Full text of SD 1544-09-06 authorizing pat-downs, physical inspections

Since the government has been unresponsive to my requests to clarify its new security measures, I thought it would be best to publish the security directive in its entirety.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration

Aviation Security Directive

Subject: Security Directive
Number: SD 1544-09-06
Date: December 25, 2009

EXPIRATION: 0200Z on December 30, 2009

This Security Directive (SD) must be implemented immediately. The measures contained in this SD are in addition to all other SDs currently in effect for your operations.

INFORMATION: On December 25, 2009, a terrorist attack was attempted against a flight traveling to the United States. TSA has identified security measures to be implemented by airports, aircraft operators, and foreign air carriers to mitigate potential threats to flights.

APPLICABILITY: THIS SD APPLIES TO AIRCRAFT OPERATORS THAT CARRY OUT A SECURITY PROGRAM REGULATED UNDER 49 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR)1544.101(a).

ACTIONS REQUIRED: If you conduct scheduled and/or public charter flight operations under a Full Program under 49 CFR 1544.101(a) departing from any foreign location to the United States (including its territories and possessions), you must immediately implement all measures in this SD for each such flight.

1. BOARDING GATE

1. The aircraft operator or authorized air carrier representative must ensure all passengers are screened at the boarding gate during the boarding process using the following procedures. These procedures are in addition to the screening of all passengers at the screening checkpoint.

1. Perform thorough pat-down of all passengers at boarding gate prior to boarding, concentrating on upper legs and torso.
2. Physically inspect 100 percent of all passenger accessible property at the boarding gate prior to boarding, with focus on syringes being transported along with powders and/or liquids.
3. Ensure the liquids, aerosols, and gels restrictions are strictly adhered to in accordance with SD 1544-06-02E.

2. During the boarding process, the air carrier may exempt passengers who are Heads of State or Heads of Government from the measures outlined in Section I.A. of this SD, including the following who are traveling with the Head of State or Head of Government:

1. Spouse and children, or
2. One other individual (chosen by the Head of State or Head of Government)

3. For the purposes of Section I.B., the following definitions apply:

1. Head of State: An individual serving as the chief public representative of a monarchic or republican nation-state, federation, commonwealth, or any other political state (for example, King, Queen, and President).

2. Head of Government: The chief officer of the executive branch of a government presiding over a cabinet (for example, Prime Minister, Premier, President, and Monarch).

2. IN FLIGHT

1. During flight, the aircraft operator must ensure that the following procedures are followed:

1. Passengers must remain in seats beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.
2. Passenger access to carry-on baggage is prohibited beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.
3. Disable aircraft-integrated passenger communications systems and services (phone, internet access services, live television programming, global positioning systems) prior to boarding and during all phases of flight.
4. While over U.S. airspace, flight crew may not make any announcement to passengers concerning flight path or position over cities or landmarks.
5. Passengers may not have any blankets, pillows, or personal belongings on the lap beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.

AIRCRAFT OPERATOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The aircraft operator must immediately provide written confirmation to its assigned PSI indicating receipt of this SD.

AIRCRAFT OPERATOR dissemination required: The aircraft operator must immediately pass the information and directives set forth in this SD to all stations affected, and provide written confirmation to its PSI, indicating that all stations affected have acknowledged receipt of the information and directives set forth in this SD. The aircraft operator must disseminate this information to its senior management personnel, ground security coordinators, and supervisory security personnel at all affected locations. All aircraft operator personnel implementing this SD must be briefed by the aircraft operator on its content and the restrictions governing dissemination. No other dissemination may be made without prior approval of the Assistant Secretary for the Transportation Security Administration. Unauthorized dissemination of this document or information contained herein is prohibited by 49 CFR Part 1520 (see 69 Fed. Reg. 28066 (May 18, 2004).

APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE MEASURES: With respect to the provisions of this SD, as stated in 49 CFR 1544.305(d), the aircraft operator may submit in writing to its PSI proposed alternative measures and the basis for submitting the alternative measures for approval by the Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector Network Management. The aircraft operator must immediately notify its PSI whenever any procedure in this SD cannot be carried out by a government authority charged with performing security procedures.

FOR TSA ACTION ONLY: The TSA must issue this SD immediately to the corporate security element of all affected U.S. aircraft operators.

FOR STATE DEPARTMENT: Retransmittal to appropriate foreign posts is authorized. Post must refer to STATE 162917, 201826Z Sep 01, Subject: FAA Security Directives and Information Circulars: Definitions and Handling, for specific guidance and dissemination.

Gale Rossides
Acting Administrator

(Photo: aka_zoe/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • http://www.singleparenttravel.com John W. Frenaye

    Once again knee jerk. They are looking for legs and torso, but arms are OK. Looking for syringes but probably will let a baby bottle go.

  • http://www.alaskatravelgram.com Scott McMurren

    The TSA is FUBAR. FAIL FAIL FAIL.

  • Steve Surjaputra

    When I left for LAX this morning on Virgin America, I saw two TSA officers at the gate, but they let a few of us go without patdowns. Maybe they’re looking for certain characteristics or what people are bringing on board.

  • Aaron

    Steve, according to the directive you should not have had to be pat down, though I suppose some consider JFK to be a foreign location.

  • Eunice

    What are they going to do about babies and young kids? If you have a lap child? What if your young child needs to go to the bathroom. I know I can’t tell my 3 yr old to hold it for an hour. And if my 1 yr old does #2, there is no way I’m going to let him sit in it for an hour because he will jump up and down on his diaper and smear it all over himself and me! I am dreading my return on Jan 1. And why does it expire on Dec 30? Wouldn’t New Year’s Eve and New Year’s also be a good day to blow up Americans?

  • Bill

    No word on what’s being done to correct the absolute stupidity about being warned by the perpetrator’s father and doing nothing about it. The person or persons responsible for doing nothing about this should be either fired or jailed for their absolute incompetence.

    Most of these rules make me think of someone who is in a tantrum because they can’t think of how to solve a problem, so they do a bunch of things to make it look like they are doing something about it.

    A review of American visa policies is in order, since they seem to give visas to pretty much all of the terrorists.

  • MichaelM

    “Good morning folks….this is your captain. We are now flying over…..uh……someplace….uh……well, it’s a big country you’ve all heard of, but they’ve gone kinda bonkers lately, so just look out the window and see if you can figure it out for yourselves.”

  • Frank Palmer

    Unauthorized dissemination of this document or information contained herein is prohibited by 49 CFR Part 1520 (see 69 Fed. Reg. 28066 (May 18, 2004).

    Hey where did you get this from Chris?? I hope the goons at TSA don’t show up at your house. ha ha

    I agree that this is an over reaction as always. Next thing you know we will all have to either get the body scan or a full strip search including anal probe just to fly. There has to be a better answer to all of this.

  • marsjanco

    BBC were actually reporting yesterday and Friday night that he had the chemicals sewn into his underwear in Yemen.. How long til they give us all paper to wear to ensure no chemicals are brought in through clothes….

  • Carver

    Seems generally silly to me. But then most TSA procedures seems silly, most notably the rule that says I can have 3.5 oz containers, but not one 7 oz container.

  • Sam Petersen

    Not only that, but I swear I read somewhere this numbskull was on the watch list. So they’ll stop kids from flying because their name is similar, they’ll even hassle senators, but they won’t stop the actual terrorists?

    Pretty soon they’ll have us flying naked with no luggage whatsoever.

  • Eric

    @ Eunice

    I see another problem regarding children.

    The way this reads, unless a kid is traveling with a head of state, they get a pat-down, too. I have a real problem with patting down children. If some screener started patting down my daughter, I’d get VERY upset. And if that screener were male, I’d cave his teeth in.

