TSA watch: Are screeners preying on sick passengers?

The latest TSA horror story comes by way of Lori Dorn, a human resources consultant in New York.

Dorn, a breast cancer patient, was flying to San Francisco, when she was pulled aside by a TSA agent and told she would have to undergo a pat-down.

“I told her that I was not comfortable with having my breasts touched and that I had a card in my wallet that explains the type of expanders, serial numbers and my doctor’s information and asked to retrieve it,” she explains on her blog. “This request was denied.”

Instead, a supervisor was called over, who told her a physical exam was required. She explains,

I was again told that I could not retrieve the card and needed to submit to a physical exam in order to be cleared.

She then said, “And if we don’t clear you, you don’t fly” loud enough for other passengers to hear.

And they did. And they stared at the bald woman being yelled at by a TSA Supervisor.

Her post, which being widely covered online, is just the latest in a series of incidents in which TSA screeners appear to target visibly sick people.

As I read Dorn’s troubling account, I couldn’t help but remember the last time I saw someone who was dying of cancer. It was almost exactly a year ago, and I was visiting Hawaii’s Big Island with my family. We stumbled into a coffee shop, badly jetlagging and in desperate need of caffeine, and happened to sit at a table next to someone who was perhaps a few weeks from death.

The first thing I noticed after we sat down was the book he was reading: Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’ On Death and Dying.

Then I looked up at him and saw all the signs of late-stage disease. He was bald from the chemotherapy and almost skeletal from the weight loss.

He’d come here to die.

I mention this because in many of these TSA incidents, the passenger is as obviously sick as the guy I saw in Hawaii. You don’t need an MD, or to call over a supervisor, to know that the person standing in front of you with no hair really does have a breast cancer, and poses absolutely no security threat — none whatsoever — to the flight she’s about to board.

And there have been many incidents. Too many.

• This summer, TSA screeners gave passenger Lena Reppert a once-over when she tried to board a flight out of Northwest Florida Regional Airport. Reppert was 95, in a wheelchair, and suffering from late-stage leukemia. She was visiting her daughter for what would probably be the last time. Reppert’s daughter said screeners demanded her mother remove her adult diaper. “I ran with her to the bathroom and stripped her down,” she told FOX News. “I got back to the line and just started bawling.”

• Earlier this year, TSA agents in Detroit botched a pat-down of cancer survivor Thomas Sawyer of Lansing, Mich., leaving him covered in his own urine. Sawyer is a bladder cancer survivor who wears a bag which collects his urine from an opening in his abdomen. “Every time I tried to tell them about my medical condition, they said they didn’t need to know about that,” he told MSNBC.

• And in late 2010, during the pat-down craze, Cathy Bossi, a longtime Charlotte, N.C., flight attendant and cancer survivor told a local television station that she was forced to show her prosthetic breast during a pat-down. The TSA screener “put her full hand on my breast and said, ‘What is this?’ “Bossi told the station. “And I said, ‘It’s my prosthesis because I’ve had breast cancer.’ And she said, ‘Well, you’ll need to show me that.’”

None of this should be happening. The TSA’s stated policy on passengers with what it calls hidden disabilities seems pretty reasonable. But apparently its implementation isn’t, in some instances.

I want to give TSA the benefit of the doubt on these incidents. I want to believe they really thought the bald cancer patient wanted to blow up the plane with her breast implants. I want to believe the agents thought the adult diaper contained plastic explosives and that the plastic bag was filled with some kind of combustible liquid.

But I’m having a little trouble with that. Folks, what we probably have here is either a profound lack of common sense or — worst case scenario — TSA agents cynically targeting sick people who fly.

(Photo: foshy dog/Flickr)

  • ButMadNNW

    Um, if the US government so badly wanted that guy on the plane, why didn’t they make sure he had all the proper paperwork so there wouldn’t be an attention-drawing hassle?

    Just wondering.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dpalen Donna Palen

    TSA will give anyone who questions their authority a more thorough check through….and that goes against common sense as a terrorist wants to just get through with the least trouble possible, so they won’t raise a stink with the TSA officers.  But the TSA seem to go after the more vulnerable, the sick and the ones with young kids.

