Volcano strands couple in Portugal for a week — is this an “extraordinary” circumstance, or what?

Even though EU 261, Europe’s strict consumer law for air travelers, has an exception for what are called “extraordinary” circumstances, Europe’s big carriers made a big deal about not invoking that clause when the cloud of volcanic ash spread across their airspace earlier this month.

Unless you were David Bray, who couldn’t return to Washington from Lisbon, Portugal, via Frankfurt on Lufthansa.

“My wife and I are currently stranded in Portugal,” he wrote to me last Monday. “What’s frustrating is flights are entering and departing Portugal for the U.S., but we’re with Lufthansa and they won’t help with rebooking with another carrier to get back to the U.S.”

Paragraph 13 of EU 261 addresses his situation.

Passengers whose flights are cancelled should be able either to obtain reimbursement of their tickets or to obtain re-routing under satisfactory conditions, and should be adequately cared for while awaiting a later flight.

But that’s not what happened.

My wife and I tried both Sunday and Monday to call Lufthansa’s travel offices to try and reschedule — since their website explicitly says not to go to the airport if you’re flight is cancelled.

No one ever answered after the phone rang and rang and we waited and waited. We finally went to the airport and saw in person — they’re just letting the phones ring and not answering. That seems wrong and bad behavior on their part?

Moreover, right now Lufthansa is saying the earliest confirmed flight they can put us on — as our flights were cancelled — is next Monday, April 26.

During that time they’re not going to give any meals or hotel accomodations. I cited 261 but they said this is extraordinary circumstances. I mentioned that I heard they were giving out reimbursements at other airports, they said this was a decision of each Lufthansa airports “operations” and they had decided, for Portugal, not to do this. I asked for a copy of this new policy — they refused to provide a copy. One customer service representative even hung up when I kindly asked for this.

What are your thoughts? I realize this is extrordinary circumstances, but to strand folks for more than week and (1) refuse to try and help them rebook with another airline when flights are leaving/entering Portugal and Spain — and (2) refuse to help subsidize their costs while stuck in Europe — seems awfully pennywise and pound foolish on the part of Lufthansa?

Is there any way I can convince them their interpretation of 261 is wrong? Or that their denial of providing me a copy of this “new policy” not to help with hotel or meals is wrong?

The Lufthansa office in Portugal was interpreting EU 261 to its own advantage, but it was also hurting itself by not accommodating passengers like Bray. I contacted the airline on his behalf.

Interestingly, my Lufthansa contact was stranded in Germany at the same time, and he described the extraordinary efforts to which the airline had gone, at least in that country, to take care of its customers. It didn’t sound as if Lufthansa was falling back on EU 261′s “extraordinary circumstances” provision — even though it probably could have.

On Friday, I heard back from Bray.

Lufthansa successfully did contact us, many thanks for your conversation with them. We were able to catch a return flight home today. We literally landed at Dulles about 1.5 hours ago.

Thanks again for all your help — I salute you!

Thank you. And good work, Lufthansa.

(Photo: BriYYZ/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Bruce InCharlotte

    Boo on Lufthansa. It shouldn’t take the Travel Troubleshooter getting involved to get a carrier to do the right thing. Would calling the corporate office or sending an email, rather than letting the local airport operations people, have been a better option here? If you don’t get an answer, it’s time to escalate. Don’t be a sucker.

  • Justin

    Good work? What the heck. They didn’t work a bit but to inconvenience these people. Lufthansa doesn’t deserve a pat on the back but a swift kick in the ass. I hope they contact the European Regulators with their case. I imagine that even with extraordinary measures clause in place, some heads could roll. Remind me again why flying sucks half the time…

  • soitgoes

    The extraordinary circumstance clause applies to the *cash compensation* provisions of Regulation 261. It does *not* apply to the “duty of care” provisions–which require the airline to provide refreshments, meals, lodging, and airport transportation.

    The EU has been very clear that Duty of Care passenger rights apply:
    http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/kallas/headlines/news/2010/04/20100416_volcanic_ash_cloud_en.htm

    Remember also that *all* airlines (including US airlines) are subject to these rules on flights departing *from* the EU. (Only EU airlines are subject to the rules on flights departing from outside of the EU but flying to the EU.)

    Many airline employees are harried and misinformed, but there is no doubt that Duty of Care (e.g., lodging & meals) is an entitlement even in *extraordinary circumstances*.

    What does NOT apply in the Volcanic Ash situation are the compensation provisions that ordinarily provide passengers with cash payments for canceled or severely delayed flights.

  • Mary Graham

    Well, personally I’ll never fly Lufthansa again. I don’t trust them anymore. This is what happens when businesses behave badly. We find out about it and they lose customers. LOVE the internet, don’t you?

  • J C

    Was the LH Portugal office truly doing this on their own? If so, I can give LH credit for straightening out the situation. Heads should roll. Still, this shows lack of good judgment. LH should have been on top of this with all it’s offices.

  • Jasper

    I avoid Lufthansa as much as they can. They stink. Nothing big has happened to me personally, but it’s just their general contempt for customers. They openly do not care.

  • Sahsa

    I can understand this frustration over people not answering their phones and trying to reschedule flights, this is just plain wrong. However, I do not think any airline has an responsibility to reimburse travelers for their expenses during emergency situations like this one.

  • Scott

    The silly thing about statements like Mary Graham’s (which people make all the time) is that customers have bad experiences on EVERY airline at one time or another. Southwest is one of those airlines that generally has a lot of loyalty, but I know many customers who HATE flying Southwest.

    If every time you hear one person’s one-sided account of their bad travel experience, you decided to never fly that carrier again…..then soon there will be no one left.

    There are good and bad people working in any industry. This situation was crazy. There is no way that this customer went to an airport and SAW people not answering the phones he was trying to call! Those calls do not go to airport front counters. That is a pretty ridiculous statement.

    But many people working for many airlines worked extremely hard to help people get home just as soon as the planes were flying. Did it go smoothly for everyone stranded? Of course not, but one person’s experience is just that.

  • Anna

    On an average day there are 29,000 flights in Europe – during “ash week” that number was down to about 10,000 – I don’t have the numbers for Lufthansa flights alone but considering that the entire German airspace was closed for 5 days I don’t find it completely incomprehensible that customer service lines were busy.