Is this enough compensation? “I paid $94 to sleep in my own ant-infested bed”

Kate Farrelly has a little ant problem in her apartment, so she decided to book a hotel room while her landlord fumigated her building. She paid $181 for two nights in a “pet friendly” room at the Vagabond Inn Glendale through a Priceline-affiliate site. Problem is, the Vagabond Inn didn’t actually have any pet-friendly rooms. They sent Farrelly packing — back to her ant-infested apartment — and they charged her for one night after she canceled her reservation. Is one night’s refund enough? Farrelly says her initial booking was made through a site called Pet Vacations, which appears to be affiliated with Priceline.

I packed up my dog and cat, and showed up at the hotel around 7:30 p.m. When I got to the hotel, the clerk told me they didn’t have any pet-friendly rooms left. [An employee] called her manager and was supposedly given permission to open up another non-pet-friendly room for me. I was told they were going to charge me an extra $60 per night for my pets. Meanwhile, there’s a sign on the counter that says pets cost $10/night. I had already paid $181 for the “pet-friendly” room. My credit card had already been charged, so I assumed this included any pet fees. I told the clerk that I didn’t think the extra fees were fair as it was the hotel’s fault they’d accepted the reservation without having the room, and asked to cancel the reservation. I was told I needed to call Priceline. I was told that I couldn’t cancel the reservation because it was afternoon on the day of check in. A Priceline supervisor called the hotel and asked if they would waive the $60, but they supposedly refused. The most they agreed to was cancelling the reservation and refunding me $87. So I paid $94 to sleep in my own ant-infested bed.

Yuck. The next day, Farrelly filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau. She received the following response:

Priceline contacted the hotel and spoke with [a representative] who confirmed to Priceline that the property allocate a number of rooms for pets, and when all these pet allocated rooms are all occupied, the hotel has the option to open another non pet allocated room. However, the hotel must charge an additional fee for providing a non pet allocated room for the special cleaning process required once the guest check’s out of the non pet allocated room. As a goodwill gesture, the consumer has already received a courtesy one night refund, and we can offer no additional refund for the hotel room that was used by the consumer.

She appealed, but the BBBs response was the same. I contacted Priceline. Here’s what it told me:

We contacted the hotel on Kate’s behalf. The manager claims that she requested a room upgrade and that’s what the additional fee is for. The hotel feels they’ve already met her halfway on this and they declined to go any further. Sorry.

I can sort of see the hotel’s perspective. If it opened another pet room, it would have to clean it. But maybe it should have thought of that before it accepted Priceline’s money. Is its refund of one night’s accommodations enough? In a quickie poll of more than 500 readers, you said … (Photo: B inux/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • SirWired

    It’s credit-card dispute time, if it’s not too late. She paid for a pet-friendly room, she didn’t get one. Period. There’s no “meeting halfway.” I’m not sure where the ambiguity comes from.

  • Walt Blackadar

    Full refund, no excuses. She paid for a pet-friendly room. She didn’t get one and you can’t charge her more because you want to. I’d chargeback the credit card immediately.

  • Eric

    The hotel accepted the reservation with her pets. They should have accommodated her at no extra charge. Since they were unable to provide what she paid for and she opted to leave, she’s entitled to a full refund regardless that she cancelled the evening she was scheduled to check in.

  • Cynthia

    I voted no. Frankly, I think the hotel was fair in refunding half the fee. I think the remaining refund needs to come from Priceline.
    Here’s why: I think the breakdown came somewhere between Priceline and Vagabond. Priceline needs to improve their communication regarding special needs, especially something like pets, given that they’ve got a separate website dedicated to pet-friendly bookings. They need to improve their communication process with their vendors and have verbiage that includes a pet acceptance guarantee.
    Not that Vagabond is totally clear on blame for this incident, either. They need to work on improving their process, in that it’s possible that they did have Ms. Farrelly’s reservation, but gave away the pet room to an earlier arriving customer who failed to notify them that a pet room was needed. The room should have been held for Ms. Farrelly, who had made the request, and turned away the guest who failed to notify. Perhaps they could have walked her to another hotel nearby that was pet-friendly and had a room available. I don’t think they went far enough in trying to find her a better solution.

