Can things get any worse for the TSA?

To say the TSA just had a bad week would be a lot like saying Muammar Gaddafi is dealing with a little opposition in Libya.

And how.

This week’s TSA shenanigans are almost too bad to be true. I take absolutely no pleasure in reporting them, because after all, this agency is supposed to be protecting us when we travel.

Boxcutters on planes! A passenger at JFK accidentally carried three boxcutters — yep, the same kind used by the 9/11 terrorists — on a plane last week. The breach reportedly grounded the flight for three hours last Saturday night and drew fury from Port Authority cops, who accused the Transportation Security Administration of being asleep on the job. “In case anyone has forgotten, the TSA was created because of a couple boxcutter incidents,” one law enforcement source told the New York Post. The agents who let the boxcutters through are being “retrained.”

Did we forget to screen you? At least 27 officers with the Transportation Security Administration in Honolulu are reportedly being investigated because of reports that they were not screening checked-in baggage for explosives, as their jobs require. The officers worked at Lobby 4 at Honolulu Airport, which services 12 airlines. They, too, face “appropriate disciplinary action” in an ongoing investigation, according to the TSA.

Genetic pat-downs? Although TSA denies it’s doing this, The Daily reports TSA is testing a DNA scanner that would essentially give passengers a “DNA patdown.” Who do you believe?

Portable scanners coming soon? Here’s another story the TSA denies. Newly uncovered documents show that as early as 2006, the Department of Homeland Security has been planning pilot programs to deploy mobile scanning units that can be set up at public events and in train stations, along with mobile x-ray vans capable of scanning pedestrians on city streets, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center. Soon, they’ll be everywhere.

Touch our junk and go to jail. New Hampshire has introduced a bill that would make the touching or viewing of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent a sexual assault. When did it not become sexual assault? That’s what I’d like to know.

Give us more money, or else … Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Congress this week that luggage fees have prompted more passengers to hold onto their bags, which means more items for TSA officers to inspect at security checkpoints at a cost of about $260 million annually. She wants more money, otherwise air travelers can expect delays at the airport. As if we don’t have enough delays already.

Passengers are fed up with this nonsense.

“In the final analysis, the TSA will never make our air travel system 100 percent airtight secure,” says reader Douglas Shachnow. “And I still can’t help believing that TSA procedures at our airports are little more than theater.”

In fact, it is theater.

I’m encouraged that TSA is considering some changes to the way it screens us.

I hope it does so soon.

What do you think? Has the TSA hit rock bottom this week, or can things get any worse than this?

Yes, they can.

  • Roger

    Ugh. Every time I think you’ve grown up about the TSA stuff and start reading your site again, you come out with another emotionally biased “story” dripping in hyperbole.

    Sure, they gave you a hard time once about a story you posted. Get over it.

    I’ll say it again: You can’t have secure air travel without airport security.

  • Monica

    I hate the TSA as much as the next traveler, but I have to admit I had a good experience with them last weekend traveling from IAD to MCO. A last minute change in my plans prompted me to take my personal laptop and bag as a carry-on. I usually don’t travel with my laptop (usually take the business one), but since this was a personal trip I left the company laptop at home. Last time I used my laptop was on several car trips. Needless to say, I forgot that the back zipper pocket was where I kept my loaded gun. Since I don’t use that pocket, I forgot the gun was there. I strolled through Dulles security without a thought about it. It was an honest mistake.

    When it was discovered on the xray machine, and I realized it was my bag, I freaked out. All of the agents were professional except one. He wanted to immediately slap me in cuffs and haul me off. Other than him, the rest of the TSA agents were professional, calm, and one guy did his best to keep my spirits up. I was freaked out and crying. At the time, I appreciated a friendly smile. They were encouraging and kept me informed what was going on the entire time. The MTA were also very professional. I discovered they don’t have a lot of love for the TSA either. Thank goodness the MTA gets to make the final call, not the TSA.

