|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
False Forecasts
Opinion · April 8, 2002
What's the summer
travel season going to be like? Will airfares rise or fall? How about
hotel rates? Will the roads be busy? In newsrooms across the country,
reporters are gearing up to answer those questions, just as they do every
year. And the same pundits are stepping forward to make their travel forecasts.
But unlike other industries where predictions are closely tracked - stock-picking
and sports come to mind - these travel gurus are rarely held accountable
for what they say. If they were, the editors and producers who rely on
their knowledge would realize that they're wrong almost as often as they're
right. Maybe it's time to start keeping score.
How do I know about the shoddy punditry? Because reporters have called
on me with these questions - and I've given them answers that later proved
to be completely untrue. Last year, for example, I told one magazine,
"This will be the worst summer ever for air travel." Wrong. The summer
turned out to be pretty good for air travelers, with lower fares and less
crowds. (What I should have said, in retrospect, was that it would be
the worst fall ever for air travel - but I'm not that good.)
I'm certainly not alone. Last year, Texas travel expert Tom Parsons predicted
"the airlines will try to go with high fares" in the summer and BusinessWeek
even estimated that prices would increase by between 8 and 10 percent,
presumably a consensus of several airline experts. In fact, airfares fell
last summer - down 8.4 percent, 9.2 percent and 12.6 percent in June,
July and August, respectively, according the Air Transport Association.
I only mention Parsons because he recently issued a press release (yes,
some travel pundits actually do that) predicting that airfares are "trending
sky high." And I only mention BusinessWeek because I was quoted in the
same story in which it made its prediction about climbing fares, and it's
more than likely that I was one of the airline gurus who helped it come
up with the incorrect estimate. Note to BusinessWeek: sorry.
The truth is no one - not even the airlines - knows what their fares are
going to do tomorrow, next week or next season. Like forecasting hotel
and car rental rates, it's a guessing game at which you're just as likely
to be right as you are wrong. The travel industry relies on sophisticated
yield-management systems that set prices on airline seats, car rental
rates and hotel rooms. The computer programs create the prices based on
factors such as anticipated demand, competition, and load factors or occupancy.
Anyone with even a vague understanding of yield management knows better
than to predict prices. So why do they do it?
Easy. Because journalists ask them. And because they offer a tacit deal:
if you're wrong we won't tell on you.
It's difficult to resist that kind of a bargain. Travel pundits rely on
press mentions to sell books, airline tickets or to find new clients.
Even though it's often against their better judgment to offer a reckless
forecast, they just can't resist seeing their name in print or their face
on TV. So they play along.
It's hard to say if readers or viewers will be better served by keeping
a scorecard for these forecasters. Do people pay close attention to these
predictions and make purchasing decisions based on them? I think they
do, although maybe not to the same extent as Wall Street analysts who
project a stock price.
A solution doesn't just lie in holding these travel pundits accountable,
but in making sure the journalists covering travel don't ask questions
to which there can't possibly be an intelligent answer. Anyone covering
a travel beat ought to understand that a dartboard is as effective at
projecting prices as any expert. Editors should know better than to write
simplistic headlines that leave readers with a wrong impression.
But ultimately it's up to the travel experts to practice restraint. Not
every travel issue can be summed up in a tidy sound bite or quote. Those
who try are a lying to the public - and themselves.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator based in Key Largo, Fla. All e-mailed
questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|