How to win the car rental claim game


Tim Carpenter thought he had done everything he could to avoid a frivolous damage claim on his rental minvan.

He took pictures of his vehicle before he picked it up and after he returned it. He noted every pre-existing scratch and dent in the paperwork.

But he thought wrong.

An Alamo representative at Orlando International Airport informed him that “none of that mattered” when he brought the minivan back and that his vehicle, which had a small scratch on the rear bumper, would be processed by the company’s claims department.

“Three weeks later a series of claim letters started arriving in the mail, demanding payment of over $750,” says Carpenter, who works for a federal agency in Oklahoma City. “When I questioned the damage amount, based on the amount of damage that was noted, I was told that the entire rear bumper had to be replaced. And there was ‘loss of use’ associated with that. I asked for documentation of the repair, but was told that was ‘company property’.”

Carpenter’s story is hardly unique. Try as hard as motorists might, more of them are getting dinged by the dreaded car rental damage scheme. Although there are no reliable statistics on the number of these claims, a recent reader poll found that just over half of respondents believe car rental companies are pursuing every claim, no matter how small, with greater fervor. An almost equal number say the claim game is being played the same as it always has been.

Alamo eventually dropped its claim, but only after Carpenter forwarded his photos to the company, along with an email promising he would file a complaint with the insurance commissioners in Florida and Oklahoma alleging insurance fraud. Alamo also apologized for the incident and sent him a free coupon for a weekend rental after he posted his story on my site.

I think it’s important to acknowledge the car rental industry’s side of this issue. When a car, truck or minivan is damaged, the company has every right to ask the customer or its insurance company to pay for the damages. If you didn’t buy the optional insurance from the rental company, and you harmed the vehicle, you need to make things right.

But customers argue that many of the damages for which they’re being dinged are minor – tiny chips, dents or scratches that, on any other car would be considered normal wear and tear. They’re also turned off by what they see as a racket to sell optional (and to the car rental companies, highly lucrative) insurance coverage. What’s more, they regard the “no claim left behind” philosophy as nothing more than an effort to profit from inevitable damage that comes with using a car – not unlike a hotel charging its guests for wearing out a carpet or burning out light bulbs.

I can certainly see both sides of this argument. If you damage a rental car, you should certainly pay up. But going after motorists for little scratches and adding hefty – and highly theoretical – “loss of use” surcharges, crosses a line. There are ways to push back, though.

Take video of the vehicle – before and after. Many phones now have the ability to take a high-definition video with the flip of a button. This is the time to use it. (If your phone can’t record videos, then at least take picture.) Liz Brown credits the images of her SUV rented in Honolulu for saving her from an expensive damage claim. A rental associate had “forgotten” to record pre-existing damage to a bumper on the paperwork, and her pictures made the claim go away — eventually. “The car was already a piece of junk,” she says. “The damage claim was a waste of time and energy.”

Get the “all clear” when you return the car. Give yourself a few extra minutes when you return your wheels. Ask an associate to inspect the car and ask for a sign-off in writing. “I always wait for the on-site contract closeout,” says Steve McEvoy, a consultant based in Little Falls, NJ, who rents dozens of cars a year. With written proof that the vehicle was returned in satisfactory condition, making a claim is far more difficult than if you simply slip the keys in a drop box.

Ask for documentation. A car rental company needs to substantiate any damage to the vehicle. That includes time-stamped photos that show the damage to your car the day you returned it, and repair invoices that note the model, make and license plate. Ro Spinelli, a researcher and occasional car renter, looks for other signs that the car rental company is being honest, such as a pre-repair damage estimate. “It may be eye-opening to see what other appraisals are,” she says. I have yet to see an appraisal among the claim documents, unfortunately.

Discard the “loss of use”. One real gotcha during this process is “loss of use” since it is almost never based in reality. Rather, it’s a theoretical number that assumes the car would have been rented while it was being repaired. And that’s not necessarily a valid assumption. In order for such a claim to be on the up-and-up, a car rental company would have to prove the vehicle would have been rented while it was being repaired, which can be exceedingly difficult.

