Can this honeymoon be saved? Help, they closed my resort in Fiji

Careful readers of this feature have probably figured out by now that it’s loosely based on the Ladies’ Home Journal column, Can This Marriage Be Saved?. We haven’t saved any marriages here — yet. But this week’s case may come the closest.

Meet Caroline Majsak, who is planning her honeymoon in Fiji. After months of research, she settled on Namale Plantation Resort, a gorgeous property that looks like it’s right off the cover of Architectural Digest. (As a matter of fact, it is.)

But then, only a few weeks before her trip, she was hit with “terrible news.” I’ll let her explain.

We were informed that Namale is closing April 22nd to May 8th, without a fraction of an explanation, yet a remarkable sense of apathy.

How does a five-star resort provide confirmed guests six weeks notification of a closure? Moreover, how does a resort close without an explanation?

If it’s renovation, I find it hard to believe that a resort receiving countless awards, accolades, and raves about their customer service, would elect to close during peak wedding/honeymoon season, much less letting guests know so short on time. Most renovations are confirmed months in advance, much like most honeymoons.

If it’s for a speaking or private event, I find it deeply insulting to place higher value on such events (presumably more lucrative) than regular patron.

Indeed, had Majsak done a cursory search on the resort, she would have learned that it is owned by motivational speaker Tony Robbins, and that guests — even honeymooners — are sometimes kicked out of their rooms for seminars.

A search of Robbins’ site does not show an April seminar in Fiji, but it might be unlisted because it’s sold out.

So did she do her due diligence? Yes, she says. Her fiancee spent “countless hours” researching Fijian resorts for their honeymoon.

“He visited blogs, travel boards, and contacted travel agents as time permitted,” she says.

She adds,

At this point, nothing can offset the damage caused to our honeymoon, a trip we were most looking forward to as of a few days ago. We are now left researching competing resorts; crossing our fingers that any have availability, much less comparable prices and amenities.

Namale, its managers, and owners should be ashamed of the manner in which business has been conducted.

Majsak has rebooked her honeymoon at a different resort, but her perfect vacation at the Namale is ruined.

Does the resort owe her anything?

Before answering, consider the hotel’s own policy, which isn’t available though its site but can be found elsewhere online. If you cancel a month before your visit, they’ll charge your credit card for the entire visit. So if Majsak and her fiancee had decided to cancel their vacation now, they’d still have to pay for it.

Seems like a little bit of a double standard.

Could this have been avoided? Absolutely. A competent travel agent would have known about the resort’s propensity for canceling confirmed reservations, and might have steered them to a different resort or destination. These are the perils of being a DIY travel agent.

But if, as Majsak says, the resort was apathetic about their honeymoon cancellation, then I think there’s no excuse for that. They’re certainly owed an apology.

Question is, should I jump in and try to mediate this? And if so, what is this unlucky couple entitled to?

Update (12:30 p.m.) I’ve just learned that the case has been resolved. The resort contacted her, apologized and agreed to honor her original reservation. The poll was running 75 percent in favor of mediation when I closed it.

  • Roberto Pascal

    Was the party able to cancel the newer reservation then or is she just left out in the cold?

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Michael K – “A quick check on Expedia shows that 6 of the 11 of the 5-star hotels in their search results for Fiji are unavailable for this couple’s honeymoon dates.”
    - – - – - – -
    Please understand that Expedia only shows ITS inventory which may NOT be the actual inventory of the hotel. I have found rooms where one website (i.e. Expedia, Orbitz, Marriott, Hilton, etc.) had no availability but another website had availability (i.e. Marriott, Hilton, Expedia, Orbitz, etc.) for the same date.

    @ Michael K – “Several of the commenters here (@Arizona, @Thalassa, et. al.) appear to have a double standard:…”
    - – - – - – - – - – - –
    There are terms and conditions which are usually fully disclosed before the purchase of a hotel reservation, a cruise, an airline ticket, a tour, etc. Like most contracts in the real world, the terms and conditions are usually written to favor the seller of the product\service. In my profession (software), it is not unusual to spend a few weeks or even longer for the lawyers to work out the terms and conditions when a client wants to use their Ts&Cs instead of ours.

