5 reasons I’m opting out of the TSA’s scanners (and you should, too)

Next week is one of the busiest of the year for air travel. And the last thing you probably want to see at the airport when you fly home for Thanksgiving is a long line — especially one that’s preventable.

But this year is different.

This Thanksgiving, I’m telling the TSA agents who screen me that I won’t walk through their full-body scanners.

And I’m not alone. A group of activists who are concerned about the so-called “advanced” imaging technology are also urging air travelers to just say “no” next week.

Opting out means agents will either give you an “enhanced” pat-down or wave you through the screening area (and when there’s a long line, it’s a safe bet it’ll be the latter). But the peaceful protest will also slow screenings to the point where the agency will have to reconsider the way it checks air travelers, as it did during a successful opt-out action two years ago.

A sustained protest could kill the scanners.

If you’re one of the millions of Americans who fly, and don’t think there’s anything wrong with getting a full-body scan, let me offer a few reasons you should reconsider.

1. They’re not adequately tested and could be dangerous. Unfortunately, the scanners you’ll be asked to walk through haven’t been properly tested. The latest independent evaluations are actually based on data provided by the TSA. The government wants us to trust it, but it won’t give us a reason. That’s unacceptable.

2. They’re easily foiled. It’s not difficult to sneak a weapon through a full-body scanner,  according to several reports. The career criminals who might want to do us harm have figured out how to get around the scanners already.

3. They’re too expensive. At a quarter of a million bucks a pop, the scanners are a huge waste of taxpayer money. To use one, or to allow one to be used on you, is is an endorsement of an iffy technology. It also lines the pockets of undeserving security contractors, say critics.

4. They probably violate your constitutional rights. Beyond the fact that they are nothing more than an overpriced visual deterrent to amateur terrorists, the TSA’s scanners are constitutionally problematic. The Fourth Amendment’s provisions against unreasonable searches are directly at odds with the way these scanners are deployed and used.

5. They haven’t caught a single terrorist. Sure, they’ve netted plenty of contraband, which the TSA likes to show off weekly on its blog. But so far, not a single airborne jihadist has been caught with the scanners. Not a one.

National Opt-Out Week is a good start, and it comes on the heels of the TSA’s humiliating withdrawal of its most controversial full-body scanners from major airports: the risky “backscatter” X-ray machines.

But in order to end the warrantless scans for good, we need to stand up at the same time and say “no” even after Opt-Out Week ends.

We need to do it until the TSA changes the way it screens us.

Are you opting out of the TSA's full-body scanners next week?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • jim6555

    I will be flying on Wednesday morning out of Tampa International Airport. This airport has always used millimeter wave scanners which do not produce deadly or harmful radiation. I will let them scan me here. My return flight will be a few days later out of LAX. The last time I was there, they were using backscatter machines. If those machines are still in use, I will definitely opt out there.

  • naoma

    I tried to opt out of the scanners (I did not have to remove my boots, however). It is an “age” thing. But they said I must go through scanner. Wanted me to remove a scarf I was wearing but it was attached to my sweater — it is a sweater with attached hood and scarf. On previous trip I had to go through “enhanced” patdown and have my hands rubbed with something and then wait for results.
    I passed. Scanners scare me.

  • naoma

    On a previous trip I had those locks on my luggage that they can open with their special key. BOTH LOCKS WERE STOLEN. Will not buy anymore. I even had a luggage tag removed (my name was on it — hope they can use it). It was a brass tag.

  • Jill_Ion

    Actually, the courts have upheld that Americans have a right to fly.

  • Jill_Ion

    They caught someone? A terrorist? What did they actually find?

  • Jill_Ion

    Despite your attempts to minimize our comments, it IS a big deal for many travelers, and the numbers are growing.

  • Jill_Ion

    Maybe if the TSA supervisors properly assigned the necessary number of screeners and demanded they actually work their entire shift, then things won’t slow down and we’ll get a day or two of full value for their paycheck.

