Why won’t airlines cover stolen computers?

Here’s a question I get all the time: Why won’t an airline cover a lost or damaged computer in my checked luggage?

My answer is always the same: because!

Well, it’s been that way since the Wright Brothers flew a kite at Kitty Hawk. Every airline contract specifically says it doesn’t cover lost or stolen electronics, among other things.

But when a friend asked me for help with a computer claim on United Airlines, I couldn’t say “no.” First, he’s an elite-level customer, the kind airlines like United often make exceptions for. Second, his bag was obviously pilfered either by a United employee or a TSA agent, he says, because his laptop never made it from California to New York.

And third – well, I’ve been repeating “because” for so long, that I had begun to wonder: why is this?

The Transportation Department, which regulates airlines in the United States, “does not prohibit” carriers from declining to pay compensation for a computer that’s lost, damaged or stolen when carried in checked baggage domestically, according to a department spokesman.

“Airlines have pointed to fraudulent claims by consumers for loss of electronics and other expensive items as the reason they exclude these from compensation,” he told me.

An airline doesn’t have that luxury when operating an international flight. Under the Montreal Convention, it’s on the hook for a damaged or pilfered computer in your checked luggage. Domestic airlines tried to weasel out of that one until the DOT issued a stern warning (PDF) telling them that the Montreal Convention applied to them, too.

Curiously, this hasn’t led to a marked increase in fraudulent claims.

Of course, stolen electronics aren’t the only thing United Airlines exempts itself from.

Take a deep breath and read this, folks:

BAGGAGE LIABILITY For travel wholly between points in the U.S., United will not be liable for loss of money, jewelry, cameras, negotiable papers/securities, electronic/video/photographic equipment, heirlooms, antiques, artifacts, works of art, silverware, irreplaceable books/publications/manuscripts/business documents, precious metals and other similar valuable and commercial effects.

Whoa. That’s a lot of items.

It gets worse. United “prohibits” such items from being place in checked baggage on international trips – presumably to avoid paying for them under its Montreal Convention obligations.

Unbelievable.

But back to my case. Richard Laermer, who runs a communications firm in New York and rarely if ever checks bags, was flying back home from California on United when the MacBook Pro he’d tucked into his bag disappeared. (He packed it because he was already carrying another Mac and an iPad and his carry-on was beyond filled.)

“Someone — TSA or United, who knows — went into my bag and stole a separate neoprene holder with my computer in it,” he says.

When the luggage arrived on the carousel it was casually left open. (As for TSA, Laermer points out, there was no explanatory note placed in his baggage as they must do when screening chosen suitcases.)

When he asked the airline to pay for his loss, it told him it didn’t cover electronics. Even after a written appeal to a supervisor, the answer remained the same.

I thought this was unusual, given Laermer’s status and the circumstances of the PCs disappearance. So I asked United to take a second look at this computer case.

A representative called me and explained that even United’s very best customers – they’re called Global Services – don’t get a check for missing electronics in their checked luggage.

“Our response was appropriate,” she told me.

And besides, didn’t I know the rules?

Yeah, I do, I told her. I just don’t agree with them.

Laermer is talking with an attorney about his missing computer and has taken his business to Delta. United, meanwhile, is still looking for his lost luggage.

Me? I’m one of the tens of thousands of passengers who don’t trust an airline with my checked bags. Ever. You should be, too.

Also, I’m not sure why airlines can’t take responsibility for some of our valuables. After all, aren’t we paying them extra to transport our luggage?

(Photo: Yu Ta Lee/Flickr)

  • Aaron Weiss

    Given that they’re charging an extra fee for checking bags, it’s totally reasonable that they’re liable for the contents of those bags. 

    It’s also not unreasonable for the airlines to expect passengers to declare checked laptops or other electronics ahead of time (and have them visually verified by airline staff) to prevent fraudulent claims.

  • Guest

    “Unbelievable.”

    What?  Why would they leave themselves open to this liability?  if you ran an airline you would have the exact same verbiage in the contract.  if you can’t carry on expensive items FedEx them to the destination with the proper insurance.  It’s simple.

  • Anonymous

    No it doesn’t.  Read carefully and pull out a dictionary if needed.  Chris wrote that “his bag was obviously pilfered”.  “Pilfered” means stolen in small amounts, which means that something smaller from inside the bag was taken.  A car can be pilfered.  A house can be pilfered.  That doesn’t mean said house was stolen, but rather the contents.

  • Schumidabest

    If these stupid airlines placed limits on bag size in the cabins, that seems to imply that one should not travel with anything of any value even if it means you’ll be wearing the same clothes for 10 days. It sounds like they refuse to take any responsibility for their clear negligence. And yes, TSA agents have been caught swiping stuff from bags too so they’re not totally innocent here.

  • Anonymous

    FDX has complete control over who can access packages, so they can revoke the access of a thief and make sure it stays revoked. They even have their own sworn police officers.

    On the gripping hand, an airline passenger’s checked baggage can be accessed by the TSA and airport staff. While UA may — eventually — be able to get a thieving TSA employee fired, good luck if the crook is a Chicago Department of Aviation employee who happens to be an alderman’s drinking buddy. (Is the Emanuel administration better than Daley? If the mayor’s name is still plastered on every vertical surface at ORD and MDW, the answer is no.)

