It’s time to say “no” to the TSA’s full body scanners

Michael Roberts said no.

Karen Cummings said no.

You may have though of saying “no” to the Transportation Security Administration’s new full-body scanners, too, despite the agency’s decision to impose a more aggressive pat-down technique on passengers who do.

Well, now is the time. It’s time for all of us to say “no.”

I called Roberts, a pilot for ExpressJet, yesterday to verify his story. He tried to opt out of a scan in Memphis but was turned away when he also declined to be “groped.” By his own account, his employment status with the airline is on “hold” during an investigation. He may be terminated.

“The very bedrock of our way of life in this country is under attack from within,” he says. “Please don’t let it be taken from us without a fight.”

Cummings was allowed to fly when she refused a scan, but subjected to a “completely thorough” pat-down, “as though I was a common criminal or a drug pusher,” she says. “The only place I was not touched was in my crotch — and isn’t that the one place they should be checking, after the underwear bomber?”

What if we all opted out of these invasive scans, like Roberts and Cummings?

The TSA would have to give us an aggressive pat-down, each and every one of us. The system would slow to a crawl and the agency would be forced to rethink the deployment of these unwanted devices, to re-evaluate the prison-style pat-downs.

Did I say “unwanted”?

Sure. I don’t recall anyone asking for these machines. Did you?

Oh, now I remember what we wanted. We asked for the airport security process to become more efficient, for the TSA to focus on the people who are likeliest to commit a crime on a plane. We didn’t want to see any more images of nuns being frisked.

We think the TSA is doing a terrible job. We’re tired of being treated like criminals.

But these scanners — machines that may bombard us with dangerous radiation, or maybe not; machines that we never asked for — that’s where some of us are drawing the line.

It’s where all of us should draw the line.

So the next time you’re at the airport, say no to the scan. Tell everyone else in line to refuse.

If anything, we should be opting in to the scans — not out. And we shouldn’t be punished with an even more invasive pat-down if we refuse.

America is better than that.

(Photo of Muslim TSA agent frisking a Catholic nun at Detroit airport by cj davis/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Cassivella

    @Chris, it’s highly irresponsible of you to suggest civil disobedience for such a silly issue.

    @Nearly everyone else: Guess what? You probably aren’t worth staring at naked. Do you really think that someone who is forced to endure basically cartoon outlines of the human body for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week is really going to get excited if he/she actually does end up seeing some part of your anatomy?

    Really, get over yourselves. This is the same mind set that people have regarding gay people. Oh no, we can’t have gays in the military/locker room because the gays are going to be staring our our fine naked bodies the whole time!

    For those of your complaining about your precious children, you probably already post more revealing pictures of your children in the bathtub or in the swimming pool on FaceBook or something similar, and we all know how secure that is.

    And frankly, most people wear clothing that is more revealing than the scanners on a daily basis anyway.

    And for those worried about radiation – just keep in mind that you are exposed to the equivalent of a full-chest x-ray’s worth of radiation each time you fly the equivalent of NY-LA. So, if you are afraid of irradiating yourself, just stay home or drive to your destination. Because we all know how safe driving is!

    I am tired of dealing with people who, nearly 10 years after Sept 11, have not figured out that you can’t take large containers of liquids on planes. If you want safer airlines, then learn how to read or, at minimum, watch the nightly news at least once every 10 years. That way our TSA Agents can actually focus their efforts on finding people with real dangerous objects instead of having to x-ray your baggage twice, completely unpack it in front of everyone, test everything in your baggage for explosives – all the while you scream at the top of your lungs about how your rights are being violated because you can’t bring a 10 ounce jar of hemorrhoid cream through security.

    Do you want us to have to actually infringe on your rights? In most countries, para-military police patrol the airports with machine guns. I think hundreds of people walking around with machine guns is a little less safe for the average traveller than a backscatter machine. They can stop you at any time and search your belongings and ask for your papers. Some countries require the equivalent of an FBI background check before you can board one of their country’s airliners. And, heavens forbid, I was in a country recently where you were not allowed a single carry-on item. And where was this backwards police state? Canada!

    At the minimum, let the people who don’t mind following the rules through a separate line. Let all the rest of you stage sit-ins (that is what it would end up being if you refuse proper screening – because you won’t be going anywhere) in the other line. As a frequent traveler (I fly 4 times a week), I am freaking tired of dealing with you all.

  • Brooklyn

    Remember, as your various cancers are diagnosed, to congratulate yourself on your principled position! But the idea of separate lines for anyone wishing to be groped is a good one – maybe they could be staffed by TSA employees with prior convictions for this type of activity so everyone can be happy!

  • Eric

    @ Cassivella

    Take a breath and go outside for some fresh air. You have far too much anger in you.

    PS
    Since you can’t see me, you have no idea if I’m worth staring at naked :D

  • Sue

    I’ll actual welcome the scanners.

    I have been what is called a “road warrior” for the last couple of years for business purposes. Fly round trip somewhere almost once a week, and due to having both knees replaced, I have been forced to go through a “pat-down” every time I fly. That’s at least 100 body searches in the last 12 months.

