When travelers experience discrimination

As self-described “adventurous grandparents,” Trevor and Jean Broome had been looking forward to their upcoming trip to Costa Rica, which included diving, hiking, snorkeling and whitewater rafting.

Until they got some bad news from their tour operator: They were too old for the tour they had selected.

Gap Adventures of Toronto recently notified the couple that the adventure package they had purchased had been “re-aligned” to a younger demographic that would “likely be in the 18 to 39 age range.”

To travel is to be discriminated against, of course. Separating passengers and guests by age, income or gender is hardly new; whether it should be happening is an ongoing debate that some travelers seem to be having with greater frequency.

Although a Gap representative told the 50-something Broomes that they could either cancel the tour or continue as planned, Trevor, a retired police officer from Plymouth, England, told me that he was “horrified and deeply offended by this blatant ageism.” He called Gap’s decision to change its tours prejudicial, discriminatory and something done with “total disregard to our feelings.” He added, “Is this any less offensive than discrimination on grounds of race or gender?”

I asked Gap about Broome’s grievance. Lyndon File, the company’s manager for customer satisfaction and safety, said that segmenting tours by age is a common practice in his industry and that the company made every effort to accommodate Broome when it decided to rebrand his Costa Rica tour, including moving him to a different tour with a financial incentive to do so.

“Further, in subsequent e-mail communication with Mr. Broome, I offered to reimburse for any out-of-pocket expenses should he cancel,” he said. “All of these options are fair and reasonable, I believe.”

It’s difficult to find any real data on discrimination in the travel industry. Perhaps the most reliable numbers come from the airlines.

The Transportation Department reports complaints against carriers every month, and discrimination-related grievances hardly registered (they came in 10th place in the latest month for which statistics were available, behind baggage, customer service and refund-related problems). Are the numbers low because people don’t know they can complain to the DOT, because they don’t bother, or because there’s nothing to complain about? I’ll have the answer in a future column.

Not all of the discrimination is blatant. Consider Dan Nainan, a 28-year-old voice-over artist and comedian from New York, who says that the airline he regularly flies routinely discriminates against him based on his youthful appearance. “Everywhere I go, they challenge me — telling me that the ‘preferred’ line is for first-class passengers only, even though I’m a first-class passenger. They just assume I’m not in first class,” he said. Why? “Because I’m not some fat, gray bald guy with a huge belly wearing a suit and tie.”

But some of the discrimination is overt. Melanie Gutermuth, a disabled veteran and graduate student from Hanover, Md., travels with a service dog. “Most of the time, this is not a problem,” she said. “However, in recent months, that’s changed. People will say, ‘You look normal to me,’ because I’m not in a wheelchair or blind. Consequently, I have been excluded from some services, and charged pet fees for others.”

(Note: Some commenters have suggested that Gutermuth isn’t a veteran, as she claims. I don’t conduct background checks on my sources, but have made a notation that her status as a veteran has been called into question.)

For travelers with disabilities who think that they are being discriminated against, there are places they can turn to for help, according to Kleo King, a senior vice president at the United Spinal Association, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with spinal cord injuries and disorders. She recommends working with a travel agent who specializes in travel for the disabled (you can find one at the Web site Able to Travel and bookmarking pages such as the Department of Justice’s Americans With Disabilities Act site.

C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, suggests that travelers who are discriminated against turn to such groups as the Rights Working Group, an organization that protects civil liberties and human rights for Americans, and the ACLU for more information. Most important, he says, they need to speak up about discrimination.

“If problems occur, either to you or to someone else, be sure to report them immediately and in great detail,” he said. “Using the organization of your choice, seek help in publicizing the discrimination you experienced or witnessed and register the act of discrimination with the appropriate authorities.”

I may be getting ahead of myself — after all, I plan to write about this subject again soon — but I agree that talking about discrimination is certainly the first step to ending it.

I admit I have mixed feelings about this subject. While some kinds of discrimination are unconscionable, others are understandable. No one objects to gender-specific bathrooms, for example. And suggesting that a couple like the Broomes take a less strenuous Costa Rica tour is no crime, in my book. But both of those are also discriminatory, because they exclude someone. Does that make them wrong?

Likewise, is it discriminatory to ask an oversize person to buy an extra airline seat? To deny someone a rental car because he or she is under 25? To charge a security deposit on a room when you’re traveling with a pet?

You can debate those questions among yourselves. Meantime, say something when you see discrimination on the road. It’s a good place to start.