    In the case of travel providers, the agreement is more one-sided than normal but the terms are disclosed. Don’t like the terms then don’t buy…buy from a company with better terms. I don’t like the Ts&Cs of most travel providers but I am aware of the terms which is one of the reasons why I have an annual travel insurance policy for my regular business travel and I purchase an travel insurance policy for ‘large’ trips (i.e. cruises, land tours, travel outside of the US, etc.) with the family.

    I am not defend the resort’s cancellation practice. More importantly, what are there Ts&Cs of the resort’s cancellation practice? It could be one-sided stating that the resort has the right to cancel up to the last minute without any compensation or etc. It is a mute point since the case has been resolved and the OP got back their original reservation; however, the hotel was going to give a full refund to the OP\won’t charge their credit cards\etc.

    When traveling outside of the USA, there are differences in customer service, customer protection, etc. One time in China, we tried to return an item at Wal-Mart and it was nearly impossible…compare that to a Wal-Mart in the US.

    In regards to your comments about travel agents: IF the OP was working with the travel agent, the travel agent would have contacted the resort to see what was the problem, could the cancellation of the reservation be reversed, etc. In other words, the travel agent would be their champion\advocate\troubleshooter\etc.

    @ Tim – “However a quick goolge search shows that she has posted this complaint to a number of different wedding blogs. Including one in which the OP states that the hotel general manager and Tony Robbins have been in contact with her. They will remain open and have restored her reservation.
    Anything more at this point is the OP just trying to get some freebies.”
    - – - – - -
    I agree with you that it looks like the OP is trying to get some freebies if this has already been resolved before the article was posted today.

    @ Karen P – “Yes, perhaps had she looked 13 pages into the reviews on TripAdvisor she…”
    - – - – - – - -
    When I look at the reviews on TripAdvisors, the first thing that I do is click on the ‘Terrible’ reviews to read them first; then I click on the ‘Poor’ reveiws to read them; then the I click on the ‘Average’ reviews; therefore, I don’t have to look through several pages of reviews to find the ‘Terrible’, ‘Poor’ and ‘Average’ reviews if there are several reviews. The reason why I look at the Terrible, Poor and Average reviews first is to see if there is a common theme among those reviews. If I am traveling with my family, I will also look at the ‘Family’ reviews since needs of families could be different than the needs of a single traveler, a business traveler, etc.

    @ Rose – “This is the same kind of bride who will complain that her honeymoon was “ruined” by cracked tiles behind the toilet in the hotel bathroom.”
    - – - – - -
    Or a speck of rust on the sink pipes or a tropical bug in their room!!!

  • Powergirl

    I used to love reading this blog but now I feel like I have stumbled on to a site for corporate travel apologists, travel insurance salespeople, and travel agents. It is not being a bridezilla to blow a gasket upon finding out six weeks from the wedding that she’s back at square one in terms of planning. Can she go elsewhere? Sure. But at what costs? She would then have to buy new plane tickets or pay the change fees. She hasn’t done anything wrong here. Why does she now have this added cost? If she had written in about asking the airlines for a change fee waiver, I’m sure many here would jump up and down and say she should eat the costs because she’s making the change. Or better yet, why didn’t she get travel insurance? On top of all this, if she’s like most of us, she and her fiancee are both working. So all this additional research/planning would have to be done at night, on the weekends, when there are a million other things that still need attention.

    For all those who says she should focus on spending time with her spouse then the next step is why not just go to the Holiday Inn Express down the street? She would be with him still and most probably have a pool according to that logic. She’s not a bridezilla just because she used the word “ruined” to express her frustration. Have we all become high school English teachers? How many times do we use hyperboles in our daily conversations?

    @Rose – I’m glad you were happy with your honeymoon. But let’s not pass judgment on other people because they want something different. How would you feel if when you showed up, that motel in Montauk said they weren’t going to honor your reservations and send you on your way? Everything is relative. How do we know that they haven’t been eating P&J sandwiches a year to save up for this spectacular trip because that’s the one thing they wanted? We don’t know and it doesn’t matter. The question is whether or not the resort treated them fairly and thereby Chris should mediate, not what you think is an appropriate honeymoon.

