Guests who want it all and the hotels that pander to them

From time to time, I get an email from one of you that makes me want to say, “That’s ridiculous!”

The one I received from a guest at a budget motel in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., was one of them. Problem is, I can’t figure out who is being more ridiculous — the hotel or the guest.

As this column makes its curtain call, I’ve critiqued air travelers, car renters and cruise passengers. But this week it’s time to talk about hotel guests.

Specifically, the person booking the room at the bargain hotel in South Florida. In addition to expecting all the creature comforts of an American hotel, and getting the benefit of a super-low rate, they were upset when they found a $4.50 per night “hotel shuttle/parking service fee.”

“The hotel home page very prominently boasts — in red print — that it has a free shuttle service,” she says. “And in the list of hotel services, it offers free parking.”

Here’s the thing — when you pay $49 a night for a room, you should expect them to nickel and dime you, if not bend the truth. The fact that you can even get a room in South Florida for next to nothing is such a fantasy, it might as well be a scam. Why? Because you will pay much more, once everything’s added to your folio. (And just to be clear up front — that’s no excuse for making a bogus offer. None whatsoever.)

The griping guest didn’t see it that way. “The fee really makes me angry,” she told me. “It’s sneaky and dishonest at best and just because ‘every other hotel does it’ doesn’t make if fair.”

So she called the hotel to complain. She was connected to a hotel manager named “Izzy,” who berated her for raising the issue.

“He called us cheapskates for even questioning the fee,” she says. “He became very defensive, and refused to answer our questions about the fee.”

OK, time out!

Both the hotel and the guest are wrong. The hotel is running a bait-and-switch, offering a low rate and “free” shuttle (which is “free” after you’ve paid a $4.50 a night fee for it) and the guest is wrong because she thought something that looked too good to be true wasn’t.

As a consumer advocate, I’m obliged to take the guest’s side in this dispute. But as a practical matter, I’m annoyed by this silly tango between cheap hotels and their miserly guests. The motels dangle a ridiculously low price, promising guests the world. The guests expect to be staying at the Marriott. They act shocked when they are not.

The problem isn’t limited to fees. Hotel guests give up the right to choose their hotel in exchange for saving a few bucks when they book through an “opaque” travel site, and then have the audacity to complain about the result. What did they expect, a room at the Four Seasons? After mediating enough conflicts between guests and hotels, I’m convinced that the answer sometimes is: yes, they do.

Here’s what you need to know: The average nightly room rate is somewhere around $100, according to Smith Travel Research, give or take a few bucks. If someone is offering you a room that’s well below that, they will almost certainly try to make up for it with a fee, surcharge, or substandard service. If you pay more, you can reasonably expect more.

Sometimes, I really want to reach through the Internet and grab my readers by the lapels and say, “What did you expect for $39 a night? The Taj Mahal?”

To be clear, I think hotel guests have every right to live in their fantasy land; hotels, on the other hand, shouldn’t be able to represent their rooms as being cheaper than they really are. That’s why I support tough rules that ensure the hotel room rate you’re quoted is “all in.” Mandatory resort fees are a special kind of evil that must be stamped out.

But just because you can live in a bubble doesn’t mean you should. Get with the program, people. Stop expecting the world from a business and then feigning outrage when you don’t get it.

You know better. Or at least, you should know better.

Who has more unrealistic expectations?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

This is my next-to-last Tuesday column. I’m saying good-bye next week and on Jan. 8, a new feature will debut in its place. Thanks for the memories, and happy holidays! (Note: This blog will still be published every day by yours truly.)

  • JenniferFinger

    Chris, too bad you don’t have a “both are equally unrealistic” option in your poll today.

  • Bill___A

    The thing I don’t understand is how you can expect the guest to be nickel and dimed if they got a cheap room.
    I expect a hotel to come up with the price for their hotel and if I accept it, that’s it. NO more fees. Although I agree that $49 is unrealistic for a hotel room, that’s not the issue at all here as I see it. It is a hotel charging extra fees they should not.
    I can absolutely guarantee you that although I am one of the most fair minded people out there, there is absolutely no way I would have paid extra “parking/shuttle” fees, especially “per day”.
    I would expect the hotel rate to be higher. But what if it were $300 and the hotel still had a “parking/shuttle” fee?
    This sort of garbage about tacking on extra fees has got to stop and I encourage each and every guest to challenge unfair fees as much as possible. Otherwise, these bottom feeder hotels just continue to take fees that add up to a few dollars per guest and thousands of dollars for them.
    it is immoral and wrong and I certainly won’t ever stand for it.
    One of the reasons I don’t use any of those obscure sites is that I read about these fees. If a hotel lists on priceline, it should include Everything including resort fees.

  • Uniall

    Chris,
    I don’t understand your position on this issue at all. I don’t care whether its $5000 or 5 cents, adversting a service as free and then charging for it is more than lying, it’s a legal “fraud”. It has been illegal even in the ancient days of yore (before a movement to consumer protection) when the law was “caveat emptor” (let the buyer beware). To paraphrase Shakespeare, “would a fraud by any other name smell as rotten?”

  • http://www.facebook.com/linda.bator Linda Bator

    Same reason I voted the guests – many more complaints they didn’t get MORE than they paid for. But this case is disturbing (if true) – would love to see that website, and if they have a service fee for MANY items, these 2 included.

  • Ed Boston

    Bill, in this case, it’s not about them tacking on extra fees, it’s that they charged a fee for something they said was included in the price.

  • Bill___A

    I stand corrected, thank you…but I oppose both things.

  • Ed Boston

    I’m with you and oppose both too.

  • http://twitter.com/DutchessPDX Dutchess

    Chris, I don’t see where the guest is being so unreasonable here. If it’s advertised as free, it should be, well, free.

