TSA Watch: Should we avoid screening — or embrace it?

Full-body scan or pat-down?

It’s a choice that hundreds of thousands of air travelers will make for the first time this summer.

Not willingly, mind you. Some passengers are even going so far as to change the way they dress in an effort to avoid the whole thing. Susan Jones, an executive from Bellevue, Wash., wears clothes that won’t set off the airport magnetometer, hoping to pass through the checkpoint quickly.

“I have a favorite underwire garment that gets caught going through the machine,” she says. “So I try to remember not to wear it when I’m traveling.”

The TSA policy of either frisking or scanning passengers selected for additional screening dates back to last fall. But the full effects are being felt just now. Airports are bustling with infrequent travelers who have never faced this decision. Many want to know: Is there any way out? Is it even possible to avoid the TSA this summer?

The answers: yes and yes.

If you decide to fly, you can steer clear of this modern-day Morton’s Fork by doing exactly what Jones does, according to the TSA. Remove anything from your person that might set off the metal detector, and unless you’re randomly chosen for the scanner, you can walk free.

You can even improve your odds of avoiding a scanner by looking up your airport online to find out where the machines are and sidestepping them. A new site called TSA Status allows passengers to report which airports use the so-called “backscatter” machines more frequently and which checkpoints have the most aggressive screeners.

For example, a recent report rated the Terminal D screening area at the Philadelphia airport “green” — meaning that there were no machines visible — adding, “It’s still clear as of now.” On the other hand, it warned that the scanners were being used on almost all passengers at Ontario International Airport in Southern California.

Air travelers have used other tricks to elude the scan/pat-down dilemma. They include traveling with the kids — TSA agents seem far less likely to split up a family or to pat down young children — and bringing along pets. The evidence that either of these strategies works is strictly anecdotal, but if it makes any difference, one of the anecdotes is mine.

Nigel Appleby, a reader who lives near Vancouver, used to cross the border to fly out of Seattle whenever he found a bargain. The TSA’s sometimes heavy-handed screening practices have stopped that for the most part. “We’re heading to Europe in September, and we’ll fly out of Vancouver International Airport,” he says.

Some travelers would prefer not to play the game at all, and for them, the decision is made before they buy a ticket.

Darryl Wolfe, who works for a consulting firm in Charlotte, chose a pat-down over a scan last year and regretted it. “I was shocked by the intensity and roughness of the pat-down,” he told me. “In my mind at least, some of it was retribution for opting out. It was more like an assault.”

After that, he stopped flying altogether.

There may be hope for him. A new airline venture called Plane Red plans to start operating between regional airports in smaller craft that would be exempt from TSA screening. Although the airline is still in the planning stages, it has received a fair amount of publicity because of its avoid-the-TSA pitch, according to founder Wade Eyerly.

“It’s remarkable that treating travelers like actual people, preserving their dignity and helping them be more productive requires avoiding the government,” he says.

But avoiding air travel doesn’t necessarily mean that you won’t have to deal with the TSA. The agency’s Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response program, which goes by the unfortunate acronym VIPR, randomly checks passengers using other forms of transportation. Last year, VIPR teams were deployed 8,000 times, according to the agency.

I asked the TSA how to avoid a VIPR team and was assured that the program is nothing more than a visual deterrent and limited for now to major transportation systems such as trains, subways and an occasional public event. TSA does not screen automobiles on public streets but looks for “suspicious activity” on roads and in parking lots at transportation hubs.

Still, it seems that with only a few exceptions, such as a cruise or a car trip, it’s increasingly difficult to take a TSA-free vacation. While that rubs many travelers the wrong way, others are far more understanding. Susan Jones says she’d rather be safe than sorry. “I was scheduled to be on one of the 9/11 planes and had my trip canceled at the last minute,” she says. “And my husband was supposed to be at a breakfast meeting at the tower, which also was canceled last minute. So I take security seriously.”

I do, too. I was only a few hundred feet away from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing (the one that was meant to send the north tower into the south tower) so I’m not just writing from a theoretical perspective.

Somehow, playing this cat-and-mouse game seems silly. Shouldn’t we be welcoming the screening instead of running from it?

 

(Photo: achab/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Anonymous

    Personally, I’d prefer more Lisas and less Grants, but that’s just me.

  • http://elliott.org Christopher Elliott

    I try to avoid the TSA wherever possible, specifically the pat-down/scan choice. I think something is wrong with the agency, when the people it should be screening are running from it. There’s nothing wrong with us for trying to avoid the unnecessary hardship of having your dignity violated.

  • Daisymae

    Lisa, Grant is a jerk.  Please keep up your good work.

