Ship of fine print: 7 clauses to beware of in your cruise contract

If you ever want to feel confused, outraged and powerless all at the same time, just read your cruise line’s ticket contract.

Carrie Streahle didn’t know what was in hers until her cruise arrived late in Houston, and she had to pay an extra $1,900 in airfares and accommodations to get home. She contacted Carnival, asking for reimbursement.

“Carnival’s first response was that we didn’t have travel insurance,” she says. She protested. The cruise line responded again, this time blaming Mother Nature. “They said they can’t control the weather,” she says.

No kidding. Carnival’s ticket contract specifically says it can change arrival or departure times without notice, for any reason whatsoever, including weather. “Carnival shall have no liability for any compensation or other damages in such circumstances,” it adds.

“Carnival is not at fault because they were delayed by an act of nature,” says Anita Dunham-Potter, who writes the blog ExpertCruiser. “When this happens, they have no control over the port, or the time it takes customs to clear the ship, which is ultimately what decides the time you can get off the ship.”

Cruise contracts are filled with clauses and supported by laws that the average passenger doesn’t know about. If they did, they might think twice before setting sail. The paperwork addresses everything from what the cruise line owes you when something goes wrong (not much) when it’s responsible for your well-being (hardly ever) to where and when you can sue them (in a faraway court, and almost never).

“No one reads the fine print,” says Al Anolik, a travel attorney in San Francisco. But if you do — and a warning to all you non-attorneys out there, this isn’t light reading — you’ll find the law limits the rights of passengers in many key areas, such as a cap on damages you can collect from a cruise line and time limits on any lawsuit.

“There are no consumer protections in the ticket,” adds maritime attorney James M. Walker, who writes a blog about cruise law. “It was drafted by the cruise lines lawyers to protect the cruise lines at the consumer’s expense. It is a one-sided document.”

So what do you need to know before you set sail?

Your laws aren’t our laws. That’s not hyperbole. It’s literally true, according to Robert M. Jarvis, a maritime law professor at Nova Southeastern University Law Center in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. “The law governing cruises has nothing to do with where a passenger lives or buys a ticket,” he says. “Instead, federal maritime law, international law, the law of the country where the cruise ship is registered — typically the Bahamas, Liberia, or Panama — and the law selected by the cruise line are going to control, and all of these favor the cruise line.” That’s why it’s so hard to find a good lawyer to sue a cruise line. There aren’t many. Maritime law, or admiralty law, is “incredibly complex,” says Jarvis. “Only a few lawyers have the necessary training and experience to deal with such matters, and most of them are working for the cruise lines,” he adds.

Don’t hold us to the brochure. The ship may — or may not — keep the promised schedule. This is perhaps the most irritating contract provision. Here’s Royal Caribbean’s: “Carrier may for any reason at any time and without prior notice, cancel, advance, postpone or deviate from any scheduled sailing, port of call, destination, lodging or any activity on or off the Vessel, or substitute another vessel or port of call, destination, lodging or activity.” What’s more, it owes you nothing if it does. “Everything is subject to change and availability,” says Kristen Bentz, a travel consultant in Mesa, Ariz. “Basically, prices, rooms, excursions, itineraries, and anything not guaranteed is up to the cruise line’s discretion.”

The quack who treated you isn’t our problem. Most medical care on cruise ships is perfectly adequate. But just in case it isn’t, cruise lines have a clause that say they aren’t responsible for the malpractice of the ship’s doctors. Have a look at paragraph 13 of Princess’ passage contract: “Doctors, nurses or other medical or service personnel work directly for Passenger and shall not be considered to be acting under the control or supervision of Carrier, since Carrier is not a medical provider. Similarly, and without limitation, all spa personnel, photographers, instructors, guest lecturers and entertainers and other service personnel shall be considered independent contractors who work directly for the Passenger.” In other words, when a doctor’s negligence leads to the death of a family member, the cruise line is off the hook.

“The passenger is left with the problem of having to bring a claim against the doctor who inevitably is not a U.S. citizen, often has no insurance, and is not subject to personal jurisdiction here in the U.S.,” says Walker.