(Photo: ladybeames/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • p.through

    Younger folks are more often discriminated than older people. At least they’re a protected class. Young folks cant rent an apartment, rent a car, can easily be passed over for a job despite being the most qualified, are considered irresponsible, and the list goes on. The second you discriminate against an older person in a workplace, you get a EEO complain.

    I dont feel bad for these older people.

  • ARS

    I am 59 and would be offended if the company would prohibit me from going on the trip as described, as my wife and I hike frequently and often much faster than some 30 year olds. On the other hand that they give a warning, when changing the character of the trip, is the right thing to do. Many people in their fifties would not be able to do the things listed at a reasonable level and would become a drag on the the rest. As the couple was given the option to continue on the trip I don’t see the age discrimination issue here. There is nothing discriminatory about pointing out that people in their fifties as a group can’t do the same activities at the same level as people in their thirties.

  • Parker

    I have a question. If the Broome’s had been allowed to go on that trip, after complaining and they had gotten hurt, would they blame themselves or would they blame the tour operator and sue him?

  • http://mytimetotravel.wordpress.com Kathy

    Clearly describing the level of fitness required – good.
    Blanket discrimination on the basis of age – bad.

    I had a Gecko rep. tell me (late 50s at the time) I needed a doctor’s cert. for a tour in Indonesia – rescinded when I pointed out I was already backpacking in Asia! On the other hand, I wouldn’t want to wind up on a “party” tour as I hear the Contiki tours are.

  • Dave

    I’m 57, with 3 grandchildren. I scuba dive (just finished my PADI Divemaster rating and starting on Instructor), ski, backpack, bicycle, river raft, hit the weight room at the athletic club 3 times a week, sail, and more. I’ve taken grandchildren backpacking and looking forward to skiing and diving with them.

    I’d be pretty upset if I were told I couldn’t go on an adventure tour with the “younger folk.” However I don’t know that publicity about this policy would necessarily be bad for Gap Adventures – it might increase business among young people looking for a hookup tour.

    I took a look at Gap Adventures’ website. Discrimination seems seriously in violation of their “Core Values” (http://www.gapadventures.com/about-us/gapadventures), especially the one that says “Do the right thing all the time, every time.” If readers also happen to look at their website, there is a contact form – they say they appreciate your comments.

  • Ames

    I agree wholeheartedly with Kathy – describe the level of fitness required – there are plenty of younger people who are less fit than athletic older ones – no need to delay the olders ones. Also clearly describe the nature of the activities, tell whether they are really snorkling for several hours each day or spending most of the day sleeping after socializing around the bar all night. There could be a terrible mismatch all around if the tours and activities are not clearly described. My hair turned snow white early and I am learning to enjoy thanking people who open doors for me while my hands are full of stuff heavier than they can carry. No! not while I am getting on a plane! I travel light there!

  • Eileen

    I just don’t get it. Why does the travel company think they are better off without this guy’s money? And why would they go on record talking about how reasonable they’re supposedly being? Do they want to be known as a bunch of discriminating jerks? Obviously this couple will never want to give them money again, and the peope who read this site aren’t exactly goign to rush to use their services now, I just don’t get it.

  • Jill R.

    I have been on a number of physically strenuous multi-week treks with people from a variety of age groups, and I have observed that age has had little to do with a person’s performance on the trip. In fact it is often the younger participants that have had more problems with fitness and “keeping up” with the group. And anyone can fall ill or become injured, thus slowing the group down. It’s one of the risks you take with group travel. I would also say that the experiential knowledge and interesting conversation that an older individual can bring to a group far outweighs any negatives. I personally would not consider going on one of these 18-39-only trips (aside from the fact that I just aged out of being able to) because often the most interesting and agreeable people I have met have been in their 60′s and even 70′s. Any trip that excludes people on the basis of age is potentially bankrupting the experiences of the other participants. I think what is most important is that tour companies accurately represent the conditions and level of difficulty of their trips, so that individuals can assess whether it is within their ability, regardless of their age.

  • Sally

    I saw racial discrimination on my flight from Brussels to the US. Two African customers in the row ahead of me were repeatedly passed over for drinks and meals by the flight attendant. They had to press the call button to get their dinner. Once might be a mistake but twice is deliberate. Further the flight attendant assumed that because they were both African they must be traveling together, when they were as much strangers to each other as I was to them. They should have complained but realistically, who is going to risk getting detained or thrown off a flight for making a scene? Flight attendants have all the power while in the air.

    I have been discriminated against on planes my entire life because I am female instead of male and thus have not ever looked like a stereotypical business traveler. If I am seated next to a male businessman, he seems to live in fear that I will haul out my photos and make him listen while I brag about grandchildren. I hate being treated as if I am invisible by both flight attendants and other travelers. And no, I do not like it when someone grabs my bag and says “let me help you with that dear,” when I am perfectly capable of lifting a 20 lb bag over my head into a bin.

