Thanksgiving air travel disaster!

Flying somewhere this Thanksgiving? You might want to read this first.

This probably isn’t going to be like past Thanksgivings.

• The full-body scanners issue hit a critical mass this morning when a technology blog released images taken from one of the machines in Orlando and obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. People are upset about the pictures.

• The controversy over the new pat-down procedures for those who refuse to be scanned also climaxed this morning when Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told a newspaper, “if people want to travel by some other means,” they have that right. In other words, don’t fly if you don’t want to be patted down or scanned.

• TSA didn’t exactly help when it announced it will formally investigate John Tyner, the San Diego-area passenger who who left Lindbergh Field under duress on Saturday morning after refusing to undertake a full body scan. TSA says the investigation could lead to prosecution and civil penalties of up to $11,000.

• AAA added fuel to the fire when it predicted a double-digit increase in the number of Thanksgiving travelers. It projects the number of Americans traveling for the Thanksgiving holiday will increase 11.4 percent from 2009, with approximately 42.2 million travelers taking a trip at least 50 miles away from home. (Fortunately, 94 percent of these trips will be by car.) Separately, the Air Transport Association has said it expects 24 million air travelers this Thanksgiving, up 3.5 percent from a year ago.

I’ve also just learned that several consumer rights activists, including Ralph Nader, have taken a stand against the new body scans and pat-downs, raising the possibility that even more air travelers will participate in Opt-Out Day on Nov. 24, when passengers are being asked to refuse to walk through the machines.

If even a small number of air travelers turn down the scans on Nov. 24, which is one of the busiest travel days of the year, it could significantly slow an already overburdened air transportation system — maybe even bring it to a standstill.

What to do?

I’ve been getting that question a lot this morning — is there a solution?

The activist in me says: Fight the scans. Resist. Make the government back down. Because if it has its way with us now, it will take even more liberties in the future.

That’s a point many commenters on this site have made, too. If we don’t draw the line now, where does it end?

But the mediator in me says: Open a dialog with the Department of Homeland Security. See if there’s another way to achieve its screening objectives.

Yes, I’m put off by some of Secretary Napolitano’s comments. But in the same interview, she says she has an “open ear” to any adjustments to security measures in place at the nation’s airports. I know many people are trying to talk with DHS now in an attempt to avoid a Thanksgiving travel disaster.

I like plan “B” better. But if the government doesn’t listen and make meaningful changes to the way in which it screens passengers, then we will be left with no choice but to opt out en masse on Nov. 24.

Or not to fly at all.

(Photo of turkey vulture by jack ana pes/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • http://nmdfreelance.com Nancy

    Just tried to visit the site showing the scan images that were leaked/obtained via a FOIA request and the images are scrambled now. I can’t see a single one clearly. Makes me wonder if there’s some tom foolery behind it all?

    I’m not normally a conspiracy theorist but this seems suspect, at best.

  • Mike Z

    @David Young, I’m sorry, but our Constitution was designed for this quite clearly. nowhere does it state that we only have a right to protest when it doesn’t affect anyone else. We explicitely have a right to protest and it is my hope that many people will. this has been planned for some time now, so if someone is flying, get there early enough. nobody is causing you to miss an appointment if you plan ahead like everyone else.

    Also, I used to be on the side of flying is a privelage. i still believe so, however, one should not have to subject themselves to being molested in order to fly. As someone else said, the US Constitution doesn’t end when you enter an airport. You don’t give up your rights just because you need or want to fly, as much as the TSA would like you to believe.

    I’m also troubled with the story linked about the guy who wouldn’t go through the pat down, so he got a refund and left. If he incurs legal fees or is charged, I’m donating. If he was forced to remain he would have been illegally detained, AKA kidnapped by the government, a clear violation of his rights. The ACLU should be all over this one.

    Just when will our elected representatives learn? They beg us for our votes then seem to forget why we elected them to begin with and they treat us like commoners while they “rule” with their friends.

  • Mary Graham

    How about an out and out boycott, like the good ole days??? Instead of “opt out” day, how about a “no fly” day? If we all just stop flying for at least a day or two (no fly weekend?) what a message that would send. I hear you coming up with all sorts of excuses as to why it can’t be done, but they don’t “fly”, pardon the pun.

  • Raven

    Instead of an opt-out day, how about we hit them where their pocket book is? Everyone book REFUNDABLE tickets on their airline of their choice, say, Dec 23, a heavy travel day, and then cancel.

  • John

    If people do this, and I miss my flight, I hope that people are arrested and not allowed to fly. Flying is a privilege not a right.

  • Pilgrim

    John,
    So the right to travel and assemble ends at the airport doors?
    I think there’s a name for folks like you – authoritarian suck up.

  • http://www.phoenixjustice.com Phoenix Justice

    @Joe Farrell

    I am not sure how you equate my views with that of the Tories at the time of the Revolutionary War, but I will chalk it up to overheated rhetoric. I pointed out that I am not happy with the procedures employed by TSA and I also pointed out less disruptive means of addressing the issue.

    If you want to throw a temper tantrum at the airport and screw up the travel of everyone else, be my guest. Just don’t count on my support.

  • Allie

    THE OBAMA CODE

    The wolves sure know how to oHOWLma
    At the news which can make me oGROWLma;
    I’ll never throw in the oTOWELma
    If we can get rid of oBOWELma !

  • deb

    Something I have not seen/heard addresses: what about menstruating women? Not all wear tampons, and a TSA agent feeling up a pad —worn on the outside of the body—is just more invasion of decency than necessary. What about sanitation as a whole? Do the agents ever change those latex gloves?

  • Scott

    Boy some of you sure are childish.

    @ Allie: Take your silly Republican propaganda elsewhere. That has nothing to do with this discussion.

    @ Raven: Again, what does this have to do with the TSA acting like Nazi Germany? Your actions would promote hurting airlines and their employees (who are all on your side, btw), not the TSA.

    You want action? Only Congress can stop the TSA. Start contacting your senators and representatives. LOUDLY.