Nice work, US Airways! A story of compassion with a happy ending

I don’t think of this as a “good news” kind of blog. There are countless corporate sites that specialize in slick posts stripped of meaning, and this isn’t one of them. But sometimes, travel companies really do right by their customers, and when that happens, they deserve recognition.

Such was the case with Dani Djamal’s mother, who was trying to change her flights on US Airways.

She needed to change her departure date from August to October on her flight from Phoenix to Los Angeles as she had to accompany me in the hospital after an accident.

When the US Airways rep on the phone told me there was a change fee of $150, I asked her to waive it. I explained that I was admitted into a hospital in Flagstaff for two months and her presence was important for me.


Lately, carriers like US Airways have only been waiving change fees for elite-level customers, and even then, sparingly. In my experience, you have to die before a legacy carrier will waive a change fee for a garden-variety passenger.

The reason? Airlines are relying on reservation change fees to make money. Here’s US Airways’ revenues from these fees.

Whoa — $65 million in the second quarter of 2010? That’s no small amount. (Mind the gap in this chart, which is probably merger-related.)

So what did US Airways do? A representative named Ana spoke with her supervisor. Djamal furnished the airline the name of a doctor who could verify the story. And then US Airways waived the fee.

“Customer service is still around,” adds Djamal, “Especially with US Airways and Phoenix Airport.”

Being flexible on ticket changes makes sense. After all, passenger are expected to cut the airline a break when they can’t fly because of bad weather or “air traffic control” issues. Why shouldn’t it go both ways?

Nice work, US Airways.

(Photo: super ciliousness/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Jesse

    “Being flexible on ticket changes makes sense. After all, passenger are expected to cut the airline a break when they can’t fly because of bad weather or “air traffic control” issues. Why shouldn’t it go both ways?”

    I completely agree!

  • http://www.gokudat.com Sunduvan

    I love more flexibility when I travel. Always allow more time for everything.

  • Raven

    A feel-good story to be sure, but I feel that anyone who has the possibility of a flexible travel situation should ALWAYS buy a higher fared, changeable ticket.

    My friend travels to the middle east to work on the bases there. Since they can’t guarantee when he’ll be able to leave the base due to a number of factors, he always pays a bit more for a commercial ticket that is totally changeable.

    I don’t know on this one…at least it wasn’t “my down’s syndrome son” or “my special needs child” or “an elderly couple on a fixed income.” But still…either buy a changeable fare of fly SWA which allows you to change without fees.

  • sweepergrl

    @ Raven-
    “A feel-good story to be sure, but I feel that anyone who has the possibility of a flexible travel situation should ALWAYS buy a higher fared, changeable ticket.”
    Dani said it was an accident. Not sure how someone is supposed to anticipate an accident, hence the word accident. If we use that line of thought, I guess every one of us should be buy changeable tickets.

    “But still…either buy a changeable fare of fly SWA which allows you to change without fees.”
    Not everyone has access to SWA. They don’t fly into many airports, which leaves a lot of people without this option. And the last time I flew, the ‘flexible’ economy ticket was $30 less than the 1st class ticket.

    Stop being so judgmental and appreciate the rare time an airline was humane. These good stories are few and far between.

  • http://www.airportsbase.com Jerzy Matuszczak

    Wait for day when any USA airlines will fly to Krakow Poland.
    It could be US Airways.Long time ago it was PAN American.
    I took my first trip in 1973 to San Francisco.
    I was there later 1980 and 1999 twice and lately 4 times in Boston between 2006-2009

  • BucksterSF

    They should just do away with the non-refundable ticket. People just don’t seem to get what they trade for savings.

  • MikeS

    To Raven:

    You said: “he always pays a bit more for a commercial ticket that is totally changeable.” I have to violently disagree. If it was a bit more, like 10% or 20%, I would agree with you. Usually it is an extra 100% to 300%.

    Instead of buying a full fare, completely changeable ticket, I can probably buy one non-refundable, decide not to go, throw away the ticket, then buy another one, and still be ahead.

  • Mary Graham

    How refreshing to hear this story. MORE! I need this to restore my faith in the airline industry. Right now I’m boycotting…..

  • Timothy Crowe

    Boy cot flying. Reform the TSA or better yet abolish them all together. Hold you congressman accountable. Involve your state legislatures. Report the sexual assaults. Reclaim you rights America.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392