  • Jennifer Hanuschak

    @Parker You pose an interesting question. I use a wheelchair and have done some traveling. I would never blame the tour operator if I fell or something happened to me on a tour, unless one of their employees pushed me off a curb or something malicious! It just wouldn’t make sense to blame or sue the operator. Those who do, in my opinion, are not accepting responsibility for their own actions. I, just as any other traveler, travel knowing something could happen and I accept that risk.

  • Barbara

    Just last night I was checking out Gap Adventures for a trip I’d like to make to South America. After reading this, I’m now having second thoughts. Why not do as REI or the Sierra Club does, which is provide a scale of fitness and each tour has a listed scale number (usually 1 through 5 in order of ascending fitness)? That way people can self-eliminate, rather than going through the indignity of being told they’re too old. I’m 59, and once when I made a comment to a co-worker about Woodstock, I was told I was showing my age, to which I responded, “So are you.” (I rarely talk about my past so that comment wasn’t an attempt to stop me from taking some incessant hike down memory lane. I prefer my hikes outdoors.)

  • Sam Petersen

    Actually the part of this article isn’t about the ageism, it’s about the disabled vet travelling with her service animal being charged pet fees for her service dog. I didn’t think those were allowed, especially if she can prove it’s a service animal. A service animal is working, unlike a companion animal who if travelling with their owner is usually just a spoiled toy.

  • Lawrence Thelegend

    I’m waiting for the day when three grossly overweight passengers have the three connecting seats and there is not room for one of them. Would love to see his/her reaction when there is no room for him/her to squeeze their “weight challenged” body into the assigned seat.

  • Leslie

    Several years ago Mountain Travel Sobek wouldn’t allow me to book a Kilimanjaro trek with them due to my having diabetes (they ask beforehand). I’m very healthy, in good shape, and travel all over the world — sometimes alone — and have had no problems. My doctor wrote MTS a letter and told them that my diabetes would not pose a problem on the trek. Still, no, I wasn’t allowed to go. MTS kept trying to tell me it was for my own health and safety, when we all know it was for their own liability. Eventually, I booked with another company — who knew I was diabetic, was happy to give THEM my money, and summitted and returned to sea level with no diabetes- or other related issues. What I learned is that there are some companies who will discriminate against many things, but there are also other good companies who will work with you. What I hope MTS learned is that they lost my several thousand dollars then and any future travel I may have booked with them.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Leslie “Several years ago Mountain Travel Sobek wouldn’t allow me to book a Kilimanjaro trek with them due to my having diabetes (they ask beforehand). I’m very healthy, in good shape, and travel all over the world — sometimes alone — and have had no problems. My doctor wrote MTS a letter and told them that my diabetes would not pose a problem on the trek. Still, no, I wasn’t allowed to go. MTS kept trying to tell me it was for my own health and safety, when we all know it was for their own liability.”

    What is wrong with that? We do live in a sue-happy environment and they are just protecting themselves. Even if they had you to sign releases, disclosures and etc. (which still won’t have prevented you from suing them) and you did get sick to the point that it affected the pace of the trip, the itinerary of the trip, time on the trip and/or etc., do you think that it is fair for the other travelers?

    A five years ago, my wife and I took a tour to China. In large bold print, it stated that there will be a lot of climbing of steps, strenuously walking and etc. At lunch time on the first day, two people took taxis back to the hotel and a few others were complaining about the pace and etc. to the tour director which resulted in missing the Echo Wall in the Temple of Heaven, one of the must see attractions in Beijing.

    I am sure that there are 60+ YOs that are in better phyical shape than me as I am sure that I am better shape than some 20 YOs. However, throwing out the exceptions like ARS and Dave, in general most 60+ YOs are not in better shape than people in their 40′s, 30′s and 20′s.

    I have seen parents at Legoland arguing with the staff about allowing their child to go on a ride when the child isn’t tall enough to go on the ride. However, it is my guess that these parents will be calling an attorney in a New York minute if their child was hurt.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Kathy “Blanket discrimination on the basis of age – bad.”

    Unless of its customers are from the same city, it will be difficult for a travel provider to check the health of a potential customer via an independent source since there are family doctors based upon their friendship with a person that will state that the person is healthy enough to go on the trip\tour\adventure\etc. Look at the costs that will be past on the consumer such as higher liability insurance and etc.

    In Arizona, we have several ‘Active Adult’ housing communities (no one under the age of 55, no children and etc.).