    Thankfully, the MTA corporal saw that it was an honest mistake, and was relieved to see I had a concealed weapon permit. Another blessing is that I can drive to Dulles without traveling through DC, where guns are still not allowed. I think he concluded that I was a good citizen and an arrest wasn’t necessary. He allowed me to call my husband, who had dropped me off, to return to the airport and hand over the gun to him. I was allowed to go through security after my husband took possession of the fun, and still managed to catch my flight. The TSA agents all recognized me the second time and made sure to get me through the line quickly to catch my plane. Thank goodness I arrived at the airport almost three hours early.

    I’m certainly glad they found it at IAD. If I had made it to MCO and got caught with it trying to get home I would have been screwed.

  • Monica

    Whoops typo… possession of the *gun*.

  • http://www.singleparenttravel.net John Frenaye

    @Roger–

    You can’t have secure air travel without airport security.

    Roger that! But you also cannot have the NYPD (or any other large police force) run by a group of mall cops and gate guards for Florida retirement communities.

  • Tom

    Would be possible to run this feature about a number of professions. This week, for instance, one college professor was suspended for having kids experiment with sex toys in class while another was allowed to retire after comparing some of his Black students to slaves.

    You could easily run a feature about doctors behaving badly. Or cops. Or elementary school teacher molesting for abusing their students. How about one about the unhealthy habits of restaurant workers. Or union members getting paid $100,000 for no-show jobs.

    Somehow this feature elevates the brief discomfort of spending two minutes with the TSA a few times a year into bashing and hate mongering.

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Tom, great idea! Actually, there are some changes coming to this site that I think you and @Roger will like – and hopefully, others.

    More soon.

  • Thomas

    @ Roger

    There airport security, and then there’s airport security. I wouldn’t use TSA and airport security in the same sentence. They’re more like the 3 Stooges on steroids!

    The entire program needs to be scraped and start over. Perhaps with some consultation from the Israelis.

    The agent is being retrained? If he worked in the private sector, he’d be fired!!!

  • Catherine

    Granted, I’m sure the readers here are biased against the TSA as indicated by the poll results thus far. However, I am hopefully that since TX as also introduced a bill with even more bite against what the TSA is doing, changes will be forthcoming. More states need to rally against this so we can get REAL security and not the theatre we currently have.
    As a very frequent flier for business, I find that I don’t want to fly anymore and, after getting harassed and violated by the TSA personally, I get anxious prior to trips. I have no less than 12 TSA engagements ahead of me this month and I’m almost sick thinking about the potential for more abuse.

  • frostysnowman

    @Roger – No one is saying there should not be any security at the airports. Of course there should. The issue is that the way it’s being done now is overly invasive and makes normal people feel like criminals. Unfortunately not many people have any good ideas for improvements (yet), but they are definitely needed and Chris needs to continue to write about them. You can always stop reading this blog if you are tired of these types of updates.

  • Raven

    Think they’re bad now? Just wait til they unionize.

    I cannot understand why the agents who failed to catch the boxcutters were not fired on the spot. Then again, maybe they were doing important things like comparing each other’s tattoos, nail art, or cell phones.

  • Sommer Gentry

    You read my mind about the New Hampshire bill. I’m 100% in favor of putting TSA screeners on the sex offender list for coercing adults and minors into unwanted sexual contact, but I’m still shocked they aren’t being placed on it already! Don’t we already have laws that say manipulating people and threatening people to get them to go along with unwanted sexual activity is illegal? What these screeners are forcing people to do against their wills is exactly, exactly, what people do in both criminal and consensual scenarios for sexual gratification, I know from personal experience on both counts (a criminal other than a TSA screener did this to me on the street).

    It’s just like any other anti-sexual-harassment campaign – we have to name the behavior that’s unacceptable: “Stop touching my breasts! Stop rubbing my vagina! Stop putting your hands down my pants! Stop threatening me!”
    and then we have give consequences if the behavior doesn’t stop: “You will be charged with a crime. You will be placed on the sex offender registry.”

    Go, New Hampshire, go! I’ll also note that Hawaii, Texas, and New Jersey also have state initiatives to bar the TSA from some of its most egregious crimes.

  • Raven

    @Chris:
    Any way to hide the Facebook comments on the blog? I don’t use that site and I’m suspicious of any site that automatically connects to it.

