Ridiculous or not? Airlines charge fees to use my credit card

When it comes to airline fees, you’ve probably stopped asking yourself, “What’s will they think of next?”

That’s because you thought they’d stop with charging for the first checked bag. But they didn’t. You thought paying for lunch on a six-hour flight was where they’d draw the line. Nope. How about seat reservations — surely they’d be included in the ticket price? Sorry.

So if I told you that you’d soon have to pay for the privilege of paying, that probably wouldn’t sound like a joke. But when I heard from Will Storr, a fellow journalist who lives in England and who had booked flights from Florence, Italy, to London on British Airways, I thought there was some kind of mistake.

Storr was broadsided with a total of $28 in mysterious fees. Like any good journalist, he investigated and found they were credit card fees levied directly by the airline. He says he feels as if the airline “helped itself” to more of his money even after quoting a lower fare through an online travel agency.

Charging customers to pay is highly unusual. In the United States, only one airline, Allegiant, does it. It cleverly avoids the term “credit card fee” because that would violate Visa’s credit card rules and is illegal in 10 states. Instead, it calls them “convenience” fees.

For the convenience of using any of Allegiant’s booking services (inclusive of call center) there is a fee of $17.00 per traveling customer. Purchases made at any of Allegiant is Airport Ticket Offices will not incur a Convenience Fee of $17.00 per customer. All fares are subject to change until confirmed and purchased.

Got that? If you buy a ticket anywhere except the Allegiant ticket office, you have to pay a $17 fee per customer.

European airlines have no such restrictions. For years, no-frills discount airlines have added these credit card fees to their ticket prices. But now the larger air carriers like like British Airways, Lufthansa and Swiss are catching up.

It’s easy to understand why airlines would want to pass the cost of merchant fees along to passengers. They can represent up to two percent of their ticket distribution costs, and at a time when every penny counts, a two percent savings is nothing to sneeze at.

In order to understand how European airlines are rationalizing this decision to us, their passengers, let’s have a look at the recent announcement by Swiss that it would begin imposing a $24 ticketing fee for customers who pay by plastic.

Credit card holders enjoy benefits that extend beyond the ability to make secure non-cash payment. Depending on the card product, such benefits include an extended deadline for settlement of payment and/or the provision of insurance services. Recent years have seen a rise in the related costs, which Swiss has hitherto borne. The introduction of the Optional Payment Charge represents a distribution of the costs on a user-pay basis.

Aha. So Swiss is making the argument that paying by credit card is somehow better, and that customers should be paying more because of it. But isn’t that what your annual fee is for?

Another issue is whether the new fees cover the airline’s cost, or whether they are a source of profit. I think we all know the answer to that one. Airlines aren’t just going to cover their costs; these new fees are certain to become significant source of revenue.

Already, the UK’s Office of Fair Trading has weighed in on this issue, saying it believes there’s “a strong case for a change in the law so that the cost of using a debit card, the almost universal payment method for today’s online consumers, is always included within the headline price.” It is investigating complaints about credit card usage fees.

There are fears that these fees could spread to the United States. Any halfway competent airline revenue manager must be looking across the pond with envy, hoping that the European courts let the fees fly. If they do, they could pave the way for a more widespread acceptance of credit card fees here, and with a little linguistic acrobatics — referring to the surcharge as a “convenience” fee — it’s not inconceivable that a major domestic airline could embrace these surcharges soon.

There are just two small problems, as I see it. First, the airlines charging these fees are being dishonest with themselves and with us. The fees don’t just offset their ticket distribution costs — in almost every case, they also enhance their profits. They make their tickets look cheaper than they actually are.

If cards are too expensive for an airline, then shouldn’t they either stop accepting them or raise their fares? Of course.

My second concern is where this will end. If you’re allowed to charge for using a credit card, can a fee to cover employee salaries, insurance, benefits union dues — or, heaven forbid, CEO bonuses — be far behind?

(Photo: Decla /Flickr)

  • Mel

    This reminds me of a restaurant that recently made the news because they’re going to start taking 2% of all tips that are put on credit cards from their serving staff to offset the credit card fees since they don’t “get the revenue from those tips.” Credit card companies so actively solicit our business; they need to figure out how to keep mine if I start being penalized for using them.  I still have a checkbook…somewhere that I can dig out!

  • Carver

    I”m going to have to call BS on this one.  This is a pure money grab.

