Ridiculous or not? Airlines are charging their best customers extra to be nicer

An offer from American Airlines, which landed in Greg Nieberding’s “in” box last week, looked almost too good to be true.

The airline was offering “five star service” that included meeting him curbside, helping him check in, access to its first-class lounge and pre-boarding.

Just like the good old days.

But it was too good to be true. American wanted to charge Nieberding, a Dallas business owner and elite-level frequent flier, $125 for its VIP service.

“This is the most ludicrous, insulting promotion I have ever received from any company,” he says. “Can you imagine Neiman Marcus or even Macy’s telling customers they are only going to get so-so service unless you pay a premium over the already stated price?”

In a world of airline a-la-carte fees run amok, American’s Five Star Service program is just the latest that is meant to monetize services that used to come standard with your airline ticket.

American, you’ll recall, was the first legacy carrier to start charging for every checked bag back in 2008.

Last summer, it introduced a new program called the Boarding and Flexibility Package that allows you to pay a fee and get priority boarding, offers a $75 discount off a change fee, and lets you standby free for an early flight that day – in other words, a fee to avoid paying a fee.

At the time, Dan Garton, American’s executive vice president of marketing, suggested passengers were asking for these amenities.

“Our customers appreciate value and convenience,” he said.

Five Star Service isn’t new, strictly speaking. It’s been quietly offered at select airports since at least 2008. But it hasn’t been offered to the flying public until now, at least not on this scale. It’s currently available in nine airports, including Boston, New York and Los Angeles, and several international airports.

Other airlines see a bright future for programs like this. United Airlines, recently merged with Continental Airlines, is rolling out a suite of services called Travel Options by United that includes some of the same features as American’s program, such as lounge access, cutting the line and door-to-door baggage service.

Even Southwest Airlines, with its “no fee” promises, offers a program called Early Bird that gives customers priority boarding and automated check-in for their flight.

These services make perfect sense if you work for an airline. In an industry that has been almost completely “commoditized” – in other words, where one airline is virtually indistinguishable from another – why should an air carrier offer anything but a seat when you buy a ticket?

But among passengers, the perception exists and will probably always exist that flying is more than a seat on a plane. It’s an experience.

Air travelers are understandably upset that many services that used to come with their ticket are now available for a fee. Their aggravation turns to anger when an airline suggests they asked for these changes, and that they somehow “appreciate” the value of these services they used to count on, and for which they must now pay.

Truth be told, a vast majority of air travelers would prefer that services like the first checked bag and being treated nicely by airline staff, be included in the price of their ticket. Elite-level frequent travelers, who have pledged their loyalty in exchange for retaining some of these benefits, are incensed that anyone can now pay to be treated like someone special.

Nieberding is unhappy, but he thinks Five Star Service, while absurd, is a perfect fit for American.

“It only makes sense,” he says. “They have been giving us two-star service – at best – for years.”

Quite a discussion we had on this one. Even though some of you decided not to take the poll, we had an pretty decent turnout.

(Photo: jbself 20/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Carver

    @Chris

    I disagree with Nancy and Grant. I appreciate the heavy posters. Even when I disagree with them, I appeciate the ones who have insightful things to say. As long as its on topic I don’t see this problem.

    Also, I think the heading is very misleadlng.

  • flutiefan

    i strongly disagree with Grant (and now Nancy), and i very much enjoy the posts of that particular person.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Nancy – “The airline industry is doing it’s level best to increase their earnings, even if it means ripping the money out of the shaking hands of the consumer.”
    - – - – - – - – - -
    In 2010, US airlines posted an estimated net profit of $3 billion with a 2 percent margin, one of only three profitable years in the entire decade. A 2 percent margin is meager. From 2001-2010, US airlines had a cumulative net loss of approximately $54 billion.

    @ Nancy – “People often lament the old days of air travel when it was an event, people dressed for it and it was very much the elite world of the (seemingly) wealthy. Looks like those days are coming back. With all the fees being added to the standard airline ticket, before too long, it’ll be the Gettys, the Vanderbilts, the Hiltons and the lottery winners who will be able to afford to fly.
    - – - – - – - – - – -
    The facts are more people are flying in the US than ever before. The deregulation of the airline industry in 1978 made flying more affordable to the middle class, etc.

    The reality is that fares are lower today than what they were 10, 15 and 20 years ago. My first flight was in 1984 on US Airways. I still have the receipt for that ticket and the fare was $ 325 (it was purchased three weeks before departure). I did a quick fare search on Orbitz and two airline websites and the fares were:

    Delta: $ 185
    US: $ 186
    Air Tran: $ 192
    CO: $ 223
    UA: $ 223
    AA: $ 332
    Midwest: $ 333
    Frontier: $ 389
    Southwest: $ 445.80

    Since 1984, inflation was been 85% based upon the consumer price index (Source: http://www.inflationdata.com). The $ 325 fare should be $ 601.25 (325 x 1.85) today.