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone else feel uncomfortable about the wait and approval process after you leave the x-ray scanner?  A couple times after leaving the scanner and waiting for the go-ahead from the TSA agent with the headset communicating with the x-ray “reader” I have gotten a physical pat down.  Both times I have felt very uncomfortable with the situation as I don’t know what the x-ray reader actually said (a further inspection?) or if the TSA agent just wanted to pat me down.  

    While waiting at one airport the TSA agent was commenting about my figure and my dress, and then got word I needed a further pat down that included her hand up my legs–it was awful and I felt violated standing out in front of all as she ran her hand over my body.  And I also thought she was liking it.  It really left me shaken.  

    My point?  We, the travelers, should be able to see a green light or hear the approval from the x-ray reader so we know that we aren’t being given an unnecessary physical pat-down.

  • Carrie Charney

    By the time the suit gets finished, after the first hearing and all the subsequent hearings if the defendant fights the claimant’s victory, the sick person probably won’t live to see any money. It is not worth the end-of-life hassle.

  • Fishplate

    Bad publicity doesn’t seem to harm the TSA, but certainly they react to huge fines against the agency and it’s administrators.

  • Beccaoshaughnessy

    I had a similar experience at O’Hare last year. My company had used an agency to book my flight and they had spelled my last name wrong by one letter. My last name has 13 letters and it was a matter of two letters next to each other on the keyboard. I didn’t know about it until I checked in. I told the check in agent, who told me one letter was no big deal, especially in such a long last name. Sure enough, when I showed my license to the TSA agent, they refused to take it and made me go get my ticket reprinted with the letter updated. At the airline counter the second time, the lady kept telling me it was no big deal. I had to tell her over and over the TSA sent me back. I ended up barely making my flight.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Iam-Wendy/100002138363206 Iam Wendy

    I do know that the TSA repeatedly harasses anybody that requires any type of medical assistive device (including adult diapers)… every time. I wear an artificial leg. The ONLY way I could ever get on an airplane without physical assault (back before I needed a plate in my wrist and a new hip joint) was to take my leg off, put it on the conveyor and hop through the metal detector. I learned that the TSA never confines their searches to the area that alarms – EVER. So my knee alarms? Go for the breasts. The TSA just doesn’t target sick citizens: they target anyone that valiantly tries to live otherwise normal lives with the help of some sort of medical assist. There is currently no way to get the equipment certified -there is no way to fly without being assaulted EVERY TIME. So I don’t fly. Flying While Anything-But-100% is the new Driving While Black.  

  • Carver

    No, not really.  There are of course anamolous cases, but there are both complex and simple attorney fee shifting provisions to ensure that any recovery and its associated attorney fees are fair.

    In CA for example,, there is a schedule for statutory attorney fees which the court uses to provide attorney compensation in certain cases.  It is not particularly generous to attorneys.

    You may be thinking about class action lawsuits. In those cases the attorneys generally make out better than any indivual plaintiff except for the lead plaintiff.

  • Carver

    Terminally ill people can present a problem for the fair adminstration of justice.  One option of course is provide for expedited procedures for terminally ill folks.  For example, evictions take about three months because its an expedited procedure.

  • Carver

    That brings up an intesresting point. Are TSA agents hired locally and remain in the locale.  That might cause TSA checkpoints to be different in different regions.

    The TSA agents in the Bay area are different from the ones in LA and very different from the ones in LGA.

    I wonder if that might partialy explain the widely divergent TSA experiences.

  • ghost

    Personally, I would like to think they would simply create a quiet area where they could talk to the passenger and not “make them prove their claim”.  I would think after a small conversation, it would be obvious what’s happening and why.  On the other hand, I could see terrorists using terminally ill people to bypass screening.    

  • Anonymous

    No, they don’t need to pat you down. Run a metal detector, use a metal wand if needed. Otherwise, good to go.

  • Anonymous

    No, they don’t need to pat you down. Run a metal detector, use a metal wand if needed. Otherwise, good to go.

  • Anonymous

    We do actively profile – we profile the sick, disabled, and medically challenged.

    We profile American citizens of all groups.

    We profile teenage girls.

    We profile elderly.

    We profile those with big hair.

