Hey Hotels.com, what happened to my Internet connection?

Question: I recently reserved a room at the Ramada Charleston in Charleston, S.C., through Hotels.com. When I checked in, I was told there was no Internet in the rooms despite what the Hotels.com Web page said.

I explained that I needed Internet access and that the Ramada would not do. I called Hotels.com from the Ramada lobby and the Hotels.com representative, whose English language skills were poor, confirmed with Ramada that there was no Internet and canceled my reservation.

I then went across the street to the Red Roof Inn, confirmed they had Internet in their rooms, and called Hotels.com back to book it instead. This time the phone representative (whose English was even worse) told me my credit card was declined. This was because she couldn’t understand me and input the wrong number.

Finally, I had to book the room with the front desk of the Red Roof Inn using the same credit card that the Hotels.com agent said was declined and the same credit card I used for the initial Ramada reservation. I lost four nights of Welcome Rewards and about 35 minutes on my cell phone.

I think, at the least, my four nights of welcome rewards should be reinstated. But Hotels.com refused, instead offering me $50 worth of “Hotel Bucks.” They promised them within four to six weeks, but it’s been five months, and there’s no sign of them. Anything you can do to help would be appreciated. — Michael Rosenthal, Miami

Answer: Your room should have had an Internet connection, as promised. I can understand how some hotels might think of a wireless high-speed network as an amenity, like a TV or a hair dryer, but if you’re traveling on business, it’s a necessity.

I reviewed the Hotels.com listing of the Ramada Charleston several weeks after working on this case, and I saw that the hotel still claims to offer “high-speed Internet access” on site.

Evidently not.

Hotels.com is on the hook for selling you a room that fell short of its description. But before getting to that, let’s deal with the foreign call centers. I believe online travel companies have a right to hire the most cost-effective call center personnel they can — wherever they may be. However, you also have a right to speak with a company representative in English. Hotels.com shouldn’t even bother offering a toll-free number if no one can understand the folks staffing it, or if they can’t understand you.

Strictly speaking, the absence of a high-speed Internet connection was a breach of contract by Hotels.com. You booked the hotel because it had an in-room connection. Hotels.com should have offered you an immediate refund, if not found you a comparable room (with Internet, of course) at another hotel.

If you agreed to a $50 coupon at the time you left the hotel, then Hotels.com owes you the “Hotel Bucks” within four to six weeks. Here’s another idea: Why not spring for a wireless Internet card, which will ensure you’re always connected and never at the mercy of a hotel to get work done?

I contacted Hotels.com on your behalf. A representative contacted you and credited the four room nights, plus the promised $50 voucher.

(Photo: the G/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • cjr

    Why didn’t this individual check out the hotel’s website on their own first? I’m on there right now, and it does not mention internet access at all, where as a random check of one in my area says it has complimentary Wi-Fi.

    Christopher, if the individual had bother to check, they wouldn’t have wasted your time (and mine as well). And hopefully this will be a listen to not use sites like Hotels.com

  • cjr

    Oi, that should be ‘lesson’, not ‘listen’.

  • Liz

    Why do some people think that it’s always the consumer’s fault in these situations? Hotels.com is a reputable website and should be put to task for not having correct information. It’s not some fly-by-night company or rarely updated tourist website.

    You should be able to assume that the information provided to you on major internet retailers is correct.

  • gin

    I don’t see any good reason to use secondhand information, when firsthand is easily accessible. I would never rely on hotels.com or similar sites to have accurate, updated information.

    It’s generally just a couple of clicks and you’re at the hotel’s own website. Any further clarification needed, give the hotel a call.

  • GeekChic

    Hotel wireless is generally even worse and is hardly ever stable or functioning. Unless you’re suggesting we find an unsecured connection after scanning the surroundings….

  • http://bidontravel.com/blog/ Don Nadeau

    Those of us who travel with a Mac laptop purchased during the last few years do not have the option of inputing an Internet card. We depend on hotel Internet being available, as promised.

    As for Hotels.com and similar sites, I use them because 1) it becomes so easy to compare prices of many hotels, instead of going from hotel site to hotel site and 2) sites like Hotels.com often have negotiated prices that significantly undercut the prices on the sites run by hotels. If you book solely using prices on hotel sites, you are frequently overpaying.

  • Mike Z

    I’m curiuos as to why he needed to try calling Hotels.com to make a new reservation at the hotel he was standing in, looking at the front desk. One would think that once you had your non-refundable hotel refunded and you go to the next place, you don’t call anyone else to get a room for the place where you are standing.

    as to speaking english, many of these call centers are getting better. I noticed that the OP is from Miami. Maybe Miami is starting to become like Boston or NY where they have their own accent. Even within the US, people get used to hearing the words of those around them, and I’ve had conversation with people within the US that I could barely understand. I know if I was from their area I would know exactly what they were saying.

    All that said, when promised the credits, they should have been issued right away.

  • Steve

    I don’t understand how anyone could think it’s okay for a business like Hotels.com to display false and misleading information, and that there should be no repercussions for that.