    I don’t know what mediating does for the OP, but at least now I know where NOT to book when planning a trip to Fiji.

  • http://badbadwebbis.wordpress.com badbadwebbis

    Perhaps the bride is overreacting, but as another poster noted, many of us would be royally pissed off if our much-anticipated trip were canceled for no given reason. Our much-anticipated REALLY EXPENSIVE trip which now has to be rebooked, possibly unsuccessfully.

    And yes, she had 6 weeks to do it, and perhaps she did complain all over the internet. So would I, to be honest. If a resort is marketing itself as a honeymoon destination (which it certainly is) and if it is willing to cancel a honeymoon reservation with no excuse (it clearly is) then it is reasonable for the victim to warn others who might be inclined to book it for a honeymoon destination.

    The resort is engaging in poor PR/business practices, and I’m glad the issue has been resolved. And perhaps the negative press the resort has received will prevent it from doing something like this again. Thanks for making the case public, Chris.

  • Unicorn

    I’m very glad to see the resort do the right thing and honor their original commitment. It’s too much to hope that someone there feels some shame and guilt over the whole episode, but perhaps they will offer the couple something special when they get there as a means of saying “we’re sorry”.

    We’re planning our own wedding in about 2 months and while we don’t have anything nearly as ornate planned as Ms. Majsak’s honeymoon, I can see how the planning and the expectations can overwhlem you. And to lose a once-in-a-lifetime trip like that… well, good thing they weren’t in the US. My fiancee is a lawyer and we’d be all over them.

  • Michael K

    @Arizona: “Don’t like the terms then don’t buy…buy from a company with better terms.”… “I am not defend the resort’s cancellation practice. More importantly, what are there Ts&Cs of the resort’s cancellation practice?”

    I agree that the contract terms are relevant and it’s not clear from the article (or the resort’s website) what the terms state. Where I sense we differ is that I don’t believe the literal terms are necessarily the be all and end all. If the terms are very one-sided or unreasonable or poorly disclosed then they can be ruled adhesive and unenforceable (at least in the USA). And even if that legal threshold is not met (or, as in many of these cases, it’s borderline and we really don’t know how a judge would rule), when a travel provider behaves unethically or unfairly, then I submit they should be embarrassed in a public forum like this one in order to seek a fair remedy.
    ————————————————–
    @Arizona: “IF the OP was working with the travel agent…the travel agent would be their champion\advocate\troubleshooter\etc.”

    A few commenters wrote that they voted “No” only because the OP didn’t use a travel agent. I don’t understand that voting logic, because as I pointed out, it’s possible the OP could have found herself in exactly the same predicament even if she used a travel agent.
    ————————————————–
    @Arizona: “Please understand that Expedia only shows ITS inventory”

    This just distracts from the substance. If you dispute my quick observation that several (roughly half) of the five-star Fiji resorts are no longer available, then you are free to demonstrate that I was way off. I’m aware that some hotels (e.g. Marriott) will show availability on their websites to their top-tier elite guests even when they are oversold, but that’s neither here nor there.

  • Diana

    I’m glad the resort decided to change it’s mind. (I wonder if they have someone monitoring the internet full time, considering it only took a few hours of being up here to change…) Regardless of who owns the hotel, to just cancel a reservation, honeymoon or otherwise, for no reason (and a seminar is no reason) is horrible policy. Honestly, the OP should demand either her money back or that the resort book them in another resort of better quality, because, reading the TripAdvisor reviews, I bet that the couple would be treated as if they didn’t exist if they stayed there. I would love to see the T&Cs, but sadly, they seem to be nowhere to be found.

  • DJP

    I seriously wonder how many people who votes no ever traveled to some place expensive like Fuji for a honeymoon.

    When traveling to these honeymoon centric destinations you can not easily rebook at a comparable location since most places are booked months in adavance.

    This is true if you travel to Australia , europe, south america or other far flung places. Generally doing it at the last minute (ie 6 weeks in advance is very difficult).