    Consider: we know that most US based airlines find it cheaper for you to electronically buy than in person or on the phone.  We know this because internet bookings are free whereas phone and in person bookings incur charges designed to discourage that behavior. This is similiar to a bank that has free ATM only checking but charges to speak to a teller

    Ticketmaster and fandango are different animals.  They are third party booking sites wihch aggregate sales from multiple sellers. The so called convenience fees is their polite way of saying, this is our profit.  This fee is unrelated to the method of payment.

    Third party travel booking sites do the same thing.

    Also, airlines use electronic tickets, whereas Ticket Master actually has to deliver physical tickets to you.  So the analagies don’t work

    Curious though, your power company charges you for autodebit.  Lame.

  • Carver

    I see the confusion.

    I believe you are being mislead by the marketing term “convenience fee”  I would argue that a convenience fee implies that the merchant is undertaking an unusual cost, seperate and beyond what is expected in that industry

    For example, my local grocery store charges a convenience fee to shop and deliver groceries.  Since grocery stores don’t usually deliver groceries, an additional fee is appropriate.  Its truly for my convenience and a charge is appropriate.

    However, business have been trying to use that very benign term as a euphemism for credit card processing charge.

  • Carver

    I think you have an excellent point.

    And as far as the accouting red herring, it would be akin to sales tax. Some items are charged sales tax, others are not.  Yet, business don’t seem to have much issue sorting that out.

  • Carver

    I don’t understand the point.  Banks are in the business of making money.  They charge a fee to use their products.  What’s the problem. Why are banks the villian.

    If Airlines don’t like it perhaps they should offer their own payment products.  AA for example accepts checks via telecheck and Paypal.

    I used the check option once for grins and giggles.  It was horrible. 15 day advance purchase and all change must be made by phone incurring a $20 charge

  • Carver

    I respectfully disagree.

    I do agree that its a money grab, but to suggest its a means of punishing credit card holders is beyond reason.

    Airlines love credit cards.  Billions are processed with credit cards.  It allows for internet bookings, which has lowered operating cost, it safer as no one robs you of credit card slips, it encourages larger purchases, etc.

    As a small business man, I can tell you, I hate cash transactions.

  • Carver

    Come again?

  • Carver

    AA uses Paypal, Telechex, etc.

  • Carver

    You sound like these fees have made it to the us in mass.  This is just Chris’ musings

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=593805601 Robyn Jacqueline

    What other options do people have to pay for tickets?

    You book online, you HAVE to pay with a credit card. You book at a travel agency, you HAVE to pay with either Credit Card or Debit. Cash or cheque payments aren’t even an option. At least not that the travel agency I use. I would be S.O.L. if I wanted to pay with Cash. I might be able to pay with certified cheque if I begged and pleaded.

    So either way, your stuck paying these “fees”. It’s a total scam.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=593805601 Robyn Jacqueline

    What other options do people have to pay for tickets?

    You book online, you HAVE to pay with a credit card. You book at a travel agency, you HAVE to pay with either Credit Card or Debit. Cash or cheque payments aren’t even an option. At least not that the travel agency I use. I would be S.O.L. if I wanted to pay with Cash. I might be able to pay with certified cheque if I begged and pleaded.

    So either way, your stuck paying these “fees”. It’s a total scam.

  • Asiansm Dan

    Airlines shooting in their foot and don’t blame anybody else. Ten years ago, I flew twice a month. Now I fly once every 4 months. From 24 to 3 a year, 8 times less. The culprits are not only Airlines, Oil company, Airport authority and Government taxes, fee and surcharges kill the travel industries.  A roundtrip ticket Montreal-London-Montreal cost 249$ and all the taxes, fuel surcharges and fees are 490$, double the ticket price. Already I gave up just seeing at the all the taxes, fuel surcharges and fees.

  • Asiansm Dan

    Airlines shooting in their foot and don’t blame anybody else. Ten years ago, I flew twice a month. Now I fly once every 4 months. From 24 to 3 a year, 8 times less. The culprits are not only Airlines, Oil company, Airport authority and Government taxes, fee and surcharges kill the travel industries.  A roundtrip ticket Montreal-London-Montreal cost 249$ and all the taxes, fuel surcharges and fees are 490$, double the ticket price. Already I gave up just seeing at the all the taxes, fuel surcharges and fees.