  • Aimee

    Can you imagine what the last hour of the flight would be like? “I know you’ve been flying for 14 hours now, but make sure you spend your last hour with nothing to do except stare at the seat in front of you. It will put you in a great mood for when your luggage doesn’t show up. And if you need to go to the bathroom, be prepared to pay for it with prison time and the lifelong label of terrorist.”
    And I thought RyanAir was bad. Good thing the TSA is here to protect us from a slightly bearable flight. What would we do if we weren’t needlessly miserable while we were flying?

  • marsjanco

    @ Eric…

    I have flown quite a few times form LON to NYC with my son- in London his entire stroller and tiny little person is completely patted down already.. infact, because my bra has metal hooks so was I!
    I cannot believe they pat down in LON all these families, yet dont pat down single men with with names like muhammed/ utamallah etc…

    When I complained at the time, they told me that ‘you never know who was asked to bring something or slipped somehting they didnt know about’. They credit most of us with zero intellect, and in fact when I wrote a letter to BAA (TSA’s even dumber UK equivalent) the amount of sheer crap and excuses tey wrote back to me was insane.

    One has to ask whether anyone has completed a vulnerability assessment or emergency plan on airports, because as someone in that field it doent seem like they have, and if they have it looks like a terrible job was done.

  • Joe Farrell

    TSA has finally gone off the deep end.

    Instead of this insanity – how about explosive sniffing dogs? They work for free, need only food and a little loving, and the occasional walk. thousands of times more effective than machines.

  • John

    Interesting … lots of complaining but no one can come up with something TSA could do to stop this kind of attack in the future. Especially since Chris’s friends at ConsumerTraveler worked to ban the one piece of equipment that is designed to find this (full body scanner).
    So either propose a different solution or be quiet.

  • Carrie Charney

    A friend was on a JFK to LAX flight yesterday and it was business as usual, including not stowing anything till start of descent a half hour before landing.
    There is nothing we can do to be 100 per cent certain of preventing any kind of catastrophe. Israel has had a modicum of success in the way they do security, and they certainly know how to do it more thoroughly, but pleasantly than anyone!

  • frostysnowman

    I flew home from my Christmas trip yesterday (out of Atlantic City, NJ, a very small airport) and my 4 year old was patted down, but not me, nor my spouse, nor my 10 year old. My 4 year old was wearing a slightly A-line dress with a wider skirt (suitable for the twirling that four-year-old girls like to do). The TSA did ask my spouse for permission before the pat-down, but I hadn’t heard them. But could my spouse have said no? I think not. When I questioned the reason for patting down a 4 year old, I was told that “We pat down all passenges from age 4 to 104 in loose fitting clothing, so that everyone can arrive safely at their destinations”. Huh?

  • http://www.fred-hart.co.uk Fred Hart

    @Eric

    As I understand it, it has to be someone of the same gender who does the searching.

  • Doug

    It’s hard for me to imagine how disabling the in-flight map system, as well as all potential communications with the ground, will enhance security unless somebody thinks that a terrorist would decide against an attack on a U.S.-bound aircraft just because he couldn’t determine the exact position of the aircraft when he attempted his attack. A blown-up plane is a blown-up plane. Fifteen minutes before landing in Houston, if land is visible out the window, I wonder which country the plane is above. The map system happens to be one of my favorite pastimes on long flights.

    I am completely in favor of better security, such as the body-scan imaging systems, but I oppose rules that reduce everyone else’s quality of life and travel enjoyment without providing a tangible security benefit.

  • Sara

    I flew from JAX to CVG on Saturday 12/26 and noticed absolutely no more security and screening than normal. I ended up with a long delay and then canceled flight that night trying to continue onto JFK and spent the night in the airport. Not one person challenged me as I was stretched out dozing or wandering the baggage claim & ticket counter area at 4 am. I was one of the first three or four people through security that morning at around 4:30 am and still very little scrutiny.

