Dot bomb! How to handle online travel purchases gone bad

The roundtrip airfare from Brussels to New York on the European online travel site eDreams was €337 — until Alisa Schlossberg clicked on the “buy” button. Then it jumped to €592, creating an eNightmare.

Schlossberg, a software consultant who lives in Antwerp, Belgium, thought it was a simple misunderstanding. “After all, I had purchased, paid and received a confirmation from the site,” she says.

But that’s not the way eDreams saw it. “Unfortunately, your ticket fare expired when we tried to issue your booking and the fare went up in 251 euros,” Luis Alberdi, a company spokesman, wrote to her after I asked about her ticket. “We do apologize for any inconvenience caused by it.”

Can an online travel agency do that? Yes. And more of them are, to hear travelers like Schlossberg and others talk about it. At a time when more tickets, hotel rooms and rental cars than ever are being booked online, frustrations with the booking process are growing.

The complaints can be divided into several broad categories:

Bait and switch. You thought you’d locked in a price, but were asked to pay more. Either surcharges and fees were added, or the ticket was completely re-priced.

Double booking. Your Web browser freezes during the booking process, you page back and make a reservation, only to find you’re now the proud owner of two nonrefundable reservations.

Sleight of hand. The site offers a ticket or hotel room, but once you try to book, you find out the tickets are gone. If you’re buying a vacation package, the site may offer you an alternate destination — usually at a higher price.

What’s going on here? There are two explanations: one put forth by the travel industry, and the other by irritated consumers.

“This predates the Internet,” explains Chicago-based online consultant Bruce Mainzer. He says the reservations systems used by travel agents showed the airline seats and hotel rooms in real time. When more than one person tried to book the same item, the system accepted one request and rejected the other.

“As more and more consumers started accessing these same computerized reservation systems through the Internet, they are getting the same type of mixed signals when they go to book,” he says. “The last seat may have been grabbed by someone else.”

Another theory — so far unproven — is that the Web sites, far from being helpless victims, are leveraging technology to squeeze every last dollar from travelers. Customers contend that Web sites use so-called “cookies” (the crumbs of information you leave behind when you visit a site) to control virtually every aspect of the booking experience. Based on that data, sites can display a higher or lower price or even deny the sale.

Consider what happened when Melissa Gomez tried to buy an air and hotel package through one of the major online travel agencies recently. “After I filled out all the information and gave my credit card, the transaction could not be processed,” she remembers. “After three failed attempts, I had to call customer service.” The agency charged her an extra $25 for making the reservation by phone. Why didn’t the sale go through? A representative told Gomez the airline inventory wasn’t “up to date” on the site. But were they really just trying to make an extra $25?

Whether these failed online bookings are innocent hiccups from an overloaded reservations system or secretive efforts to cash in on our technology ignorance, the real question is: How do we deal with it?

I asked experts for their opinions.

1. Don’t give up.
Sometimes it really is just a glitch, nothing more. Try to search for the fare or hotel room again, and if that doesn’t work, phone the online travel agency, says Rob Käll, president of Bookt, a Web services provider to the hotel and vacation rental industry. “If you don’t have any luck,” he adds, “try the hotel or airline directly.”

2. Call for help.
If your travel site doesn’t work, try someone whose system does — such as a travel agent. “In most cases a real travel agent can check the price to see if it’s available and also book it at the same price,” says Bruce Fisher, Honolulu-based operator of a vacation package site, Hawaii-Aloha.com. A competent agent understands the perils of booking online and can often price-match. What’s more, their systems can be faster and more reliable than the one you’re using to buy your trip. It’s worth noting that the advice isn’t free — agents charge a booking fee for their services.

3. Take your best shot.
If you find a price online and try to buy it, but are denied, your first step is to gather evidence. “Take a screen shot of the page with the fare you were promised and contact the travel site,” says Damian Bazadona, president of Situation Interactive, a New York marketing agency. “Most consumers assume that if it’s an online service they can’t speak to someone. That’s not the case.” He’s right. I’ve seen travelers prevail in a dispute with a travel company or bank because they had screen shots.