  • Clare

    Chris, thank you so much for highlighting all these TSA horror-stories the way you do! If folks like you weren’t drawing public attention to these abuses, and these thugs were allowed to continue on their merry way with complete impunity, we’d soon wake up one morning to find ourselves in a total police-state. (Hello, anyone heard of the 4th amendment? Anyone even READ the Constitution any more? There’s a REASON why we fought a revolution, anybody remember it?) The sheeple who criticize you are frightening to me, in their inability to distinguish logically between the genuine need for real security, and the non-need for intrusive violations of our privacy. Please keep up the good work!

  • Donna

    @Roger, yes, we need airport security, but that doesn’t mean we must be molested to get it. We should use Israel as a model. The USA is the ONLY country in the WORLD that require we take our shoes off to go thru security.

    We are a bunch of wimps, at this time due to a lot of reasons, one being our security changing each time someone does something. First it was the shoe bomber, now we remove our shoes, next it was the underwear bomber, now are underwear is felt. I have NO clue as to why us women need to have our breasts thoroughly touched though. What is going to happen when some terrorist uses his body cavities to hide something? Are we going to have our cavities checked too? Instead of presuming all of us are terrorists, they should narrow it down a bit via asking questions all the way through from the curb side check in, to the counters to the metal detector agents, to the boarding agents, etc. You can find out far more about a person that way, than feeling them up.

    @Monica, glad you had a good experience. :-)

    @Tom, yes, every industry has it’s bad apples, but we are talking about the TSA over all. Their idea of security isn’t real for one thing. I’d be complaining about Janet Napalitino (sp?) and John Pistole the most, but some agents too. That is unlike complaining about ALL Universities cause one teacher did something stupid….can’t do that cause not all Universities are based on stupidity like the TSA is. Now we CAN compare it to the Police…as the police protect even their bad apples…..and unions protect bad teachers. Off subject…so I guess I’m off the podium.

  • http://jose.l.cruz2@navy.mil Jose

    The initial theory behind TSA and its functions were a great idea. The execution of that theory is and has been flawed. The knee jerk reaction was required at the time, cause lets face, we had nothing in place. But, homeland security has had plenty of time to get high quality personnel to man the TSA, but it hasn’t and until it does you will keep seeing stories like this.

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Raven, not sure if the FB comments are blockable. If you leave a comment logged in on WordPress, it won’t show your FB identity.

  • ccincalif

    Regardless of Christopher’s past history with the TSA, they are overall, mostly a large group of incompetent workers, many of whom are on a power trip. I have been spoken to in the most deprecating, patronizing manner by several TSA agents. We are human, and will learn and make judgments depending on how we are treated. If most TSA agents were well mannered, highly educated, caring people and the agency was run by competent management-this article and this thread would not exist.

  • Ree

    I really hope the New Hampshire bill goes through, and that other states will follow. Personally, I have not traveled by air since the TSA implemented the “porno” scanners and invasive body search. I will continue not to travel by air as long as the TSA is allowed to treat ordinary citizens like criminals/terrorists. People can not say that we need the TSA to keep our airports secure. Just by the latest news, there are items that are prohibited that pass through security, and all of our bags aren’t being screened, and thefts have occurred.

    Chris, I want to say that I don’t feel you are biased against the TSA. You seem to want what the people like me want…fairness when it comes to ordinary citizens’ rights. Thanks for all you do and keeping us informed.

  • Geldhart

    I vote YES, but only because of Einstein’s quote about human stupidity and the universe being unlimited, but not being sure about the universe.

    Cracked.com of all things had a sensible idea about security.

    Let all of us board the planes armed with guns. If you draw yours first, you are the terrorist, otherwise you are everyone else. Good luck first guy.

    But seriously, if the TSA would honestly recognize that it is the passengers who have stopped activities on planes, and let us handle it amongst ourselves (1 bad guy, 100 good guys is good odds) we would be good. Just scan for explosives and we are good to go, and a good dog or those electronic sniffers would be just fine.

    The simple fact is that an unarmed person with skills can kill anyone quickly and silently, and as anyone who knows anything about prison, a deadly weapon can be fashioned from anything. My laptop could be a weapon, my shirt in my carry on could be used to strangle, and my pencil could pierce the jugular of someone.

