I use my WinMo6.1 HTC Tilt…it’s a little long in the tooth, but nothing out today does everything this thing can do! Just the other day I set up my phone as a wireless access point and had 5 other people connected to my phone using it to connect to the internet!
    As for your wireless charges in international areas? You think the voice calls are expensive? Just wait until you get your data charges! If you don’t explicitly turn off your data, or force it to use WiFi, your iPhone will make a data connection every day at around 3am to upload your usage information to Apple’s computers so that they can monitor what it is you do with their iPhone…and this is a data charge! Apple claims that it’s so small, that it would not affect your tiered data pricing, but if you’re in international territories, that little data connection will cost you big time! And the insidious thing is you have no idea the phone is transmitting data!

  • y_p_w

    Yeah – when everyone gets on at the same time, it reminds me of the legendary (and mostly incorrect) “Laurel Lane” ads from SBC (pre AT&T rename) about their DSL service. It presented a theoretical situation where an entire neighborhood is saturating the capacity of a cable internet connection, and neighbors are engaged in petty actions against each other. In reality, I’ve found cable internet to be way faster than when I had DSL service.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqj7De-0j8M

  • Carver

    Free?

    No hotel offers free wireless. Let’s dispense with that falsehood. Some hotels bundle it in with the price, others charge seperately. I don’t see the difference. When I book a room, I simply look at the goods and services that I am likely to use and compare accordingly.

    The total cost is the only issue. Who cares how the individual pieces are priced.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ SirWired – “I happen to agree that WiFi should be included in the price of a hotel…”
    - – - – - — – -
    There are thousands of hotels in the US where Internet (hard wired and/or WiFi) is free. Why stay at a hotel that charges for it? I don’t understand people that stay at a hotel that doesn’t have their amenities that they need yet they complain about it.

    @ SirWired – “but I operate under no illusions that providing decent service is cost-free to the hotel. (Although it doesn’t cost $11/day/device…)”
    - – - – - – - – - – -
    Unless you want the government to bail out hotels, run the hotel industry, etc., hotels are in the business of making money. Over the years, I have read comments in this blog from people expecting hotels to assume the costs, break even, etc. of the costs to provide Internet service. I am guessing that these individuals have never run a business before.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Joe Farrell – “Why is it when I’m on the road and stay in a cheap or moderate level hotel – all this stuff and coffee and a basic breakfast is free- but when I spend $400 a night for a room they think that internet is a charge and orange juice and coffee needs to be $30?”
    - – - – - – - – - – -
    It is simple…different hotels for different markets. The market for individuals that stay at a Fairfield Inn, Holiday Inn Express, Hampton Inn, etc. can’t bear to charge for breakfast, Internet, etc. Someone who stays at a $ 400 night hotel, can “afford” to pay for breakfast, Internet, etc.

    There is a benefit of being a member of frequent guest program. As a Platinum member with Marriott Rewards, I do receive a free breakfast and Internet service at their top-end hotels.

  • Brooklyn

    My pet peeve is different but related. When I travel within the United States on vacation, it’s usually to the Southwest in summer. I don’t spend every night in the same hotel and it gets far too hot to leave a laptop in the car. Because I travel extensively abroad, I have a basic unlocked cell phone – as far as I know, you can’t buy the more sophisticated ones unlocked online – so I have no e-mail or internet access on my phone. Most hotels have free WiFi in the rooms, but very few have a terminal in the lobby for customers’ use, and internet cafés are few and far between. Would it cost them so much to provide this service? I doubt it. And am I the only one with this problem??

  • Thomas

    @ SirWired: Satellite is speed of sound, not light. You’re confusing it with fibre optic cables.

    @ Sara: I don’t know where your boss travels internationally, but he’s paying the cell carrier in that country for the data, not AT&T. (And it’s not cheap)

    @ Ed: You’re right about the data with AT&T, but it applies to all their smart phones. I leave my Iphone at home, and use an unlocked GSM phone while traveling internationally. Pick up a local Sim card, and make calls back to the States for $.10 a minute compared to $6.00 + for AT&T.

    Internet speed will increase in time, as companies expand the fibre optic network. Cayman Island was the first country in the world to be totally covered. Saudi is spending $5B to blanket their country. The problem with the US is the infrastructure. Yes, we have subsea cables running from both coasts, but little in between. When the data is traveling on copper instead of along a beam of light, there’s a huge difference in speed and quality.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Thomas – “@ Sara: I don’t know where your boss travels internationally, but he’s paying the cell carrier in that country for the data, not AT&T. (And it’s not cheap)”
    - – - – - — – - – -
    I can’t speak for AT&T (I have AT&T for my personal cell phone) but the cost for unlimited data (e-mail and Internet) for three weeks in China for my Verizon Blackberry was $ 42 which I considered to be cheap.

  • Carver

    @Thomas

    Satellites use microwave transmission which is part of the EM spectrum aka light. The speed of sound is about 3 miles per second through a solid. That means your cross-country conversation would take about 15 minutes for each word to be heard by the recipient.