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Jennifer Hanuschak “It just wouldn’t make sense to blame or sue the operator. Those who do, in my opinion, are not accepting responsibility for their own actions.” Good for you. However, we live in a country (I am assuming that you live in the US) that is full of people that do not want to take responsibility for their actions or lack of actions; want to blame someone else and expect the government to give them something that was a privelige as a right for free. How about the people that sue McDonalds claiming that McDonalds made the fat. No one made them to eat at McDonalds…no one from McDonalds took a shotgun to their heads and force them to drive their cars to McDonalds and made them to order the super size portion every time or go to McDonalds every day.

  • Kd

    Although my husband does not have a service dog (yet, we are applying) he is also a disabled vet and we often run into this kind of problem when traveling, even if just a short trip. We recently went to Seattle (we live in Portland) to pick up my older children on a flight. Upon arriving at the airport we got our gate passes to meet the flight (the kids are minors) and we were on our way, until my husband’s knee and back started acting up and the airport proved too much and he had a severe panic attack. After getting the kids I requested a wheelchair in order to move him quickly out of the airport, it took me four times to get the wheelchair and then the young main they sent to wheel the chair proceeded to practically run (in a dangerous manner) through the airport making comments the entire time about lazy jerks wanting special service. I complained to his manager and all I got was a “he doesn’t look ill.” When I request special accomodations at hotels, such as a ground floor room or handicap accessible bathroom I am often told those are only for truly disabled guests. Although my husband does not use a wheelchair, he does often use a cane and because of his physical and mental disabilities, we find that handicap bathrooms allow the space and features he needs for safety. We have had these problems from hotels, airlines, through rental car agencies, and even at while eating out. Sometimes it is blatant and sometimes not, but it is always hurtful.

  • Carly

    Ummm… they were given the opportunity to “continue as planned”! What’s the problem? I think it’s fantastic that GAP called them to let them know that the demographics of the people choosing to sign up for the trip were very different from the couple in question. I can just imagine how disappointed the Broome’s would be if they showed up in Costa Rica and finding that the rest of their group was under twenty-one and was only interested in partying. GAP went out of their way to alert the Broomes to the changing makeup of the tour group and went above and beyond to accommodate this couple. What a bunch of whiners.

  • http://http/aol.com barbie45

    Carly, I agree with your post. Frankly I would be very uncomfortable with such a young group. I agree that GAP went out of their way to accomodate them. Yes they are a crabs.

  • MeanMeosh

    Maybe I’m just grouchy today, but I don’t see what the problem is here. The couple was informed that the age demographic of their trip was changing, and they were given the option of either continuing on with the tour as planned, or changing to something else without penalty. Personally, I think Gap did what they should have; after all, they have no idea what kinds of personalities the Broomes have. Maybe they’re the type that don’t like hanging around with people outside their age group, or, maybe Gap thought they would see the changed demographic and activity list and decide it’s now too tough (or too light). Now, if Gap pressured the Broomes to switch tours – something that’s implied, but not directly stated in the article – that would be another story.

  • Steve

    Yeah…I don’t see at all what the fuss is about here. The tour company decided to change the demographic of the tour and was decent enough to inform the couple that it was going to be a younger demographic. They had the option of continuing with the original itinerary, receiving a full refund, or switching to another tour (with “a financial incentive to do so” – sounds like they would have actually come out ahead if they wanted to switch).

    In an era where there is still so much actual discrimination, calling this case discrimination seems pretty silly to me.

  • Sarah Di

    Personally, I would want to know if the tour that I previously booked, thinking that it would be a group around my age/travel needs had changed dramatically in style and demographics. Would they have been as upset if the tour company had warned them that the tour had been made easier and they were expecting a crowd in a demographic that was much older? If they are good with going with people around that age range and are okay with a harder itinerary, no harm no foul and they can continue on like normal. If I booked something like that, expecting one thing but got there and found that the trip had changed (whether it was much easier or much harder) and I was surrounded by a completely different group of people (again much younger or much older) than I had expected, I wouldn’t be thrilled and would be grateful for a heads up and an offer to change to something that was more suited to my needs prior to the trip.

  • Noah

    “Likewise, is it discriminatory to ask an oversize person to buy an extra airline seat? To deny someone a rental car because he or she is under 25? To charge a security deposit on a room when you’re traveling with a pet?”

    Pretty different, since none of those types of discrimination is illegal, nor has any been the basis of pervasive discrimination in our nation’s history.