  • Daisymae

    Lisa, Grant is a jerk.  Please keep up your good work.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    From one of the Facebook pages in her support -Judd GoldenFolks: I’m Yukari’s attorney. Her last name is Miyamae. Yukari has been violated and traumatized. She wishes to maintain her privacy at this time. She appreciates everyone’s support. We are gathering facts and will be making a public statement soon.http://www.travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/whats-good-for-the-goose-arrest-of-yakuri-mihamae-for-groping-tsa-screener.442/page-4#post-3419

  • Tubby

    Holy crap, enough with the drama already!

  • agree with Grant

    Lisa, people would take you a lot more seriously if you cut out all the dramatic crap in your posts – it does make it sound just like whining. Especially if we can’t actually find the point you are trying to make.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    Sorry, person who hides behind the moniker “agree with Grant,” I’ve posted chapter and verse, sourced reports, statistical analysis, risk assessment, and empirical evidence so often on these pages I’ve lost count.  That you characterize these things as “dramatic” and “whining” says more about you than it does about me.

    But that’s cool.  Shooting the messenger is a time-honored practice.

  • Silence Dogood

    Oh. So you aren’t aware of the new cancer clusters popping up among TSA’s employees?

  • Silence Dogood

    It’s nice to know you’ll eventually allow them to stick their fingers up your a*s. After all, complying with the requirements is just part of the show, right?

  • Sadie Cee

    I see that I will have to do some further research on “behavioral analysis of passengers” and “comprehensive surveillance.”  I took these at face value and didn’t associate either of them with “profiling” and with ”racial” and “ethnic” profiling, in particular.   Please understand that adverse targeting of a human being on the basis any physical, emotional, mental or cultural characteristic is abhorrent to me. 

    Considerable years of observing human nature have led me to believe that certain people should never be placed in positions of power or authority; that some people with particular fetishes and perversions are drawn to occupations where they will have ample opportunity to indulge their aberrant predilections and that the principles of equity and equality are merely theoretical concepts for many people.

    I endorse your call for reponsible intelligence.  Law enforcement must become aware of those who present a danger to the community, their location and their activities.  Should such people be accorded the privilege of travelling, or has travel become a right?

    Having law-abiding citizens standing in line for hours at airports waiting for their bodies to be assaulted is repellent and transport security agencies need to take this back to the drawing board.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    Sadie, re your comments on people’s propensity for abusing power, that’s why I keep bringing up so often on these pages the names Philip Zimbardo, Stanley Milgram, Solomon Asch, and the Stanford Prison Experiment, Milgram Experiment, and Asch Paradigm.  (More empirical evidence that seems to disturb the TSA apologists.)

    These famous experiments demonstrated more than 40 years ago the tendency for people — “ordinary,” “normal,” “average” people — not sadists, not mentally unhinged freaks — to dissolve the boundaries between decency and indecency, between dignity and cruelty, so easily when put into positions of absolute authority.  That’s why what the TSA is doing was predictable, and will only get worse unless we put a stop to it.

  • Deborah Newell Tornello

    Gosh, Grant, this is a post entitled “TSA Watch”.  It, like other TSA Watch posts before it, does a great job of informing people about the ongoing problem that a significant number of Americans have with with the TSA, not the least of which are the repeated violations of people’s civil liberties in the name of safety.  The waste.  The humiliation.  The regarding of innocent, law-abiding citizens as criminals until proven innocent–a direct inversion of one of America’s bedrock principles. All that stuff, and more. It affects travelers, so much so that Chris has made it a regular feature.

    Perhaps you’d prefer to look at some nice, beachy travel postcards or slide-shows of people’s exciting cruises to the Yucatan?  It’s all in the keywords you use to perform your searches, Grant–all in the keywords.

  • cjr

    I’m surprised it took this long for this to happen, somebody who simply said, “Fine, if you’re going to grope me, then I’m going to grope you.”

    But then, what is there to charge her with? After all, it’s apparently OK for TSA to do this, so why not for the rest of us?

    It shouldn’t have come to this, but I wouldn’t blame anybody in the least for having this kind of reaction.

  • Joe_American

    If the new body scanners were really that important for security, the TSA would make EVERYONE go through them, not just a few people such as attractive young women, grandmas, disabled people, and college students who know their constitutional rights.  :P  Don’t you love security THEATRE? 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Fisher/100002384496916 Bill Fisher

    In the past eight months, TSA has been plagued by reports of agent
    thefts, sex crimes, assaults, drug trafficking, security breaches, passenger
    abuse and drug use. Over sixty screeners have been implicated in that brief
    time without one notable success to offset this abysmal record. There is
    something fundamentally wrong when an organization posts this level of criminal
    conduct.

    This ineffective focus on passengers has become both excessive and
    dangerous. Once cockpit doors were reinforced and pilots armed a terrorist
    could not gain control of a plane a repeat of 9/11 became impossible. A human
    is physically incapable of concealing enough explosive to bring down an
    airliner yet the focus of TSA remains on passengers while allowing 60% of cargo
    on airliners to go unscreened and remaining oblivious to threat of a ground
    based attack.