  • BeccaM

    I voted no. If the hotel accepted her reservation for a pet-friendly room then it should have provided her that room at the price she paid. I think it is suspect that the hotel manager claims she requested a room upgrade. She should receive a full refund since they did not provide her with anything.

  • Jennifer

    I feel like I’m missing something.

    She paid $181 for 2 nights in a pet-friendly room. When she got to hotel, they had 2 choices: either give her a pet-friendly room, or give her a full refund.

    If they couldn’t provide her with the pet-friendly room that she had already paid for, there’s no reason she should have been asked to pay more money, and no reason she shouldn’t get a full refund. It seems pretty straightforward to me.

    If you reserve a room with 2 beds, and get to the hotel and the only rooms they have available have only 1 bed, they don’t get to charge you the cost of having an employee go out and buy another bed. This is the same thing.

  • http://www.thetravelinggiraffe.com Crissy

    No, the hotel reservation was made for a pet-friendly room. If the hotel couldn’t provide that then they should have offered another comperable option or a refund.

    If the hotel and Priceline had a breakdown – then they should work it out amongst themselves. But, Kate made a reservation for something and the hotel (not the agent booking) couldn’t provide it.

  • K

    Why isn’t Pet Vacations involved in this dispute? It appears that they were the agency that accepted the reservation (even if they then turned around and placed it through Priceline), and that they should be the ones to make it right for the customer.

  • Mariel

    She paid for the room including her pets. The hotel must refund all the money!!

  • Steve

    I voted no. She deserves a full refund, since the hotel could not provide the room she reserved and paid for.

    That being said, the comments about an ant-infested bed are kind of irrelevant to the situation. It doesn’t matter *why* she booked the hotel room; the salient point is that she booked it with the understanding that she’d have a pet-friendly room, and then the hotel didn’t provide it.

  • jonathan

    What a nice little scam this is for the hotel!

    Hmmm, see, it’s like this: we’ll offer pet-friendly rooms; sell pet-friendly rooms on Priceline, with the money upfront; and, once the few pet-friendly rooms are sold, look at the money we’ll make on extra fees and/or cancelled pre-paid rooms.

    Wow! I’ve been in the wrong business all these years!

    I think it’s time for Ms. Farrelly to file with her local Small Claims Court.

  • Kevin

    Everyone seems to be concentrating on the Hotel giving the Refund. She DID NOT pay the hotel for the room. She Paid Pet Vacations/Priceline and they paid the Hotel for the room.

    Pet Vacations should refund her the entire amount and they should be the ones to go after the Hotel for the refund. Period.

  • Monica

    This is pretty easy. She paid for a pet-friendly room, she should have gotten one. If they didn’t have one, they should have refunded her the full amount or opened another room at no additional expense. It’s not her fault the hotel didn’t leave the appropriate room available for her reservation.

  • http://www.sanibel-rentals.net Sylvia

    She deserves a full refund. Yes, it does cost extra for a pet clean up, and at my pet friendly vacation rental house on Sanibel Island, I post the charge up front. Sounds like the hotel fouled up with overbooking pet friendly rooms. That’s not the customer’s fault.

  • Chris in NC

    Based on what was written, she deserves a full refund.

    If she had a confirmed reservation for a “pet friendly” room, the hotel should either: Provide her with a room, or ff no rooms were available, find her an accommodation a similar or upgraded property and pay for that accommodation. This would be consistent with industry “walking” policies. Interestingly, I am not aware of any specific laws that mandate exactly what the hotel is to do.

    However, I don’t think this case is as straight forward as it first appears. I’m not convinced that she actually had a confirmed reservation for a pet-friendly room, despite using a site petvacations.com. I just looked at the site, and despite statements all over the site touting “pet friendly hotels” it appears this site is nothing other than a “listing” of so-called pet friendly hotels.