  • Gino Buffalino

    Chris — I take great exception to your back-handed, arrogant suggestion that the customer purchase a wireless Internet card. First, those of us who use older MACs can’t input a wireless Internet card. Secondly, not everyone can afford to purchase one, let along pay for the monthly fees that are generally involved.

    So, since if you’re suggesting that they’re cheap enough for just anyone to purchase, why not spring for one for your customer? And, why you’re at it, buy me one too, please!

  • Chris in NC

    I have had a Wireless Internet Card for 4+ years now. I will agree that neither the card, nor the $60 monthly fee, is inexpensive, the card has proven to be a lifesaver. If you are in a profession where Internet access on the road is critical, then its worth every penny. Sure, you can depend on “free” internet, but if access means the difference between closing a deal, or being frustrated, then by all means stick with the “free” hotel Internet.

    I don’t think Chris is being arrogant (or unreasonable) by suggesting that a customer purchase a wireless Internet card. However, if your work depends on the Internet, then in my opinion, it is a necessity. One can make the same argument, why get a rental car, if the hotel provides a shuttle service? Why fly when you can drive or take the train? Why pay for a toll road, when the side streets are free? Its because TIME = MONEY, and the $60 + tax that I pay each month is worth every penny and more!

    The other piece of this article I find interesting, is that the OP is using Hotels.com solely for the purpose of getting 4 nights credit with the “Welcome Reward” program. I like a bargain, but was the hassle and time spent REALLY worth the “rewards” of the program? Remember TIME = MONEY? While I agree that the OP deserved 4 nights credit because he attempted to book 4 nights at the Red Roof Inn, I’m startled at the amount of time and energy he invested to get 40% closer to a “free night” via Hotels.com. This is even more surprising given how Hotels.com has “misleading information” and terrible customer service.

    My advice to the OP is to ditch hotels.com. Obviously, he has been suckered into making bad decisions simply because of a loyalty program.

  • Chris in NC

    @ Don,

    “sites like Hotels.com often have negotiated prices that significantly undercut the prices on the sites run by hotels. If you book solely using prices on hotel sites, you are frequently overpaying.”

    Thats simply untrue. While I agree that using opaque sites like Hotwire and Priceline can yield substantial discounts, I have found that most hotel rates are negotiable, especially if occupancy is down. I simply find that booking sites like Travelocity, Expedia, Hotels.com, Orbitz, etc, rarely provide substantial savings. Thats not to say that I don’t check booking sites to see if there is a major price difference. If there is, it usually is trivial.

    Further, booking directly with the hotel offers some protection if something goes ashtray. I have had managers of hotels waive or relax policies on non-refundable, non-changeable rates, give welcome gifts, or upgrade without asking. While I don’t condone the practice of reserving the worst rooms in the house on a 3rd party booking, I can attest that it happens.

  • Edmond

    Offshore call centers (which may or may not have been the case here) are a hot button issue. I have had good and bad experiences dealing with non-native english speakers. It is my understanding that some companies, such as United Airlines, have offshore centers for general customer service and reservations and US call centers for their VIP customers (Premier Exec and up). It’s not optimal but it makes sense from an economic perspective.

  • Salami

    hotels.racket

  • andi330

    Perhaps there is a misconception about what a wireless internet card is. These days, they are not “cards” for the most part, but USB modems that any computer (even Macs, I am a Mac owner) can use. The appelation “card” is a holdover from the days when they were indeed cards that fit into an Express Card or PCMI card slot on a laptop computer. While no one should feel pressured into purchasing a wireless card (and I doubt that was Chris’s intent), for those who need a guaranteed internet connection, and who don’t want to worry about the possibility of paying a daily rate at a hotel, it is a valid option. Some wireless “cards” these days, are portable Wi-fi hotspots, usable by up to 5 computers at one time, any computer with built in Wi-fi can use them.

  • Chicky

    Hotels.com and like sites are great for scanning hotel prices. I’ve often noted a price on hotels.com and then checked the hotel web site to see if it’s the same. Usually it is, and sometimes a dollar or two cheaper. And I always check the hotel’s web site for accuracy about amenities.
    Wireless cards aren’t cheap, it’s true, but there have been times when I really needed access and didn’t have it. It doesn’t happen often for me, but has occurred. I can see where a business person who absolutely depends on Internet access to do business would benefit from having one, and sometimes, the company will pick up the airtime tab.

  • Thalassa

    I’ve used hotels.com a number of times and had absolutely no problem. I agree that the problem here could have been solved by due diligence, but also that hotels.com owed the OP something.

    However, it was clearly greed that led the OP to try to book his four nights through hotels.com again, instead of just reserving the room as he stood there at the desk. He wanted credit for his loyalty program, darn it. Sometimes, it ain’t worth it.

