TSA Watch: Pistole tries to soothe holiday travelers as agency silences gun talk

TSA Administrator John Pistole was busy making the rounds during Thanksgiving week, trying to assure holiday air travelers that their screening experience would be better than last year.

Which it was, thankfully.

That’s probably because the agency backed off some of its more absurd practices, like forcing children to take off their shoes. (Ever heard of a two-year-old shoe bomber? Neither have I. Richard Reid was 29 when he tried to take down an American Airlines flight to Miami.)

TSA also installed privacy filters on many of the body scanners, which seemed to quiet some of the critics who contended the advanced imaging technology was invasive and sent revealing images to TSA agents for their amusement.

Of course, Pistole glossed over the biggest problem, which is the radiation emitted by the machines. He had agreed to have the scanners retested earlier this month, but now says it’s probably unnecessary.

“I have no concerns about the safety of the machines,” he told CNN. “I just learned about an Inspector General report that is in draft form, that validates those prior studies, so that may suffice.”

Then again, CNN didn’t really conduct an interview with the administrator as much as it seemed to be shooting a promotional video for the agency. (Sample question: “And what’s on your holiday wish list?”) And the traveling public responded with a collective yawn.

Incidentally, Lisa Simeone has a more detailed analysis of Pistole’s holiday interview over at the TSA News Blog.

But as is so often the case, what TSA said wasn’t as interesting as what it didn’t say.

It didn’t post its usual weekly roundup of weapons confiscations to its blog. Anyone notice that? The last TSA Week in Review was posted on Nov. 11.

What’s going on?

It’s possible that Bob Burns, the PR genius behind these posts, took a long vacation (despite promises to continue updating the traveling public during the busiest travel period of the year). But skipping two weeks of the confiscated-weapons updates suggests something else may be going on.

Last week, I told you about the loaded gun that got through airport security in Houston, but that’s hardly an anomaly. Here’s a recent story about a knife that made it through in a carry-on bag.

“This is something they need to take a look at how or why something like this happened,” the knife-packing passenger, whose name is Gary Flouhouse, told a Fox News affiliate in North Carolina.

Has the TSA decided to keep quiet about its weapons confiscations because it draws the public’s attention to loaded guns and hunting knives being brought on the plane? Does that then potentially subject the agency to more ridicule when it fails?

Perhaps.

Maybe the TSA decided to go in a different direction, asking passengers to stop carrying dangerous items on board instead of telling them how great it was at finding their contraband. I think that’s a much smarter approach, from a public-relations perspective: shift the focus on the passenger and away from the incompetent agency.

Ah, but the holidays are just getting started. All it takes is one little terrorism scare to throw this whole circus into chaos. Pistole knows that he has Congress breathing down his neck, which may be the reason he gave the world’s most boring interview to the Washington Post while he was on his media tour last week.

That’s exactly the point; he didn’t want to say anything that would give his DC critics any more ammo.

Pistole is probably just trying to run down the clock until the next presidential election, at which time he will find a job as an overpaid consultant, or as a lobbyist for Rapiscan Systems, and air travelers will be none the wiser.

That is why no one paid much attention to his tepid “can’t-we-all-just-get-along-now” Thanksgiving message. Because in the end, he really didn’t say much worth paying attention to.

(Photo: Tal Atlas/Flickr)

  • William Touzani

    TSA screeners will continue to miss Guns and knives as long
    as TSA does not replace the old X-ray scanners. Over 90% of the Scanners today have
    one X-ray tube that give a single image of the bag as it is placed by the
    passenger.

    A knife may look like a coin if viewed from the top, a gun
    may look like a dense roll of coins if view from the side. The latest
    generation X-ray machine does provide 2 views of the bag where one view may
    show the gun from its side with no distinguishable features and no visible
    trigger, while the second X-ray picture provided on the second monitor, would
    show the same gun viewed 90 degree apart from the first picture, with an unmistakable
    view of the trigger.

