Ridiculous or not: Just who does the TSA think it is?

Hardly a day seems to go by that I don’t get a complaint about the Transportation Security Administration.

Today it’s Judi Kutzko’s turn. She believes many air travelers like her are afraid to stand up to the agency for fear of being blacklisted.

“TSA can — and often does — make things miserable for anyone who speaks up,” she says.

(Indeed, it took some convincing to let me share her grievance with you here. You’re a brave woman, Judi.)

So what, exactly, happened to her?

A few weeks ago she was flying out of Bradley International Airport in Connecticut when a TSA agent rudely ordered her through the airport’s full-body scanner.

“She said because it was a Saturday and not many people were waiting, they were X-raying everyone,” she says. “I was told to remove my jewelry, and before I could take off my watch, the TSA agent ripped it off my arm and threw it in the bin. Thank goodness it didn’t break.”

Kutzko had some trouble wiggling out of her medical-alert bracelet, and finally the agent told her, “Oh, never mind. Just get in the machine and hold your arms up.”

She asks how, precisely, this security theater is keeping America’s skies safer.

Also, to use the vernacular, what is up with the TSA?

It’s a good time to ask. The TSA is celebrating its 10th anniversary this month, which is the perfect occasion to reflect on what the agency had done – and continues to do – to air travelers.

Kutzko and the many other travelers who have claimed during the last several weeks that the TSA is forcing them through the scanners are almost certainly the victims of an overzealous agent. The agency site is clear that the body scanners are optional.

Then again, TSA might have issued a secret order telling agents they could insist passengers use the scanners, contrary to its published policy.

If it has done that, it wouldn’t be able to tell me because, see, it’s a secret order.

Kutzko and others like her tell me they’re appalled by the agency’s apparent lack of accountability.

Incidentally, her story doesn’t end there.

“After the X-ray I heard her speak into a walkie-talkie and say, ‘OK, she’s clear’,” she told me. “I started toward the bin to retrieve my belongings, only to have the TSA agent block my path and say, ‘Where do you think you’re going? I’m not done with you yet.’”

Turns out there was “something” about her arms that had made them suspicious. She needed to be patted down. Kutzko told her that was “ridiculous” since she was wearing a sleeveless shirt.

“They were just doing this because they can,” she says.

I agree. I’m willing to bet that a 72-year-old retiree wearing a medical bracelet is not going to blow up a plane.

She wonders: Just who does the TSA think it is?

That may well work as a rhetorical question. But it is also answerable, to a certain degree.

TSA is an agency that thinks it can operate in secret, with little or no accountability. It is an agency that believes the rules – even the ones that it sets for itself – don’t necessarily apply to it.

On a more practical level, the TSA thinks that frisking grandmothers and forcing them through a scanner is not only completely acceptable.

It seems to also think that it can be rude about the whole thing.

It is easy for someone like me to be outraged by these clear violations of our dignity, if not our civil liberties. After all, I’ve been covering the most unpopular government agency since its inception a decade ago. I have been threatened by the TSA, lied to by it and been served with an illegal subpoena to force me to name a source (I didn’t).

But until everyday passengers share my disappointment with the way the agency operates, I’m afraid the answer to the question, “Just who does the TSA think it is?” will be: Whatever the hell it wants to be.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_N3ZAUPJC44NBAU64ZEUWWKKJPQ J

    What are the right people the 4% respondents are alluding too?  Sure as heck it isn’t the flying public. One thing that definitely needs doing is REMOVE the uniforms from ALL TSA emplyees. Their uniforms are designed to give the impression that TSA is either a) a police agency, or b) a quasi-military agency; which neither is true. Handing a person a uniform AND A BADGE, it tantamount to giving free license to the wearer to consider them to be such and it then follows that they will act as such. We all have seen this mindset in play for the past 10 years.  DHS, the parent agency of TSA, was created during a complete climate of FEAR foisted on the American public and is still being played out today.  The ONLY way we will see and realize a re-do is when we have an administration who will ORDER shut down of BOTH agencies and start from scratch to make a better one.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_N3ZAUPJC44NBAU64ZEUWWKKJPQ J

    What are the right people the 4% respondents are alluding too?  Sure as heck it isn’t the flying public. One thing that definitely needs doing is REMOVE the uniforms from ALL TSA emplyees. Their uniforms are designed to give the impression that TSA is either a) a police agency, or b) a quasi-military agency; which neither is true. Handing a person a uniform AND A BADGE, it tantamount to giving free license to the wearer to consider them to be such and it then follows that they will act as such. We all have seen this mindset in play for the past 10 years.  DHS, the parent agency of TSA, was created during a complete climate of FEAR foisted on the American public and is still being played out today.  The ONLY way we will see and realize a re-do is when we have an administration who will ORDER shut down of BOTH agencies and start from scratch to make a better one.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Rcwally, you say, “If you think about these people trying to save you from blowing up while you are flying,” and I think the difference between you and me is that I don’t believe they are there to save me from blowing up while I am flying.  Not for one second.  The risk of blowing up while I am flying is less than the risk of being killed by lightning.  Also, their searches are known to have a massively high failure rate (fail to find weapons in 70% to 100% of tests), so what they’re doing doesn’t even reduce the risk of blowing up while flying.  There is not a single rational argument for their presence in terms of making people safer. 

    I’ve actually scratched my head, thought it through, and I’m still drawing a blank as to why they are actually there.  Maybe it’s really about the war on drugs and trying to exploit the “administrative search” exception that courts carved out of the Fourth Amendment to try to nab drug users?  Maybe it’s just a massive boondoggle to scam money out of Congress?  Maybe it’s just that people aren’t rational and they become super-manipulable and docile when fear strikes their reptilian brains?  Yeah, it’s probably a combination of all of those and mostly the last one.  Plus fear plays well politically.

    You should really examine the actual risks in your life so that you can respond appropriately: car crash, heart disease, real risks, oh-no-a-terrorist is so rare that the possibility must be entirely discounted in trying to plan how to live your life.  And I don’t plan to live my life being humiliated and bullied by government thugs, so I will never never consider patdowns and body scans as something done to protect me.

  • Anonymous

    Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government. Among deprivations of rights, none is so effective in cowing a population, crushing the spirit of the individual and putting terror in every heart.

    Justice Robert Jackson, chief U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HMW3OTJSBDWWRKIEKEKWWM7BEA bc

    Seems I struck a nerve Paulette, apparently you’re one of “those people”.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HMW3OTJSBDWWRKIEKEKWWM7BEA bc

    You just said it yourself, “I don’t think TSA is doing a great job in general” yet we’re trolls for saying the same thing and calling them out on being part of an ineffectual system that has spent millions of taxpayer dollars without improving security one iota. The true trolls are the ones who must resort to petty name calling and strawman arguments to make their point. You’re the troll, and I feel dirty for having fed you.

    Apparently you’re having a moment of cognitive dissonance.

  • Anonymous

    Hi, Ron.  Too afraid to post using your “real” name?

  • Anonymous

    they dont apologize  either if they are wrong if the machine says you have something on you and you dont and you miss your flight tough s–t  plus they seem to have the right to be rude crude and tell you off!