    I’ve had “good” searches and I’ve had “bad” ones that did invade my privacy. I’ve learned that when you get a “bad one” and say anything at all, you’ll only be detained and questioned longer while they try to intimidate you and threaten to not let you proceed to your plane if you continue to fuss. Who needs this under any circumstances?

    Do I care if some “creepy” guy or gal gets to see the outline of my naked body on a monitor if it saves me from having their hands on me? Have at it!

  • Sharon

    I am not willing to sacrifice my personal freedom the appearance of security. That’s all it is. My sister, who is a cop, got selected for a secondary screening at Dulles and felt like she needed to give the TSA worker a lesson in how to give a correct pat-down. We are no safer than we were 10 years ago, we just have fewer freedoms.

  • http://DontScan.me Wimpie

    You have the UNCONDITIONAL RIGHT to OPT-OUT and especially to OPT-OUT your kids!
    Click on my name above or go to:
    http://DontScan.me
    for important safety and privacy information as well as actual images, not the propaganda that TSA is spewing.

  • Woody

    TSA is here to stay and so are the full body scanners. Sure, you all can op out and place security screening at a slug pace. However, you’ll only be hurting yourself and everyone who are trying to catch a flight. Everyone want to leave on time.

    It’s amazing how everyone so far hasn’t come up with a better solution. You rather sit on the sidelines griping and complaining about any security changes. I guess it was probably the same response when the walk through metal detectors and hand wanding was brought into security screening years ago. I can see it back then, “You’re violating my constitutional rights.” Times have change and the threat has changed with it.

    So big talkers, what is the solution to screening passenger with the new threats that are evolving all the time? Come up with some solutions and send it to a contact link at TSA.gov. If your not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.

    Best solution is comply with the procedures and be on way to your flight. That’s the best solution.

  • Woody

    Side note: Has anyone looked at the picture above of the nun been padded down for loose clothing? Can you come up with a time frame when this picture could have been taken? White shirts – hmmm? Well, for your info, it was an era before the full body scanners. I think the news media has you scared to death. I think it’s funny to use a picture of a nun or child to make their point.

  • FJP

    What Cassivella said, or most of it at least. I’d much rather be scanned than groped. Particularly if I can leave my shoes on. I have been through a full body scanner at JAX and the only strange aspect of the process was being required to remove innocuous paper or plastic items from my pockets. If it can scan me through clothes of any fabric, what the devil is the problem with a small plastic comb?

  • http://www.worldtraveler.biz Preston Smith

    I can only say: CLASSIC PHOTO!

    Take that with a good camera, high contrast and in black and white and you could probably win yourself a spot in the World Press Photo competition.

    Wow. Congratulations on the quick snap.

  • SFO

    @FJP

    Actually the worst part of this is that you still have to remove your shoes, and now you also have to remove belts with non-ferrous metal buckles and all headgear.

    The “screener in another room” takes approximately 20 seconds to approve or deny you. This is not an awesome answer to the (nonexistent) problem, but it does take security theater to a whole new level.

  • Carlo

    The more aggressive pat-down is not a security measure in this case – it’s a punishment for non-submission. I don’t care if anyone thinks I’m worth looking at nekkid (my spouse certainly thinks I’m alright). It’s that I should be able to reserve that view only to my spouse instead of having to show off every time I fly. No one else has any kind of “right” to see that part of me.

  • lb

    @Cassivella this is not a ‘silly issue’. I don’t want to be exposed to more radiation than I already am. If you don’t mind it, fine, but I do, and I don’t want to be harassed, bullied, and punished if I opt out.

    This is all just to brain-wash us, instill fear in us, oh, and make us get sick with cancer so that big pharma and the x-ray companies make more money. see the connection? this is not a silly issue.

    If you don’t want to be late, get to the airport earlier!

  • John

    Elliot: What a disgusting convoluted photoshopped image to make a nasty point. Are you advocating that TSA only scan Muslims? How will the TSA determine who is Muslim? Impossible to do. Therefore, are you suggesting they should only thoroughly check brown peoples: racial profiling by a government entity? Your suggestion that Catholics are innocuous is not well taken. Many of us know the horrors missionaries have perpetrated upon the world. Stick to mediating travel complaints.

  • J

    Casivella, you’re out of your mind. First of all, you’re spouting nonsense. There is no conclusive evidence that these X-Ray machines are safe in the first place, only guarantees from the manufacturers and of course TSA. Then the safety of these machines is entrusted to TSA who, as we all know, is not exactly staffed with radiologists and brain surgeons. I find it quite interesting that you spout the same nonsense that TSA spouts VERBATIM, as if it were fact. But it is not. Numerous groups of scientists from a wide variety of sources including the Mayo Clinic, the Radiological Society of North America, Johns Hopkins and UCSF Oncology have brought up the inherent dangers of these machines. Do a little research, you sheep.