     It’ s amazing to me
    that TSA would waste millions on the useless Body Scanners instead of putting
    that money on the latest 2 monitor dual  X-ray machines. Which is more dangerous, to
    miss a gun because of outdated X-ray machines or, a Body Scanner missing a wallet.?

     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BGKBQF2IWAHX6KJHFNZFIIILKI Kym

    If they were turned on at all, they are worse than last year.  Last year, they didn’t use the machines or feel anyone up

  • Anonymous

    Pistole should be indicted for his criminal assault on citizens and violating the basic human rights of travelers while reigning over a criminal workforce.

    Under his “leadership” over 60,000 people a day are harassed and molested at his direction. Of that 20,000 are subjected to this groping at random, without any rational security basis for this harassment.

    He has presided over a criminal workforce that has had 62 screeners arrested for serious offenses so far this year.

    His “professional” employees include 10 screeners that have been charged with child sex crimes this year including four child rapes.

    Over a dozen of his vaunted screeners have been jailed for stealing over $800,000 from passenger baggage this year alone.

    He has lied in testimony to Congress over ten times this year. He claimed that TSA would stop molesting children on four separate occasions, once in January, again in March, then again in May and October yet their invasive groping of children continues.

    He lied about Congress and the public saying that the scanners produced a chalky, cartoon like outline, but in August Denver TSA Director, Pat Ahlstrom admitted that the images were indeed “very graphic”. So millions have been digitally strip searched despite the propaganda earlier this year.

    He has deliberately misled the public into believing that the privacy software exists at all checkpoints. In reality, they continue to have male workers view the nude images of men, women and children. TSA has not added the privacy software on the 250 x-ray scanners installed at many major airports, including LAX, JFK, O’Hare, Orlando, Boston and Phoenix and has not said when, or if, this will be installed.

    He has told Congress three times since January that the scanners would be independently tested yet again reneged on the latest promise he made in October, saying that he deems the scanners safe. Meanwhile, millions of passengers continue to be digitally strip searched and irradiated by these dangerous devices. He continues to expose passengers to these dangerous scanners despite expert testimony that these will cause over 100 cancer deaths a year.

    TSA has been adamantly refused to allow independent testing. He has not explained what TSA is afraid the tests will reveal or why they are so willing to sacrifice passenger privacy and health other than to protect private manufacturers’ products and their profits. There is clearly an implication of corruption in the deployment of these scanners and demands investigation by Congress.

    Under his “leadership”, complaints about TSA screening have increased dramatically. According to an article in WSJ on 9/1/11 complaints about TSA screening jumped this year. TSA logged 1,975 screening complaints in June alone, more than double the 814 received in June 2010.

    Since Pistole assumed control and instituted these Draconian procedures air travel has declined. The US Travel Association reported this month that “We can reduce the hassle of flying without compromising security” and estimated that TSA is costing the travel industry $85 billion in lost revenue and 880,000 additional jobs.

    TSA can plant all the stories they want saying that people like TSA but the fact remains that the vast majority of travelers despise this agency and want it dismantled.

    TSA Crimes & Abuse
    bit.ly/TravelUndergroundTSAabuses

  • cjr

    If Pistole has no concerns about them, then he should have no problem spending 48 hours standing in one of the back-scatter machines while it constantly scans him.

  • Anonymous

    If Joe Pistole has “no concerns” about the radiation emitted by the nude-o-scopes, why doesn’t he prove it to the public by sleeping in one, while it’s switched on, every night for a year?

  • William Touzani

    One 100 billion dollars later, I’m sorry to say that the 14 hijackers of 9/11
    have the same odds of getting box-cutters through security today than they did
    10 years ago.

  • http://DontScan.us Wimpie

    Why doesn’t some grown up admit that the TSA is nothing but a multi-billion dollar cesspool of incompetent government bureaucrats that shouldn’t be running a lemonade stand? Technology can’t replace competent professionals, of which the TSA appears to be void.

