Where does the clever hotel wordplay cross the line?

The surcharge seemed like nothing to Andy Fixman — a “trivial amount” he says. But it meant everything to him.

Actually, it should to every hotel guest.

Fixman, an engineer based in Seattle, found an item in the fine print of his bill at the Westin Bayshore Hotel in Vancouver, where he stayed recently. His daily edition of the Globe and Mail newspaper was “complimentary,” it said.

“If I refuse the newspaper delivery, a credit of between $1 and $2 a day would be applied to my account, depending on the day of the week,” he says. “This one really annoys me.”

Huh?

If something is free then refusing it shouldn’t result in any credit if you refuse it. Because, you know, it was free.

The hotel seemed to be engaging in a little clever wordplay. What it actually should have said was, “We’re charging you between $1 and $2 per night, depending on the day of the week, for the newspaper. (It actually costs us far less, because we buy the newspapers in bulk and distribute them ourselves.) If you don’t want it, fine. We’ll give you a credit.

Daniel Burrus, author of the book Flash Foresight, says it’s fine print at its finest.

“They know that the vast majority [of guests] will never read the additional fee section and if you are an aging Baby Boomer, it’s likely that you won’t even be able to see the small type much less read it,” he says. “Airlines and their baggage fees are well-known examples.”

That’s where, ahem, sites like this come into play.

“Thanks to social media, it is very easy to spread the word about a non-disclosed fee and create a minor revolt that can often spread to major newspapers and network television,” he says.

I asked Starwood, which owns the Westin brand, for its side of the story. Helen Horsham-Bertels, the company’s senior director for consumer affairs, told me the verbiage Fixman shared with me is printed on his bill, also known as folio.

“Upon checking in, guests receive their key packet, on which the verbiage below is communicated,” she says. “The folio is more of a reminder that if the guest had in fact refused the newspaper, the credit would be applied to the bill, as stated on the key package packet.”

But what about the wording — specifically, the “complimentary” part?

“We understand from the guest’s remarks that the word ‘complimentary’ may have been the concern,” she says.

Look, I don’t want to make a mountain out of a molehill, as my mother likes to say. And Starwood is a squeaky-clean brand, when it comes to customer service.

But this one really annoys me, too.

Customers want businesses to give it to ‘em straight. That’s why people are so upset when they encounter “gotcha” fees on their airline tickets and wireless phone bills. They feel as if they aren’t getting the whole picture, that somehow the company is trying to pull a fast one.

It only took a few years for airlines to go from customer service leaders to laggards. The same catastrophe is within easy reach of any industry, including hotels. (And once you’re there, recovery is all but impossible.)

I hope this fee is an aberration. Starwood, for its part, say it has already contacted the hotel and recommended removing the word “complimentary” from its fine print.

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is an author, journalist and consumer advocate. You can read more about him on his personal website or contact him at . Got a question or comment? You can post it on the new forum.

More Posts - Website - Twitter - Google Plus