    I’m a frequent traveler too… spending upwards of $120K a year just on airline tickets, 2.5 million miles so far. I’ve put up with the regular secondary screenings (I wear a prosthetic) for over a decade… it was part of my routine and I had no problem with it. Professional, somewhat efficient. Now, the new enhanced secondary screening involves a man groping my genitals. This is absolute horseshiite and your defense of it is absurd. The last few times I’ve flown, I didn’t even have a choice of an x-ray machine… they hadn’t been installed yet, so it was yet another round of indignity with the crotch grab. I still opt out because I don’t trust their safety.

    Your comments sound like they’re coming directly from TSA… particularly when you say “Do you want us to have to actually infringe on your rights?” Yes, you give yourself away.

    You poser.

  • Richard

    say no ?? sure we all say no. But the TSA and all elected monkeys do not listen to us. This police State treat us like shi.. and will go one that way. There will be NEVER EVER a peace full way to stop that. They are an Authority and do not listen to anybody and our legislator gave them all the rights the same rights all dictators in the world are using. This is the same in Irak , Northkorea China Europe or USA. It doesn’t matter . Authority are the same everywhere they are not humans they are some dictators right hand. All what they create is frustration and resignation and a few stand up they call them Terrorists. That’s how easy their world is “shut up or you get killed ! “

  • T.J.

    This is an invasion of pricacy and sexual assualt..If this had been a stranger doing this to you, they would be in jail. But its ok for the Gov to do this, I don’t think so. I will refuse both a pat down and a body scan. The Gov has no right, understand no right. More and more people are speaking out against this invasion of privacy. Makes me wonder whats next, a chip and so they can monitor our every move, now they are wanting to dicatate what we eat, how much we eat, how much electricity we can use. The Gov wants to total control over the American people, sad thing is a jot of Americans are blind by this. We are losing more and more of our civial rights. It’s time we the People say enough already. They have bomb sniffing dogs that can smell a bomb or weapon. This is getting out of hand..

  • http://peakofelephants.tumblr.com Peakofelephants

    @Cassivella “Do you want us to have to actually infringe on your rights? In most countries, para-military police patrol the airports with machine guns.”

    If you’ve never seen this at an American airport, then there is no way you fly nearly as often as you claim.

    Incidentally, “others have it worse” is a breathtakingly logically fallacious response to the concerns raised here.

  • KLH

    I am amazed at how people are taking the attitude of…well I haven’t done anything wrong so I have no problem with the scans. This is typical drinking the cool aid thinking. No one knows if the scanners are safe. Sure the Govt. says they are but the Govt says a lot of things that are not true. These rationalizations that people are giving in the comments to support subjugating our rights is misguided. There is no evidence that these machines work! All one needs to do is look at a country such as Israel and look at exactly what they do to keep their travelers safe. There is nothing like this going on there. They profile behaviors (not race) they study and understand the psychology of a terrorist and have at least 4 levels of security starting on the roads into the airport. They talk to the people and observe them for behaviors that suggest there is something suspicious about a person. People in this country are getting more and more apathetic about our rights. If this nonsense continues, one day in the near future, we will all scratch our heads and wonder where the hell our civil rights went and it will be nobody’s fault but our own.

  • naoma foreman

    Have not flown since the patdown but will be
    flying soon. When was the last time a 5’2″,
    elderly, blonde, blue-eyed female ever tried
    to get a bomb on a plane? That is me. Look
    to the ones who do try — MIDDLE EASTERN MEN. End of comment.

  • George Rowbottom

    Refuse the scan. Make them do the pat down

    Wear a sanitary napkin (ladies)
    Wear a Depends.

    Don’t make it easy for them

  • Diana

    We have a right to say “no”, if we don’t want to be touched. There should be an alternate option of screening that does not require someone’s hands to be placed on our bodies.
    If the option isn’t given maybe no one should be flying at all! That’s the safest of ways afterall, right?
    Just a thought.

  • Sommer Gentry

    @Diana,

    No, if no one flies at all that is in fact the most dangerous outcome that the TSA could produce. If people substitute more dangerous modes of travel (driving) for less dangerous ones (flying) then more people will die. Of course, the TSA’s mission isn’t to save lives. It’s just to make sure nothing bad happens *on an airplane*. Any of us who die on the road because we believe in being free from unreasonable searches will be casualties of the TSA.

    The radiation from the scans is predicted to cause about the same rate of deaths from cancer that airline terrorism has ever caused, so even assuming the scanner is 100% effective at preventing terrorism the death rate hasn’t moved. I put this whole problem down to poor math education. The TSA and everybody else who’s afraid of the boogieman (terrorists) just plain can’t count.

  • http://MANYYEARSAGO naoma

    I never understood the taking off of shoes — and even flip flops. I wear those blue booties (clean ones) inside my shoes. Filthy floors and warts, etc. Toss them when I put shoes back on.
    Will not do the x-ray (have had cancers). After the underwear bomber why didn’t they mandate “remove your underwear.” TSA is a joke. All comments on this site are just GREAT!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Q6BVVIJB76JLH7WQMVE573Q4RQ Zech

    Um, you just pointed out how it made things slower….