Ticket? Check. Bag? Check. Insurance? Pre-check.

Seconds before Terri Widder booked a recent flight from Chicago to Tulsa, she hesitated. Something felt wrong.

She scrolled up on her computer screen and noticed an option to buy a $19.95 insurance policy that would protect her if her trip were canceled, her bags were stolen or she needed emergency assistance.

The box was already checked.

“Fortunately, I caught it before I confirmed the reservation,” said Widder, a retiree who lives in Carol Stream, Ill. “I believe this is just another way to mislead the customer and get more in fees and adjustments in revenue from people who may not be that familiar with the process. There are no benefits to the customer.”

Forcing travelers to opt out of a purchase when they’re buying a ticket or a hotel room isn’t new. But the volume of complaints I’ve received about pre-checking is on the rise, as is the number of well-known travel companies engaged in this questionable e-commerce practice.

American Airlines, the carrier on which Widder had booked her tickets, says it doesn’t pre-check boxes online and referred my questions to Yahoo Travel, the online travel agency through which the reservation was made. That site offers a policy through Travel Guard, and as it turns out, it’s a good thing Widder gave her itinerary the once-over. If she hadn’t, she’d be stuck with a nonrefundable policy, according to the terms on the Travel Guard site.

“The practice of including travel insurance and other ancillary benefits is becoming more and more standard,” said Dan McGinnity, a spokesman for Travel Guard. “Thousands of people purchase travel insurance in this way. Our complaint rate is less than one-tenth of 1 percent.”

Travelocity, which handles bookings for Yahoo Travel and is the company responsible for the pre-checking, said a majority of its users – 86 percent of customers booking domestic trips and 75 percent of those buying international vacations – click the “no” button.

“The price is also broken out as a separate cost, so there is no confusion on what is the airfare charge and the travel protection charge,” said Travelocity spokesman Joel Frey. “Should, however, a customer initially overlook the travel protection offer during checkout and later decide they do not want it, we’ll provide a refund within one billing cycle from the time of purchase.”

A follow-up call to Travelocity’s reservation number suggested that there might be some confusion about its return policy. A representative told me that an accidental insurance purchase might be refunded if it was bought within 24 hours.

Joyce Carlson, a reader from Oakland, Calif., recently had a similar experience to Widder’s when buying a round-trip airline ticket from San Francisco to Tokyo on Orbitz. She discovered that she’d left her box checked and inadvertently purchased a policy through Access America. She wrote to Orbitz asking for a refund and received what appeared to be a form letter denying the request.

“We have found that many of our customers choose travel insurance when booking an international vacation to protect their investment in their trip should covered emergencies require that the trip be canceled,” an Orbitz representative said. “Therefore, we default to ‘Yes, Add Ticket Protector Plus’ to provide this peace of mind.”

I looped back in with Orbitz, where a spokesman told me, “I’m pretty sure we’re following industry practices in terms of how insurance is sold.”

Oh, really?

“I think it’s unethical. And obnoxious,” said Lauren Bloom, a business ethicist based in Springfield. “You’re tricking people into buying your product.”

Thomas Way, an associate professor of computing sciences at Villanova University, said pre-checking isn’t an industry standard. “We teach our software engineering students that if they are designing a Web site, it should never do anything the visitor doesn’t explicitly ask it to do,” he told me. “Forcing an opt-out selection of anything – much less a purchase – is a great way to anger customers, drive away business and ultimately ruin one’s business.”

The U.S. Travel Insurance Association, a trade group to which both Access America and Travel Guard belong, doesn’t explicitly forbid pre-checking. Its code of ethics requires members to present their products “clearly and accurately” and to “make no misrepresentations, false or malicious statements” about their products or services.

Ethical or not, the practice may be illegal, according to Jeff Langenderfer, an associate professor at the Meredith College School of Business in Raleigh, N.C. “Under basic guidelines of contract law, silence is not a contractual acceptance,” he said. “In other words, someone can’t send you a letter reading, ‘If I don’t hear from you by Friday, we have a contract’ and thereby bind you. In many ways, a pre-checked purchase box is not any different in that it requires no active assent from a purchaser, and thus tries to create a contract by inaction or silence – something that the law has prohibited for a very long time.”