Kids and retirees are second-class citizens. The survivors of children or retired passengers who die on cruise ships have no right to compensation except for burial and funeral expenses, according to Walker, who recently wrote about this quirky provision on his blog. It turns out that when passengers die on the high seas, the “Death On The High Seas Act” applies. “It limits the recovery of the surviving family members to what is called pecuniary losses,” he says. “This means that only lost wages and burial or funeral expenses are permitted.” If you’re a child or a retiree, and not earning wages, the only compensation is for the costs of the burial.

Wanna sue us? Come to Miami. These are called “forum selection” clauses, and they require you to sue the cruise line in a particular court. “Forum selection clauses have been routinely enforced for many years,” says Thomas Dickerson, author of the book Travel Law. “However, recently, the courts have consistently enforced a federal forum selection clause, which requires injured passengers to sue in federal court in Miami instead of state court — the significance being that jury trials may not be available in federal court.” That makes suing a cruise line difficult, and often impossible.

Time is short. There’s a one-year limitation period to file a claim, and a six-month period to write a letter to the cruise line when the passenger has been injured, says Walker, the maritime attorney. “This is a relatively short period of time, compared to the statute of limitations of most states,” he says. “Florida, for example, has a four-year limitations period.” What if you miss your deadline? Walker says people who have, contact him all the time. “There is nothing we can do for them.”

If you think that’s bad, get this: Experts agree that the contracts are getting worse. “In the last decade, cruise lines have had to tighten the reins,” says Bentz. “Contracts have gotten a little longer and a little less customer-friendly.” That means we may one day look back on 2010 as a time when cruise lines still cared about their passengers.

I have a sinking feeling that might be true.

(Photo: nick herbert/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • David H

    It’s probably a good isea from the traveller’s point of view to consider a cruise as a vacation abroad. Treat booking and travelling on a cruise ship the same as you would travelling to a large resort in a foreign country, and take the same precautions.

    U.S. law rarely applies on board a cruise ship (except within the 12-mile limit), so you may want to read up on the laws of whichever country the ship is registered in.

  • Chris Hansen

    I suppose the only ultimate recourse is to not take a cruise and tell the cruise lines why. If enough people told them that their contracts are too restrictive then perhaps they’d revisit them. After reading this I certainly will not take a cruise anytime soon.

  • larry

    I use one simple guideline when booking a cruise. Arrive one day early and leave the day after the ship returns to its origination port. There are way too many horror stories about folks that do otherwise.

  • Richard Trilling

    I do suspect that this would be illegal in France & that they would come under the abusive clause in French contracts, despite the fact that a person signed the contract. That is if the cruise contract was signed in France.

    Furthermore the French court that would adjudicate would be located in the jurisdiction where the contract was signed.

    Last point, under French law, it would be the travel agent that sold the contract that was responsible for it’s execution and therefore liable. It would be up to him/her to turn turn around and go after the cruise line.

    French courts & law take very dim views of one sided contracts like this and have probably already declared some of its clauses null and void.

    For the rest of the EU I’m not sure.

    Richard (an American expat)

  • MarkieA

    I guess I’m missing something here as far as the “survivor” clause goes. If your child or partner, or whoever, dies on-board ship, what exactly are you supposed to be looking for as far as “compensation”? I guess if the cruise line was somehow at fault, I can see this, but that wasn’t clear from the description.

    @Richard Trilling
    I think you may be missing the whole point. French law, American law, etc. simply don’t apply on the cruise ship. You can’t impose the French ideals you praise because the cruise ship is registered in Liberia, for example. Liberian law rules. Most of this s**t would be illegal in a lot of countries, that’s why the ships aren’t registered in France, or the U.S.

  • Richard Trilling

    MarkieA

    You missed the point. A commercial contract was signed either with the cruise line or a travel agency. That contract falls under French law.

  • http://www.cruiselawnews.com Jim Walker

    In most cases involving passenger injuries or deaths, U.S. Maritime Law applies. The U.S. Supreme Court has permitted foreign cruise corporations (Carnival, NCL, Royal Caribbean) to limit their liability in this manner even thought it is unfair to U.S. passengers. International passengers fare no better. Any claim against one these cruise lines, even by a passenger from France, has to be filed in Miami where the court will apply U.S. Maritime Law.