    None of those things however could pierce the locked cockpit door – the one piece of security out of 9/11 that makes any sense.

  • Question
  • cjr

    Yes, it can get worse for TSA:

    (Texas Rep.) Simpson files anti-body-scanner bill
    http://www.lonestarreport.org/Blog/tabid/65/EntryId/1022/Simpson-files-anti-body-scanner-bill.aspx

    TSA deserves everything that is thrown at them right now.

    A plane will NEVER be threatened again because of box cutters, simply because cockpit doors are now secured… something that should have been done when it was first suggested in the 70′s.

    And yet, we still freak out over them.

    That is EXACTLY the kind of reason why TSA is so utterly useless in defending against a real threat. It is EXACTLY the kind of reason why TSA will never stop a real threat.

  • Jeff Pierce

    @Roger. Since 9-11 there have been zero hijackings. Hardening the cockpit doors and scanning for guns has essentially eliminated that risk.

    What the rational people among us understand is that the TSA cannot use illegal and unconstitutional means. Let me give you an example. I could dramatically increase the capture and conviction of rapists in the US, and I will share this idea with everyone. All you have to do is simply take a saliva swab of all male citizens and run a DNA test to keep on file. At $100 a test, and 140 million people, the cost is $14 Billion dollars. I am sure other crimes would be solved as well where DNA evidence (skin, blood, etc.) could be collected. You could start pilots in towns with highest rape percentages and thus economically improve in capture and conviction for this crime. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court will not allow this as it is against the 4th amendment…that nonsense about warrentless searches of your person. The TSA has no right to violate the constitution, even if they “think” it increases our safety. On US domestic flights over the last 48 years, 0 people have been killed by airline passengers setting off a bomb. There is no reason to fight this risk with strip searches and sexual contact, unless you think it will improve on this risk by resurrecting someone so we can have -1 people killed by airline passenger bombings in the last 48 years.

  • Aaron

    @Roger:

    >I’ll say it again: You can’t have secure air travel without airport security.

    What we have now is NOT secure air travel. It’s ineffective and a WASTE of OUR tax dollars. And all this while flirting with violation of our Constitutional rights (which, let’s be clear, makes their actions as illegal as robbery or murder).

    TSA is a bull-headed organization that is blundering blindly forward, wasting our money and our time without providing real protection. TSA needs new management and a new attitude.

    And think about it: Why the emphasis on secure air travel? Even with the terrorist “threat” (which is actually pretty damn tiny), driving is WAY more dangerous than air travel. Every time I get in my car, I knowingly accept a risk. Why can’t I knowingly accept a risk when I fly?

    And furthermore, if TSA is REALLY about saving American lives, why don’t they leave the airports and start patrolling the roads for reckless, drunk, and careless drivers? They could be MUCH more effective at protecting Americans that way.

    Don’t buy into the BS, Roger. Chris is right. TSA, as it currently exists, is a major waste of time and money that gives little return.

    Aaron

  • LeeAnne

    THANK YOU Christopher, for continuing to shed light on the atrocities being performed by this out-of-control government agency. Those of you who don’t like to read about it, well…don’t read it! But for those of us who’ve been subjected to TSA abuse, we are supremely grateful for the voices in the media who continue to report on the TSA’s absurdities, abuses and outrageous actions.

    Keep it up, Christopher. Don’t let the “anything for security” sheeple dissuade you. You are doing a great service to this country by keeping up the media pressure.

    I do think you missed another good (and important) one: how about including TSA’s public response to the VIPR incident at the train station, in which passengers DISEMBARKING from a train in Savannah were forced into the train station and assaulted, including a prison-style frisking of a 9-yr-old, caught on tape? TSA’s official blog basically called it a mistake, but LIED when it said that the passengers didn’t have to go into the station. That is in direct contrast to the passengers, who have widely reported that they were FORCED into the search area, told by the agents that they had to go in there to get their luggage, which was in fact left unattended on the platform outside! This was an open, bald-faced LIE by TSA – which is still visible on their blog site: http://blog.tsa.gov/2011/02/screening-of-passengers-at-savannah.html

    As someone who has a family member who was assaulted by TSA, I too am wondering why a law has to be passed making viewing and touching the genitals of strangers illegal. Isn’t it already? Why is it okay for the low-life Walmart rejects hired by the TSA to touch our breasts and vaginas against our will — but not some pervert on the street?