    We profile every f’ing one of us for no good reason at all. There have been no successful suicidal airline passengers on US domestic flights using NON-METALLIC bombs in over 48 years. That is a chance I can live with to keep the Constitution and stop having a BS country that is scared of its own shadow.

    No one is outraged at over 8000 handgun deaths a year that kill exactly 8000 more people a year than suicidal airline passengers on US domestic flights with working non-metallic bombs.

  • Anonymous

    Great question. Kurt Haskel is about as non-nuts as a witness can be. However, he may have misinterpreted or misidentified what and who he saw. BUT…What is an absolute fact is:

    - the Visa was granted to the guy over the objections of the State Dept. The State Dept testified to congress that the intelligence agencies asked that he be given a visa, although they all knew his father had reported that the underwear bomber had travelled to a training camp.

    - the passport issue is interesting. We will either see a valid passport in the trial (which would discount an assumption of Kurt Haskel’s) or we may not. If we do not see a working, valid passport – which the Dutch police have claimed that the guy had one – then that will add significant support that someone helped get him on the plane…ignoring the obvious help of the intelligence community which said testimony is online, etc. and indisputable.

  • Fisher1949

    TSA is a jobs program creating an
    illusion of airline security. After nearly a trillion dollars over eight years
    they can’t cite one success. Meanwhile 60% of the freight in the cargo hold
    remains unscreened, half of that from foreign shippers.

    Add to that the 52 TSA screeners
    arrested this year for serious crimes, including two last month, one for rape
    and the other for murder. Of these, nine have been for sex crimes involving
    children. They can’t prevent crime within their own ranks, but we’re supposed
    to trust this agency with airport security.

    There is no excuse to harass and
    humiliate this woman simply for the “crime” of flying. The guards at
    Treblinka were just doing their job too and sadly even had those who excused
    their atrocities.

    This is a clear failure in
    management and explains why so many abuses are occurring. Pistole and the
    senior staff of TSA have failed miserably in managing this agency and it must
    be abolished.

    TSA Crimes and Abuses

    http://www.travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/master-lists-of-tsa-abuses-crimes.317/

  • AirForceVet

    Since when have we been “guilty until we prove we are innocent”?!  The government taking away our rights and freedoms.   We do NOT deserve to be “handled” by former McDonald’s employees on their “power trip”.   I went through a checkpoint in front of the metal detector and asked the TSA agent “do I need to remove this pull-over” and she said “no, it’s not necessary”.  I walked through the metal detector and it did NOT go off.  The next TSA agent (only about 10′ to 12′ away from agent #1) said “sir, please put your arms up, I need to inspect you”.  He then proceeded to THOROUGHLY pat me down.  He then said “had you removed that pull-over, this would not have been necessary”.  I said “I asked that agent (pointing at agent #1) if I needed to and she said no”.. and he repeated himself “had you removed that pull-over, this would not have been necessary”.  I said “well maybe you should tell her (agent #1)”.  He didn’t respond.    Many of these TSA agents are a-holes on power trips.  And the government, in the name of “Homeland Security” (ala “Nazi Germany”) are going overboard and taking away our freedom and liberty.   And for those of you that say “this is for your safety”… where does this STOP??!!  Will it be okay for “Homeland Security” to tap your phone without a warrant?  Wait!! They already are!   What about questioning Americans about their patriotism?  Wait!!! They already are!  What about imprisoning people without “due process”?   Wait!!!! THEY ARE!!   

    “When they arrested them.. it wasn’t me, so I did nothing.   And when they search their house.. it wasn’t mine, so I did nothing again.   And when they tapped my neighbors phone… it wasn’t mine, so I did nothing.   Then they came after me.. and there was no one left to stand beside me to defend me.”    As the government, in the name of “Homeland Security”, begin taking away our rights and infringing on our privacy, we must stand up and say “NO”.  The government must represent US and NOT the government or big business!

  • marlio

    I;ve about decided the TSA is just as evil as the Government. These people are not only ignorant, they are evil, in my opinion.  Im afraid the niphilim, spoken about in connection with the sumerians are in our govt and part of tsa, the less functional ones.  No one with any common sense or decency would do the things the tsa does, and I plan never to fly again, until they get rid of these sick, invasive, unconstitutional procedures, as well as the people who put them in place.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    The answer is definitely profiling: search people who are suspected of a crime.  Search people only when there’s a warrant.  The TSA is blatantly exceeding Constitutional boundaries on search and seizure, and I will never concede their right to abuse the people’s rights.  Shame on the TSA for abusing a cancer victim and inflicting pain on her – but every one of the TSA’s illegal suspicionless searches is a travesty and an injustice and a slap in the face to everyone who fought and died for the Bill of Rights.