  • chris

    while I voted no, we recently flew from Singapore to Siem Reap in Cambodia on one of the deep-discounted airlines.  Sure, there was a credit card charge and we even paid extra for reserving our seats (optional, and most passengers seemed to NOT do this) – never mind fees for checking baggage, etc  (which we didn’t do) – but even with these extra fees, the total cost was only about 1/3rd of the other airline –

    so if charging for everything under the sun enables supercheap fares, I don’t mind too much –

    on the other hand, paying by credit card is in today’s world, the only real payment option available – unlike checking baggage or reserved seats or eating airline food, there is no real choice available

  • Anonymous

    Paying with cash used to be a possible marker for drug smugglers.  Back in 1988, the former baseball player Joe Morgan was detained on suspicion of being a drug runner after he paid cash at the ticket counter.

  • Mark K

    Anyone who accepts a credit card for payment has to be connected through a merchant bank which is where the payments route.  That bank requires the card acceptor to keep an account where the funds flow through and places holds and minumum balance requirements on the account based on the average credit card volume flowing through that account.  There is no distinction between the amount of the purchase and any added fees since in the US a merchant cannot charge a fe for using a credit (or debit) card.  The amount charged is a single lump sum from the view of the credit card issuer.
     
    A smaller card acceptor may not get its money for a month.  Most are required to keep anywhere from 15% to 30% of their CC dollar volume in that account to cover reversals for fraud, stolen cards, and so on.  The card acceptor is 100% responsible for paying for any reversed charge even if they do not recover whatever was bought with the card.
     
    Frontier Airlines was almost caused to go into liquidation when during their most recent bankrupcy their CC bank wanted to double their minimum balance in their merchant account from somewhere around $10 million to $20 million.  They were able to work out a deal to avoid this.

  • Mark K

    “I would never dream of passing these fees onto my customers”

    But you do.  As with any other cost of doing business, there is an amount in the price of everything sold be a business that includes all of these items.  The utility bills, the rent of any office space, the salaries of the employees, and yes the credit csard fees are all included in the price of everything sold.  While you don’t add a line item to the invoice that says “Credit Card Fee recovery” you have to charge it to the customer along with a share of every other expense or you don’t make a profit.

    I think in the case of the airlines and other businesses, the CC use fee they want to charge far exceeds what they pay and is in addition to the fee recovery already built in to the ticket price.  It is purely a new source of profit that they can collect while blaming someone else for the need to charge it.

  • Tony A.

    Because they charge too many high fees. That’s why.

  • Cbrownie77

    This isn’t a new concept — TicketMaster has been charging a “convenience fee” for years.  If you buy a movie ticket online, you can expect to pay $1-$3 extra as a “convenience fee.  Even some gas stations have you pay an extra fee if you pay with plastic.  Why is it that everyone freaks out when airlines do the same thing that other businesses have been doing for years, apparently without serious objections from the marketplace?

  • Carver

    How do we determine what the correct merchant processing fee is. 1 percent? 2 percent? 3 percent?  It would be sheer speculation on my part and I suspect yours as well.

    This is a perfect example of supply and demand

  • Linda Bator

    Due to the fact that there are no more city ticket offices, and most airports are too far for the average customer to go, and that MOST every airline has moved to internet bookings already, to charge for using that which they prefer in the first place, and which is far less expensive than hiring personnel for face-to-face transactions (why they moved to internet in the 1st place) seems like a shell game!  If you know the costs are more due to the use of credit cars and their fees, then just incorporate the charge in the original cost of the ticket.  End of story.

  • Linda Bator

    And why the airlines moved most of their business in this direction in the 1st place!  NOW they want to penalize us for their choice, rather than just rolling the cost into the tickets as the cost of doing business.  Preposterous!

  • Tony A.
  • Tony A.
  • Tony A.

    Make it cost based + reasonable income.
    The banks get to create money and are helped by the Federal Reserve.
    You cannot just create a bank and survive w/o being a step child of the Federal Reserve. So SUPPLY is not exactly as “free” as you think. China with 3 Trillion Dollars cannot simply come here and run a credit card operation.

  • Tony A.

    You are exactly right. Pay with cash virtually guarantees one to be an SSSS Selectee. Also Cash is not accepted to pay for food and drinks for most flights nowadays.