    If they were traveling to say somewhere stateside could they find a different hotel in someplace like Honolulo or Miami…sure.

  • Ken Rahr

    And, what exactly will happen w/ the new resort that they booked? Need more details!

  • Jeanne in NE

    @DJP: I very easily voted “no” because of the OP’s own words: “At this point, nothing can offset the damage caused to our honeymoon.”

    Well, if there’s no offset possible, there’s nothing to mediate.

    Was the situation outrageous? Yes. Rude? Yes. Nail-biting for the bride-to-be? Yes.

    But that wasn’t the question asked, was it?

  • Brooklyn

    I wouldn’t want to spend my honeymoon surrounded by people who had come to hear a motivational speaker, but that’s just me. I’m very glad that this hotel’s hidden agenda has been broadcast far and wide so we can all know to avoid it. They confirmed her reservation, so unless there was a terrible natural disaster or a fire, that room was spoken for. The hotel did the right thing but only, I suspect, because of the bad publicity. Talk about shutting the barn door after the horse has escaped!

  • Brian

    Chris, since this problem is resolved I would like to make a comment about another item. I think it’s about time to institute a character limit to posts. It’s getting a little ridiculous when 1 or 2 individuals dominate the discussions and there’s one in particular who loves to have comments that stretch two screen pages and posts multiple long winded comments.

    As for this couple, I understand why they were disappointed their preferred resort wasn’t available but seriously aren’t they being a little hyperbolic when they say their vacation is “ruined” before they even left? Who’s to say they won’t have a wonderful time at a new resort? I’m glad their reservation was reinstated but it seems they forgot a honeymoon is about who you’re with, not where you’re staying.

  • Annette

    My hesitation on how to vote as related to not using a travel agent is this: The couple contacted apparently more than one travel agent, and then made a conscious decision NOT to use a professional and do it themselves. They’ve now gotten into trouble that could be been avoided by using a professional and want … I’m not sure what they want. Frankly I’d be less on the fence if they hadn’t contacted travel agents at all, but for me once you call in professionals and then decide not to use them, that muddies the situation a bit.

    And while no, travel agents don’t have a magic wand they can wave and make everything better, and there are instances that we can’t do anything about, we do have avenues and sources of information available to us that the general travelling public doesn’t. You use a travel agent and you get someone who works for you on your behalf, and who has access to information and opportunities that you otherwise don’t have. You don’t use one, and you’re on your own.

    And honestly, when you’re dealing with something as important as a honeymoon – why add to the wedding stress by taking on all the responsibilities for the honeymoon booking yourself? That’s like deciding to bake the cake and cater the reception yourself too.

  • Carver

    I hadn’t intended to comment on this thread as I think most of the issues have been more than adequately flushed out. One thing though that is bothering me is that number of monday morning quarterbacks. making nonsensical remarks

    1. ” She should have used a travel agent.” Perhaps, but that would not have changed the fact that the hotel unilaterally cancelled the reservation. Its not as if the OP did anything wrong.

    2. ” The honeymoon is about being with her future husband, not the location.” BS. If that were true, everyone would go the the Motel 6 for their honeymon.

    3. “6 weeks is plenty of time.” Not hardly. The last few weeks before the wedding is very stressful. The last thing a bride needs is having to figure out new lodgings.

    Also, we don’t know why that particular resort was important to her. I was once asked for vacate a suite at, of all places, a Hilton Garden Inn in Arcadia, California. Turns out I had been accidentally assigned the very room where the bride and groom first fell in love and they decided that they wanted to spend their honeymoon in that particular room.

    4. Powergirl. Excellent comments. +1000.

  • Anonymous

    Dear Tom:  Personally, I would have chosen Bora Bora in Tahiti — but I do agree with you about the “Bridezilla” factor.  A Honeymoon is such a brief time in life.  They have a lifetime together (let us hope?) that such a fuss over one place on the globe should not have made any difference.  If you love someone, you can be happy in a tent!  Our honeymoon was not ruined even when my suitcase got “lost” and never found again!  In those days I filed for insurance and got money for my clothes in the bag — for which I saved receipts.  We still laugh about this and it is a good story to tell.