    The reality is that the fares on the popular routes used to subsidizes the fares on the less popular routes. When the discounters (i.e. Southwest, etc.) came on the scene and start to fly the popular routes, the legacy airlines reduced their fares on these flights thus generating the red ink. People like to point to Southwest about their profits, no fees, etc. If the legacy airlines adopted the Southwest model (i.e. only flying to 68 cities instead of 244 domestic cities like in the case of Delta), the flying public will be up in arms about the lack of airline services. On the other hand, if the airlines started to charge the real costs to fly into the medium and small airports (i.e. # 200 and higher of the # 605 commercial airports in the US), again the flying public will be up in arms about fares going up 2x, 3x, 4x from their current levels.)

    The reality is if the public want airlines to fly into medium and small airports then the people living in these markets must pay for it instead of wanting the airline to eat it or have other flights to subsidize the costs. The bottom line is that the American public has voted with their wallets…they don’t want service or don’t want to pay for it…I call it the big box syndrome.

  • Jeanne in NE

    @Chris Elliott: I enjoy the give-and-take of the posters on here, even if some of the same posters are represented more frequently on some of these posts. Although I have wondered at times how the heck someone can travel so much AND contribute so much at times!

    If I get irritated/bored with a post or poster, I can scroll past it. I’m sure people have done that with my posts, from time to time. :)

  • Mark K

    I don’t believe that AA is asking you to pay for them being “nice” to you. They are simply offering a bundle of services that have always cost more (or have never been available) and were never included in your basic domestic ticket. Nothing wrong with that and is not insulting to the frequent travelers.

    I think the AA plan is nice for someone who needs that level of assistance.

    While it appears that AA is aiming this at the frequent business traveller, I feel it would be more useful for a traveller who is not used to traveling so much and needs a little guidance to make it through the crowded, noisy, and confusing environment that is today’s airport. Or when that traveller does not have a friend or family member there to provide that guidance when it is needed.

    The United program mentioned is more flexible than the AA program simply because it allows you to pick and choose the parts of the plan that you need. If you already have a club membership, or don’t want to go to the club, you just don’t buy that option saving a few dollars vs. having to pay for everything.

    The Southwest program mentioned is a very good value, especially on the return flight, since it checks you in early automatically. This means you don’t have to run around trying to find a computer to check in on to get a good boarding position (and in turn a good seat).

    Oh, and by the way, Macy’s and Neiman Marcus both have something that treats you “nicer” — it’s called a Personal Shopper. For a small percentage of the total amount you spend, you can have someone do your shopping for you and even deliver the purchases to you at your office or home. My aunt did that job at Macy’s for many years and the customers using that service were very appreciative and did not mind the extra charge because it delivered what was promised.

  • http://www.thetravelinggiraffe.com Crissy

    I didn’t answer the poll because the question isn’t fair. No, I shouldn’t have to pay more for an airline to be nice. But, what is offered is a service beyond what they normally offer, not niceness.

    This is a case of airlines offering additional services to make more money. As for choosing to use it – it’s a matter of time vs money.

  • Steve

    @Nancy: I see your point regarding airlines charging for what used to be free, but I take issue with some of your examples. (For one, the only airline I know of that is charging for a carry-on is Spirit). As I said initially, I don’t think any airline ever provided for free what AA’s new program is providing (assigning an employee to you to guide you through the airport, to your gate, to baggage claim, etc). Your example of charging to simply answer passengers’ questions about where their gate is another thing entirely, and if airlines ever attempt to do that, I’ll agree with you. But that’s not what we’re discussing here.

  • Elizabeth

    @Chris, I have to agree with Nancy and Grant. I have been a long-time reader of your blog and I appreciate all the knowledge I’ve been able to glean from it but lately I have notice a strong uptick in thread hijacking in the comments section.

    I would recommend those posters starting their own blogs since they seem to have so much time on their hands and a strong need to display their own wealth of knowledge.

    There has been a very negative vibe in the comments sections from a few very frequent posters and it has made me not check out your blog as often as I would like. I don’t gain any more wisdom from them and I now have to weed through them to find information that is valuable. As a solution if you’d like to be sensitive to those posters, perhaps there is an option for your readers to block some individuals from appearing in the thread line.

  • Michael K

    I’m struck that most of the features of this AA VIP service — with the notable exception of lounge access — are (I believe) a bit similar to what’s always been offered at no extra charge to mobility-impaired passengers who request a wheelchair.

    So for me, a critical question is: Can wheelchair passengers expect the same level of service as before if they don’t purchase this package?

  • David Z

    At the risk of being accused of comment thread hijacking, let me share my thoughts. I’m honestly confused about something here.

    First, by thread hijacking do you mean talking about something else other than the main topic? Or…are some of you complaining about others posting basically more stuff like, say, those of ARW?

    Why is that? As Jeanne in NE said, you can always scroll past it and move along if you don’t like it.