Get the authorities involved. A polite but firm response to the car rental company’s claims department, with copies to the insurance commissioner in the state in which you rented the car, sends a clear message: If you don’t drop this frivolous claim, I’ll appeal my case to a higher authority. That’s what Nathan Smalley did when he was asked to pay $870 for damage neither he nor the car rental company associate could see when he returned his Enterprise vehicle in Arizona. “The pictures essentially showed nothing,” he says. “Absolutely nothing.” In his correspondence with the company, he disputed the claim, threatened to contact a lawyer, and copied the state’s insurance commissioner. That seemed to work. Enterprise dropped its claim.

By keeping meticulous records, requesting a car rental company’s repair paperwork, focusing on the actual damages and notifying the authorities when necessary, you can ensure you’ll only have to pay for what you wrecked.

A word of warning to anyone considering using these strategies to avoid paying for honest damages: If you abuse these tips, you’re no better than the car rental companies who are trying to make money from normal wear and tear. For what it’s worth, I think most people who rent a car and damage it want to do the right thing.

The bottom line is that no one – not the car rental company, not you – should be able to profit from a fender-bender.

(Photo: neop orcupine/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Tom

    What you described is thievery. If Alamo is consistently behaving like this, the guys best bet would bring a suit either for insurance fraud or for racketeering under the RICO laws. With so many lawyers looking for work and Alamo’s deep pockets, the Carpenters could soon be building their dream house.

  • BillC

    The car rental companies know that enough people will just pay up without question that it makes it worth their while to go after every claim that they can.

    Keeping meticulous records is the only way to avoid these charges.

  • Bruce

    I had many bad experiences with Alamo, including one incident not very different from this one. Eventually, I made the obvious decision to simply stop doing business with them. hertz has never tried anything funny with me, and I rent dozens of cars a year.

  • Geldhart

    We rented a car from Budget at LAX and it was so full of scratches and dings that we were there about 40 minutes documenting them all with the video camera, along with a voice over. The sheet showed a few things here and there.

    No employee came out with us.

    I’m holding the video for about a year on my online backup if they ever come back to me. That was mid – February, so we will see.

  • Robert Davis

    We usually rent with Dollar (no problems) but we photograph every square inch of the vehicle and close-ups of any damage regardless of how small. I then mark it on the sheet Dollar gives you and take it back in. This usually adds about 10 minutes to the transaction but I’ve never been hit for repairs.

  • Lila

    Why did I decide to take the insurance for a one day rental last week? I do not know but am glad I did. When we “inspected” the car, it was in a downpour and neither of us saw the windshield chip – nor could we have been expected to in that rainstorm. It was certainly worth my $18.

  • Tim@OKC

    Now along with the “ding and dent” scam, comes the “mechanical repair” money maker. I returned a rental vehicle due to a mechancal issue with the vehicle (wouldn’t start/towed in by rental company) and received a replacement. 2 weeks later I got a call from the claims department wanting to verify that the rental period had been “official Government Travel”, which it was. I was then informed that since it was, the Government rental coverage included insurance to cover the cost of the repairs. When I questioned what would have happened if I had been on leisure travel, I was told that “the renter is responsible for any mechanical issues, and associated costs to repair them, that occur while renting the vehicle”. THAT made my hair stand up! Anyone else come across a similar situation?

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    IF it is possible, avoid dealing with a rental car location that is a franchisee. The problems can occur at corporate locations but it seems that problems are prevalent at franchisee locations.

  • Ames

    Tim@OKC – Which rental company was that? Totally unfair, how could a renter possible know what condition the car was in? If there was some sort of deliberate mechanical damage ok, but a simple lack of maintenance or worn out something or other, no way! There was a column about this issue in the last few weeks.

  • Heather

    @ Tim

    Not the exact same thing, but similar. Years ago my family and I rented a car for a trip since ours was in for repairs. Halfway through the trip black smoke started coming out of the exhaust and we smelled burning so we pulled over and called the company. We ended up exchanging the car, but they tried to charge us when we finally returned a different car than we had taken out. Our response: “you’re welcome to take us to court, but you gave us a faulty vehicle so we’re not paying extra” They dropped the charges.

  • Jeff

    I always mark the damage sheet pretty thoroughly before I take the vehicle. In the future, photos/video will be part of that routine.

    It makes me wonder, though…of those car rentals that have the additional insurance purchased, how many dents and dings are repaired under those policies?

