It’s been five short years since the airline industry, led by an ailing American Airlines, quietly stripped the ability to check your first bag at no extra cost from the price of an airline ticket — an act given the antiseptic name “unbundling.”
At about this time in 2008, passengers were beginning to adjust to a new reality, as other airlines eagerly joined in separating their luggage fees from base fares. Now, they’ve finally accepted the fee revolution, according to most experts.
An airline ticket doesn’t have to include a “free” bag or a meal, no more than a hotel room should come with the ability to use the hotel’s exercise facilities, or your rental should cover the cost of a license plate. And that’s the way it should be, they say.
Well, the experts are full of it.
It’s time to call unbundling by its proper name: misleading. Separating anything that was historically a part of the product is problematic, in and of itself, because it confuses consumers.
And the travel industry pulled a fast one on top of it. Some companies, notably airlines, promised customers that unbundling offered the “flexibility” to pay for only what they use — and nothing more.
But there’s no convincing evidence that they lowered their prices when they unbundled, which is what should have happened. Instead, they just added new fees to their rates, undermining their argument that they were helping you. Helping themselves to more of your money is more like it.
The numbers are truly staggering: Airlines collected $27.1 billion in fees and other “ancillary” revenue last year, up nearly 20% from 2011. Other sectors of travel are doing their darnedest to emulate this so-called success.
Truth is, there’s a growing sense that unbundling, at least the way the travel industry has done it, isn’t right. Not only did the airlines implement these extras in a dishonest way and then resort to telling half-truths when explaining them to their customers, but they also often fail to adequately disclose unbundled fees before a purchase.
“People want fair,” says Sally Greenberg, executive director of the Washington-based National Consumers League, “and many of these fees aren’t fair.”
That’s not how travel companies see it, and they’ve done a masterful job convincing some customers that travelers want it this way. Toni Vitanza, a flight attendant for a major airline and a regular reader of this column, sums up the argument as a question: “Why should I pay, built into my base fare, for your headphones, cocktail, meal or, for that matter, for your checked bag when I actually know how to pack a real carry-on that fits under the seat in front of me?”
Of course, there are degrees of deception. Convincing travelers that their seat shouldn’t include an unpalatable airline meal is fairly easy. A confirmed seat reservation? That’s a little harder. Convincing them, when they check into a hotel, that they should pay a mandatory “resort” fee to use the pool or get “free” Wi-Fi? Good luck.
“Resort fees are a major scourge,” says Glenn Haussman, who works for a hotel industry trade publication. “I hate them with a passion, and they will not take them off even if you never use the pool or gym, which I usually can’t because I am attending a conference and working too hard.”
When does unbundling go too far? When common sense tells you it’s wrong, say travelers. “It’s like a restaurant charging you for the use of glasses, plates and the table,” says Lillian Mizrahi, a talent consultant from Los Angeles. “Where does it end?”
Jay Sorensen doesn’t think it will end, and says we’re partly to blame. And he ought to know. His consultancy, IdeaWorks, advises airlines on how to maximize ancillary revenue.
“The trouble actually lies with the consumer,” he says. “Everyone says they will pay more for better service. But this rarely occurs in actual practice. I’d guess 75% of consumers today look for price first and last, 20% consider other product attributes and the final 5% always go with the best product regardless of price. If you are an airline, that’s a challenge, and it explains why most simply go the route of price.”
Sorensen is right. Actually, we’d rather not pay anything for travel, which partially explains why it’s so easy to be seduced by loyalty programs and the promise of a “free” ticket or hotel room. But that doesn’t necessarily mean we expect an airline seat to come without the ability to carry a bag on board (sorry, Allegiant and Spirit) or that we have to pay an extra fee so our car rental company can dispose of its tires.
The unbundling games must end. Travel companies have to clearly disclose fees up front when they’ve engaged in this creative and lucrative product-parsing exercise. In the end, it’s probably up to the government to define what is — and isn’t — included in an airline ticket, a hotel room and a rental car. Too bad it had to come to this.