    In any event, I don’t see what the discrimination was here. Gap did not tell these folks that they could not go on the trip. Gap said that the COULD go on the trip, and merely suggested that a different trip might be more up their alley. If Gap had banned them from the trip, this would be a very different situation.

  • Noah

    @ AZ Road Warrior-

    What’s wrong with what happened to Leslie is that it almost certainly violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. The company faces at least as much of a litigation risk by not letting her travel, as it would have if it had let her travel.

  • http://http/aol.com barbie45

    Sally, I feel that you are sort of paranoid about plane travel.The majority of passengers are just interested in getting to point A from B. No one is particularly intersted in seeing pictures of your grandchildren. I would also be thrilled to have someone volunteer to aassist me in helping me with my luggage. Actually that was very cosiderate gesture on that persons behalf. Consideration is all to rare in this age. Also you are sort of nosy. You do not assume discrimination unless you understand all the facts. Bring a book , relax and focus on yourself.

  • Mike

    “Although a Gap representative told the 50-something Broomes that they could either cancel the tour or continue as planned”

    So they gave the option of continuing as planned. What’s wrong?

    As to the necessary helper dog, the law says someone can ask about the animal and if told it is a special needs dog and the person needs it, that is all that can be asked and the place must accomodate. Personally, I would like to see a notation on some form of ID stating such so that you don’t have a bunch of scammers out there. We already have enough problems here with non handicapped people using their significant others’ HC tags to park. No reason that ID can’t be shown.

    It is sad in this country that one can sue for age discrimination because they are old and the place doesn’t want them. Too bad IIRC the Supreme Court says you can’t have age discrimination if you are younger and denied something. I’m sure if those on the court weren’t all of the age where this law would cover them, they might feel differently when they are denied housing, rental cars, or any number of other things that those younger people cannot have.

  • Natalie

    I agree with Carly. I don’t see what the big deal is with the Broomes. I handle discrimination claims on a daily basis and it really ticks me off when people cry “discrimination” when it’s really not actually discrimination. They were not prevented from traveling. The company realigned it’s trip for a legitimate business reason and gave the Broomes the option to not take the trip with compensation if they didn’t.

  • Natalie

    Wait – how did the tour operator know how old the Broome’s were? Did they collect age information on them before booking? I’m not familiar with how these are booked. Did the tour operator only contact people they perceived to be too old or everyone on the tour in case anyone wanted out?

  • Tom

    In the article, Dan Nainan, complains about be discriminated based on his looks and then says, “They just assume I’m not in first class,” he said. Why? “Because I’m not some fat, gray bald guy with a huge belly wearing a suit and tie.”

    Isn’t he showing prejudice against people who are overweight, have less than a full head of hair, are overweight, and dress differently than he does? With so much hate inside himself, who cares about his complaints?

    Also Sam Peterson (above) talks about proving that an animal is a service dog. It’s illegal in the United States to ask somebody to prove that their animal is a service animal. Just trying to keep Sam out of trouble.

  • Carver Farrow

    @natalie

    Suppose instead of age, it was race or religion. Sorry, Mr and Ms Broome. Most of the group are Race A and since you are Race B, we thought we’d have you go on another tour more suited for your race.

    The mere act of being singled out can be discrimination, regardless of the final outcome.

  • Natalie

    @Carver

    I’m still not sure what the issue is here and I still think the tour operator was acting in good faith. The point I was trying to make is that while they may feel “discriminated against” as a social term, I still don’t think it is technically discrimination that you could sue them over. I don’t disagree with you that real people experience real discrimination every day.

    I would still like someone to answer my second question about how they knew how old the Broomes were and if they called only the Broomes or everyone on the tour to notify them of the change. I still don’t understand if they were actually singled out, but maybe I’m not reading closely.

    I don’t know if you can even make the comparison of race or religion because I’m not aware of a market for tours that organize on that basis (correct if I’m wrong). However, consider sexual orientation, which is a protected class in most states and there is a market for gay-friendly travel. Suppose that I, as a heterosexual person booked a tour and then the operator called me and the rest of the folks who booked the tour and said that they had to realign the tour and it was going to be majority gay-friendly. I guess I could be offended, but I don’t consider that discrimination if the tour operator had a legitimate business reason to change the tour.

    Finally, regarding the age question, didn’t I read a post recently (maybe it was on the Consumer Traveler site) about a mom who was upset the cruise she booked for her family was geared towards the younger set and she wished she would have known that? I guess damned if you do . . .

  • Bob Anderson
  • Army ROTC Associate

    I actually know Melanie Gutermuth personally and she’s not a disabled vet, nor has she ever deployed. Sucks that journalists are just looking for stories without trying to really tell the truth.