  • Janet

    I also thank you for continuing to stay on this issue. It needs to be fixed with real professionals and real detection methods and nothing will ever happen unless we talk about it. I feel less safe with faux-security.

  • http://wild-light.com Fedor G Pikus

    @Roger: “You can’t have secure air travel without airport security”

    You also can’t fish without water. Does it mean that you need a bicycle for fishing? TSA and airport security have about as much in common as fishing and bicycling.

  • Joe Farrell

    TSA is designed to keep bad thngs off an airplane – to a trained agent almost anything can be used as a weapon, thus, the task is essentially impossible. A syringe used by ‘diabetics’ is deadly in the right hands.

    If Roger above had managed to get his weapon on board the aircraft- then the TSA would have failed – however -there was NO risk to commercial aviation security because Roger is not a terrorist nor did he want to commit bad acts onboard the aircraft – the gun was not dangerous in those hands.

    A gun, a knife, a syringe, boxcutter or a nuclear weapon is not dangerous by itself – it requires a human being with bad intent to make it so. You can have an aircraft full of Marines armed to the teeth and there is zero risk of terror incidents because the PEOPLE are not of bad intent. Same with an aircraft full of law enforcement officers – whereas you can have a SINGLE person on board an aircraft with a syringe and some poison in a vial labeled ‘insulin’ all of which ls legal on board an aircraft and everyone would be in mortal danger.

    TSA is akin to having $3million sitting on your kitchen table, and inviting in every thief in the neighborhood but making sure they do not have any bags with them to steal – is the mere fact of having thieves in the house the risk, or at the bags the risk?

    Keeping commercial aviation safe requires that you keep bad PEOPLE and not bad things off airplanes. . . .all the No Fly list does is keep bad NAMES off airplanes . . . consider that the next time you fly. . .

  • Fisher1949

    I think things will get worse when this misdirection of resources and focus results in another plane bombing.

    This idiotic and obscene spectacle is not lost on terrorist organizations. They read these reports and know that Americans have come to despise TSA. No surprise that TSA ranked last in a poll on government agencies in 2010.

    Consequently, most people would not help DHS or TSA even if they did see something, thereby increasing vulnerability. Add to that the rampant crime and misconduct among TSA employees and mounting an attack is easier than pre-9/11.

    Al-Qaeda probably can’t believe the level of incompetence and is waiting to see just how high the hostility toward TSA will get before they make a move. They must be giddy with anticipation.

    Pistole and Napolitano need to go now before innocent travelers are killed because of their hubris and incompetence.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/life-in-the-usa-a-photo-album.html Lisa Simeone

    Sure, things can always get worse with the TSA. Incompetence and bullying don’t have finite limits.

    I’ve also been reading about the proposed three-tier system, Chris, and I don’t think it’s an improvement. If anything, it’s just carte blanche for Our Security Overlords to treat some people badly rather than all of us, and that’s not morally defensible. The three proposed categories, at least at this point, are Trusted, Regular, and Risky. Besides having to provide all sorts of biometric data to Big Brother to be considered “Trusted,” and god knows what for “Regular,” the “Risky” people are screwed, whether they’re actually risky or not. So the Trusted can just watch the Risky get groped and degraded and humiliated at airports, train stations, subways, etc.

    Hey, here’s an idea — why not just slap a big ol’ orange circle on them, in homage to the Color Code Terror Threat Alerts of yore — yeah, history has never shown us anything like that before, has it?!

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Lisa, I share your concerns. I’m afraid someone could end up in the “high risk” group simply because they share a name with a person on the no-fly list or they speak out against the TSA’s policies. If that were to happen, I’d be delayed at the airport every time. There has to be a better way.

    At the same time, it would be a step in the right direction — away from treating every air traveler as a suspected terrorist.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/life-in-the-usa-a-photo-album.html Lisa Simeone

    Chris, to your latter paragraph, yes; and to your former, yes.