  • Liz

    I’m not sure why TSA hasn’t brought in the Israeli experts for training. Whatever they’re doing at Tel Aviv is obviously working.

  • Jennifer

    First of all, the draconian measures are supposed to be applicable to flights originating out of the U.S. only. See, “departing from any foreign location to the United States (including its territories and possessions)…” If you were hit with problems on a domestic flight, it was most likely due to an over-zealous flight crew.

    Hopefully, these rules will be relaxed or we’ll end up with more problems like the poor guy who had food poisoning. How are children going to sit still for an hour while their teddy bears are taken away? The keys to security are dogs, expanded use of explosive sniffers, not the use of WBI or soon, we’ll have to wear diapers and submit to cavity checks. There is absolutely no way to 100% prevent what happened on this flight but in the end, the other pax handled it correctly and is what I would expect the next time this happens (God forbid). The most important lesson to come out of 9/11 was that you no longer cooperate with hijackers. That, and reinforced cockpit doors.

  • Sarah

    Yes, because a flight attendant telling someone that intends to blow up a plane that they can’t leave their seat is going to stop them from getting up and blowing up the plane. The only real solution is to figure out how to stop them from getting on the plane in the first place and detecting the explosives or weapons. Once they are on the plane, they aren’t going to care what the inflight restrictions or that they don’t know where they are. If someone knows that the plane is going from point A to point B and that the flight takes XX hours, they can figure out the timing, approximately where they are, and when they are beginning to descend. It doesn’t take a Mensa candidate to figure that out.

  • Joe Farrell

    Looks like the SD has been revoked and replaced with a voluntary order.

    So, what happened was that the senior bureaucrats were all off for the weekend and the holiday. The second and third stringers got together and came up with a response that was so lame even the press figured out it would accomplish very little. The adults returned on Monday am, got together, listening to the morning news shows, saw they were being mocked and ridiculed, and thereupon changed the response to one that makes sense.

    Once they admitted the system did not work properly – there was no reason to punish anyone else.

  • Jennifer

    I hope you’re right, Joe, but I fear that this will lead to FAs making up their own rules, domestic and international. They do this now with the previous 30 minute rule into DCA. I will wait and see. I am dreading my upcoming trip to China. 13 hours and no IFE or laptops? I will literally go insane.

  • Lisa

    START PROFILING NOW! I’m sorry but if you’re a muslim or have an Arabic or Middle Eastern name or are a woman wearing a burqa and/or with a baby then you deserve an extra look. The time for political correctness is FAR gone. It’s time to be AMERICA, take the gloves off and start slamming and jamming these jerkoffs, no matter what country they are coming in from.

  • LeeAnne

    @Lisa – I’m with you. Patting down 4-yr-olds in twirly skirts and middle-aged women in underwire bras (that’s me I’m referring to ;-) ) while allowing Muslim extremists on terrorist watch lists to waltz onboard unhindered is just the height of absurdity.

    I was flying home from Ecuador a few weeks ago. In line behind us were several rather shady-looking (at least in my eyes) males traveling alone. Who got picked out of the line by security to be taken out of the area for a detailed search and pat-down? Me (a 49-yr-old woman) and another 60-yr-old woman in my group. We were the ONLY ones who were “randomly” selected.

    We were brought outside, down some metal stairs, and out to the tarmac, where we had to point out our luggage. They put our bags up on tables and went through them with a fine-tooth comb. At one point my searcher, a man who spoke almost no English (who was searching passengers on a direct flight to the US!), removed a small plastic bag containing my (no lie) dirty underwear that I had closed with a knot. He made me rip it open…and then (I swear I am not making this up) stuck his face in it, SNIFFED it, held it out to me and asked, “Gifts?” I was so flabbergasted I didn’t even know what to say, so I just said, “Hey, if you want ‘em…”

    Fortunately he did NOT swipe my panty bag…he put it back in my suitcase and continued his search. Then a female security officer who spoke no English at all came over and “patted us down”, which is an interesting euphamism for “manually and rather violently palpatated our private parts.” While being escorted back to the waiting area, I whispered about the little panty-bag incident to my friend, and we practically fell down in laughter – causing our escort to stop and glare at us malevolently, before he let us back into the waiting room. Meanwhile the shady-looking men flying alone were happily sitting there, unmolested.