  • Eric

    What REALLY bothers me is that the makers of these scanners won’t allow independent testing.  Several universities have asked to have a machine on loan to independently verify the companies’ claims as far as radiation exposure.  In every case, those requests have been denied.  Why?

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Seriously, TSA?  Just stop.  No one believes in your fake security theater anyway.  We’ll let you keep your jobs and your fake badges and your worthless equipment and your boondoggle of funneling billions of dollars to a jobs-for-the-untrainable program.  You can have my security fee.  Just stop hurting people.  Not a day goes by that you don’t damage someone else: you are inflicting pain and sexual humiliation and needless medical risk on innocent people.  Just stop HURTING PEOPLE. You know, you can’t not know, that all this make-believe has nothing to do with safety and that no one can shield us from these vanishingly small risks.  You know that you’re tormenting rape survivors, humiliating transgendered people, training little children to be easy prey for sexual predators, and you know it’s all for nothing.  What could be wrong with you TSA leaders and employees that you’re willing to damage people, to inflict serious pain on another human being, just so you can pretend that your “procedures” aren’t a worthless lie?

  • older but wiser

    This is typical of low paid, relatively uneducated people who are put in a position of power. Unfortunately, it is true that power corrupts. You can see it from politics to police to security screeners. It somehow makes them feel more important than they really are and the sick are just easy targets.

  • Marvin

    One of these postings reminded me of an incident I experienced… that has a macabre humorous aspect.

    I was going through the line and asked if it was necessary to take my shoes off.  The TSA officer said, “No, it’s not necessary, but then you will have to go through a special screening.”

    “What’s that entail?” I asked.

    She replied, “You will have to go over there (pointing to a row of seats) and take your shoes off.”

  • MichelleLV

    This just keeps reinforcing that I believe TSA targets only people who will not be a threat because they are just a bunch of losers who really don’t want to find a real threat. It is easier for them to target the weak for the easy power trip.  Most are just high school graduates (if that) who are tired of working in retail.  At least the acquaintances I know who work for the TSA. 

    They used to provide at least a sense of security now they are nothing but bullies who are backed by a very flawed system.   10 years is enough!!!!!!  It is to the point that I think we would be more secure if they did not exist and that is just f-in sad. 

  • Mark K

    The “new and improved” software in some of the scanners does exactly what you request.  

    There is a small panel to your left as you go through the machine that is clearly visible.  It either lights up completely green if nothing was detected, or a gingerbread figure appears with the area of interest highlighted.  I have been through these machines in DEN and IAH once each.  The one in IAH lit up and the TSA guy touched only the area indicated on the panel (my left outer thigh).  I was NOT sent for the full body grope.  There was a dime caught in the lint in the pocket.  In DEN, I got the green screen and nothing else.  

    The other thing I noticed with these machines is there is no communication between the agent and someone else.  Does this mean there is no longer anyone sitting in a dark room drooling over the images and within the machine is the only place the image is inspected and only by software?  I can hope.  

  • Sadie Cee

    It was hard for me to choose an option as to my mind the entire TSA machine is out of control.  Everyone who presents at the screening area is a target for ill-treatment.  

    After reading the comments here and witnessing the humiliating treatment  inflicted on my own husband in Detroit two years ago, I believe the time has come for all good men and women to do something.  I cannot bear any more; it has gone far enough. 

    Let’s face it.  The travelling public is being bullied and the time has come for us to stand up to the bullies.  Instead of standing by and silently watching the public abuse and degradation of another human being, every pax in the vicinity could start chanting “SHAME” or some such thing?  Would everyone be denied boarding?  Would we all be arrested?

    At the very least, could we not declare individually a one-month moratorium on all but essential flying?  Business and emergency travel would be deemed essential; flying to vacation destinations would not be.  Once the reason for the decline in revenues is known, without any doubt the airlines would use their enormous clout to exert political pressure on the legislators. 