    Over a million Americans have died in defense of our Constitutional
    liberties and it is shameful that the fearful and cowardly among us would
    squander those rights for the miniscule degree of security that TSA provides.

    TSA is far too broken to be reformed and must be closed. There needs to
    be a grand jury investigation of the agency and its leadership for corruption
    and mismanagement.

    http://www.travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/master-lists-of-tsa-abuses-crimes.317/

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Fisher/100002384496916 Bill Fisher

    Opinions from cowards like this are a disgrace. Anyone who would agree to having their genitals. or those of their children, fondled by clerk with a tin badge just to board a plane are unfit to be called Americans.

    Maybe the commenter should “man up” and stop whining like a frightened 3 year old afraid of imaginary monsters under the bed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Fisher/100002384496916 Bill Fisher

    If you were really a frequent flyer ypu would know its 3/1/1, not 3/3/3. Obviously you’re a TSA troll and a poorly informed on a that.

    How much is TSA paying you do to do a poor job of defending them? You however have confirmed that even paid trolls, like everyone else at TSA, are incompetent.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Fisher/100002384496916 Bill Fisher

    This will be the last time I read anything from this writer.

    Just another lame TSA apologist. Sellout.

  • Sadie Cee

    Lisa, I do agree that the findings from Milgram’s study (despite its limitations) could well be used to explain the readiness with which some ordinary people resort to cruelty when power is given to them.  However, I believe that in other more extreme cases we have to go beyond merely possessing the authority to be able to explain what motivates some of the behaviour that takes place.  For obvious reasons, I hesitate to be more explicit.  Perhaps by researching the other names you have provided I will find support for what I have in mind.   

  • Grant

    Mom?  Are we still on for Thanksgiving??  :-(

  • Jackson

    Good heavens…what is the big deal?  Just walk through the scanner and get on with your life!  I fly quite often and go through the full-body scanners as well as the magnetometer and neither bother me.  I have more important things to think about than TSA and their scanners. 

    I know I’m a minority, but I can’t be the only one not bothered by either of the scanning options.

  • cjr

    Thanks for being part of the problem!

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    And the good news is –

    drumroll, please –

    Video: Woman accused of groping TSA agent won’t be charged with sexual abuse.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    “Just walk through the scanner and get on with your life!”

    Okay, we’ve explained this about a dozen times, but here goes again:  just because you acquiesce to the scanner doesn’t mean you’ll be spared a grope.  The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

    And “get on with your life” indeed.  That’s what those of us who don’t think Terrorists Are Hiding Around Every Corner are trying to do.  We’re being impeded by the TSA and by people who are so afraid of the risks inherent in everyday life that they’re better off staying home cowering under their beds and leaving the flying to us.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    Yukari Miyamae Legal Defense Fund

    http://causewayllc.com/yukaridefense.html

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    Yukari Miyamae Legal Defense Fund

    http://causewayllc.com/yukaridefense.html

  • Brooklyn

    Don’t do anything to draw the FBI’s attention to you if you use this site!  Next thing you know, you’ll be selected for pat-downs whenever you travel.  Conspiracy theory?  You bet!

  • Brooklyn

    Well, maybe, but the TB risk could have been avoided if the airlines allowed us to change our tickets when we’re sick.  Some of you may be able to afford to pay for reticketing, but I’ve flown sick many times and suspect that most other people have as well. I’ve also gotten sick many times after a flight.  Do I blame the sick people?  No – I blame the airlines, and Congress for not regulating them. 

  • Brooklyn

    That’s a brilliant idea – you could drive to the nearest stop on the US side and just take the train the rest of the way into Canada.  But if you’re flying overseas from JFK, the site Chris mentions will allow you to avoid the scanners altogether.  Would routing through Canada work if, say, you wanted to get from New York to San Francisco?  And how would you avoid the scanners on the return, since you’d left your car on the east coast?  I’d really like to hear from anyone who has this system worked out – I haven’t seen my family since the new scanners came into operation and I miss them.

  • Brooklyn

    You seem to have forgotten the cancer risk from the new scanners: it’s a different kind of radiation.  So now your only choice is to be groped, or not to fly.  And this is fair?

  • Daisymae

    Thank you for clearing that up.

  • http://twitter.com/NancyNally Nancy Nally

    I also experienced the “everyone has to go through the scanner” screening at O’Hare on Friday of this week. It’s not being used as a secondary screening in addition to the magnetometers there – it’s the primary screening tool. Should have seen the look on the TSA agent’s face when I just looked at him and said I’d like the alternate screening. He actually looked confused! LOL I guess they don’t get too many opt-outs. But I refuse to be a guinea pig in the government’s backscatter technology experiment.