4. Cite the law.
I’m not going to go into details about how to complain to a travel company — I have a section on my blog dedicated to that — but I would add one thing: In addition to a brief, polite e-mail with your screen shots, it may help to cite any laws that apply to your situation. For example, the Federal Trade Commission has a useful guide on bait advertising with chapter and verse of applicable federal law. (Bait advertising is an alluring but insincere offer to sell a product the advertiser in truth does not intend to sell.) If a company thinks it’s breaking the law, it is far likelier to see things your way.

5. Wait.
Online agencies and reservations systems are aware of the problem and are working to fix it, says Pablo O’Brien, the general manager of Yahoo! Travel. Users should expect “gradual improvement in system performance,” he told me. Those much-needed upgrades will allow travel companies to rely less on a process called “caching” — or storing potentially outdated prices on their servers, where they can be accessed by customers. But the fixes won’t happen overnight.

I had a lengthy conversation with a representative from Amadeus, one of the companies that handle reservations, and came away with the impression that the technology already exists to eliminate most of these problems. I also felt that a few common-sense strategies such as the ones I just mentioned could prevent most of these booking snafus.

Common sense and a little tech savvy is also important. “If a traveler uses their browser’s back button, they are essentially going back to an old display, not a refreshed display,” explained Alix Arguelles, director of product management and support services for Amadeus. “Browsers settings should be set for ‘refresh every time’ to help guarantee fresh data.”

But I’m not sure this problem will vanish any time soon. In addition to the conspiracy theorists who believe these system “troubles” are a thinly-veiled money grab, there are people on the other side who think the current reservations systems and the Web sites that book travel through them work just fine, thank you very much.

Alex Bainbridge, a UK-based travel technology consultant, capably represented that point of view when he called these issues a “minor inconvenience” that would be too expensive to repair. “People should get on with their lives and be grateful that affordable flights exist,” he said.

Maybe he has a point. Maybe we should just shut up and travel.

Or not.

  • sirwired

    I just had an odd experience w/ CO’s website. I was booking a RDU->SJC R/T and farecast directed me to CO for the best fare (by about $80) on a DL codeshare. I go through the booking process, selecting my seats on about the 1/3rd empty planes, but my booking won’t complete.

    I call the CO help desk, and the person on the phone informs me that my purchase won’t go through because the flights were full. (She later mentions that CO and DL are about to break their codeshare agreement, so the availability information is all messed up.) I get ready to get upset, but then she offers me a “real” CO itinerary that is slightly better than the DL setup for the same fare; I take it. (No booking fee, I also end up with seats normally reserved for “elite” flyers for pre-book, which is good, because otherwise all four flights are showing ZERO seats avail. for assignment.)

    The thing I am most pleased about is that this particular set of convenient flights is going for about $250 more if I tried to book it myself; only that DL codeshare was showing up at the cheap fare. I am glad CO didn’t just try to raise the price on me since the flights they were advertising were full (or not working.)

    SirWired

  • Lisa

    Like everyone else, I am tired of the misleading advertising, false offers, incomplete pricing, and bait and switch tactics that companies use. I am tired of being swindled. I appreciate these tips, Chris, but it seems as if we need bigger incentives for companies to act ethically. We need laws that carry great penalties if a company offers a product at €337 and then charges €592. There shouldn’t be any discussion if a customer immediately calls or sends an email saying the price was switched. The burden of proof shouldn’t be on the victim but on the company that engages in these practices. Unfortunately, Congress and the governments of many other countries privilege businesses at the expense of customers. I don’t see that changing any time soon. I have accepted that I will receive no service from airlines and that the price of a coach ticket does not include anything but an uncomfortable seat, lousy food, and a method to get where I want to go. If one wants service, one needs to spend triple or more the cost of a coach ticket. This attitude limits my stress because low expectations mean I am not disappointed when I receive nothing.

