Are you traveling more after the TSA’s unpopular scandowns?

Compelling journalism connects dots, telling a story by revealing a bigger picture. But what happens when you connect the wrong dots?

For example, here are two facts that should be connected only with great care and perspective: The latest Transportation Department numbers, which show domestic airlines carried 58.1 million passengers in November, up 6.1 percent from a year ago, and the introduction of the TSA’s unpopular scans and pat-downs, which prompted many air travelers to say they would stop flying.

Put them together and you get headlines like, Despite new security measures, airline travel soars.

Oh, really?

Really.

During the first month that the Transportation Security Administration launched a more aggressive pat-down search technique, the nation’s airlines saw the highest increase in passenger traffic in more than three years.

That may be completely true, but as anyone who travels knows, there’s a little more to the story.

First, most flights are purchased weeks ahead because of the airline industry’s strict advance-purchase requirements for reasonably-priced fares. Chances are, a significant majority of the folks flying in November made their plans before the TSA’s actions and were locked into their holiday travel plans.

Second, the economy is slowly emerging from a recession, so more people are traveling. A far better measure might have been last-minute flight cancellations, but those numbers aren’t reported to the DOT.

Connecting passenger enplanements with TSA policy without the benefit of this additional perspective tells an incomplete story. Passengers are as upset as ever about TSA policy. And they gave this particular reporter a piece of their mind in the comments.

“Looks like this writer is in the tank for TSA,” declared one reader. “The Sicko Agency likes to release these tidbits so talentless “journalists” can cut and paste a story without having to do any real reporting.”

That’s a little over-the-top. I know this reporter, and it’s far more likely that deadlines or a directive from his editors, who may or may not be intimately familiar with the airline industry, had more to do with the post than any political agenda.

So what’s really going on?

Passengers are, in fact, deeply troubled by what they say are the TSA’s unconstitutional actions. One disgruntled passenger, Terri Daniel, is even organizing a boycott of air travelers called “No-Fly Week” July 10 to 16. Here’s the group’s Facebook page.

“If the people of Egypt can overthrow a police state, why do we in America just sit still for ridiculous security practices and numerous other insults?” says Daniel.

Meanwhile, the government seems to be as tone-deaf as ever when it comes to reading the taxpayers who are footing the bill for the new body scanners. On Thursday, TSA Administrator John Pistole told Congress he wanted to broaden airport security to include vehicle checkpoints, small security teams patrolling the grounds and using officers who are trained to detect unusual behavior.

There’s some evidence that TSA has already started roaming beyond the screening areas and random gate checks. Last Sunday, Linda Morrison experienced what to her was a new security screening procedure in Seattle.

A lady wearing a TSA uniform came into the gate area where I was waiting for a flight and started going through people’s bags randomly. She seemed to be focused on larger carry on bags.

She did not approach me (or I would probably still be in detention) but I overheard her. She gave no explanation, cited no authority, did not give her name.

I truly felt the police state had arrived. The scary part was no one questioned her authority to do what I consider an illegal search. The bags had already been passed through security. Are they that insecure with their primary security procedures?

Apparently they are. It’s unclear if the TSA is authorized to make this kind of random search as passengers board. Under Public Law 107–71 (PDF), the legislation that created the TSA, it is allowed to screen passengers before boarding, but probably leaves open the possibility for such a search, however police-state-like it may be.

How long before TSA visits us at home to ask us a few questions about our upcoming flight?

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/napolitano-strikes-terror-into-our-hearts.html Lisa Simeone

    George,

    We’ve addressed all your points, repeatedly, in this thread and several others.

    As for how often we fly, I’m a very experienced, frequent flier. Or used to be. After getting punished for opting out of the stripsearch scanner in September, I have stopped flying. It’s a big sacrifice for me, as I love to travel, especially abroad. Luckily, I’ve already done a lot of it in my life.

    This is one “high horse,” as you put it, that I’m proud to ride. But to each his own.

  • Kathleen

    I read a tongue-in-cheek article a few weeks back…
    Two planes are at two neighboring gates going to the same location. At the boarding gates – two signs are visible, one for each plane. Sign for Plane #1 “Everyone on this plane has been scanned and fully searched, including luggage and carry-ons”. Sign for Plane #2 – “No one on this plane has been scanned or searched, this includes their luggage and carry-ons”. Choice is ALL Yours – think it over for a minute or two and board at your leisure.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/napolitano-strikes-terror-into-our-hearts.html Lisa Simeone

    Tongue-in-cheek indeed. And a completely false dichotomy.

  • cjr

    “I’ll continue flying, not because I necessarily support the TSA’s procedures, but because I simply want to get to my destination and home to my family as quickly as possible.”