  • MarkieA

    Tim@OKC

    What they TELL you is your responsibility and what is ACTUALLY your responsibility may be two different things. Sure, they’ll try to get you to pay for mechanical defects, but I think any resistance from the renter would prompt them to drop the claim. There’s just no way I’m gonna pay for, say, engine damamge done because the oil level was low. It’s not the renter’s responsibility to make sure the car is well-maintained and in good mechanical condition. Any attempt to foist this responsibility on the renter would, I think, fall flat in any official jurisdiction.

  • L2Y2

    Chris, thanks to your articles about the high instances of car rental companies trying to pass off damages to clients, I now note every single ding, dent, and scratch when I pick up a car. On a recent trip to Las Vegas, we were given a car from Avis with 22,000 miles on it. It had numerous dings, dents and scratches and I had the agent note every single one of them. When I got inside the car it reeked from long-term cigarette smoke use (it was a non smoking car) and had numerous stains on the upholstery. I had her note it all. If I hadn’t been renting it only for a day and had more time, I would have required them to give me another car. Your recommendation to take pictures with my cell phone is a great idea and I will now do that, as well. Thank you!

  • sweepergrl

    I know there are several lawyers that read this site and I’ll very interested to see what they think about the legality of this. This is a prevalent issue and it seems 80% of these ‘claims’ (give or take) are completely bogus. They are responsible for normal wear and tear as well as mechanical upkeep. Wouldn’t this qualify for some sort of lawsuit/class action because there are so many people that are hit by this? It seems like theft to me. Just my two cents.

  • Aaron

    >When a car, truck or minivan is damaged, the company has every right to ask the customer or its insurance company to pay for the damages.

    I’m not so sure this is the case.

    First, It’s one thing if you get into an accident in the car that was your fault. If you don’t have insurance, and if your insurance won’t cover, you have an obligation to pay for the damage, just as you would with your own car.

    But minor scratches and scuffs could be considered the cost of doing business. If you rent a car to tourists in New York City, it’s reasonable to assume that someone might “kiss” the bumper when the car is parked or ding the doors in a parking lot. An owner could exercise reasonable care and still have those things happen.

    Second, if rental car companies are indeed pursuing all these claims, then the cars we rent should be perfect. And yet the cars we rent are often *covered* with dings, dents and scratches. So what are they doing with the money they collect for damage waivers or repair claims? Clearly, they aren’t repairing the cars.

    The last time I rented a car, my “damage waiver” wasn’t actually a waiver – it limited me to $500 worth of damage. So they could have come after me for a $300 scratch claim. (Which of the car’s 20+ scratches and scuffs would they have picked?)

    It might be time for the gov’t to look a little closer at what’s going on here. With all these claims made, and so many damaged rental cars, I think the rental car companies are flirting with fraud.

    For my part, I avoid vacations that require renting a car for this very reason. If the rental car companies weren’t acting like vultures, they would be making a lot more money off of me.

  • Steve

    I really hate to suggest that the government get involved, but maybe it’s time for some legislation to lay out what rental car companies can and cannot charge for. Mechanical problems that aren’t caused by driver negligence should be ruled out, no question. And charging for normal wear and tear is equally absurd (though in that case, there would need to be some kind of objective definition of what constitutes normal wear and tear).

    It’s interesting because I just had a rental car for several days for a business trip – it was almost new (8,000 miles on the odometer) but had a number of small scratches on the rear bumper already. I wondered if a previous renter had been charged for the “damage” – if so, they were being scammed since the rental company apparently had no intention of fixing them.

    I rent for personal trips infrequently (once or twice a year at most) and I always take the collision damage waiver…in part because I’m not sure that I’d be fully covered by my insurance/the insurance provided by my credit card, and in part to avoid the hassle of dealing with frivolous claims from the rental car company. It stinks to feel like I have to do that to protect myself, but it is what it is.

  • Les

    I, too, am interested in knowing which company attempted ding @Tim for the mechanical failure of its vehicle. Unless the problem came from an obvious error by the renter (leaving the lights on, for example), I’d think the company could be held negligent for providing defective merchandise.

    That, at least, would be my initial response.