    So do you think a single person on our plane was even remotely “safer” due to this exercise in absurdity?

    I agree with all the folks who think that the terrorists haven’t had to take a single life to have won this battle.

  • Joe Farrell

    @LeeAnne – who would you rather search? A couple of harmless little old ladies or possible violent terrorists or drug smugglers?

    @Lisa- the simple solution is to ban non-citizen muslim males between 15 and 45 from traveling by air in the US. End of story. If we can get the rest of the Western world to see the light and do the same thing we put the pressure on them to show they are harmless, not the other way around.

    @Jennifer – do a news search – here is one link – http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34601479/ns/travel-news/

    nothing is going to stop the flight attendants from making up the rules as they see fit and how their peri-menopausal bodies are telling them to feel that day. And if you were a pilot, woud you tell some 45-55 year old flight attendant having a very bitchy day she was not going to get her way that day?

    Yeah, thought so.

  • Anthony LaMesa

    Raise your hand if you think this sucks for all the airlines that just installed or are in the process of installing WiFi access on planes. ::raises hand::

    Guess they’ll need to raise the baggage fees to make up for the money they won’t be earning on Internet access…

  • The Travelster

    How long do we have to continue to pretend there is not a characteristic to these militant terrorists?

    Maybe if certain groups of people felt a bit of social pressure they’d start policing their own? So far they don’t seem to be.

    Can we finally get serious about the laughable “war on terror”?

  • Howard

    After reading all the messages about the so-called pat downs, I began to wonder whether the extent of the pat downs was related to security or some other things?

  • http://www.happyhotelier.com/ Happy Hotelier

    Main reason I don’t fly to the US of A next to my smoking habit.

  • http://www.TheMadTravelerOnline.com Kevin

    I find it just as silly to suggest we start profiling men who maybe look Arab or women with burqas especially since terrorists until now on planes looked pretty normal and this last guy was African. Bomb sniffing technology/dogs, not hunches and prejudices. And a terrorist can slip something into woman- with-underwire-bra’s bag just as easily as anything else. Timothy McVeigh looked like a regular Joe, non Muslim and blew up a whole Fed building. Again, 9/11′s solution would have been disseminating info regarding the intel about potential hijack/crashing of planes and a lock on the cabin door. End of incident but for some potential box cutter wounds/casualties and some brutally beaten perps. This latest guy was identified. There is the failure — follow through on intel. Also, I’m still not clear on why a guy from 3 rows back was the only one to act. What did the rest do? Press the call button or just wave their arms around and scream? Good intel and follow up, bomb sniff protections, and some Americans with spines and awareness on the planes and this should just be fine. No need to start counter-proposing ludicrously flawed plans of “anyone with a Muslim name.” Then you just catch Cat Stevens and look dumber yet.

  • Jason

    @ Fred Hart
    Eric: I see another problem regarding children.
    Fred Hart: As I understand it, it has to be someone of the same gender who does the searching.

    What difference does that make if the person performing the pat-down is a pedophile?

  • http://http/aol.com barbie45

    President Truman once said ;’the buck stops here’. It is clear that the current president just does not understand that. He is to preoccupied with other issues than to focus on homeland security.

  • http://http/aol.com barbie45

    John , you are so correct. A body scan would have eliminated the entire incident. Also how foolish an argument to think passengers on board are to be responsible for disarming potential terrorists.

  • Nick

    We *are* getting closer to a cavity search @ TSA. Does Muslim religion allow to stuck explosives into their body cavities?