    What balanced and emotionally stable person would apply for a job where you are required to inappropriately and routinely touch same-sex strangers? Why would anyone be surprised by repeated stories of inappropriate fondling/touching or pilfering of law-abiding taxpayers?

    The only checks that should be made is of lawmakers that want to explain away government bureaucratic failures like the TSA.

  • Thomas

    This is the most pessimistic, biased, and unfair article I’ve ever read by Elliott.  Chris, it seems you are so obsessed with being paranoid and pessimistic about everything TSA-related that maybe you should start writing for FoxNews, as this article is more reminiscent of their writing style and journalistic candor. Sheesh.  I’m not a huge TSA fan, but at least write a fair article, rather than put in little snippets of your biased opinion and blame them for blogging too much about their successes, then not enough about their successes.

  • belmal33

    This week we also lost Pakistan’s help on terrorism,  more billions lost.  Pessimist or not I want to get my money’s worth. The only terrorists  we had since 9/11, both managed to reach their planes.   What is their to celebrate?

  • belmal33

    To make  Thomas feel
    better, the 2 things that would guarantee to stop terrorists today have nothing
    to do with TSA; armed airline Pilots and public awareness. The writing is on
    the wall, should you threaten the security of passengers, you will be mercilessly attacked by everyone.

     

     

  • Nigel

    25 years ago I managed an airport passenger and baggage screenin unit in Canada for an independant security firm under contract to the airlines. We did our very best to be a professional group. Interestingly, at that time we were not allowed to touch a passenger when we were hand scanning after a walk through alert. But on the other hand we were required to handcheck carry on baggage when we were unable to identify everything in the baggage with the Xray. That hand check was done by the person on the Xray machine for 2 reasons. One, the operator knew which item(s) was involved and two, the operator could then know what the item(s) looked like on the Xray monitor.

    So I believe that with the right supervision and training, passenger and baggage screening can be done in a professional, courteous and even friendly manner. Sadly in my experience, that is not the case with most TSA screeners nor Canadian TSA(CATSA) screeners.

    I think that TSA and CATSA management are so full of their own empire building that supervision  is non existant and training is not much better.

    We were responsible to the airlines, so if we upset their passengers, or missed anything we heard about it from the people who ultimately paid us. Plus the airline managers and supervisors could monitor us.Which ensured our professional standards etc. From my observation TSA and CATSA couldn’t care less about the local airport and airline management.

  • Eric

    I guess the new “privacy filters” must be working on the scanners.  A TSA agent was arrested in Manasas, VA for sexual assualt while wearing his uniform.  Can’t get his jollies at work so he rapes a woman in his neighborhood.

  • Eric
  • Anonymous

    But, of course, the Europeans have banned the x-ray scanners as being dangerous to health but our erstwhile TSA continues to not only deny that but refuse to allow anyone near the machines with proper scanning equipment . . . 

  • Eric

    Which is exactly why I won’t go thru one.  Several universities have requested to be able to do an independent measurement of the radiation exposure from these machines.  In every case, the request has been denied.  Why?  The only answer I can come up with is that they’re hiding something.

    And for those of you who don’t believe a company would do such a thing, do a google seach for “Ford Pinto Memo”.  The Ford motor company determined it was cheaper to pay off the lawsuits for people killed in Pintos than to recall the cars.  So I could totally believe they would cover it up if these machines are dangerous.

  • cjr

    It’s all fear profiteering on the part of TSA’s higher ups and the companies who make these machines.

    Dangle the threat of terrorism in the hopes that everybody will get in line.

    They should all be thrown out of an airplane from 30k feet without parachutes.

  • http://DontScan.us Wimpie

    Sorry, Thomas, you cannot legitimize your job at TSA by attacking Chris Elliot. Chris is MILD and balanced in his criticism.

    For real venom visit Flyertalk.com.
    http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/

  • Fred I

    Honestly, as much as I don’t want to, I have to agree with you on this. Chris really does seem paranoid, writing what essentially seems to be the same article about the TSA every week or so. Not that it’s wrong, but it is a waste of time when nothing new is added.

