Are you exempt from a TSA screening? The list is growing, and you just might be on it

Maybe you aren’t a senior member of Congress, a visiting dignitary or a working pilot — three of the most high-profile groups of air travelers who are exempt from a full-body scan or “enhanced” pat-down by the Transportation Security Administration.

But the list of exceptions is bigger than you might think, and it’s growing.

Working pilots are the latest group to skip the scanners, following intense pressure from their unions and several lawsuits. “Allowing these uniformed pilots, whose identity has been verified, to go through expedited screening at the checkpoint just makes for smart security and an efficient use of our resources,” TSA Administrator John Pistole said in a prepared statement last Friday.

Flight attendants are not far behind. Already, Delta Air Lines and Southwest Airlines’ flight attendant union have asked TSA for an exemption for their crewmembers. They are widely expected to get their way soon. (Update: It just happened.)

Senior members of Congress traveling with a security detail, including the speaker of the House, the House minority leader, and the Senate majority leader, are allowed to bypass security checkpoints when flying on commercial jets, according to the Washington Post. However, other members of Congress must be screened.

Cabinet secretaries who use commercial aviation and travel with bodyguards may bypass security, according to TSA. Cabinet secretaries traveling without protection and other senior government officials flying commercial must be screened.

Former presidents flying commercial with Secret Service agents and some foreign ambassadors also traveling with guards are exempt from screening, according to the Post.

Members of the military traveling in uniform must pass through security checkpoints but are not required to remove footwear unless it sets off a metal detector, according to the TSA. The agency also allows airlines to issue special-access passes to military family members who are not flying but want to say goodbye or greet a loved one at the gate.

State, local and tribal police officers who must fly with a firearm have to obtain an identifier code from the TSA before flying. The officers have to present the code and law enforcement credentials before passing through security.

Cargo loaders, baggage handlers, fuelers, cabin cleaners and caterers can, as a matter of routine, bypass TSA inspection entirely, according to Salon’s Ask the Pilot.

In some cases, this exemption also extends to airport volunteers who offer directions, information and assistance to air travelers. I interviewed one airport volunteer who routinely used his credentials to bypass security when he flew, arguing that the ability to skip a checkpoint was one of the perks of his job.

It should be noted that the level of exemption are not the same for every group. For example, ground workers can access the terminal by swiping their ID card at an unguarded door, whereas pilots must still have their IDs checked and submit to random screening.

Still, the list appears to be growing by the day as more special interest groups try to opt out of the screenings. It is probably just a matter of time before this list is exploited by the bad guys.

(Photo of flight attendants by Janne M/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • cjr

    “Cargo loaders, baggage handlers, fuelers, cabin cleaners and caterers can, as a matter of routine, bypass TSA inspection entirely”

    Gee, I can’t possibly imagine how the next bomb will get through all this security…

  • barbie45

    cjr, ditto

  • frostysnowman

    cjr hit the nail on the head. And now that we see female suicide bombers, how soon might it be before one decides to try and fulfill her life-long dream of becoming a flight attendant if flight attendants get an exemption?

  • Raven

    @CJR:
    Exactly. These are the people we should be checking intensely. Most airlines employ illegal labor or people with questionable SSN#s to do these tasks. This is a catastrophe waiting to happen. I know this for a fact because the last SWA flight I was on, I stayed on the plane during a stop at BWI, and the “cleaners” came through not speaking nor understanding a word of English.

  • Steve

    Exempting pilots from the screening is the most sensible thing that the TSA has done since…well, it’s probably the most sensible thing they’ve ever done. Assuming that their identification is still checked carefully, there is zero reason to subject a pilot to a scanner or a patdown; if a pilot *did* want to bring down a plane, he could simply choose to fly into the ground (or some building). The idea of scanning pilots for bombs/explosives/weapons is comical.

    I think flight attendants should still be screened, though.

  • Deborah

    Gee frostysnowman, since when are all flight attendant women 1950? The issue is that flight attendants (who, by the way, can be either male or female) are frontlines in flight safety, just like other flight crew.

  • http://www.all-about-guatemala.com/bc Benjamin Barnett

    Weren’t the 9-11 culprits employed by the airport? Maybe I’m mistaken on that.