Customers agree that having to opt out of a purchase is out of line.

“This is akin to a car dealer negotiating a price but then slipping into the final paperwork a charge for upholstery stain protection or hundred-dollar floor mats that you did not order and do not need,” said John Polich, a college professor in New York, who has had two trip insurance polices added to his cruises “as a favor” by his online travel agency in the past year.

Even some insurance companies frown on the practice. While Access America doesn’t have any written guidelines for agents who sell its insurance, it recommends letting travelers make a choice. “The best practice we recommend is to require the customer to make a yes-or-no purchase decision,” said Mark Cipolletti, an Access America spokesman. “In other words, neither option is pre-checked.”

When made aware of Carlson’s unwanted insurance purchase, Access America offered her a full refund.

Although insurance is primarily regulated by the states, the Transportation Department could step in – at least in the case of airlines – and put an end to pre-checking with a simple administrative rulemaking. Insurance companies, prodded by a few forward-looking state insurance commissioners, could also instruct their resellers to end the practice.

Until then, travelers booking online must be extra careful before they click the “buy” button. Review the entire screen, as well as the fine print, to ensure that no one has checked a box for your convenience. Or theirs.

(Photo: pixiestick s23/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Lisa S

    Thank you, Chris, for this reminder. It is a deceptive, underhanded practice. Nothing should be checked unless I specifically check it. It is that simple. Cut and dry. Perhaps we should start sending letters to the CEOs of various travel companies telling them that if they don’t write back we will be entitled to [choose whatever you want: a flight from ORD-LAX, a 7-night cruise of some sort, etc] unless we hear back from them by a certain date. As Dr. Langenderfer pointed out, that has never been legal, but apparently travel companies want to change the law. Change can begin with them.

  • EvilEmpryss

    It isn’t just travel insurance that this is happening with. When I checked in online for a recent flight United gave me page after page of “options” (Premier boarding, extra leg room, better meal menus, etc.) on screens where the accept button was prominent (and sometimes marked “Continue”) but the opt-out button was very hard to find. It was usually just a hyperlink text at the bottom of the screen, not an actual button. If I hadn’t scanned the screen carefully I might have racked up over $100 in “options” on just one leg of my trip.

  • Raven

    Deceptive trade practices from airlines, on-line travel agencies and travel insurers? Surely, you jest!

    /sarcasm

  • Joe R

    As a programmer, I can tell you it doesn’t matter what good website design is. I totally agree that pre-checking isn’t a good design.

    But if management says “do it anyway,” you have to do it.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ EvilEmpryss – “It isn’t just travel insurance that this is happening with. When I checked in online for a recent flight United gave me page after page of “options” (Premier boarding, extra leg room, better meal menus, etc.) on screens where the accept button was prominent (and sometimes marked “Continue”) but the opt-out button was very hard to find. It was usually just a hyperlink text at the bottom of the screen, not an actual button. If I hadn’t scanned the screen carefully I might have racked up over $100 in “options” on just one leg of my trip.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
    I have made several reservations at the United Airlines’ website in the past 12 months. I went to their website today to make a reservation and I made screen shoots. In regards to the options, there is an ‘Add’ button if you want to add an option service but if you don’t, you just hit the ‘Continue’ button.

    I am not a big fan of United but I think that people needs to be fair. I wish that one could post screen shots, movies, etc. to our comments.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    “Although insurance is primarily regulated by the states, the Transportation Department could step in – at least in the case of airlines – and put an end to pre-checking with a simple administrative rulemaking.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
    I can’t speak for all airlines but I make reservations on a regular basis at CO, UA and US and their websites do not use pre-checking for the travel insurance.