    To make matters worse, under each hotel, it simply lists the “pet policy.” Some hotels simply say “pets allowed in some rooms” or “Additional fees may apply..” Even worse, some of these pet policies aren’t verified. When booking on petvacations.com, it appears to be simply just another booking engine, and in the OPs case, when she booked at petvacations, it was done via Priceline.

    I’m NOT blaming the OP here. If my suspicions are correct, then I think petvacations.com site is deceptive at best. In my opinion, petvacations.com owes the OP at least $181.

  • Heather

    You don’t charge the customer for a hotel screw up. You either have the room at the original price or you don’t. You can’t change the price of something after it has been sold and hold out your hand for more. Maybe the “upgrade” was for her going to have to use a regular room since they ran out of pet friendly rooms. Either way the manager should not be playing that game. If he said that to the BBB I’m not surprised they took his side. Either way it’s a good case for a credit dispute or if that doesn’t work she could always go to small claims if she wanted to.

  • Jeff R

    She did not get what she paid for – plain and simple. The hotel is saying “We’re sorry, we don’t have what you ordered, so here’s half your money back, even though you won’t be able to stay here.”

    This is different from the typical hotel policy of room types being based on availability and not guaranteed, such as queen or king bed, etc. She booked this property specifically for the ability to bring her pet, and did so using a pet friendly site. Any reasonable person would assume a stay booked through a site called “petvacations.com” would get them a room that can accomodate their pet. The hotel could have easily rectified the situation in the beginning by waiving the $60 fee for a regular room. Such poor customer service.

    She’s entitled to a full refund.

  • Jake

    With everyone else here. She paid for a pet friendly room, and didn’t receive it. A full refund is the bare minimum that the deserves. Given her reasons for the booking, and the hotel’s last minute “cancellation” on her, I’d push for additional punitive measures.

  • Chris in NC

    @ Chris (Elliott)
    Did she have a confirmation for a pet friendly room?

    I am troubled by what I see at petvacations.com. Despite giving the impression that it reserves pet friendly rooms, the site appears to be simply a “directory” of pet-friendly hotels, that refers its bookings to another booking site (ie Priceline). Even the so-called “pet friendly” hotels in the database have widely differing policies. Nowhere, could I find a “guarantee.” If I ventured a guess, Petvacations.com will likely side step this question, and place the blame on users and the hotel.

    A lot of the comments ASSUME that she had a pet friendly room. But, if the booking was done by Priceline, and there was no guarantee, the hotel is being blasted unnecessarily. Granted, the hotel could have accommodated her in the interests of good customer service, but it too would have been blind-sided by this.

    Regardless, Ms. Farrelly got hosed. The compensation isn’t enough, and I would continue to mediate this. However, the dog may be barking up the wrong tree.

    Perhaps the BBB complaint should be made against petvacations.com?

  • Joe Farrell

    So now we have to be clairvoyant when we make pet-friendly reservations and know that the hotel does not have any more pet friendly rooms and thus cannot accomodate us when we make the reservation?

    The BBB is an organization of merchants – complaining to them is like complaining to the Airline industry groups when an airline screws you –

    How simple does it get? You reserve a pet friendly room. You get confirmation of a pet friendly room – they need to give you one.

    What happens in the REAL world is that the hotel accepts the reservation and takes the money and never looks at the specific requirements until the person appears at their doorstep wanting the room – then you have the problem which becomes the customer’s problem -

    A Vagabond? Really? Having lived in Socal on and off since 1977 I’ll tell you that the Vagabond chain is at the Motel 6 end of the spectrum – why would anyone want to stay there?

  • LeeAnne

    Wow. Can’t wait to see the results of this poll – if even one person voted “yes”, I will know that the world is soon going to end because there are just too many brainless morons out there. ;-)

    I’m stunned at the responses she received. Are these people for real? How can anyone think she doesn’t deserve her full amount back? There’s just not one speck of logic in those responses.

    Keep doing your magic, Christopher. If any case deserves your full mediation skills, this one does. Don’t let up. And please do let us know what happens.

  • http://www.cutcat.com ChelseaGirl

    Totally unacceptable. She got ripped off and hopefully she hasn’t paid the credit card bill yet; I’d stop wasting time with the Priceline and hotel idiots and dispute it with the credit card vendor.

