If you’re reading this, you’re probably not home for Christmas

No, you’re stuck at the airport or in a motel, waiting for the winter storm to pass.

The National Weather Service has issued a warning for heavy snow in the mountain counties of North Carolina not bordering Tennessee, the mountains of South Carolina and Georgia, and the North Carolina foothills. Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island are under a winter storm watch. Airlines are proactively canceling flights and waiving cancellation penalties.

Western Europe, which has been battered by winter storms, has it even worse. About 200 people spent the night at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris, which cancelled 400 flights because of snow and ice.

I spent a good part of yesterday fielding calls from reporters who wanted to know what to do if winter weather disrupts your holiday travel plans. Unfortunately, by “travel” they meant “air travel” — and that’s not how must of us are getting home. More than 90 percent of us are driving or taking the train. Or trying.

Do I have any advice for stranded travelers?

No, not really, other than to sit tight, pull out a good book or click on your favorite travel blog, and wait for the weather to pass. Airlines consider blizzards to be an “Act of God” and they aren’t required to do anything under their onerous contracts of carriage. As for motorists, when’s the last time you negotiated a meal voucher from a car that’s stuck in a snow drift?

I do, however, have some interesting holiday reading.

Scanners and lobbyists. The Washington Post published a fascination story yesterday on how influential lobbyists have sweet-talked the government into making misguided investments in whole-body imaging technology. Many scanner companies are also on pace to spend record amounts of money for lobbying this year — $6 million, records show — to rebuff potential problems as some lawmakers push for limits on airport-security practices.

The House, it reports, “stunned the industry” last year by overwhelmingly approving a bill by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) prohibiting the TSA from using body scanners as primary passenger-screening tools at airports.

The vote prompted a frantic scramble by scanner lobbyists to halt the measure in the Senate, according to legislative aides and others familiar with the battle. The effort was bolstered by the failed “underwear bomber” plot last December, which hastened calls for increased scanner use.

Where’s the rest of big media on this story? Apart from a Department of the Obvious “expose” in AOL, which pretty much confirmed the scanners are unsafe, they’ve been asleep at the wheel.

Hello! Anyone home?

Removing shoes is worse that scanning? No one ever accused the mainstream media of brilliant coverage of the TSA scanning issue, but this may represent a new low. CNN reported earlier this week that body scans (and presumably, the threat of a pat-down) aren’t the worst part of airport security. What is? Removing your shoes. Nearly 40 percent of travelers say it’s the the most dissatisfying aspect of their flying experience, according to a survey conducted for the U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit organization lobbying for a trusted-traveler program.

What nonsense. Only 3 percent of air travelers are scanned, according to the TSA, so of the 1,000 people surveyed by U.S. Travel, only a fraction would have likely known that the scans or mandatory pat-downs were worse — which they certainly are. I can’t believe U.S. Travel didn’t clarify that when the reporter called. Too much eggnog at the holiday party, fellas?

Still-anonymous pilot says he’s made air travel “safer.” Anyone who believes the stereotype that all airline pilots are arrogant probably shouldn’t follow the coverage of the whistleblowing Sacramento pilot who videotaped the the security flaws at San Francisco Airport. He’s still anonymous, which I find troubling. And from behind the protective veil of anonymity, he’s made a remarkable claim: that’s his YouTube videos (which have since been deleted) have actually improved airport security. “This might actually stop something that might otherwise have happened this Christmas,” he told a Sacramento TV station.

Who in their right mind would believe the federal government can move that fast? Mr. Anonymous now wants to go to Washington to share his “insights” on security with Congress. Oh, I’ve seen all of this before, and it doesn’t end well. The pilot should just shut up and let his video do the talking.

Kudos to News 10, the Sacramento station that broke this story. They followed up today with a report that says passengers are outraged by the holes in security. But we already knew that.

So that’s all for now. Have a great holiday, and if you’re not home, here’s hoping the weather clears!

  • Alan

    “body scans (and presumably, the threat of a pat-down) aren’t the worst part of airport security. What is? Removing your shoes.”

    I’m with this poll, actually. I would personally rather go through a body scanner than keep going through the shoes-off shuffle every time I pass through an airport. To me, it’s the essence of TSA humiliation. When I’m trying to concentrate on disassembling my belongings into multiple bins and then make multiple trips through the metal detector while trying to keep my high-end laptop in sight, the last thing I want to do is walk around on a dirty floor with shoes in hand.