    As for me, I say again that I will not subject myself to groping by anyone.
     

  • Mark K

    Most of the airports I go through have a majority of TSA agents who are old, apparently working to supplement their retirement, and can carry on intelligent conversations within the confines of their job.  I can’t speak to their training because in most cases I have not seen them do anything that would require training.  

    In comparison, those airports with the younger TSA crowd I have been through seem to have more confusion, more activity that doesn’t appear to make the process smoother, and are much louder yelling about how you are to undress and be ready.   

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    I’m right with you Iam Wendy. I had steel rods and pins placed in my spine earlier this year. Now I can’t fly without setting off the metal detector (my home airport doesn’t have nude-o-scopes, not that I’d go in them anyway, what with my family cancer history). This means every single time I fly, I have to get sexually assaulted – EVERY SINGLE TIME. Why? Because I have metal parts in my body.

    The airport is no longer safe for anyone who is disabled or has any kind of medical condition.

    It’s disgusting.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    Yeah, that would be nice, wouldn’t it? Unfortunately, that’s not what they do. In the real world, TSA agents don’t make conversation with passengers. They just shove their hands between our legs until they feel they’ve proven to themselves we’re not carrying bombs in our hoohas.

    As for terrorists using terminally ill people – maybe you can see it in your imagination, but we live in the real world. In the real world, no terrorist has ever tried to use a terminally ill person to blow up a plane in America. How do we know? Because if they had, one of two things would have happened:  1) the TSA would have caught them, and taken out full-page ads crowing about their success, or 2) a terminally ill person would have blown up a plane.

    Neither of these things has happened. So, we are spending 8 billion dollars a year molesting millions of innocent travelers trying to prevent something from happening that has…um…never happened.

    Makes a lot of sense, huh? Welcome to Amerika.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    Hey, Carver, just curious – still wanna question my belief that these atrocities are happening?

    Clearly they are – and here is yet another report. So your attacks on me over the fact that I believe it’s happening seem kinda silly now. Not to mention cruel…especially given that I’m a crime victim myself.

  • BostonBill

    While I’m no fan of the TSA, I think there might be an entirely defensible reason for these recent atrocities.

    These sick passengers may actually be triggering radiation sensors at the TSA checkpoints as a result of their chemotherapy or radiation treatments. The high levels of radiation might be interpreted by the TSA agents as an attempt to get radioactive materials (e.g. a dirty bomb) past the TSA checkpoint.

    I think the TSA should use a bit more common sense when patting down a clearly ill passenger who has set off the radiation sensor, but I certainly wouldn’t put it past a terrorist to feign illness to sneak radioactive materials past the TSA checkpoint.

  • http://twitter.com/travelingiraffe Crissy

    My mom had knee replacement maybe 7 or 8 years ago and has traveled by air about a dozen or so times.  She has never had an issue with the TSA.  It’s anecdotal, but so are all the other stories.  

    A line or a paragraph in a manual about hidden disabilities apparently is not enough though.  Perhaps the TSA needs to spend more time on this in training.  However, the problem is that there are soooo many different types of illnesses and treatments that there is no way TSA agents could ever get a grasp on it.  Which means you have to rely on common sense and that ability of the agents to listen when someone says they have a medical condition and then make reasonable accommodations.  Maybe the TSA should have the agents who made these mistakes and hopefully learned from them speak at TSA training.  

    But what I find even more problematic is that the supervisors don’t seem to be much better.  I don’t know how the TSA chooses to promote people  (if it’s civil service I know their hands are tied in many ways), but when the agents don’t have common sense the supervisors are the ones who should be stepping in.  

    Supervisors should have common sense, an ability to adapt to the situation and the ability to protect their workers while making these “adjustments.”  I know that saying protecting their workers may not be popular, but I think it’s important to workers to know that when they’re making a mistake to know that their boss will bring them back to reality without throwing them under the bus.  That’s how good relationships between bosses and subordinates work.  Of course the boss should then take corrective action – it may be just speaking to them and showing them the error of their ways or it could be sending them back for retraining.     

    Of course bosses could just go and demand and order and throw people under busses, but I think that only sets an example for the workers to do that to the public in turn.  