    By all means then, George, please write to your Congressmen and tell them to bring my brother home from Afghanistan.

    Life is too short, after all. And I don’t need his being any shorter by putting his life on the line for people like you who won’t stand up for their own rights.

  • Dave

    I happen to be traveling less, but it’s 100% due to a lack of income, rather than TSA antics. Come to think of it, though, the two trips I have taken (to California from the Seattle area) have been on Amtrak, rather than by air.

    Yes, the TSA has definitely gotten too big for its britches, and Mr. Pistole is talking out of both sides of his mouth. In January he emphatically stated that we cannot do Israeli-style security in the US, yet now that’s exactly what he wants to implement. Secondary searches inside the airport? Nothing but a complete admission that the searches up front are inadequate.

    What TSA collectively needs to remember is who pays their salaries — the people they’re harrassing! They’d better start caring about what the passengers want, or sooner or later they won’t be around at all. Right now, they wouldn’t care if it took 6 hours to get through Security (they’ve as much as said so). But way too much of what they do is pure window dressing, accomplishing nothing.

    As far as the new scanners go, I don’t object to the images (let’s face it, folks — we all go to the doctor, and for the vast majority of us images of our bodies are not exactly what attracts the publishers of certain magazines). My gripe is that they take LONGER than before. We need to be looking for ways to speed up the process; time in the Security line is time completely wasted.

  • George

    cjr,

    Let’s get one thing straight – I have family in the military as well, so you can ditch the superiority complex. Just because I’m not so quick to grab a pitchfork and jump on the bandwagon with you and others who are so completely convinced of that their 4th amendment rights are being violated doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate the rights I have, or the freedoms we enjoy. Get over yourself.

  • not worried

    Some posters still do not know the difference between a search and a sexual assault. They both start with the letter ‘S’ so it must be the same. Pornograpy and picture’s seem to also be confused.

    I’ve also noticed that some posters seem to think if they say it enough or scream loud enough that it will convince everyone else they are right.

    For those that question the rights of TSA to search in the ‘secure’ zone, go ahead and decline the search and see what happens.

    Its now the Republician’s fault, its TSA’s fault, its probably my fault, who knows.

    All the whining in the world isn’t going to change anyones mind. Don’t think that posting it will do anything either. There are ways to fix the problem but crying won’t do a thing.

    I read this blog to learn about what not to do when traveling and what problems are out there. Rehashing your complaints about TSA does not do anything except waste my time and maybe make you feel important.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/napolitano-strikes-terror-into-our-hearts.html Lisa Simeone

    Year-to-date statistics on airport screening from the Department of Homeland Security:

    Transvestites 1,133
    Hernias 1,485
    Hemorrhoid Cases 3,172
    Enlarged Prostates 8,249
    Breast Implants 79,350
    Natural Blondes 3
    Terrorist Plots Discovered 0

  • cjr

    “Get over yourself.”

    Says a person who only cares about himself when traveling.

    But then, by the time you do decide to stand up, there won’t be a pitchfork to grab, so you don’t have to worry about that.

  • Sommer Gentry

    Hey not worried,

    Bet you’re “not worried” about street harassment, stalking, upskirt photos, subway frotteurism, workplace harassment, or the myriad other threats of targeted sexual violence that are part of everyday life for young women in this country. Probably doesn’t affect you much. Must be nice on the other side.

    TSA’s worthless kabuki may not be *intended* (by whom?) to victimize women, but the clear result is that the TSA is positioning women to be exceedingly vulnerable to predators.

  • PDN

    This year, instead of flying to a vacation spot, I will be driving to various National Parks with my children. This will take much more time, I will hear more grumbling, but I refuse to allow my children to be harassed by total strangers. What I choose for myself, and what my husband chooses for work, is done with an adult understanding of the ramifications. However, I have an obligation to protect my children — and I cannot allow a “stranger” (not the family doctor that they see regularly) to physically touch them inappropriately, or to allow their “growing” bodies to be exposed to excess radiation, due to political correctness.

    So the answer is – our family is traveling less on the airlines due to the TSA screening process.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/napolitano-strikes-terror-into-our-hearts.html Lisa Simeone

    Chris, some of your readers are apparently not familiar with your own experience with our homegrown Gestapo wannabes. I refer them to your report:

    http://www.elliott.org/blog/full-text-of-my-subpoena-from-the-department-of-homeland-security/

  • cjr

    This isn’t going to help TSA’s popularity any:

    Two TSA screeners charged with stealing nearly $40,000
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41626290/ns/travel-news/

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Lisa, one of the darker chapters in my life, but thankfully they backed off. Otherwise I’d be rotting away in Gitmo now.