  • Ed

    I’ve had horror stories with Alamo as well and I will *NEVER* again use them! I tried them all, National, Dollar, Hertz, Avis…and other than Avis, they all disappointed me. So now, I use Avis. But I’m going to be trying something different when I go to Hawaii in June…I’m going to try a local Hawaiian car rental company (want to contribute to the economy of the island, not a multinational company) They also have some really nice older cars that I want to drive!
    Being that I only have liability insurance on all my cars, I’ve always relied on my credit cards to cover any damage to rental cars…I recently upgraded my Costco American Express card and one of the features they offer on the card is that for $19.00 total, they will completely cover any damage and loss of rental for any rental car you rent using their card, regardless of how many time you rent…but each rental must be under 42 days in length. The instructions for this service clearly state that you MUST decline all insurance offered by the rental company for their system to cover your rental.
    Well, this is a no-brainer in my book! 19 bucks covers up to 42 days per rental? What’s not to like?

  • carver

    This article explains what to do if you are being fraudulently charged. But it is silent as to whether these charges are on the rise or not.

  • Clare

    Chris, thank you for all this information.

    But what does one do if this happens overseas? I had a horrific experience in Ireland with Hertz some years back. Apparently I had rubbed the bumper on something (or someone had rubbed me) and got some white paint on it–it needed a bit of rubbing compound and a rag to “fix” it. The Hertz agent at the airport got excited like a lottery-winner at the sight of “damage,” and by the end of our conversation was screaming at me (honest!).

    Rather than engage him, I thought it was more constructive AND safer for me to go into the airport and get hold of a more central-office sort of person… wrong. She told me “not to worry about it” and wait until I got home. (Sounds like your recent post about the gal who was given false info in the airport, no? I did what I was told, and what I was told was wrong.)

    I discovered when I got home that (a) Irish rental-car agencies are so infamous for fraud that Visa, which normally has automatic rental-car insurance, refuses to cover claims from both the Republic of Ireland AND No. Ireland. (Should’ve checked this in advance, but who would have guessed it? I didn’t buy the add’l insurance because I assumed I was covered through Visa.) Mastercard, on the other hand, evidently pays all these claims up to $600, and the Hertz agent kept assuming, when he wasn’t screaming, that I had used Mastercard.

    Long story short, eventually I got a charge for unspecified “damage” and “repairs” and “supplies”… for $600. How convenient! Obviously, they assume people won’t fight it because they’ll pass the buck to their ccard co.

    But I DID fight it. Called travel agent, Hertz, Visa, you name it; I ended up on the phone to the Irish Embassy, who helped me take it to some EU consumer protection office… and the scum at Hertz in Dublin simply refused to cooperate with them. So the EU folks apologetically said that my only recourse was to go to Ireland (like I was going to do that?) and sue them in court.

    So I got burned. And I can’t possibly be the only one! Was there an avenue that I should have tried and didn’t?

  • Joe Farrell

    Anyone can claim anything from you – once they get a problem with a car – they probably fix everything – and send you the bill. After all – they’ll try to tell you that they need to paint the whole car and not just the fender – because when the fender is shiny and new the rest of car a scratched up mess they will know that they can’t sell the car as undamaged because its clear it was . . . there are soooo many efforts to part you from your money –

    A rental company coming after you for damages is a creditor – they MUST follow the Fair Credit Billing and Collection Act. But rarely do – and that is how most of them get caught – Dillinger got caught for tax evasion and not being a criminal.

    If ANYONE gets a ding from a car rental company you must

    1) Inform them you are not liable for their damage until they prove it

    2) You invoke ALL rights under the Fair Credit Billing and Collection Act

    3) As for proof of all damages – include receipts, estimates from threee repair shops, video/audio/photographic or documentary evidence of the condition of the vehicle before and after the rental.

    4) The identity of the last three renters – so you can ask them about the condition of the vehicle

    that should be the last you will hear from them unless you truly damaged the vehicle in a significant manner -

  • Ed

    @Joe Farrell
    I like your 4 step solution to this problem, but like what the OP stated in his missive above, the company can pull the “proprietary information” card:
    “I asked for documentation of the repair, but was told that was ‘company property’.””
    Then you’re screwed and have to subpoena their records, which may take quite a bit of doing if they are international!

  • Lauri

    I was involved in an incident (long story) but when Budget sent a collection agency after me when my insurance denied it. I had my claims adjuster call them and point out that they weren’t within their legal rights to continue to pursue me. Now I just need to figure out what to do if you get involved in an accident during a snow emergency when the police won’t come because the cars are driveable.