    Terri Widder – “There are no benefits to the customer.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – — – - -
    There are benefits to travel insurance in regards to bad weather, mechanical trouble, labor strikes, delayed checked luggage, lost checked luggage, medical expenses, non-refundable deposits, etc. There is no need to purchase travel insurance if a traveler can handle the financial loss and/or additional financial costs for trip cancellation, medical expenses, missed connections, flight delays due to bad weather, lost and/or delayed luggage, etc. It is my guess that most passengers don’t purchase travel insurance because they don’t want to spend the money for it or want to assume the risk. That is okay as long as you assume the risks and responsibilities instead of complaining, whining, etc. about it and asking Chris for assistance to get money refunded and/or reimbursement of expenses that could been covered with a travel insurance policy.

    The number one rule of buying travel insurance is NOT to buy it from the provider (i.e. airline, cruise line, tour operator, etc.) because the terms and conditions for the travel insurance policy is generally written to benefit the travel provider not the passenger\traveler. I have not look at the terms and conditions of the travel insurance sold by the airlines so see if it is written for the airline or for the traveler; therefore, I can’t comment if it is a good buy or a waste of money.

    I think that no boxes should be pre-checked. I like how US Airways does it…there are two boxes, one to accept the travel insurance and one to decline the travel insurance…a traveler must check one of the two boxes.

  • Mary Bodsford

    Crooks! I WISH someone with $ would challenge the legality of all these practices. Is that being done at all, does anyone know?

  • BucksterSF

    @Mary Bodsford

  • BucksterSF

    @Mary Bodsford
    Crooks? Really? For presenting you with options? They are a business not a utility or charity. Anyone who takes 30 seconds and actually reads the web pages can navigate them fairly quickly and reliably. Is it a hassle? Maybe. But when you have a DIY system like a web site the price you pay is diligence. If you want mindless call a travel agent – they will walk you through every single solitary question……

  • http://www.insurancedirectory.ca/ insurance

    It isn’t just travel insurance that this is happening with. When I checked in online for a recent flight United gave me page after page of “options” (Premier boarding, extra leg room, better meal menus, etc.) on screens where the accept button was prominent (and sometimes marked “Continue”) but the opt-out button was very hard to find.

  • David Z

    <blockquote.Crooks! I WISH someone with $ would challenge the legality of all these practices. Is that being done at all, does anyone know?

    That’s being done in the U.S. every other day. Check out blog.ericgoldman.org or internetcases.com to give some ideas.

  • cjr

    “The U.S. Travel Insurance Association… doesn’t explicitly forbid pre-checking.”

    Sadly, we’re a country of opt-out, rather than opt-in, and that will probably never change.

  • MeanMeosh

    AA used to have the annoying opt-out for travel insurance if you booked on their website. Looks like they’ve changed it, though, and I like the current way they’re doing it much better. Now, there’s just a box in the middle of the reservation screen that tells you to call AA if you’re interested in a policy and want to buy it.

  • MVFlyer

    “The U.S. Travel Insurance Association… doesn’t explicitly forbid pre-checking.”

    What a surprise…the trade association made up of the groups who profit from this practice doesn’t forbid it.

  • http://www.eset.com Randy Abrams

    In this case I believe a bunch of people filing complaints with the FTC at http://www.ftc.gov could be effective. I have blogged this at http://blog.eset.com/2010/07/29/beware-of-travelocity-and-yahoo-travel

  • Steve

    Pre-checking a box to buy something like travel insurance is unethical and IMHO should be illegal. As Chris pointed out, it’s tantamount to sending someone a letter saying “we have a contract unless you reply to me saying we don’t.” (Whether or not the travel insurance is worth buying is another issue, and I think it’s irrelevant here. I don’t care if the travel insurance policy is such a good deal that I should buy it – it’s unethical to pre-check the box for it in the hopes that I won’t notice it).

    My first response, should I ever inadvertently make a purchase and buy something I don’t want because the box was pre-checked, will be a credit card dispute.

  • Carver

    @buckesterSF

    No, Mary is correct. Diligence may be the price, but if a merchant is acting unethically, he/she is still a crook.