  • CoryJ

    He’s standing in the lobby of the Red Roof Inn calling hotels.com to reserve a room. I don’t know, call me slow but this is the height of idiocracy. He’s more concerned about getting his “Welcome Rewards” that he spends 35+ minutes on the phone and whining about the customer service. If your customer service rep cannot speak English, then ask to speak to their supervisor or to “someone who can speak english please, I cannot understand you”. It’s a fair request to make and not a foreign (pun intended) request to those agents taking calls. If I can’t understand them I’m not afraid to speak up and politely tell them that I need to speak with someone that I can understand. Instead this goof was more worried about speaking up for his 4-night welcome reward and $50 coupon.

    As for these online hotel web sites, I strenuously disagree with those that say these type of sites (hotels.com, expedia, travelocity, etc.) have negotiated better rates than those booked directly at the hotel/chain website. InterContinental Hotels Group (InterContinental, Holiday Inn, Crowne Plaza, etc.) and Marriott both have rate guarantees and will match, then beat by 10+%, any other advertised web rate. I’ve never even had to take them up on their web rate guarantee as they’ve always had the lowest price when I’ve been booking rooms at their properties. Skip the opaque web sites and deal directly with all travel and hotel providers!!

  • http://bidontravel.com/blog/ Don Nadeau

    @ andi330, Thank you. I will look more carefully at routers.

    @ Chris in NC, We have different experiences. I’ve noticed considerable price cutting on sites like Hotels.com. After all, those (and I am not talking opaque here) are the places a hotel wants to post discount prices not to be seen by loyal customers who go directly to its Internet site.

    However, you and I completely agree that hotel rates can be negotiable, especially in this economy, if you are willing to take the time to deal directly with a hotel, but not while using its Internet site, which is what I meant.

    Although not mentioned but also something we probably agree on, third party sites like Hotels.com can be a little more expensive for hotels when they ask you to prepay. As you probably know, this is when room prices on third party sites and hotel sites are the same, because many third party sites will then add a booking fee.

  • Carol in the figurative case

    @Gino Buffalino
    Lay off the coffee this a.m. – seems you’re a bit touchy. (I’m smiling genuinely as I’m typing this in case you think I’m being arrogant). :)

    I didn’t think Chris’s comment was neither backhanded nor arrogant. The written word in a blog is subject to interpretation – given Chris’s professional yet lighthearted writing style (as I see it), I deemed his advice helpful and genuine as always.

    BTW Chris, I’ve a wireless card for my laptop and it works wonders for me when I’m traveling. Considering you’re a travel writer, I didn’t think it was necessary for you to consider your readers’ individual laptop requirements when suggesting the wireless card. Sheesh, now I’m fretting about making a blog recommendation for a good travel hair dryer in case the folically-challenged people take offense. LOL (yes, I’m joking).

  • Jeanne in NE

    I’ve thought about the wireless card option, but since I travel irregularly, the monthly fees don’t make sense to me. I empathize with Mr. Rosenthal’s situation, just having gone through a similar experience in St. Paul, MN. I was promised high-speed wireless Internet access in my room, but found out that access is cut when too many people are logged on. I ended up having to conduct my business in the lobby, where another hotspot was located. I spent an hour on my cell working with their Internet techs, because the room phone didn’t work. I finally got to talk to a manager on day 2, and had him give me a credit toward the inconvenience. Checking out of my location and going to another would have been difficult, as all rooms in the area seemed to be booked up.

    Rewards programs don’t hold any particular charm for me, because of my irregular travel habits. I’m still astounded that Mr. Rosenthal would have used an Internet service for booking a room at the motel where he was standing. That reward program in which he is enrolled must be mighty important to him. Hotels.com did not do its job and essentially owes him the points, not the $50, since they were unable to deliver the service for which he contracted.

  • Kevin M

    @Chris in NC: Just because internet access is crucial for a particular trip does not mean that the cost of a wireless card (including subscription fees) make sense. I travel only occasionally, almost always just for leisure, but because I’m on a sort of “virtual call” for work, I need to be able to log in and work in the unlikely event of a problem that needs my attention. But I don’t need it so often that I can justify it as a business expense. With monthly fees in the $40-60 range, that can’t be sustained too long out-of-pocket just so I can go out of town occasionally.

    So the original poster was well within his rights to demand a refund of the hotel room. That said however, as others have commented, spending a ton of time and effort to get hotels.com rewards seems kind of pointless, particularly if he’s worried about 35 minutes of cell time. If costs are that critical (and I’m not disparaging him if they are), then there are a lot smarter ways to save money in travel.

  • Geoff

    I have aquired my hundreds of associates over 45 years owning a travel agency. What the new and computer literate traveler has failed to learn is tha “online” travel agencies don’t have any clout. When I make an error (it happens) I am resposible and take care of it in moments. Whern you are looking to “score” on a 4 star room for a 2 star price, youi get whatever the computer “deamons” offer you based upon their criteria. $50.00 hotel rooms don’t get you a whole lot as $500.00 rooms may not get you a whole lot. The internet lies sometimes…..BTW, I have the Broolyn Bridge for sale…it’s on the internet, so it must be true.