|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Thanks for
Nothing
Opinion · August 16, 2002
Now that US Airways
is bankrupt and United Airlines is following its vapor trail into the
abyss of insolvency, here's a question worth asking: What happened to
all that money we gave the ailing airline industry after Sept. 11?
Congress allocated $15 billion to save the carriers after the terrorist
attacks, of which $5 billion were outright grants. Of that, US Airways
pocketed $287 million and United took $724 million. Are these airlines
going down and taking our tax dollars with them?
Possibly. Although the affected airlines insist the government money was
well-spent, thanks very much, all this talk of bankruptcy leaves the average
taxpayer with the impression the money was wasted.
If it wasn't - and we all hope that's the case - then let me be the first
to ask: Where's the evidence?
Surely US Airways' reassurance that it will emerge next spring as a stronger
carrier proves that we didn't throw government funds at a lost cause.
"Our customers should be confident that we will continue service to the
more than 200 communities in our network," US Airways' chief executive,
David Siegel, promised on the eve of his airline's bankruptcy filing.
Several days later, however, his airline quietly announced it would eliminate
service between Pittsburgh, Pa., and Saginaw, Mich.
Now there's a confidence-building move if I've ever seen one.
Maybe United Airlines' self-imposed 30-day deadline, by which time it
must pull itself out of its debt trouble, is evidence of the carrier's
clear resolve. Or its tough-talking CEO, Jack Creighton, who recently
declared that United will "do whatever it takes to continue to meet the
needs of our customers for many years to come."
We want to believe him, but those of us who remember what it was like
to fly on United before its troubles began might doubt that the airline
ever knew how to take care of its customers in the first place. If taking
care of passengers means charging your best customers prices that are
four times higher than the advance-purchase fares, then maybe we're better
off without Creighton's help.
We hear the airlines make promises, but experience tells us not to listen.
They say that it's "business as usual" as they file for Chapter 11 protection,
but bankruptcy has such a ring of finality to it. Bankrupt means you can't
pay your bills. Bankrupt means you're going out of business. That's what
it meant for Eastern, Pan Am and TWA. Do they think we've forgotten?
Face it, the money was squandered.
And more of it is about to be misspent. Curiously, US Airways hopes to
qualify for another $1 billion in federally-backed loans by declaring
bankruptcy. United is trying to secure a $2 billion loan guarantee and
is threatening to file for bankruptcy if it doesn't get it.
The intent of the federal aid under last year's Air Transportation Safety
and System Stabilization Act was to compensate air carriers for losses
incurred as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United States, but
the legislation was sold to us as an investment in the future of America's
air transportation system. The airlines took our money and used it to
fund their failure. They accepted our hard-earned tax dollars and now
they want to take even more of it before they go under.
Thanks for nothing.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator based in Key Largo, Fla. All e-mailed
questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|