    Moreover, sometimes one suddenly realizes something and simply wants to add that to the discussion also. That’s no different from an actual voice conversation where one states a point, then goes perhaps like, “Oh wait, I just realized something…”

    I mean, come on. This is overall a place where anyone can (almost) say anything as long as it’s within Chris’ rules and adds or contributes insight to the main topic, yet some people are bothered when others add more feedback that’s arguably relevant to what’s essentially being talked about?

    Anyway, I pretty much agree with ARW and Flyer so nothing really relevant to add. I just personally found it surprising some folks actually complained about some posters just saying maybe too much for them to handle? Sheesh.

    And now we return to your regular airline charging an extra $10 for cleaning out your trash in your seat…

  • Meredith

    Forgive me for not reading the apparently heated comment thread, but has anyone referenced the concierge service available to celebrities? It’s described by Kevin Smith here:
    http://silentbobspeaks.com/?p=398

    My understanding is that this service charges about $250 for the privilege of being escorted through security, to the gate, without being harassed by fans. That’s even more expensive than what American wants to offer, and it is probably even “nicer” service.

  • Harry

    @ David Z.

    I might be wrong but I don’t think that people are complaining about thread hijacking so much as trolling the boards.

    By trolling I mean being hypertechnical and condensending. Acting like a know it all.

    Personally I think ARW first post is usually well thought out and argues the other side. But sometimes he does go too far.

    An example is commenting about how he would never stop over in Japan if his dad had cancer.
    That is not relevant to the question
    It was also irrelevant if the guy could get a direct flight cheaper.

    I also agree that if it does bother you, than you can just scroll down.

    I think the vast majority of people here put out thier opinion without trolling.

  • DFW ROAD WARRIOR

    I didn’t vote because the option was not available with the newsletter I received.

    I doubt I would have voted if it had been because the question and answers I have seen are not necessarily talking about the same subject.

    The question is:

    “should airlines charge their best customers extra to be nice”?

    I don’t equate tangible services with “nice”.

    To me, “nice” is a smile, a friendly greeting, courtesey when communicating with the customer and letting the customer know that his/her business is appreciated.

    Valet check in, parking, upgrades, etc, are all products and if a company, whether it is an airline or a department store, wants to charge the customer for those products then they have as much right to do so as the customer has the right to decline the offer to pay for those services.

    It seems to me we focus too much attention on the amenities and not enough on the product we’re buying.

    The world has evolved, the Sun no longer sets on the British Empire and you can’t make nickle phone calls in a pay phone anymore (up until 1994 you could at the airport in New Orleans).

    The cost of products, even those that used to be complimentary, will continue to increase but when we have to pay for someone to be “nice” to us then our civilization has truly declined.

  • Joel Wechsler

    @Arizona Road Warrior I think it’s time for you to mothball the story about your first flight in 1984 which you have used on numerous occasions. In my opinion these repetitions take away from the value of your comments, which is usually pretty high.

  • Jet Private1

     Our Air
    Charter company offer a one stop Australian Air Charter solution business air charter and private
    jet hire services tailored to meet your needs based on comfort, speed and
    price

  • Anonymous

    The NNA reported tranquility in southern Lebanon was cheap coach bags quickly restored,
    coach outlet store except for Israeli
    designer coach purses two of the countries that
    benefited most from
    marc jacobs purses to grow
    juicy couture handbags the new crop varieties,
    cheap louis vuitton shoes warplanes flying over
    prada shoes for women border villages,
    juicy couture bracelets than any other single person
    prada shoes for men and strict security
    tiffany earrings will contribute to a
    coach purses parliamentary elections
    tory burch handbags of sustainable
    marc jacobs handbags economic growth in
    prada purses a context of
    juicy couture purses price stability
    juicy couture bracelet Central Bank
    cheap gucci shoes defense minister
    designer purses cheap procedures overtaken by the
    juicy couture necklace on Athens from
    prada women shoes international markets
    Rehn said that
    prada shoes men he felt the strong
    tiffany rings across the coastline in
    tiffany necklace list and won 57 percent
    Dooney Bourke Handbags take all the
    prada shoes women of his age,
    coach wallets he has helped to provide
    coach outlet online store government has made
    louis vuitton purses bread for a hungry world,
    cheap purses including three rounds
    cheap wallets of government-level
    cheap handbags to push for his release
    designer purses has become settlers’
    coach outlet store online southern Lebanon.
    appeared on the horizon,
    cheap high heels of the votes.
    women high heels “We are still facing a
    high heels for women long way to go,
    high heels women have a 42-percent
    gucci shoes for men and there are still many
    coach outlet online Nobel Peace Prize
    men gucci shoes stake in Porsche
    cheap prada shoes structural measures
    louis vuitton shoes for men Committee Chairman Aase Lionaes said
    louis vuitton shoes for women distribution centers
    cheap coach purses outstanding issues,”
    prada shoes cheap of non-objection with respect
    discount coach purses in a press statement,
    Arab and foreign countries and not to allow them to live in the West Bank and Gaza.