  • not worried

    As a survivor of a sexual assault, I am fully aware of what is and what is not an assault. A travel blog seems to be wrong place to stand on a soap box and scream about the ills of the world.

    Its sexist to think that young women are the only ones targeted and harassment. Older women, boys and even men are targeted for sexual violence but this is a travel blog for travel advise, at least until Chris gets his degree in counseling.

    For those who don’t have the unfortunate experience, most sexual assaults and rapes are not about sex but about power and intimidation. Having been there, I still see a world of difference between that and the TSA screenings.

    I’m not sure what the “other side” is but if it is getting on with my life and enjoying what I have left, well then I do like it on the other side.

  • Sommer Gentry

    Since we’ve migrated to the topic of TSA intimidation tactics, please read this tale of woe:
    http://www.everywhereist.com/dick-move-tsa-r-i-p-rands-laptop/

    A TSA screener dropped and destroyed this passenger’s laptop. It’s not clear whether the laptop was destroyed on purpose to punish these passengers for opting out of the naked scan, or whether the TSA screener’s laziness or incompetence led to the destruction. To intimidate these passengers, the supervisor made a big show of photocopying the man’s ID, and steadfastly refused to tell them the name or badge number of the agent who dropped the computer. Now they are too afraid to submit a claim for the damaged property, because they’re convinced they’ll end up on a no-fly list for doing so.

    Innocent people are terrified of what the TSA will do to them if they press legitimate claims and complaints. My colleagues warned me against picketing at the airport on Opt-Out day, believing that the TSA could get me fired from my tenured position. These petty tyrants are the real terrorists – I’m much more afraid of the abuse I’m certain to endure from them than of the infinitesimal chance I’ll get stuck in the vicinity of a murderous criminal.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/napolitano-strikes-terror-into-our-hearts.html Lisa Simeone

    As usual, I second Sommer Gentry.

    As for ‘not worried’ who wrote:
    “. . . most sexual assaults and rapes are not about sex but about power and intimidation.”

    Yes. We know. That’s our point. The TSA’s antics are about power and intimidation. Power. Intimidation. Control. Not about “security,” not about “safety,” and not about “screening.” The only thing they’re “screening” is how much abuse the public will put up with without fighting back. The tactics are about keeping the populace in line. Step out of line, and our security overlords will show you who’s in charge. They’ll make you pay, with a punitive grope, or a smashed laptop, or a missed flight, or a bashed head:
    http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/10/more-tsa-abuses-woman-beaten-71-year-old-man-16-year-old-girl-groped-stripped.html

    As for whether discussion of the TSA belongs on a travel site, uh, yeah. The “T” in TSA stands for “transportation.” Aviation is a method of transportation. People who use this method of transportation are all subject to the TSA. So yes, it’s an appropriate topic. Trying to shut down discussion isn’t going to work. If you don’t like the thread, you don’t have to comment. Chris provides plenty of other topics and threads for your enjoyment.

  • Independent

    The 6.1% rise in airline passengers in November 2010 is actually a 5.8% increase in domestic passengers from Nov 2009 and 7.8% in international passengers from Nov 2009.

    Could this be due to US travellers not flying due to the TSA?

    It would be interesting to figure out why the US passenger increase is LESS than INTERNATIONAL. One might consider, all things equal, they would both rise at the same rate with economy rising. Especially considering the US flights are cheaper than International flights. For first 11 months of 2010, vs first 11 months of 2009, the increase is 1.8% for US and 6.0% for International. AND , November has Thanksgiving, which is one of the busiest holidays for the US.

  • Seavu

    We not only cancelled a trip already booked ~ for which at a minimum we will lose the ticket price plus pay another $150 per ticket (US Airways ticket change fee) if these TSA procedures don’t change by late summer, but we are absolutely NOT booking any trips via airline for the foreseeable future. We love to travel, but irradiating porno-scanning, and molestation at the gate is not my idea of how to start a vacation.

  • Jesse

    and why haven’t we stood up for our quickly vanishing rights?

    Is it going to take someone burning themselves for this to happen?

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2011/02/life-in-the-usa-a-photo-album.html Lisa Simeone

    Jesse,

    Because the sheeple just want to go along to get along. Which, of course, makes it easier for our security overlords to implement another, and another, and another abusive practice, knowing that they’ll meet very little resistance. There are few of us out here willing to take a stand.

    Example: in Boston, where unconstitutional “random” bag searches are going on, just like in New York and DC, the entirely predictable abuse has escalated. Refuse a search? Get followed and harassed. How long before we’re handcuffed?? Take a look (scroll down):
    http://mococivilrights.wordpress.com/2011/02/22/aclu-nca-mccrc-say-no-to-metro-bag-searches/