  • Monica

    @Benjamin Barnett My thoughts exactly! It’s been a few years, but I’m pretty sure I remember at least one of the planes had a terrorist pilot on 9/11, causing all the subsequent security panic. They didn’t need bombs. Ironically, if they were to go through security today, it wouldn’t have stopped them from getting on board since they weren’t carring weapons or anything suspicious.

    A terrorist is going to figure it out one way or another. The risk is still low.

  • Ed

    I don’t know if I agree with the exemptions here…
    The reason for the scanning and pat-downs is security, right? Well, if a single person on a plane is not secure, then no one on the plane is. Who’s to say what the congressman is carrying? Perhaps he opened a package just before he headed off to the airport and forgot the knife or box-cutter in his jacket pocket…Now perhaps there is a disgruntled passenger on the plane who is upset about the way he was treated…the congressman’s knife falls to the floor during the flight, and now this disgruntled passenger has it and is threatening flight attendants with it..
    We aren’t all safe unless we *ALL* go through the same safety procedures. If a single person is skipped, there is no guarantee of safety!

  • ZK

    Are children under 12 exempt or not? I heard this morning on NPR Morning Edition that they are not. I am unable to sleep at night, worried that my young grandchildren will be radiated and/or molested this week. Will they remove the baby’s diaper? Is there anything I can do? I already wrote to our two senators (from Massachusetts).

  • Jerry

    Ed: So you think these security procedures actually make us safe? I’d take your last sentence and remove the conditional, like so: There is no guarantee of safety! Not now, not ever. There are risks every day, everywhere, in everything we do.

    I flew on September 24, 2001, just a few days after the skies in the US were reopened. One person said I was “brave”. Nonsense! It was probably the safest time to fly that there would ever be!

    I was far more concerned about walking home last night in a lightning storm than I ever am about the threats that the TSA is supposedly protecting us from. This security theater has gotten way out of hand, and I am glad that finally enough people are annoyed enough to do something about it.

  • DJP

    @CJR

    That is already well established given how many times people have had things stolen from their baggage.

  • Brian\PVD

    @Ed: You’re probably in more danger of a heavy carry-on bag hitting you in the head than to be injured by a knife that a congressman is carrying accidentally. An act of terror requires much more than being on a plane by chance with a sharp implement.

    As for airport personnel, sure, that is a weak point. But it is a crude stereotype that people who don’t speak English must be illegal. And if they were illegals, they come here for opportunity, not because they hate us. You can bet they wouldn’t jeopardize their job, their income, their freedom, and their family by doing something that stupid.

  • cjr
  • Eric

    @cjr That’s pretty scary. Wanna get on the Metro? Bodyscan. Wanna get on a bus? Bodyscan. Wanna go to the library? Bodyscan. McDonald’s? Well, you get the idea. By the time DHS is through, we’ll be picking up 20 rads a year. The terrorists won’t have to bomb us. They can just wait for us to die.

  • http://oussamastake.blogspot.com/ Oussama

    Security is indivisible you either have it consistently across the board or forget it. The system will have loopholes that will allow an elephant into an airport. Swiping the card at an unguarded gate, great security (no matching of ID card and person).

  • chris

    I believe the exemption for volunteers and crew extends only to when they are passing to the secure side of the airport to perform their jobs. We were required to be screened anytime we were going to fly, but not when we were in the airport for work.

  • B

    As an airline employee, we can not bypass the TSA checkpoints when we fly (I’m not a pilot or FA). If we do get caught bypassing security checkpoints we will be terminated, this has happened to employees from the bottom all the way up to executives.

  • http://www.worldtraveler.biz Preston Smith

    Hey Chris,

    Er… not sure if you’ve seen this, but if it’s true, based on past blogs, does this make you a “domestic extremist?”

    Check it out: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30286

    Troubling times indeed.

  • cjr

    Preston, I also stumbled across that article last night, and I am unsure what to make of it.

    At this point, anything is possible. But then, that website has a “Countdown until Obama leaves office”, so this doesn’t exactly come across as ‘free press’ but ‘free propaganda’. In fact, the more I read, the more I quickly want to dismiss anything they say as it looks like conspiracy theories abound.