  • http://www.facebook.com/geoffrey.millstone Geoffrey Millstone

    This information should be directed immediately to the state’s Attorney General. False advertising is a crime.

    Now to the ridiculous. “are you kidding me?” Cheapskates arise.

  • bodega3

    As an agent and as a consumer, if I book a hotel that states that something is part of the rate, I expect that amenity. If the hotel is stating free parking and a complimentary shuttle, then that is what is expected with no additional cost, except a tip to the driver(s) if the guest so desires. I certainly would fight this through my credit card company out of principal regardless if the room costs $49 or $490!

  • KaraJones

    Chris, I think you got a lump of coal in your stocking yesterday. Your crabby response about the OP was uncalled for and wrong (and not typical of your attitude).

    The OP never said they were expecting a limo ride or a free in-room massage. They simply paid the advertised price for their hotel room, didn’t complain about the room quality, and were charged a fee for something advertised as free. It doesn’t matter if their hotel room was $49, $29, or $1000 per night. The hotel lied to them and that’s the entire story.

    Are you saying that you’ve changed your policy now and the only travelers you advocate for are those spending a lot of money? So a traveler who can only afford a $49 room deserves whatever they get? The OP didn’t try to get away with something. Why did you attack them for being unhappy about being lied to?
    If you were trying to show that some travelers are ridiculous and expect too much, this was the wrong story to use for that point.

    Also, I didn’t vote on this one because your choices of “unrealistic expectations” aren’t relevant to this story. If you had asked “Who was wrong, the hotel or the guest?” That would be relevant. And I would have voted: The hotel was wrong. And you SHOULD advocate for this guest.

  • JoeM

    “Too good to be true” isn’t an excuse for a hotel (or any other company) to nickel-and-dime a customer. if the hotel isn’t prepared to honor an astonishingly low pice, then it shouldn’t advertise it in the first place. Period.

  • y_p_w

    It’s not necessarily a crime. It may be illegal, but the word “crime” implies that there could be jail time. The penalties for false advertising are typically civil fines and/or the possibility of civil lawsuits.

  • y_p_w

    I booked a room for $40 using PL’s opaque bidding system. Got a great room. Everything was clean and comfortable. All the amenities (complimentary breakfast, in-room coffee/tea, complimentary internet) were there.

    Now I can’t say the same about some higher-priced rooms we’ve booked. We once caught a $25 resort fee, although I’m guessing it was disclosed. It wasn’t mandatory. It paid for parking, local phone calls, a couple of drinks, bottled water, pool towel cards, etc. Otherwise parking would have been $20. We were informed that the amenities covered by the resort fee were included if we’d booked directly through the corporate website. It would have cost about double what we paid, so making a fuss wasn’t terribly conducive.

  • Ed Boston

    Bait and switch falls under the category of fraud, a criminal offense and can be subject to jail time. While the consumer is only allowed to seek civil judgements against the defendant, state and federal authorities can seek criminal charges for fraud.

  • RB

    Not everyone can afford a $100 per night room and have to pick something less expensive. Still seems to me they should get everything promised by that business. If the concerns website says something is included or free then it should be.

    Again Christopher has it wrong.

  • Mike Nash

    Chris you have a great view on many things, but here you are wrong. The hotel is at fault. A $49 could be possible – Ive seen before, so not unheard of. If they said it was free, then it should be free. Plain and simple.

  • Ome WIllem

    that is same as the airlines advertising ‘cheap’ tickets and then charge for everything else, baggage fees, peanut/pretzel and drink fees, get-a-better seat fees, check in first fees,… should I go on? ALL IN prices MUST be advertized in order to properly have the consumer compare apples to apples between companies offering similar products. And don’t forget that Florida residents live cheap because they tax the hell out of the tourists.

  • Ed Boston

    I’m not sure if you are responding to another comment or the story. If you are talking about the story, it is nothing like the airlines unbundling practice. To compare it to the airlines, it would be more like the airfare indicated there was not fee for checking your luggage but when you went to check in, they tell you that you still have to pay to check your luggage because you got a very low fare price.

  • Craig Wagner

    When I travel I generally stay in less expensive motels, usually Motel 6. When I check in I do not expect a continental breakfast, pillowtop beds, or nightly turndown service. In my opinion, that is where the hotel is saving their money. A place to park my car, or possibly even wi-fi, are almost necessities these days and lodging establishments should treat them as such and stop playing bait-and-switch tactics.

  • y_p_w

    I’ve stayed at expensive resort and business hotels where the customer is nickeled and dimed for everything including parking, internet access, and basic business services. About the only thing provided was an in-room coffeemaker. I’ve stayed at mid-priced hotels where all of that was free. I’ve also stayed at cheap motels where there was coffee in the room, a continental breakfast in a room, and free parking. However, they typically weren’t fancy and were in lower cost locations.

    I’ve learned that nothing is really guaranteed by how much money you’ve paid. However, I have noticed a correlation between the cost of lodging and the niceness of the room and facilities. It’s all the amenities that seem to be hit or miss.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=560991743 Kevin Fields

    I absolutely agree with the guest – they advertised it as free, it should actually be free, and if it is not then it is fradulent, false advertising. I have no problem with a hotel charging any fee it wishes, so long as it discloses them up-front and is honest about it. I can’t complain about being billed for a service when I know about it up-front. Honesty never cost a hotel a dime, deception will cost you more than just your fee.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=560991743 Kevin Fields

    I absolutely agree with the guest – they advertised it as free, it should actually be free, and if it is not then it is fradulent, false advertising. I have no problem with a hotel charging any fee it wishes, so long as it discloses them up-front and is honest about it. I can’t complain about being billed for a service when I know about it up-front. Honesty never cost a hotel a dime, deception will cost you more than just your fee.