|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Ceci N'est
Pas Une Pipe
The Travel Technologist · April
13, 2000
Since it isn't feasible
to write a follow-up to every Travel Technologist column, I often roll
all of the engaging questions and comments from the last several weeks
into one in enormous journalistic joint and light up, figuratively speaking.
So get your cigar cutters ready, friends. Here we go:
"I am on my third model of ThinkPad and I think they make good boat anchors,"
writes Doug Taylor in response to the story about one of IBM's
faulty laptops. "The best one I had was my last one, which worked
fairly reliably until I tried speech recognition software on it. I still
fondly remember my Toshiba which I had six years ago."
Say, Doug, do you really mean that about the boat anchor? Because I have
lots of friends who are divers and they're just crazy enough to try using
a ThinkPad for a kedge. It would give a whole new meaning to the term
"Big Blue," don't you think?
"Play fair!" warned reader Michael Zimet. "I always try to look at the
bigger picture - is [the] experience symptomatic of a trend at IBM, where
customer service ain't what it should be? Or, in today's world of extremely
complex OS's and apps, is this a messy set of conflicts, mismatched drivers
and DLLs? Why blow up his experience and make it sound like IBM is no
good?"
OK, Michael. Let's say most ThinkPads don't blow up on the launch pad,
as poor Steve Holden's did. Let's also ignore sentences like, "In addition,
IBM is really at the top of its game, as the only vendor with 7 consecutive
'A' ratings from PC Magazine's coveted service and reliability survey."
Do you think my conclusion, that IBM "can do better" is unfair?
Dan Hahn, a system engineer for a phone company in Schaumburg, Ill., took
issue with my column on Internet connectivity
in which I claimed a hotel's definition of "wired" doesn't always match
up with a guest's.
"Hotel chains need to be enlightened on the great opportunity they are
missing out on. I think they need to look at it like the cable TV they
provide," he says. "How many people actually ask how many channels they
get? Travelers don't ask and don't care, but if they turn on the TV and
they don't get more than eight channels, they check out."
His idea: Why don't more hotels offer an Internet connection through cable
modems?
For the umpteenth time, Dan, that's not the way the hotel business works.
Every decision is made with one question - how much money will it make?
- in mind. I'm convinced that customer needs are secondary. In other words,
if ripping up the walls and stringing fiber through a property is more
of a moneymaking proposition (as I suspect it may be in some cases) you
can bet a hotel will do it. Never mind what's more convenient or cost-effective
for a visitor.
"I believe $5 to $10 a day is a fair price to pay for a high-speed connection,"
writes Steve Spearman. "It's much better than the wretched per-minute
fee that many hotels charge for toll-free and local calls over 30 minutes.
I don't have to disconnect and it's a fixed cost I can live with."
Better yet, he suggests, why not incorporate the costs of connectivity
in the club-level floors that cater to frequent travelers?
That would be a good start. But let's not forget that connectivity isn't
a luxury anymore. We're not wowed by T-1 access the way we used to be.
Dual-line "dataports" don't excite us. In fact, they infuriate some of
us. Two RJ-11s imply adequate infrastructure to handle all the extra calls,
and considering the fact that hotel chains like Hilton and Starwood sock
guests with surcharges of up to 10 cents a minute for longer calls because
they need to pay for new capacity, the plugs represent nothing more than
an empty promise.
"I think Uncle Bill [Gates] has said that that Microsoft is never more
than two years away from failure," writes Ivor Purser, reacting to my
commentary about computer operating systems.
"Whether you believe that or not, I think it's a great attitude. I detest
dealing with organizations whose culture is so arrogant - for example,
Dell - that they think they are always going to be number one."
I have two thoughts on Uncle Bill's pearls of wisdom, Ivor. First, I doubt
he means "fail" in the sense that we think he means. When you're worth
a couple of billion dollars, your definition of "failure" is everyone
else's idea of filthy rich (as opposed to obscenely rich). My second thought
is that thanks to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, the clock is ticking.
"I will not use any variation of Windoze," adds Carl Gehr. "I'm not a
Mac user, and I'll gladly wait to see if Linux ever matures. You see,
I am one of the several million OS/2 Warp users who are quite happy with
my very stable, clean and easy to use operating system. Just for kicks,
you ought to try it some time. You might even become a believer yourself."
Yeah, you never know. I haven't used OS/2 that much, but I've liked what
I've seen. Maybe if the government follows through with its threat to
deal with the Microsoft monopoly, then OSs like Warp will stand a fighting
chance.
All of which brings us full circle back to IBM. To its credit, a representative
named Charles Christy from its "Integrated Technology Services" division
e-mailed me while I was writing this column. He wanted the serial number
on Steve Holden's laptop and pledged to "look into the case history of
this issue." I passed the request on to Holden, who, last time I checked,
was about to ship the unit back to IBM - yet again.
But this doesn't explain the unusual headline, which only fans of Belgian
surrealist René Magritte (and readers who know French) will recognize.
I'm referring to the bizarre 1929 painting The
Treachery of Images which displays a picture of a pipe with the French
subtitle "This is not a pipe." (By the way, if you want to see the pipe,
it's on display at the Los Angeles County
Museum of Art.)
Well, look at it this way: If I'd called my story "Another column of follow-up
comments" would you have read it? Besides, if you think about it for long
enough, the title works nicely with my cigar metaphor.
You can put that in your pipe and smoke it.
E-mail me with your opinions at chris@elliott.org
and I'll include them in a future column. As always, please include your
full name, city of residence and what you do for a living.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
The Travel Technologist appears weekly
on this site. This
story was also published on Biztravel.com.
|
|
|