  • Raven

    Cruise lines are thieves that serve alcohol.

  • Eric

    Which is why I have never, and will never, take a cruise. Your “inalienable” rights magically become “alienable” when you board that ship. What I find the most shocking is the clause I’ve read about that the cruise line isn’t responsible for the condition of the ship, or anything on it. Get food poisoning? Not our fault. The railing breaks and you fall overboard? Nope. Not our fault, either. Your room infested with bed bugs? Yup. You guessed it. Not our fault.

  • PARROT MOM

    Well, I successfully sued a cruise line and won and didn’t have to go to Miami..First we documented the problem on the ship with pictures, wrote up the entire incident including the MD’s, Nurses, etc.. and then when we came home (called my orthopedic to confirm the M.D. knew how to set my wrist) called a MARITIME LAWYER who handled the case. The funny part was that my orthopedic surgeon did such a great job on my wrist (Colles Fracture) and being a non-compliant patient I had an excellent outcome and regained more of the use of my wrist than was expected. My lawyer said most people don’t have out comes like mine and except for a little bit of weakness did end up with less than 30% use of my left wrist.

  • Joe Farrell

    I have said for years – a cruise company can put you in a dingy and drive you to the port bar and buy you lunch and then bring you back to the port and put you back on land and have satisfied their obligations under their cruise contract. They changed the itinerary, the ship and the conditions of carriage and then ended the cruise early and placed you back at the pier – not our fault and more importantly, not our responsibility. Which is why, along with the cattle car service and cattle car food – I’ll likely never take a cruise again.

    A decent cabin is $3000 a week for the room, port charges and taxes. Add another $1000 for miscellaneous charges, you know, a decent meal, a massage and soft drinks and wine, then add in another $1000 for airline tickets and a room the night before the cruise because no one in their right mind flies in the day of the cruise, and you are $5000 a week.

    I can rent a house anywhere in the country [or the caribbean / hawaii] for a vacation for $2000 a week for a KILLER home. I’ll get a pool, a hot tub and perhaps a view, lake or water front. I’ll have a kitchen, beds, room to move and a decent location. I then can add on airfare for $1000 lets say on average. Thats $3000. For $1000 I can eat every single meal except b-fast out at a restaurant, but wine, liquor, food, etc etc etc, and and be treated as a valued guest anywhere I go because these businesses want my money. At the end of the week, I’ve spent $4000 – vs. $5000 for the cruise. I have no hassles, no on or off the boat hassle, no cattle car, and I don’t need to hassle with any of the cruise ship contract issues. . .. seriously, why does anyone cruise?

  • Carver

    @Joe

    seriously, why does anyone cruise?
    ———————-

    Got me. I cruised once when I was 17. That was enough for me.

  • Lisa S

    Not a fan of cruises, unless we are talking a small ship (a boat, really) in the Galapagos or off the coast of Turkey. The big ships? I stay away from them. I simply don’t like cruising, but based on the article above, I wouldn’t give those legal thieves my money, ever.

  • Dave

    All the more reason NOT to ever take a cruise.

  • Erik

    I’ve lined through objectionable portions of my Carnival cruise contract in my ticket packet, and also changed portions of it. I initialed and dated these to show that these changes were intentional. When I gave the contract and ticket to the Carnival agent during embarkation, she didn’t say anything, so Carnival accepted these changes.

    Fortunately the cruise went smoothly so I didn’t have to file any claims, which would have been done in a local court, per my changes to the contract.

    Lately Carnival has been getting people to sign these extensive waivers electronically, which makes them impossible to change.

  • Mary Graham

    Thanks for info! I’m now convince to never, ever to take a cruise with these companies! Any good ones out there?

  • carver

    @Erik

    Unfortunately, it is unlikely that your crossing out portions will be enforceable. The reason is that the embarking agent isn’t authorized to make changes to the ticket

  • Sarah Di

    Honestly, as far as the changing of ports go, the cruiselines should have every right to do that. If there is bad enough weather in a port that it is not safe to dock or tender, how badly do you really want to go there?

    I have had wondeful experiences with Carnival. I liked it plenty well enough to be going back 2 months from now and I’ve never felt like they were a thief or anything of the sort.