9/11 phobia leads to grounding incidents, evacuations

Anyone who hoped to spend the 10th anniversary of 9/11 in quiet reflection will probably be disappointed. During the last few days, the prevailing sentiment in America has been fear, if not paranoia.

On Wednesday, an American Airlines flight from Dallas to Washington was canceled and all the passengers sent through security again after a passenger reported that two other travelers were acting suspiciously. Authorities interviewed the passengers and released them without charges. What caused the alert? That’s unclear.

A Southwest flight from Albuquerque, New Mexico, to BWI Airport yesterday was diverted to Nashville International Airport because of a passenger’s “suspicious behavior.” We don’t know what the passenger’s actions were (perhaps he was reading a book) but according to a Southwest spokesman, it “caused some concern” and triggered the diversion. All the passengers were rescreened in Nashville. Nothing was found, and the flight continued.

Several gates at Washington Dulles International Airport were evacuated late yesterday after a bomb-sniffing dog sniffed something. An ordnance team from Virginia State Police was sent to the scene, and two flights were canceled. In Kansas City this morning, an argument over carry-on luggage escalated into a completely unnecessary security scare.

A New York-bound flight this afternoon was given a fighter jet escort to JFK because passengers had locked themselves in the bathroom. Seriously. Even the airline involved called it a “big nothing.” Here’s another bathroom incident that happened today in Detroit.

The fear isn’t confined to the sky. In Los Angeles yesterday, a bus was evacuated because one of the passengers looked like a terrorist.

Meanwhile, government officials have admitted that efforts to disrupt a rumored 9/11 anniversary attack are becoming a “goose chase.” Authorities had been questioning all day the credibility of a tip from a previously reliable source that Al Qaeda had planned to attack Washington or New York, putting though both cities on high alert.

There’s some interesting wordplay going on, if you read closely. Officials have called it a “credible” threat, and then a “credible but unconfirmed” threat and then finally admitted — off the record — that it’s simply a “goose chase.” Maybe they’ll downgrade it to a “wild goose chase” tomorrow.

These clever semantics aren’t appreciated by most Americans and are glossed over by the TV and Internet pundits. That’s too bad.

The sad truth is, the Department of Homeland Security and TSA have a very powerful incentive to stir up our collective fear and paranoia, and critics say they are using rhetoric to further that goal.

Getting us riled up serves a purpose. If we believe we’re in imminent danger, we’re far less likely to question the increasingly heavy-handed security measures, including pat-downs, chat-downs and body-scans.

Some might say this is the best 9/11 anniversary ever for America’s security apparatus, because the people are finally buying it. I hope they’re wrong about that.

I’m interested in your opinion. Are security officials reacting appropriately to the 9/11 anniversary — or opportunistically?

  • Tampa Jim

    I flew out of Charlotte, NC Terminal A this afternoon (9/11). When I got to the security line, there were only a few passengers ahead of me. I asked the TSA agent checking boarding passes and ID’s which of the three open lanes I should go to and she replied “it doesn’t matter, go to which ever one you like”. A quick look made me realize that all passengers were being subjected to full body scans at two of the lanes. Passengers in the third lane passed through only a metal detector. Guess which lane I chose? This is the first time that I can remember my being able to choose the type of airport screening that I preferred. Thank you TSA!

  • Lisa Simeone

    “The three passengers who were taken off the plane in handcuffs were released Sunday night, and no charges were filed against them, airport spokesman Scott Wintner said.”

    So no charges filed, but having to pee can still get you handcuffed. And cause fighter jets to scramble. And invite a SWAT team on board. Nah, we’re not paranoid in this country.

  • Lisa Simeone

    “The three passengers who were taken off the plane in handcuffs were released Sunday night, and no charges were filed against them, airport spokesman Scott Wintner said.”

    So no charges filed, but having to pee can still get you handcuffed. And cause fighter jets to scramble. And invite a SWAT team on board. Nah, we’re not paranoid in this country.

  • Carrie Charney

    They asked you too many questions?

  • Carrie Charney

    They asked you too many questions?

  • Carrie Charney

    They asked you too many questions?

  • Vamuggle

    Because airlines can and will file bankruptcy

  • Patsy

    I go through US security when I’m on a US destined flight departing outside the US. I take my shoes off in Ireland too

  • Patsy

    And the airlines didn’t provide sham security? That’s my point…it really isn’t any different and we really aren’t safer. BTW…I flew yesterday and had no issues going through security

  • Anonymous

    I’m surprised the airlines haven’t put change slots on the potty doors. You know, just to squeeze that extra cash out of you at the most inopportune moments…

  • Guest

    Amen to that!!!

  • Mel

    I HAVE to buy that tie for my son the Uber Computer Geek!! I’m officially on the hunt for it now!