    Alex Bainbridge’s comment that “[p]eople should…be grateful that affordable flights exist” is ridiculous. A potential customer makes a decision to purchase a product based on the price. The price of a flight is the price of the flight. The customer decides if he or she considers the flight worth the money. The company decides on the price based on their costs. An airline doesn’t say, “Oh well, we are only going to charge $300 for a transatlantic flight because we want it to be affordable. We don’t care that we will lose money every time we fly.” The airline calculates its costs and decides on pricing based on what it takes to cover those costs—and ideally make a profit. Personally, I consider the purchase of a $600 transatlantic airline ticket expensive because it is a large purchase for me. Who is the airline to tell me it is “affordable”? Now, I might think $600 is a reasonable price based on fuel costs, equipment costs, et cetera, but it is still an expensive purchase—in fact it is usually the biggest ticket item of my vacation. If airline tickets cost more, fewer people would fly. If fewer people fly and the airlines make a profit, then that seems like a reasonable strategy for an airline. But if an airline can’t make a profit because fewer people fly, then airlines need to change their prices. “Affordability” is a nice marketing term, but its meaning depends on the individual. My response: “Get real, Mr. Bainbridge, and make the necessary changes to provide accurate pricing at time of purchase!”

  • http://nodebtworldtravel.com brian from nodebtworldtravel.com

    The most important thing you can use is a credit card. That is your last resort if the problem is not solved to your satisfaction. You can call the credit card company usually within 60 days to dispute a charge if services were not rendered properly or if the price is not what you expected.

  • Carver

    Alex BainBridge’s comment is just downright stupid. I usually try to moderate myself to be more civil but what he said was just dumb. It’s the very lack of satisfaction that causes us to aspire to doing better. Its the lack of the sheep mentality that causes progress. I better get off my soapbox before I start sermonizing.

  • http://www.mediasmith.com David Smith

    I too tire at the change of pricing, especially from the online booking engines. So here’s what I do. I use sevaral browsers when looking and booking travel. One I use only when I am booking (e.g., Firefox) and the others (Chrome and IE I use when exploring. That way, they don’t have me cookied. I have found Orbitz to be especially bad at this. If you look at pricing, go away and look at alternatives and come back to book, their price is invariably higher. But if when I go back I use a browser I have not used for the exploration, they think I am a new customer and give me the new customer price.

  • David Z

    The burden of proof shouldn’t be on the victim but on the company that engages in these practices.

    Generally speaking, isn’t it the burden of the one making the claim to demonstrate it? Generally speaking, anyway.

    What you subsequently commented, though, is what I was about to add to what Chris wrote. Namely, don’t expect the price to stay that way until it’s booked on the spot, and (knock on wood) no sorry-there-was-a-problem-and-we-need-to-charge-more email within 24 hours after.

    It’s sad that some cases like that happen, especially with either certain travel agencies and/or airlines that intend to do that. Of course, it ain’t easy to figure that out, so we’re pretty much left to fend for ourselves.

    As you said, $600 is expensive. But as you added, $600 might be also be a reasonable price considering the costs involved.

    From what I’ve gathered from some airline folks, they’re quite aware of that. GIven they can’t always afford to lower those prices, next best thing was to give lower fares with more restrictions.

    If it’s any consolation, your price frustration is shared by various travel agents (including me) experiencing the same thing when trying to book for their customers. I guess we just hardly hear them speak up on it as we might be seen as trying to bite the hand that tries to feed them.

    I can also understand the sentiment behind Mr. Bainbridge’s comment of being grateful affordable fares exist, given it’s indeed subjective. I partially agree with it, actually, but I also guess the more politically correct word might be “lower”.

    Ah well, words, words.

  • David Z

    Just an add-on: how I wish ALL travel agencies’ web sites connect to the same Global Distribution System (GDS) software that airlines use to determine price and availability as only a few do. But given that airlines have their own system, much more not required to use the same software among one another, it usually creates a “technical challenge” for some travel agencies to cope with them when they especially change.

    But…given people don’t care about the details except results, also oh well…we’ll all deal with it somehow…

  • Carver

    Part of the problem here is that we vote with our wallets. if you believe that XXX.com charges you higher prices due to cookies (a demonstrably disproveable claim) then why would you ever use XXX.com. Avoid that travel provider until they clean up their act. But no, if XXX.com has the best prices, we roll the dice and take our chances.