  • http://twitter.com/juandtres juandos

    Why shouldn’t airlines abuse the stupid people who voluntarily fly them?

    Look at all fees and other nonsense passengers whine about but accept anyway…

  • Guest

    Seems to me there’s a pretty simple way to help tackle this.  Bags are weighed as they are checked in, and that figure is printed on the baggage tag.  If there’s a discrepancy when it comes off, then it’s pretty easy to prove something was removed.

  • Sadie Cee

    The OP has my sympathy and I can appreciate his reasons for placing his laptop in his checked luggage.  Where our checked luggage is concerned, much depends on the honesty of the baggage handlers.  As I have said on this blog before, we can never protect ourselves from determined thieves.  All we can do is to try to outwit them.  Since I do not believe that the airlines are going to change their no-reimbursement policy soon, we have to do our best to protect ourselves.
     
    I am almost certain that for most of us the software/data are of greater importance to us than the hardware.  If we must check a computer, I suggest that a backup to an external HD be done and the HD placed in carry-on luggage.  For added insurance, prior to arriving at the airport important documents can be emailed to a computer at one’s home destination; burned to CDs and DVDs; or saved on handy USB drives. None of these would not use up much space in carry-on luggage.
     
    As for the hardware, it could be replaced if a claim on one’s homeowner’s insurance policy was successful.  However, standard policies (in my jurisdiction at least) do not cover computers that are used for business purposes.  An extra rider has to be purchased.
     
    Does the technology exist that would allow a sort of homing device to be programmed into the computer that the rightful owner could activate as soon as the computer “disappears and thus identify its location?”  Are such homing devices already available?

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrelot Andre Lot

    I think that, at least in major airports, a good solution could be having FedEx, UPS and DHL handle all luggage. Seriously, while they are not perfect, their record is so much better than that of passenger airlines.

    They could even set up different business for luggage dispatch and passenger check-in. 

  • Chasmosaur

    A firm “no” here.  As others have pointed out, the airlines have no control over TSA.  Not to mention airports like DCA where you have to drop your baggage off at the TSA checked-luggage screening point…which is right by a large entry door.  It annoys my husband, but the rare times we have to check bags (we’re both pretty experienced fliers), I won’t leave until I see my baggage has at least progressed through the pile and isn’t at a place where someone could just walk in, grab the bag and stroll away.  Elite status has nothing at all to do with this – there’s too many people who have access to your bags these days.

    Valuables never, ever go into checked luggage – that’s common sense that long predates TSA interference.  Even with honest handling, your bag is prone to rough handling and occasional breakage.  If I am carrying anything on that list above, it would never occur to me to leave it to the not-so-tender mercies of airline luggage handling.  If I ended up with an over-stuffed carry-on, then any clothes I carry would be the first thing to go into the checked luggage.  A change of clothes is easier to replace than my laptop.

  • Carrie

    I don’t blame airlines for not covering this type of thing.  It’s similar to how it is illegal to mail cash through the USPS.  It’s not illegal because USPS cares if you mail cash, it’s illegal so that they don’t have to be on the hook for it if someone steals it because you can’t trace cash AND you can’t prove the cash was there .  I would *never* pack something so valuable inside my checked luggage.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7JRPERPML6PGEK75ABURVVROJM Shukhrat

    In airports it is not an airline that sorts out your bags, it is a sorting companies who does that and airline has a limited choice – usually upto 3 sorting companies per airport, so it is not an airline employees who sorts out your checked bags, it is TSA and then sorting companies. Just to underline that it is not an airline company.

  • Patrick

    Common law says the airline has taken control over the items in checked luggage the minute the agent tags it and moves it to conveyor belts.  I cannot imagine how the airline can put that disclaimer in and not get sued.  Think of it this way.  Go to a swanky pub, check you hat and mink coat with the hat check girl. The items disappear.  The hat check girl as a agent for the pub is responsible for the items and so is the pub.  Surprizing more people don’t sue the engines off the airlines.

  • Sameer Sitaram

    Of course i never thought i’d write on this forum. Missing my Macbook Air from checked in luggage United Calgary – SFO. United says they won’t cover it. Is there any video surveillance of checked in luggage? I need my computer back.

  • Stavros

    Regarding the random screening of checked luggages from TSA and the safety of our items. In one instance after a trip to Europe, I found the note from TSA in an inside pocket of my agenda, placed behind my wife’s picture!!! I understand checking for unsafe items, but it looked like the agent who checked my luggage went far and beyond the random check by going through personal items where phone numbers, addresses as well as personal and business notes were kept.

    Makes me wonder…

  • Stavros

    Regarding the random screening of checked luggages from TSA and the safety of our items. In one instance after a trip to Europe, I found the note from TSA in an inside pocket of my agenda, placed behind my wife’s picture!!! I understand checking for unsafe items, but it looked like the agent who checked my luggage went far and beyond the random check by going through personal items where phone numbers, addresses as well as personal and business notes were kept.

    Makes me wonder…