  • Philip

    Yesterday, 9/11, my local newspaper published the costs for “security” since that fateful day: 2104 BILLION dollars! (includes two wars, over 6000 military deaths, and the incomprehensible murder by George W Bush of 125,000 innocent Iraqis called euphemistically “collateral damage”).  Along with the “scare” announcement that an imminent bombing in New York or Washington, based on “no credible evidence” would take place, gave me a knee jerk reaction. I immediately wrote a Letter to the Editor that I felt strongly that the government needs to justify and continue those huge costs and the way to do it is to keep the public on edge with death ‘just around the corner’.

    I am very pleased that here in this select group of Chris’s friends, many similar comments and feelings are articulated. I was also bolstered in my thoughts by several op-ed columns that said the same thing. Keep the public confused with false accusations, treat them like sheep to the slaughter, and we will continue to pay good tax money that goes into lucrative entities, like the TSA, and greedy pockets. 

    I would hope that all of you here, no matter pro or con, would also write a Letter to the Editor. When I wrote I thought I was alone, but I see that there is a public outcry of what justice and truth we want is expected from our government leaders. The president struggles (I like him), Congress is at a level now of a grass roots movement “to throw the bums out.” They are elected as ‘our voice’ and somehow their voice is controlled by the lobbyists and ignorant people who just like to vent; scream, bitch and moan.

    We are seeing all around us that we, ‘the little people’ can have a very ‘large voice.’ This column is only one outlet.  Speak up wherever you can!

    Thanks guys!
     

  • Jim Zakany

    Rick explained my comment well. Government revenue – from whatever source – has been under-running government spending and looks like it will continue to do so.

    But my direct point was that illegal border crossings are at their lowest levels in forty years and crime rates in border communities are plummeting. To say “this administration” is ignoring our borders is silly.

    This isn’t a political board, but it irks me when someone tried to inject politics via misinformation. Yes, border security is a government service performed by civil servants.

  • Lisa Simeone

    Welcome to the club, Philip!  Some of us have been speaking out for years.

    And sorry, though I voted for him, Obama has proven to be just as bad — yes, no hyperbole — as Bush.  He has not only continued, but expanded, the worst abuses of the Bush administration.  Our civil liberties continue to be eviscerated, drone attacks abroad have increased, he’s gotten us into even more wars, while doing jack sh*t to end the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan, he is increasing the size and scope of the National Security State, and he is every bit as beholden to corporate interests as Bush was.

  • Lisa Simeone

    Welcome to the club, Philip!  Some of us have been speaking out for years.

    And sorry, though I voted for him, Obama has proven to be just as bad — yes, no hyperbole — as Bush.  He has not only continued, but expanded, the worst abuses of the Bush administration.  Our civil liberties continue to be eviscerated, drone attacks abroad have increased, he’s gotten us into even more wars, while doing jack sh*t to end the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan, he is increasing the size and scope of the National Security State, and he is every bit as beholden to corporate interests as Bush was.

  • Anonymous

    I knew exactly where you would find it.  Thinkgeek!  Unfortunately, it’s out of stock–probably due to Raven’s post! ;) 

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/hats-ties/57ff/

  • Anonymous

    I knew exactly where you would find it.  Thinkgeek!  Unfortunately, it’s out of stock–probably due to Raven’s post! ;) 

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/hats-ties/57ff/

  • cjr

    The woman on the Denver to Detroit flight who was detained has spoken out on her blog about the incident:

    Some real Shock and Awe: Racially profiled and cuffed in Detroit
    http://shebshi.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/some-real-shock-and-awe-racially-profiled-and-cuffed-in-detroit/

    Disgusting. Whomever it was that thought there was something suspicious going on needs to be subjected to this themselves, so they won’t be so callous and stupid toward others in the future.

  • Lisa Simeone

    Horrifying.

    Thank you, United Sheeple of America.  This is what you’re doing to your fellow human beings.

  • http://elliott.org Christopher Elliott

    This is awful. Truly awful.

  • Xyl

    It really comes down to making such a public stink about the “unconfirmed credible threat” that the security folks hope that if anyone was thinking of doing anything on 9/11, they would be scared off by the heightened security. End result, the terrorists (if any) go away for the day and the police and homeland security have “saved the day.”

  • Anonymous

    Yes, that’s where I got it from!

  • Mexican Jack Bauer

    Right now, it’s a hassle to get I-94 permits coming south of the border! This tells me 2 things:

    1 – The US is at war, and
    2 – It’s obvious who’s winning it, and obviously it ain’t the US

  • Linda Bator

    Actually untrue.  Here in Michigan, all military personnel were brought to their base 9/10, and locked down.  Not phone calls out, no internet, etc.  Radio silence, and high alert due to a terrorist threat.  So they knew, just chose to do nothing about it!

  • Linda Bator

    Same here.  And funny, but London doesn’t employ our TSA agents, but are even stricter on liquids, chat-downs, shoes off, sharps, number of lighters, etc.  And were stricter LONG before we ever were.  Americans just feel there should be safety in place, it just shouldn’t inconvenience US.  (So just who are THEY?)