    One of the reasons I book my flights exclusively with AA.com is because I know their policies and I have experienced those policies to be in comformity with business ethics including fares decreasing after I’ve placed a ticket on hold. And, when I purchase a ticket, it is crystal clear how much the final price will be. I would note that Chris has yet to right a column about someone purchasing a ticket from AA.com and having issues.

  • Kimberly

    I’ve gotten into a habit of screen capturing just about everything before I “submit”. I’ll paste these captures into word or powerpoint. It’s not much, but it satisfies that I wasn’t CRAZY.

    Always go on-line within 24-48 hours to check your credit card statement.

    If your browser freezes up call the agency and see if it went through before trying again. Take down the name of the operator/customer service rep. It’ll save you heartburn later.

  • Joe Farrell

    If you own a mac you can print the screen to a PDF – then everyone sees the same image. Look, if you authorize 300 euros and get charged 500 euros fraud has been committed.

  • Mike

    I have to take offense at Mr Bainbridge’s statement that we should “be grateful” or that things are a “minor inconvenience”. Being grateful is getting a ticket for half price because someone in your family died. Getting a ticket for the same price that anyone else can buy one for is no reason to be grateful. Getting charged fee on top of fee for what should be a one price includes everything ticket is no reason to be grateful. Likewise, a company telling me that they are asking xx price for a service and then telling me that they want more is no reason to be grateful. Perhaps Mr Bainbridge should be grateful when he goes to a store or restaraunt and gets overcharged for everything he buys. After all, he should be overjoyed that he was even allowed to purchase the products he did.

    Companies exist for the purpose of providing a product or service to the CONSUMER. The consumer does not exist to provide for the business, as much as many CEOs would like to believe. With technology these days every travel site in the world should be able to know within seconds that a certain company has changed it’s prices or availability. I read a story in the WSJ some 10 years ago that said 6 modern computers of today (10 years ago) had more computing power than the entire Russian nuclear missile defense system as built. in 10 years we’ve come even further and there really is no excuse for businesses these days to hide behind some technology excuse.

  • http://www.edreams.com Nico Bour

    Dear Mr. Elliott,

    I am the New Media Marketing Manager of eDreams, a leading European online travel company with 10 years of experience serving millions of customers. I am quite concerned by your article in which you describe eDreams in an unfortunate and incorrect manner. We have reviewed internally the incident you mention and the reality is far from what you describe.

    The customer in question tried to book a flight and during the reservation process included a special request asking for “kosher food and a window seat”. As was clearly explained, immediately, in our follow-up email to her, eDreams would not charge her for the ticket until we were able to confirm that everything she requested was available exactly at the price she saw on our website.

    Because of her special request, we were unable to process the booking automatically as we generally do. Once we were able to confirm her additional requirements, the original price was no longer valid due to airline conditions, not eDreams. This was extremely unfortunate as we vastly prefer, and pride ourselves on our ability to offer customers the lowest flight prices. But, as was explained in the follow-up email she had received, if there is a delay in our ability to confirm a request, prices can expire; in which case we will follow up with the customer and obtain their consent before charging anything that is different to what they had agreed.

    With the original price expired, our customer service team then offered the client the next best price available (€592) but instead she preferred to cancel the reservation, which of course was done with no charges applied. Just to be clear, had there been no special request none of this would have happened and the booking would have been confirmed within minutes at the original €337 price.

    Our call center agents are readily available to help all clients with their queries, via phone or email. eDreams has nearly 10 million customers who trust in our service, and our main goal is to always offer the best service with the best prices. For this reason, I would really appreciate if in the future you could confirm with a company the full details and veracity of the information you’ve written prior to publication.

    If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
    Kindest regards.

    Nico Bour
    nico@edreams.com

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Nico. I appreciate your comment. Had Alberdi mentioned these details when I asked about Schlossberg’s case, I would have included them in the story.

  • Confused

    @Christopher Elliott

    Have you verified Nico’s claims? There’s A LOT of bad press floating around the internet about eDreams – and it’s possible I may yet become another victim of the old Bait and Switch.

    I’m based in the UK and they are based in Spain – they’ve already charged my credit card for their “fees” (~£20), but they appear to be holding the flight reservation ransom for a higher price. What are the chances I’ll get the fees back?