  • http://InternetAboardShip naoma

    My husband is a day trader and used the internet a few
    times on the ship. COSTS the EARTH. I signed up for free internet
    “prize” first day on ship but never went back — when it was our
    last day I went up to the internet site to find I’d WON a large
    amount of FREE TIME on their internet. Small sign posted. I was
    never notified by a note on my cabin door or anything. Boy was I
    ticked off. Complaints did nothing.

  • Joel

    First of all, this post belongs on whitewhine.com…but I’m guilty of it too.

    Every Marriott in the Bay Area I stay at has woefully slow and unreliable wifi. They contract it out to ibahn, so I bet it’s ibahn’s fault actually. I must admit that I do expect better, especially from hotels that cater to business travelers.

  • Steve

    @Joe Farrell: “Why is it when I’m on the road and stay in a cheap or moderate level hotel – all this stuff and coffee and a basic breakfast is free- but when I spend $400 a night for a room they think that internet is a charge and orange juice and coffee needs to be $30?” I couldn’t agree more. When I travel on business I’m always amazed by the fact that the reasonably priced hotels (the Fairfield, Courtyard, Hampton Inn, etc) tend to include wireless access as part of the base cost of the room, provide things like coffee and breakfast for free, etc, while the fancy several-hundred-dollar a night places charge you an arm and a leg for anything extra beyond the room itself. I really don’t know why anyone spending their own money would stay at those types of places. (I’m not talking about resorts or places that cater heavily to the leisure crowd; I mean high-end hotels in cities that seem to rely on business travel and don’t have a lot to offer beyond the name).

    Second, the main reason I don’t like places that charge extra for internet is that on top of the ridiculous per-day fee, most of the time the connection is mediocre anyway. If I’m going to be charged $15 a day or more, that connection better be 100% reliable and blazing fast. I have often checked into a hotel on a business trip and paid for a connection so abysmal that if it was my own money, I’d be demanding a refund from the front desk.

    I can see both sides of the “is internet access a utility that should be included in the base price of the room, like electricity or water?” argument. On one hand, I agree that internet access is becoming more and more of a necessity. On the other, I don’t deny that fact that it costs something to provide that access. I would have much less of a problem with hotels charging for internet if the cost was more reasonable. $15 a day or more for a crappy connection is not reasonable, IMHO. I don’t know if this is still the case (I haven’t stayed at a Motel 6 in a few years), but I recall checking into one and seeing a sign on the counter that internet access cost $2.95 a day. *That* (or even $5-8 a day) strikes me as a reasonable charge, especially in an inexpensive hotel/motel.

  • Sara

    @Thomas – Since I’m the one doing the payables I got to review the bill after his vacation – I even called AT&T to verify the extra charges and they confirmed – $20 flat fee for his phone, and $20 for his wife’s phone, while they were out of the country, and the fee covered a full month.
    I guess everyone has different deals with their phone companies though, so perhaps not everyone can get that deal? (While our company pays for his cell phone bill, it is not a business account.)

  • SeaJimm

    I used to stay at the New York New York in Vegas all the time. If you wanted internet, you paid per day around $12. Pricey but if you need it, then pay. But now they have a mandatory resort fee per day for $14.95. This includes a newspaper, two drinks at a bar, and yes, internet. And yes, it is mandatory. Now I have a computer but I do not use it every day. But if you do not have a computer, why are you forced to pay this charge? Just extra revenue for the hotel.

    Also, when I am forced to pay for internet from a hotel, I expect decent speed and a good wireless connection. I was at a hotel where the wireless would fade in and out. After an hour I gave up and asked for a refund. Of course, the hotel refused. I then got the charge on my AMEX and filed a merchant dispute. That is pending after 3 months.

  • MaryHelen Maupin aka mannersgal

    Thanks for blogging re: slow internet and expensive internet privileges. . .My experience coincides with yours. Congrats on being on the Disney Dream’s inaugural sailing. Have seen a pix of the roller coaster and just can’t figure out how it works. Hope to sail on the Dream in the future with my sister and her family.

  • Jeanne in NE

    I don’t think this is so much of a *technology* gripe as it is a *customer service* gripe, and as such, fully belongs on here.

    When I travel, half the time is for research purposes, which means at the end of the day, I have data to upload from my little NetBook. Then there is the e-mail that has to be addressed, some of which is business and some of which is personal. I count on having a good Internet connection wherever I’m staying. The last place I stayed in Mpls advertised “free high-speed wireless Internet” in the room, but I could only get it in the lobby. I asked for an adjustment on my bill and received it, using techniques I’ve learned on Elliott.org. (The hotel’s wi-fi network was being hijacked by U of M students in the apt bldg across the street!)

    I now have Tether for my Blackberry and my NetBook and can use my Verizon connection to go wireless, but haven’t had a chance to use it. (It’s been too snowy and icy to travel.) I am interested in the other options that other posters have suggested – so thanks to all of you who have done so.