US Airways tells customer her cancer isn’t terminal enough for a refund

Not the friendly skies. / Photo by wbav - Flickr
Not the friendly skies. / Photo by wbav – Flickr
Ben Coleman and his wife were supposed to fly from New York to Oakland last November on US Airways. The couple had purchased nonrefundable roundtrip tickets on US Airways for just under $1,000.

But in October, Coleman’s wife was diagnosed with cancer.

“Her diagnosis is positive and the doctors tell us — nothing is certain, of course — that it will be a hard year, but expect that she will lead a long healthy life.”

That’s when things got a little complicated.

Coleman explains,

I called US Airways to cancel my ticket and hope for a refund. This was several weeks before my travel dates.

I was told that because I bought a non-refundable ticket there was nothing that they could do except issue me credit that would be good for one year from the ticket purchase date.

They also informed me that due to rebooking fees and other fees, the actual amount of my credit would be much less than my original purchase price. This is, of course, pretty unhelpful as there is no chance we are flying anywhere before this credit expires.

I was told that I can email their customer service desk to appeal.

He did appeal, in writing. US Airways asked for documentation of his wife’s condition, a process that took several weeks. After submitting the paperwork, the airline rejected his refund request.

I was told on the phone that they only refund tickets in cases of terminal cancer.

Are you kidding me?

I get their super strict policy — I did buy a non-refundable ticket — but why make me go to my wife’s doctor, waste his time, and the precious time I have with him, and ask him for this favor, if you’re just going to reject it?

Coleman wants me to see if US Airways will reconsider its decision, and I’m tempted to.

Here’s how the conversation is likely to go: I’ll ask US Airways to take a look at the case, and it will ask if I’m aware that Coleman could have purchased a more expensive, flexible ticket. And I will ask the airline how much such a ticket would cost, and then we’ll get into a debate over whether it’s fair or reasonable for someone to pay three times more for a ticket just to be able to change a date or get a refund.

It’s an unwinnable argument.

What puzzles me about this case is that a US Airways representative actually told Coleman that his wife’s cancer needed to be “terminal” in order for her to get a refund. Isn’t it enough that she’s going to be suffering through chemotherapy treatments for the rest of the year, and that the ticket credit will certainly be unused?

Like Coleman, I understand that nonrefundable means nonrefundable. But come on. Passengers cut airlines some slack when they can’t operate a flight for reasons beyond their control. It’s not as if the Colemans thought it was possible they’d have to cancel their trip for medical reasons.

Should I mediate Ben Coleman's case with US Airways?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • JewelEyedGamerGirl

    Maybe, but they can also choose not to be very cooperative with him again in the future if he pisses them off, I would think.

  • JewelEyedGamerGirl

    I remember a post a while back about Allianz. Anyone else remember that? :P

  • markincleveland

    My issue is the airline will resell the seat and suffer no loss. With a hotel, they have to leave the room empty and will not be able to sell it. My point is if the airline is able to resell the seat they should be required to refund the ticket.

  • markincleveland

    Or the only way it is “fair” have the same rules if an airline has a schedule change and cancels your flight. The way it is now is only the passenger has the risk . .that is unfair.

  • markincleveland

    but the get off without a penalty. Are you saying both sides get off the hook equally?

  • markincleveland

    so why not have the same rules for the passenger . . . offer a full refund when you can’t go for “reasons beyond yourcontrol.”

  • EdB

    Yeah. I have pointed this out in the past but people like to come back with the, “well the airline has to refund your money.” While that is true, the airline is still free to then resell the seat and make the money back. If you have to cancel, you don’t get the option to resell the set. So, as you point out, it is only the passenger that is taking the risks from what I can see.

  • rhonda

    policies are put in place to dumb down the rep’s job; he/she doesn’t have to make a thoughtful, educated decision. also, policies add to the bottom line & fairly do protect the merchant from would-be scammers (which is not the case here). those other fees are frivolous trimmings, too. i, as a consumer, would write to the ceo. it used to be john pope; i don’t know who it is now, but that’s easy enough to find — i’m pretty inappropriate, so i would write to his home. if united is making medical decisions re. mrs. coleman, mr. coleman NEEDS to go beyond their so-called “medical” committee. i mean no disrespect to mrs. coleman, but chemo can cause vomiting, fainting, even heart attacks. is united willing/able to deal w/ this? how about an unplanned landing b/c of mrs. coleman’s illness? talk about refunds for unhappy customers. i think the customer service would rather help the colemans rather than deal with an entire flight of customers.
    united used to be an a-one quality airline but has fallen considerably; this is a prime example. i’ve dealt w/ southwest’s customer service, & they really do treat the customer w/ respect & humanity.

  • rhonda

    oops — sorry! insert u.s. airways where i typed “united.” u.s. airways has never been a top quality provider, & i’m not surprised by their decision. when in rome….

  • JenniferFinger

    Sorry, but I don’t sympathize with “CS agents trying to find loop holes.”

  • JenniferFinger

    Sorry, but I don’t sympathize with “CS agents trying to find loop holes.”