  • Mark K

    Many businesses have a discount button on their cash registers and some use it when you pay cash.  A small mom-and-pop type hardware store near my house gives you a 5% discount if you pay cash.  My travel agent gives a 3% discount if you pay for your travel arrangements with cash or check.  So this is not something unknown in the US.

    There is much more cost associated with accepting credit cards than the 1.5% average fee.  When a merchant takes cash, that’s it. They have the cash and can do whatever they need with it.   When they take a credit card, there are all sorts of possible outcomes.  The transaction could be disputed for numerous reasons resulting in the merchant losing the funds but not recovering the merchandise.  There is also the time frame and holdbacks the card processor imposes before the merchant gets the funds. 

  • Mark K

    No, this is a perfect example of an monopoly imposing nonnegotiable terms on a captive customer base.  No matter what the banks and credit card networks claim to the contrary.

    The credit card networks publish fee schedules at various times through the year (they are available online).  It is amazing that Visa & MasterCard have almost identical fees even though they are different companies.  Discover is also close with AmEx being the only one that seems to stand out by having the highest fees.  The worst is that the fees increase every year even while the major networks talking about their increased efficiency from growing volumes of transactions.  You would think that the fees would go DOWN if the efficiencies are increasing wouldn’t you?  But since almost 100% of the merchant fees are sent on to the card issuing bank, there has been no reason to lower the fees since the banks want the ever increasing flow of income for doing nothing.

  • Anonymous

    The problem I have with this is that I believe it is an added convenience to the merchant to accept credit cards as forms of payment rather than cash.  If you intice consumers to pay for items in cash, by offering say a 4% discount, then you risk the human error in cash handling.  A short drawer at the end of the business day is much more likely if the merchant only accepts cash.  Additionally, there is an increased risk of robbery, as a cash only policy would imply more cash on hand at any given time.  I understand your reasoning, but I don’t see why the consumer should take on the added cost of credit cards, when it is equally as beneficial to the merchant.

  • Anonymous

    In my post I said “cash only” business, but what I really meant was if an business incentivized paying with cash, they would have those problems.

  • Anonymous

    When I was a server in a high end restaurant 25 years ago here in CA, they did that.  I think they charged us 1.5% (don’t remember for sure) of the tips we received on a credit card.  I thought it was pretty cheap of them, and still feel that way! 

  • Anonymous

    That really isn’t the same thing.  Ticket Master and Fandango are 3rd party vendors providing a service for a fee. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    Don’t forget courier costs or the time involved in making deposits.  Cash counting machines if you have high volume cash, etc.  As someone who routinely works in the A/R field, I honestly believe is cheaper to take credit card only and eliminate cash.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    Don’t forget courier costs or the time involved in making deposits.  Cash counting machines if you have high volume cash, etc.  As someone who routinely works in the A/R field, I honestly believe is cheaper to take credit card only and eliminate cash.

  • Mbods2002

    Just another reason for me to continue my boycott…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    Actually that’s a good point about tax, but I didn’t mean accounting as a red herring, tax is the same percentage per item based on the customer’s status until the law changes.  What you take in in tax, is exactly what you pay out in tax.
     
    Credit card fees would still involve setting up an additional account, re-allocating part of your transaction, and matching it up to the fees later. Every card carries a different fee based on the bank issuing it.  Discover may be $0.50 per transaction depending on your merchant agreement, but Visa and MC can be anywhere from $0.00 fee to $1.50 fee per transaction, plus a fee of anywhere form 0.25% to 2.5%.  It varies so much by the bank that issued the particular card, and the merchant doesn’t know the fee until their get their next merchant statement.  So charging everyone a 4% fee is never going to match up with what you are actually paying in fees, and then you will have to determine how to allocate the extra funds, etc.  I would be a lot of work, and it is clearly going to end up with extra profit unless you ask each person what their issuing bank charges, which no one will know.

  • Anonymous

    I think TonyA posted a pretty good article about holdbacks below. Still “serious” doubts or just “marginal” doubts?

    I do not know if convenience fees are available sooner. Just pondering. The ENTIRE last sentence of the first paragraph of my post is pretty clear about that.

  • Technomage100

    It’s a cost of doing business.  Airlines have to suck it up the same as any other industry.