  • Carver

    Leanne

    Why would you willing pick a fight with someone who you claim (repeatedly and falsely) said horrible things to you and who you further claim (again false and repeatedly) denies that you and your mother were victims.

    I guess all of that waililng and gnashing of teeth was just posturing, an attempt to bully others into submission.

  • cjr

    Yes, I probably am applying the results of class actions to all cases, since class actions get the most attention.

    I’ve received any number of mailings over the years about how I can claim my $10 (or less) from a class action having dealt with some company or other, yet I know that the lawyers will be getting millions.

  • cjr

    And shame on our president and legislators for not putting a stop to it, and our courts for giving the thumbs up as well.

  • MeanMeosh

    I agree generally with what Carver says.  I don’t think it’s so much a concerted T&A effort to target sick people, but a combination of poor training, incompetent employees, and inconsistent application of the T&A’s own rules and regulations.  In other words, this is exactly what happens when you give a bunch of burger flippers badges and guns and don’t train them properly.  The T&A’s constant dismissal that anything is wrong with the process doesn’t help their credibility either.  I mean, when was the last time a screener was disciplined for over-aggressive tactics?  It seems like every time a new passenger abuse story comes out, the victim gets a form letter that basically says “proper procedure was followed, now please shut up and bend over like a good citizen”. 

  • Claire

    The annual TSA budget is $8.1 billion. Some agents are stupid. Some are smart about some things but lack good sense on the job. Some are smart and over-qualified but bored, so they jerk passengers’ chains just for amusement. Some are crooks who pilfer passengers’ belongings (I had a watch lifted at a security checkpoint in Houston). Some are slightly sadistic and/or on a power trip, and also in a position where they can harass and humiliate travelers. Again, we pay $8.1 billion for this overblown agency. By contrast, the National Park Service, charged with America’s most cherished public lands, is allocated $2.9 billion — and unlike the TSA, partially pays its way through entrance, passes and revenues from concessionaires.

  • Tom Brollini

    Thanks for your service!

    Absolutely correct in all you say. 

    Funny how people forget how totalitarian regimes started out by restricting & removing rights & freedoms from the people by these little incremental steps.

    Next step – PAPERS PLEASE

    Then – WE WANT YOUR GUNS

    Finally – DO WHAT WE SAY OR YOU WILL BE SHOT

    Those who give up liberty for security will soon have neither! (Ben Franklin)

    SEMPER FI

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    And you call ME a bully? ;-)

    I’m not picking a fight. Just asking a reasonable question: if you still stand behind this statement (your words):

    “Fact:  Yes, there are numerous reports on the internet about TSA abuses.  There also  numerous reports on the internet about alien abductions, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster,  and Elvis. The existence of these reports is a fact.  The veracity however of the reports is not a fact but a conclusion subject to differing opinions….What you are missing is the very basic point that while you BELIEVE that thousands of abuses are being committed bythe TSA, you dont KNOW that for a fact. Dogmatic statements to the contrary, don’t you know better
    than to believe everything you read.”

    Just wondering if you still maintain that these reports, including this one, should be viewed in the same light as bigfoot. It’s just a question, Carver. No need to get all worked up.

  • Brooklyn

    No, profiling is not the answer – it will target people with dark skin, people
    who speak with an accent, little old ladies in headscarves, infrequent flyers
    and so on.  We need to save EVERYONE from the TSA; we all have rights and they
    are being violated.

  • Brooklyn

    Those Eurosocialist countries you hate have a European Court of Human Rights that has outlawed the most invasive “counter-terrorism” practices that our own government thinks are OK – there are no Guantanamos in Europe, the backscatter scanners are either absent or limited to passengers headed for the US (because OUR government wants them) and the staff at security points are polite and well trained. The military mentality is exactly how we got into this mess – the wars that made terrorists target us in the first place and the right-wingers that took our rights away. Want someone to blame? Look in the mirror!

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Reason #7,000,0001 that it’s none of the government’s business what our genitals look like or feel like.  The *police* were called?!  Last I checked, it’s not illegal to cross-dress or to exist in any stage of transsexual transition.  Every year, thousands of babies are born with ambiguous genitalia.  It appears to be TSA’s mission to out and ridicule these and any other anatomically non-normative travelers.  Shame on you, TSA.  Shame on you.