  • http://www.worldtraveler.biz/blog Preston Smith

    Cjr,

    Yeah, I kind of don’t know what to make of it. Well-written, but very one-sided.

    Which doesn’t mean it’s wrong, but…

    I guess that’s how bad things have gotten in that we really don’t know whom to believe on things like this.

  • Ames

    @Preston Smith

    Napolitano wants to know how people get radicalized? Well, I am getting pretty radicalized right now. Treat people like criminals and that’s how they will behave! It just depends which side one is on as to whether one is a radical or not. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were radicals and terroroists to the British in 1776. Resistence Fighters in WWII Europe were radicals and terrorists to the Germans. Perhaps American people who want to be treated with dignity are radicals and terrorists to the TSA.

  • Traveling E

    That’s the takeaway point here, CJR: while the TSA is groping kids, guys who are loading planes or have access to the entire cabin are unscreened. Nice.

  • Carrie Charney

    NO ONE should be exempt, especially congressmen. For safety? Of course not. If no one is exempt, then more of the right people will get angry at having to put up with this sham and they will put an end to it.

  • Jon

    While I can see that the list looks long, if you take a hard look at exactly how many bodies this accounts for, it’s not as long as you might think..

    Yes, the pilots and FA’s are a larger list.. no doubt about that.. but “Senior Members of Congress” is really about 6 or so people.. that’s it.. 6 or so.. and it doesn’t appear that the exception applies to any family/spouse or aides who may be with them..

    When it comes to the “Cabinet” that is only 15 people as that’s the number of official Cabinet level positions.. Secretary of State, Labor, Energy… etc.. and like the Congressional exemption, it doesn’t appear that any staffers are exempt.. just the actual Secretary of…

    As to “Former US Presidents”.. that too is small.. 4 to be exact.. Bush, Clinton, Bush and Carter (in no order)..

    The other group of ground-based employees (cleaners, fuelers, etc) do have rights to bypass, but also remember that they’re not flying either.. Yes, they have access to the plane as a routine part of their jobs, but won’t be ON the plane.. If they do travel– as an employee, they must go thru the same screening process as anyone else.. Unless they are proper crew or pilots..

  • LILLIAN

    no – we need a lemon law for airlines – you have up to 24
    hours to make any changes to your reservation without
    penalty.

  • AirportFueller

    @CJR
    I don’t know how things work in the US but in Canada everyone who works in the airport airside or groundside gets a thorough 3-6+ month of background checks and not just criminal! I go through a security checkpoint (not a terminal) at least 14 times a day. It’s unreasonable and unhealthy to be screened xrayed etc that many times a day!

  • Valedwardsmusic

    as soon as I read that up pop’d the red flag. wasn’t it a busboy with the catering division of the Hotel that offed Bobby Kennedy ? You got to wonder where this wisdom from the TSA is coming from. Me thinks the whole Agency needs a pat down of IQ from the powers that be on the top of the level to the agents at the gates nationwide. We have created a problem within the problem

  • http://www.RockyFlatsGear.com Jeff Buske

    As of 9-11-2011 TSA, staff was exempted as well.  Else, being scanned daily + working around the radiation equipment would put securty staff over OHSA/FDA exposure limits.  Security’s staff would be classified as radiation workers requiring dosimeter badges. 
    http://www.rockyflatsgear.com/How-penetrating-are-airport-back-scatter-x-rays.html 

  • http://www.RockyFlatsGear.com Jeff Buske
  • http://www.RockyFlatsGear.com Jeff Buske

    Eric, if we are not careful we will have scanners on the street corners.  We already have mobile x-ray backscatter vans on the streets.

    http://www.rockyflatsgear.com/How-penetrating-are-airport-back-scatter-x-rays.html

  • Anonymous

    I am 73 years old with a pace maker.  Why do they have to feel my private areas in Phoenix.  I do not know if the person doing this has passed any background checks… The last last one in Nov. 2011, said she has this test all the time..Oh really.  I lose my dignity when flying, which is a sad place to be in this great country..