  • Mike Z

    wow, how much simpler can this be? You book a pet friendly room, you get pet friendly room. If no room is available, you get a refund. There was no asking for an upgrade or anything else, and even if she did ask for an upgrade, it was because her originally booked room was not available. The BBB must have their heads up their butt.

  • barbie45

    Totally unacceptable. I have never used priceline, but have not had any luck with Hotwire or Hotels.com. From now on I am going direct to hotel booking site.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    She should get a full refund of $ 181 plus additional compensation for her troubles.

  • Erika

    As someone who has had the unpleasant experience of sleeping in my own ant infested bed (discovered when I woke up to a distinct “crawling” feeling) I firmly believe that Kate deserves a refund and more. I wonder if it would be possible to force the hotel manager to experience what it’s like to have ants wandering all over you while you’re trying to rest. I’m sure it would change his/her mind about providing additional compensation!

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Joe Farrell – “A Vagabond? Really? Having lived in Socal on and off since 1977 I’ll tell you that the Vagabond chain is at the Motel 6 end of the spectrum – why would anyone want to stay there?”
    - – - – - – - -
    I agree..I have never stay at a Vagabond but I have driven by a few while traveling on business in Southern California…they didn’t look too good.

    I went to Orbtiz and did a quick search for hotels in Glendale, CA that accepts pets. There are 24 hotels in the Glendale-Burbank-Pasadena area. The rates (check-in: Tue, Oct 26, 2010 Check-out: Thu, Oct 28, 2010) ranged from $ 49 per night (a Motel 6) to $ 407 per night (a Hilton). There is a Day Inn at $ 87 (total price including taxes) and Homestead at $ 93 (total price including taxes).

    It is my opinion that the OP could have done a better job by herself than using Pets Vacation – Priceline.

  • noah

    I don’t understand this one at all. She paid for a pet room, which they didn’t have. Either they should have gotten her a room for what she paid, or they should refund her money.

    However, perhaps the explanation here is that they had an available room for the second night, just not the first, which is why they will only refund her money for one night?

  • Eric

    The hotel should give her all her money back.

    She paid for a pet-freindly room. The hotel either over-booked those rooms, or gave her room away to a walk-in, probably for more money, since a walk-in is almost certainly going to pay more.

    The hotel should have walked her to another hotel with pet-freindly accomodations.

    In any case, the hotel failed to provide the room she reserved, so they should immediately refund all her money.

  • Jeanne in NE

    Joe Farrell wrote: “The BBB is an organization of merchants – complaining to them is like complaining to the Airline industry groups when an airline screws you – ”

    You know, I was going to write something like that, but you were far more eloquent. The BBB was utterly worthless when I complained about two of their listed contractors. I should have learned the first time.

    Chris Elliott – would you please post any updates on this story and by what means (if any) Ms. Farrelly gets her money back? Priceline, Petvacations.com, Vagabond or credit card?

  • MVFlyer

    Has anyone looked at Petvacations.com? I just did, and for the Vagabond Inn in Glendale, here’s what it clearly says:

    “Pet Friendly (verified Oct-10)
    Pet Friendly in some rooms ($10 extra per pet per night)charged at time of arrival.”

    So, the $10 fee/pet/night shouldn’t have been a surprise. BUT, if this website implies that you’re booking a pet-friendly hotel, it should also imply you’re booking a pet-friendly room. I think petvacations.com is at fault here–if they book the room, they need to make sure the hotel knows it’s for a pet room, not another. It seems they’re no different than any other booking engine, except they only list hotels that *could* be pet friendly (most hotels limit pets to certain rooms, not the run of the place). This is dirty pool in my book–go get ‘em, Chris!

  • LeeAnne

    Okay, who are the boneheads who voted yes? Please share with us your rationale, because those of us who actually use our brains, can’t see it.