    Okay, the intrusive feel-ups would be worse still. But remember, folks – those are supposed to be only for the folks who refuse body scanning.

  • Tom

    Taking shoes off is a bummer — you have take them off in a standing position, you have to walk thousands of other shoeless people have walked (hello athlete’s foot), and you have to collect your belongings and shoes and reassemble yourself at the far side. Plus you are exposed to the sometimes nasty sight and smells of other people’s feet.

  • http://naoma@cheerful.com Naoma Foreman

    Taking off shoes at airport: I always have a clean pair of those
    blue booties you get at the airport. Put them on over your
    stocking or socks and then put on your shoes. I know it is
    uncomfortable. But after you walk on filthy floor and go to
    put your shoes back on — toss the blue booties away. I
    refuse to put my feet directly on the floor! I put them on
    before I leave home.

  • cjr

    “those are supposed to be only for the folks who refuse body scanning”

    ‘Supposed to’ and reality are two entirely different things.

    But then, babies are not supposed to be patted down any more either, yet TSA agents are still telling people they will be:
    http://open.salon.com/blog/not_quite_what_i_expected/2010/12/22/the_female_assist

    And remember, TSA never did tell us HOW they would change their groping procedures to deal with children under 12. But at least one agent in that story showed some common sense.

  • http://www.destinationiran.com/articles Iran Travel Blog

    Lucky you having snow falling in your country! We strive for a little drop of rain or some snow to make our winter somewhat cold and also make sure that the next summer there’s not going to be any shortage of water!

    BTW, I agree it’s a good time to sit back and read something or watch something to be inspired for the travel destinations in 2011.

    Rahman Mehraby
    Destination Iran Travel & Tours

  • BucksterSF

    Happy Holidays all – one piece of advice from a traveler: if things go wrong make it an adventure. it’s all about perspective.

  • MaryHelen Maupin aka mannersgal

    Hi, ya’ll!

    Merriest of Christmases from Tennessee where we have the first White Christmas in 17 years. . .here’s to Happy Trails to all in 2011 from MHM Travel. . .

  • Sommer Gentry

    Alan says: “Okay, the intrusive feel-ups would be worse still. But remember, folks – those are supposed to be only for the folks who refuse body scanning.”

    This is absolutely not true. Here are some categories of people who always get intrusive feelups: people in wheelchairs, people with pacemakers, insulin pumps, ostomies, people wearing turbans or who have medical metal, prostheses, and more.

    Here are some more senseless reasons that the TSA inflicts its senseless physical abuse: wearing “bulky” clothes (see strip search of the little boy in Salt Lake City), wearing a sari (see unjustifiable patdown of the Indian Ambassador to the United States in MS), being a menstruating woman (see the GladRags blog), leaving a kleenex in your pocket through the scanner, having an enlarged testicle (see Drinker Biddle and Reath lawsuit), having a baby in your arms (see Erin Chase’s story), and, as you well know, for no reason at all because gosh they can’t be all predictable and follow rules and stuff if they’re tryina katch a terrrrrorrrist and all.

    What effect does this physical violence against our bodies have? For some, this is just an annoyance. But for some, this is a truly heartbreaking and traumatic experience:
    “What ultimately happened is that I was subjected to search so invasive that I was left crying and dealing with memories that I thought had been dealt with years ago of prior sexual assualts. Why? Because of my flannel panty-liner.”

    Stop the TSA. They are breaking child pornography and sexual battery laws. They are traumatizing innocent travelers. They are damaging the airline industry, wasting your tax dollars on this boondoggle, and conditioning the American people to accept that it as normal that the government would demand to see us all naked and touch our genitals. Don’t fly. Demand change.

  • Meg

    Chris, do you really not have anything to say or comment on about the lack of preparedness of BAA at Heathrow airport? They boasted they were ready for weather but when the time came, they failed. Gatwick, a smaller airport, has more snow removal equipment than Heathrow. Where is the responsibility of one of the world’s largest airports to not shut down for 3 days following a storm when other airports in the area are running?

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Meg, there’s no excuse for what’s happened at Heathrow. I could write a whole separate post about that. If you were stuck there, I’m very sorry.