  • MarkieA

    @Joe Farrell

    So, is it the rental car company’s responsibility to follow these rules, and if they don’t, they get nothing? Or can they circumvent the rules and make your life miserable? In other words, do the rules have any bite to them?
    And BTW, Dillinger got caught by a hailstotm of bullets; he was never caught. Al Capone was “caught” by the IRS.

  • http://www.autoslash.com Jonathan

    Great advice from Chris in this column. For some more idea on avoiding bogus car rental claims, you can check out the following article:

    http://www.autoslash.com/blog-and-tips/posts/avoid-bogus-car-rental-damage-charges-with-your-camera-phone

  • blwaite

    I think it has probably been 10 years since I have rented a car, and I used to be a Hertz No. 1 Gold member. (I have always refused to rent a car in Europe.) Nowadays, to avoid these rip-offs, I have learned to rely upon airport shuttle / rail services, taxis, hotel shuttles, and local guides. If you adopt the attitude that you will simply NOT rent a car, you’ll be surprised how many reasonable alternatives surface. The cost of rental cars has made taxis competitive, and avoiding the hassles of attempted rip-offs make other alternatives more acceptable. This is true even of locations which are not walker-friendly.

    For example, we had always heard in Ireland you have to rent a car. Not true. We relied upon small, local guide services in mini-vans. We got not only economical transportation but expert guidance, too.

    Consumers need to do more protesting with their wallets, as in keeping them closed.

  • Burn

    It is wise to include local newspaper front page (showing date) on all photographs to prove when pictures were taken.

  • Joe Farrell

    Well, my comments about the law obviously only apply to US rentals. Once you invoke FCBCA they cannot charge your card. Which sometimes is what they do. If you involve your insurance company your own carrier never pays for loss of use. Mainly because it’s a bs claim for damages from a business whose inventory is mobile!

  • DaveS

    I think the suggestion they are using this is a wedge to get you to buy the overpriced collision damage waiver is right on target, and some people obviously pay for that simply for the “peace of mind”, even though they don’t need to. I too was targeted for one of these bogus charges, this time with Enterprise. When I adamantly refused to admit a scratch occurred to during my rental and would take every legal measure not to pay, they went back to their computer and, what do you know, they found the scratch had “already been recorded and someone forgot to note it.” Really?

    Though I occasionally must rent a vehicle because of my work, I try very hard not to. I’ve cut out at least 80% of my car rentals over the last couple of years. Public transportation, a series of taxis, or getting a ride from a friend or associate are all possibilities sometimes. Don’t the rental companies see that the games they play, while they may bring in some short-term revenue, are very harmful to their reputations and future business? I am sorry to have to have an adversarial relationship with a whole industry, but that seems to be what they want.

  • http://www.facebook.com/aybars.turan Aybars Turan

    Here is my Issue with ZIPCAR. It;s been a nightmare for me .

    http://shameonyouzipcar.blogspot.com/

    and my facebook group page

    http://www.facebook.com/groups/157453310978961

    I need support

  • Rff6035

    I am in the middle of a fight with the Budget Franchise at the Harrisburg Airport over a damage claim of $500. They claim they showed me aa inspection form prior to my rental showing no damage and the car was damaged upon return. They did NOT show me this form and I have not seen it at other Budget facilties. They have turned the claim over to a collection agency! We did not damage the car, so watch out for Budget at Harrisburg Airport!!

  • http://twitter.com/3pages Diane Sherlock

    I wish I’d read this before a recent trip to Chicago. I rented from Enterprise. The woman rushed me through the “inspection” but more significantly, the car was covered in water drops – there was no way to see the small dent that they are now trying to get me for. NEVER ACCEPT A WET CAR! I was a customer of theirs for the past 15 years – never again and from now on, will take photos before and after. What a pain to avoid their thievery.

  • Pen Thoughts

    I wish I’d read this before a recent trip to Chicago. I rented from Enterprise. The woman rushed me through the “inspection” but more significantly, the car was covered in water drops – there was no way to see the small dent that they are now trying to get me for. NEVER ACCEPT A WET CAR! I was a customer of theirs for the past 15 years – never again -and from now on, will take photos before and after. What a pain to avoid their thievery.