  • Jill_Ion

    I won’t be opting out next week because I will not allow TSA screeners to sexually assault me. I fully support those who do opt-out and I hope this is a good opportunity to inform other flyers of the issues related to TSA.

  • Jill_Ion

    Currently the courts have upheld these searches as legal, but courts change and law changes. I hope I’m still alive when it does.

  • JenniferFinger

    I think this little example of Godwin’s Law is obnoxious. You’re comparing apples and oranges here. Everyone else has the right to opt out, so I’m not infringing on anyone else’s rights.

  • MarkieA

    So, as of 11/17/12, the latest is that this guy was arrested for having a watch that looked like a timing device. No explosives, no nothing else. Whew! That was close. Sure glad we got THAT guy.

  • BMG4ME

    The problem for me is that it doesn’t prevent me from having to do what I really object to – which is taking off my belt.

  • drustrange

    I travel 70k miles per year and ALWAYS opt out, for safety, civil rights, and personal privacy reasons. The patdown used to bother me, but not any more, not after 100 of them. It’s also amusing when you get a TSA person who’s a walking example of the Stanford Prison Experiment – trying to bully you with comments, tone, or even an especially long and invasive patdown. So sorry, dull TSA person, but after you rub your hands all over me, I get to leave, whereas you have to stay here being irradiated for ever, and ever, and ever….

  • frnkbnhm

    I will not be opting out. I am not so uptight that I care if some TSA agent sees what I look like as a fuzzy naked silhouette.
    Despite being a libertarian, I completely disagree with the civil rights arguments. I decided to fly somewhere. From my point of view, the act of purchasing your airline ticket is a tacit acceptance of the search.

  • Bunny Faber

    I worry more about who sets up and runs these machines. This is like putting a medical device in the hands of the ignorant. Maybe they are perfectly harmless when they are operating according to their expected parameters – but what if they are not “idiot proof”?

  • Lost in France

    3 out of the, “5 reasons I’m opting out of the TSA’s scanners (and you should, too)” have nothing to do with why a person should opt out. #2, #3, and #5 provide no information relating to why one should opt out. While I agree with the premise of the article, it is clearly misleading, and appears to be written by an amateur.

  • http://twitter.com/dsudz Daniel

    Yet these procedures started under the Obama administration.

  • bodega3

    You need to do a bit of homework:In 2004:
    the 9/11 Commission recommended that TSA give priority attention to implementing

    technologies and procedures for screening passengers for explosives.

    2 The bombing of two

    Russian airliners in August 2004, shortly after the release of the commission’s report, focused

    considerable attention on this issue. Based on the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation, Congress

    included provisions in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-

    458) directing TSA to improve checkpoint screening technologies capable of detecting

    explosives. TSA initially tested walkthrough portals that analyze samples of air passed over

    individuals for traces of explosives. However, TSA considered these systems to be unreliable in

    the airport environment and has more recently focused on WBI technologies.

    1

    Russian airliners in August 2004, shortly after the release of the commission’s report, focused

    considerable attention on this issue. Based on the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation, Congress

    included provisions in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-

    458) directing TSA to improve checkpoint screening technologies capable of detecting

    explosives. TSA initially tested walkthrough portals that analyze samples of air passed over

    individuals for traces of explosives. However, TSA considered these systems to be unreliable in

    the airport environment and has more recently focused on WBI technologies.

    1

    1

  • Pingback: It’s The Beginning Of The End For The TSA’s Full-Body Scanners « MR-E INFO

  • New bill of rights

    You are 100% correct. Thank you for making this an issue and not being complacent fools like the rest of these idiots. It’s amazing how many stupid people will argue vehemently against their own interests.

  • Ladue

    Flew out of DCA at Thanksgiving and the full-body scanners were the ONLY option. They were not sending anyone through metal detectors, they were blocked off. I opted for the pat down.

  • http://www.facebook.com/elisabeth.grace2 Crowther Amanda-Beth

    Kind of dumb question but seriously ain’t no ones hands touching me and I have metal plate in wrist that’s capable of conducting electricity mildly yo really don’t want to know how that was found out how if I had need to fly should I handle that?