    Looks like a few employees from PetVacations might have stopped by the blog…that’s all I can figure. ;-)

  • http://thirtysomethinggrad.wordpress.com andi330

    I’m not sure if I agree with the no votes or not (and I’m sure I’m going to hear about this comment from others who disagree), and here’s why.

    The customer did not make her reservation through the hotel, but through Pet Vacations. The Pet Vacations site specifically states:

    “Pet Friendly in some rooms ($10 extra per pet per night)charged at time of arrival.”

    This indicates that the Vagabond does not allow pets in every room. Assuming that the reservation is made through Priceline (as the article does) checking the Priceline website for the same motel gives this statement:

    “Upon check-in photo identification and credit card is required. All special requests are subject to availability upon check-in. Special requests cannot be guaranteed and may incur additional charges. ”

    This tells me that Priceline can’t guarantee you a pet-friendly room when they make a reservation for you.

    Now, should the customer have to go to two different websites to get this information? Absolutely not. Should Pet Vacations be implying that when a customer books a room they are guaranteed a pet-friendly option if it’s not guaranteed? Again, no. But this isn’t actually the hotel’s fault, it’s Pet Vacations/Priceline’s error. If anyone should be giving the customer her money back, it’s Pet Vacations.

    But let’s get real here. Priceline doesn’t do special requests, not really. So unless the hotel’s pet friendly information stated that pets were allowed in any room of the hotel, and some of them do, the OP should have placed the reservation directly through the hotel, rather than a Priceline affiliated website.

    If the OP and Chris Elliott want to pursue a refund, they should go after Pet Vacations, not the hotel. The customer should also update the Pet Friendly information on Pet Vacations, so that other pet owners know that booking a room through Pet Vacations will not guarantee them a pet-friendly room.

  • LeeAnne

    @andi330: I’m a little bemused by your saying that you’re not sure if you agree with the “no” votes. Please note that the poll did not specify WHO should give her money back – it simply asked if her compensation of only one night refund is enough.

    You seem to be agreeing she should get all her money back…but disputing which entity should give it back to her. But that’s not what the poll asked. The poll made no mention whatsoever of WHO should give it back to her. It just asked if she’d gotten enough.

    So why would you disagree with the no votes? Methinks you didn’t read the poll correctly.

    I didn’t step into the discussion of who should refund her money. As far as I’m concerned, it doesn’t matter – and she shouldn’t have to decide who to go after. The bottom line is, it’s not her mistake. She had every right to expect to get what she paid for – what she was promised. She didn’t get it. She deserves a full refund.

    As others have mentioned, at this point she should simply file a credit card dispute and let the merchants fight it out.

  • http://thirtysomethinggrad.wordpress.com andi330

    @Leanne

    I said I’m not sure that she should get her money back, because I don’t think she had a reservation that guaranteed her a pet friendly room. Even Pet Vacations said that only a limited number of rooms were pet friendly and that they did not charge you up front for the pet friendly rooms. That indicates that the reservation is simply for a room and not for a pet friendly room. There has to be some buyer beware. In a situation like this where the website isn’t clear about whether you are getting a pet friendly room (and it isn’t, and I personally wouldn’t think that it was even if I hadn’t read this article) you shouldn’t book through a third-party.

    That said, I didn’t vote, so my opinion bears little on whether Chris Elliott should try to get her the remainder of the refund.

  • http://www.cockam.com ajaynejr

    So the hotel refunded half of the two night stay. That would have been fine had the guest stayed for one of the nights.

    Except that the hotel would not let the guest stay at all. So the hotel owes a full refund.

  • Tracy

    I don’t think she should have received anything back. When you’re going to travel or stay in a hotel/motel with your pets you don’t depend on the info you find on a site. What she should have done is looked up prices online then called the hotel to verify their pet policy and that a pet friendly room was available before making the final reservation. She didn’t have to make it through the hotel but could have made it trhough whatever site gave the best rate while she was on the phone with them and provided them with her confirmation # so that they could reserve the correct room for her. A lot of sites are outdated and you should never make a reservation where pets are concerned without callign the location first to verify their policy. Some hotels may say pet friendly but have restrictions as to what size or breed you can have (a lot do not allow cats).