  • John

    @MarlaM:disqus Cash in hand is cash in hand. Credit cards involve holdbacks (one processor we had decide they were going to keep the first $250k in charges to cover chargebacks. Another kept 15% of every sale for over a year for the same reason. All interest free), merchant & transaction fees(which the processor still charges on the money they won’t give you), chargebacks (those times when people suddenly “forget” they paid you for something and you get to spend hours trying to prove to VISA, after they take the money back, that the person really did authorize the charge) and added data requirements (PA-DSS) for any information related to credit cards.

    There is little added benefit to the merchant. The only reason to accept them is that the market requires it.

    Also unless you missed my point… You are already paying it as a hidden fee. The fee is already there and built into the price. Why not give you the choice if you want to pay it?

  • Carrie Charney

    Doesn’t one pay for the ticket before going through security?

  • John

    @yahoo-SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q:disqus  I never said anything about varying the fee based on card type or matching customer transactions. In fact what I said was charging the same fee for every card based on your max fee. Since this is basically what a business does now anyway, there’s no net effect for a credit card user and a benefit to a cash or e-check user.

    From the accounting side its really easy. You set up a revenue account for CC fees (much like the liabilty account for holding Sales tax) and it will offset the COS account for Merchant Fees. (Appologies to all that have no idea what I just said).

  • Carrie Charney

    How does the TSA ban you if you’ve already paid for the ticket at the ticket counter?

  • Tony A.

    Mark K. Yeah they should be really regulated like PUBLIC UTILITIES.

  • Fred I

    And how is this a problem? The airlines reward their best customers with incentives to fly more. Nothing wrong or surprising here.

  • Tony A.

    Not necessarily BAN but close to it.

    Read this article:
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/05/can_you_still_pay_cash_for_a_plane_ticket.html

    I quote the article:
    As far as the U.S. Supreme Court is concerned, paying cash at the airport
    is a shady activity. In 1984, government agents stopped a traveler at
    Honolulu International Airport based, in part, on his $2,100 cash
    payment for the ticket from Miami—all $20 bills. When the authorities
    found a kilogram of cocaine in his carry-on luggage, the trafficker
    challenged the legality of the search. Seven of the justices noted
    that “[m]ost business travelers, we feel confident, purchase airline
    tickets by credit card or check so as to have a record for tax or
    business purposes, and few vacationers carry with them thousands of
    dollars in $20 bills.”

  • Jeff I

    “…basic costs of doing business that are universal should NEVER be a fee.”
    Accepting a credit card isn’t necessarily a basic cost of doing business. Not accepting cash could be due to it being legal tender and such, but using a credit card doesn’t have to be universal, and there are perfectly valid ways to get around it, such as using cash.

  • Eric

    What’s next, you take a flight and a few weeks later you recieve a bill for the cracked windshield from a bird strike?

  • Anna

    Good points.

    I wonder if this “convenience” fee is really going to make much of a difference in Europe? The airlines have to disclose the full, final price anyway, and it’s a thing that actually seems to be enforced. People (i.e. smart people) are just going to use a ticket search engine to compare prices, and then it doesn’t really matter if one airline is operating with all-inclusive fares and another breaks it down to fare, pay-fee, bag-fee, seat use-fee, headwind-surcharge and whatnot.

    (I just did a test with Easyjet – yup, the pay-fee is displayed and included in the full price. Travelstart quotes the same price for the same flight including one checked bag.)

     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    So in your example you are charging every one based on the highest fee. So people who have a card that cost even less than an e-check to process like discover, get charged a fee as high as an AmEx card.  So you are basically punishing everyone who doesn’t use cash.  Yet you say it’s not fair to charge people who pay cash the same as those who use a credit card?  By your own logic, charging everyone the same price isn’t fair either.  It’s just building in extra profit at the expense of some customers. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    Yes, and again everything you are saying is a part of doing business. If you want to take credit cards, that is how it works.  It’s still simpler and easier than dealing with cash and I say that well aware of hold backs, PCI-DSS compliance, and charge backs.  I guess you and I cannot agree here. 
     
    I strongly believe a business should set its price, all inclusive, and only charge a fee for something that is truly an add-on.  Charging fees based on each little expense here and there is ridiculous, and makes it hard for customers to make a valid price comparison.   A business should set its price based on its ability to run itself and stay competitive.  When a business sets its price based on what it wants its profit to be, and then adds everything it pays as part of doing business as an extra fee and extra profit, it is no longer a fair comparison to consumers, and it is a slippery slope as to what they will add next.