  • Major Variola (ret)

    So can the families of heads of state use the bathroom in the
    last hour?

  • AntiVigilante

    PROFILE ALL SHARP DRESSED MEN SMUGGLING IN SUDANESE WHO ARE REALLY FROM NIGERIA AND WHOSE FATHER WARNED THE EMBASSY THEY WERE IN YEMEN IN A TERRORIST TRAINING CAMP!

    DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!

  • john 2000

    I sure would like to have a sense of the hh:mm time-line of the directive being received by you and the actual “incident” on the flight. That was some pretty quick and detailed stuff from the acting administrator, on Christmas Day no less. It’s almost as if the directive already existed. TSA should be investigated to when the directive was fabricated also.

  • Mac

    This is a win-win for the terrorists. If the plane had gone down, they win because of the tragedy, then also because of the ensuing chaos (long term as we are now experiencing). So the plane didn’t go down. They still win because of the (ensuing) long term chaos as we are now going to experience until who-knows-when! I am not sure that the TSA really knows what they are doing or should be doing.

    This seems to me to be a lot of scrambling around LOOKING busy but not really getting anything done.

    The terrorists are laughing themselves silly seeing how the chaos has spread and how imposed-upon air travelers are having to cope with all of this nonsense. Like all of these new restrictions are going to keep us safe? I do not think so. But they will keep us in line longer, and even more uncomfortable while in the air, and holding our bladders when we usually have to go the most, at then end of the flight. Like now the gov’t is going to regulate MY bladder? One of our most precious rights is being taken away. The right to relieve oneself when necessary. Maybe they can issue each passenger a paper towel and one empty plastic bottle or we could just use the barf bag. Nothing like turning your air travel into a third-world country experience.

  • Arkyump

    This is your captain, we are flying over Mecca, be prepared to bail out.

  • ian

    Yet another good reason to take AmTrak instead. Yes, it make take a day longer, but you’re not going through a process that manages to both humiliate and be ineffective at the same time.

    Explain to me how any of this would stop some whack job from simply shooting down an airplane with an uzi or a stinger missile near an airport? What does TSA plan to do? Install monitoring cameras in each private home or office within 10 miles of all USA airports?

  • http://rantingsofanindependentthinker.blogspot.com Bill

    I look forward to flying naked after the anal probe. This is the only sure fire way to ensure no one has anything on them (literally) to blow themselves up.

    My solution:
    1. Everyone goes through metal detectors (already doing).
    2. Everyone gets a quick sniff from explosive sniffing dog.
    3. Anyone acting suspicious is sent to full body scan.
    3a. Anyone with a Muslim/middle eastern sounding name is sent to full body scan (not all Muslims are terrorists, but all/most terrorists are Muslim/from middle east).
    3a1 – If Muslim’s/middle eastern people don’t like it, they can take action to police their own people and maybe get them to stop trying to blow people up.
    3b. Anyone refusing to cooperate is taken into custody till their risk is determined. If risk, arrest and hand over to FBI. If no risk, put on permanent no fly list and no compensation.
    4. Remind people that flying is a voluntary way to travel. Don’t like the rules? — Don’t fly!

  • http://www.advicegoddess.com Amy Alkon

    The only way to be safe is to do exploratory surgery on all passengers before boarding to make sure they haven’t swallowed explosives drug-mule-style.

  • Alice

    When did the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution get repealed?

  • Kristin

    @ Alice: From all the post-publishing legal actions, both the 1st and the 4th amendments to the US Constitution appear to have been repealed.

  • m3th

    TSA threats/bullying in relation to the publication of this information (information the TSA sent to thousands of places):

    http://rawstory.com/2009/12/tsa-strongarms-bloggers/

    Bloggers are having their harddisks taken from them, etc.

  • Charlie Chaplin

    Too bad the TSA wasn’t around in the early 1900′s. We could have had hours of entertainment watching their antics on the big screen along with the Keystone Cops.