    I share a name with at least a dozen other women in this country. I hope I’m not making things harder for them by my outspokenness on the TSA. (I figure I’m already on the sh*t list anyway.)

    Also, did you see the latest article in the NYT on the over-irradiation of patients at hospitals because of improperly calibrated machines? This is a subject on which the NYT has reported before. Here we have extensively trained medical technicians incorrectly calibrating xray machines and injuring patients, and we’re supposed to trust the un-trained TSA to properly calibrate the machines at airports?? Yeah, and I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell. Wait 10 or 20 years and watch the epidemiological studies start rolling in.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/health/06radiation.html?hp

  • Thomas

    @ Joe Farrell

    I was on the watch list, and I’m no more of a threat than your french poodle! For several years, every time I checked in, I got the dreaded 6 “S’s” I finally found out through an agent in Vancouver that there was someone with the same name on the “Watch List”. After sending copies of my passport, birth certificate, driver’s license, ss card, and a personal recommendation from the pope, (Just kidding on the last one) I got cleared.

    Napolitano was a terrible governor, and she’s gone down hill from there. If this idiot that’s running this country into the ground ever fires her and Pistole, it will be a step in the right direction.

  • Jeanne in TX

    I appreciate the updates that Mr. Elliott gives on the TSA from time to time. As someone who has avoided flying for quite a while, largely due to TSA procedures, a more customer-friendly approach from that agency could signal a possible change in policy that would allow me and my family members the ability to fly again.

    In the mean time, we just drive to get where we’re going.

  • Joe Farrell

    @Thomas – that name [your name] is still on the watch list- if Al Qaeda REALLY wants to have a great time with us all they need to do is to put every combination of names onto the watch list by having those names planning terror attacks – again – ANYONE could have sent in ANY copies of any documentation with THAT date of birth and guess what – they name and DOB combo comes off the watch list [or puts you on the cleared list which merely lets you check in online] and bingo – you have a terrorist on a cleared list with a specific DOB .. . the organs of state security will tell you its not that simple, but, at the end of the day, it is.

  • Thomas

    @ Joe Farrell
    ????????????????????????????????????

  • http://Dorothy4mkay@msn.com Sasha

    Does anyone believe that TSA cares about what we think of them?

  • Sommer Gentry

    Sasha, the TSA sees us as terrorists who deserve to be sexually degraded and humiliated. Among the screener insights I gleaned from reading blog posts was that a back-room pep talk for screeners sometimes includes, “I want you to go out there every day and think about Umar Abdulmutallab!” It’s no wonder they treat us like criminals, and nobody cares what a criminal thinks.

    Still, the TSA is a creation of Congress, and Congress could stop the TSA’s abuse. We could stop the TSA’s abuse today. The reason it continues is because of the shameful traitors and cowards who whimper, “Yes Master, I will submit to you, submissiveness always, physically, mentally, sexually, just tell me I’m safe.”

    Free countries aren’t designed to be safe. They’re designed to be free. If more people would man up, and demand to be treated like human beings, this would stop. Anyone who meekly allows strangers to fondle their genitals and take naked pictures of their kids is part of the problem. My body doesn’t belong to government bullies, and they’ll have to drag me kicking and screaming into their radiation chambers before they’ll get a screenshot of my private parts.

  • John royse

    Some of these people seem a little short of a full deck. In today’s world how can one forget they are carrying a gun and if they do forget do they really need one or deserve one, especially a person who starts crying in a crisis.

  • Louise

    Re Monica–now there’s someone who’s really scary! She’s running around free with her gun in her bag? And the TSA agents treated her kindly? A pox on all of them, especially Monica!

  • DFW ROAD WARRIOR

    New Hampshire state motto,

    “LIVE FREE OR DIE”

    Go New Hampshire!

    And to the Texas legislature c’mon let’s show them what we mean when we say,

    “DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS”

    We’re still a Republic!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TRWO354RBZOZIVICLGRSDVWONA John

    Doesn’t our illustrious House hold the purse strings for TSA – they need to “de-fund” it yesterday!!!