    Why not stick to mediation stories that you are great at?

  • Josh

    Re: Kid’s shoes — ironically, we went through security at BDL yesterday with our 8 and 6 year olds.  They popped their shoes off as they’ve always done; then we were told by the TSA person that they don’t need to (to save time next time, he said).  Great…until we were stuck behind a 9 or 10 year old kid at the metal detector, who went through setting it off twice, most likely because of…his boots.  He had to take them off and send them through, holding up the line (at least until we slipped by his family and went through).

    The shoe thing was for two reasons — one, because the detectors were being set more sensitive, and two to explicitly X-ray the shoes.  The first one is still true, and my kids will continue to take theirs off.

  • William Touzani

    Chris is a believer. He believes that you can insult our intelligence only so far. He needs his daily shot of medicine and hopes that someday this all  be only a bad dream.I put a picture from the book “Screeners and Virgins” to Cheer him-up.

  • Daisymae

    Chris,

    Don’t listen to this complaint. Most of us are thrilled that you are keeping up the good fight. Please continue.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5QQQ3ZH7R2QJODYKQN53J7SRL4 Bob

    My husband has a Ph.D in engineering.  He is an expert in x-ray technologies.  He has seen the spectrum emitted by the machines, and he says there are DEFINITELY hard x-rays coming from those machines.  Now, whether or not it is enough to harm a human beings, he can’t say (he has never tested humans or delt with potential biological effects of radiation).  In all likelihood, the radiation probably isn’t enough to harm most passengers when the machines are functioning properly, but who knows under less than ideal circumstances or when dealing with special populations (frequent fliers, expectant mothers, cancer patients, etc.).  The real point here is that the TSA claims backscatter only uses soft x-rays.  So, in short, the TSA will not have the machines independently tested because they know they are LYING!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Harold Rodman works at Dulles Airport, which has blue-box radiation scanners with NO privacy filtering software.  If you’ve been scanned at Dulles, you might well have had your genitals examined by a rapist.  Yet another reason I’m glad I have never gone through a strip-search scanner and I never will.

  • Eric

    I’m going to choose the pat down over the scanner.  Sure, the pat-down will creep me out, but at least I know it won’t harm me physically.

  • suzyblew

    Try living where i do.  Body scanners are compulsory and unless you go through them, you are not allowed to travel!

  • Daisymae

    It’s disgusting that TSA is now trying to pretend that all the scanners have the privacy filtering software. And people just seem to swallow that along with all the other lies peddled by Pistole and his cohorts.

  • suzyblew

    Not true.  There are no plans to remove them from the UK at present.

  • Thomas

    I don’t work for TSA (thank god) but I do travel once or twice a week for work. Even as much time as I spend at airport and in security, the TSA is only a minor annoyance. It’s a waste of effort to write an article per week of the same complaints about TSA, when in the whole grand scheme of things, there are much bigger issues.

  • cjr

    If you refuse to stand up for your rights now, then you have no claim to them later.

  • belmal33

    If more people thought like you, America would now have a Prime Minister.

  • http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2010/11/five-words.html Lisa Simeone

    “It’ s amazing to me that TSA would waste millions on the useless Body Scanners”

    It’s only amazing to those of us who don’t worship at the altar of Profit.  The so-called security industry is making billions off the scanner boondoggle.  Rapiscan, L-3, Smiths, etc. are raking in huge profits.  That’s the point.  That’s the point of the whole “war on terror.”  It exists to make money for corporations.  

    It provides the perfect symbiotic relationship for corrupt government and rapacious industry.  Toss in a willfully ignorant public, happy to hand over their rights at the drop of a hat, and you have the USA today.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/23/AR2010122304412.html?sid=ST2010122304471

  • Dunker

    Where do you live, so we may avoid traveling there?

  • suzyblew

    Manchester, UK
    http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2010/10/14/full-body-scanners-now-compulsory-for-manchester-air-passengers/

    So try flying at least 7 hours and then being hit by US immigration.  Makes you wonder why people go anywhere!