  • Michael K

    Maybe the survey should have one more option: “These incidents are a pattern reflecting poor hiring, training, and leadership practices.”  (i.e. no cynical intent is needed to explain it).

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    I don’t believe they are testing for radiation. They are testing for the chemical components of explosives. People who work on farms and might have fertilizer residue on their skin or clothes are at risk of false alarms, not cancer patients undergoing radiation treatments.

    As for a terrorist feigning illness to sneak radioactive materials past the TSA – I’ll offer the same argument that I offer when people say “but a terrorist MIGHT use a baby to smuggle in a bomb” or “a terrorist MIGHT use an elderly person to carry a bomb”: has it ever happened? Is there one single case of a terrorist attempting to board a plane on American soil using a child, elderly person or sick person to sneak a bomb onto a plane?

    NO. There is not. How do we know? Because IF it had happened, there would have been one of two outcomes:  1) the TSA would have caught them, and then held a ticker-tape parade to crow about their success, or 2) the TSA would NOT have caught them – and a plane would have been blown up.

    Ask yourself this: if terrorists are so hellbent on blowing up Americans, why the obsession with planes? Why wouldn’t a terrorist just walk up to a TSA checkpoint wearing a bomb vest and blow hisself to smithereens? He could take out hundreds of passengers, and dozens of blue-suited goons standing around doing nothing…all without having to allow an infidel to touch his junk. Doesn’t that sound easier than coming up with all these hackneyed ways to get PAST TSA?

  • noah

    Out of curiosity, do those who think that TSA is systematically targeting sick passengers also think that the TSA practices are “security theater.”  I tend to subscribe to the security theater view, which is exactly why I don’t think this targeting of sick passengers is systematic.  That would be truly inconsistent with the security theater perspective.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    I agree with you…for the most part. On the other hand, I think there ARE some TSA agents who intentionally target sick and disabled people. Why? Because they CAN. These are people who’ve never had power before, and suddenly they have power over all kinds of people. Bullies prey on the weak.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    What I really don’t understand is why the American Disabilities Association is not doing anything about this issue. There can be no doubt that TSA practices disproportionally affect the disabled. For example, someone like me – I have metal parts in my body and my home airport does not have body scanners, so I must go through a metal detector every time I fly somewhere – and I set it off every single time. This means that I must go through the full, enhanced “pat-down” every single time I fly. Not the 3% of the time that the TSA claims, but EVERY SINGLE TIME. That means that every time I board an aircraft, I must have my genitals touched by strangers.

    It’s even worse for people with artificial limbs or other prostheses. They will also have to receive enhanced screening – EVERY SINGLE TIME.

    It’s a disproportionate impact, and it needs to STOP.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    The reason I think *some* TSA agents are targeting sick people is because they are an easy target. Healthy people are more likely to give them trouble, whereas the sick, elderly and disabled are more likely to give in to their disgusting practices. This, in my opinion, DOES tie in with the “security theater” view – it means they make it look like they are busily keepin’ the Depends-bombs and fake-leg bombs off planes, without having to bother strong people who might actually give them a hard time about what they are doing.

    Keep in mind, bullies are usually lazy as well.

  • http://profiles.google.com/leeannewrites LeeAnne Clark

    This is one of the most powerful posts I’ve ever seen about this issue. As a victim of their horrific abuse, and a victim of a long-ago rape, I am one of the people they have damaged. Thank you, Sommer. Your words help me to feel validated – that my pain is real, that what they are doing is indisputably, undeniably WRONG, at the most basic human level.

    Thank you.

  • Bob

    How recent are all of these stories? I ask, because a few weeks ago I got selected for the millimeter wave screening at 3 different airports. I always opt out of those, and unfortunately, that means that I receive the dreaded freedom fondle. In all three cases, the TSA agent asked if there were any medical devices or sensitive areas of my body that he should be aware of. 

    In all three cases, the screener was respectful and looked like he wished the rules were different, too. It’s a shame that there are some bad apples there because I think most TSA agents really try to do their jobs the best that they can. Personally, I think the whole thing is security theater and makes airline passengers extremely uncomfortable for zero security benefit.