The Insider: Do I really have to deal with the TSA?

Editor’s Note: This week’s Insider series is on managing the TSA when you travel. As always, please send me any suggestions on topics or content I may have overlooked.

One of the most common questions I get from air travelers is whether they really have to endure the searches, scans and pat-downs by the TSA.

If you’re flying, the answer is: probably.

Where will you find the TSA?
The TSA is charged with protecting the nation’s transportation systems and “to ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce.” As a practical matter, the agency can’t police every highway, regional airport or waterway, and it never will. Instead, you’ll find the TSA in the following places:

At major airports and some regional airports. Smaller airports or airfields are TSA-free, so you might be able to avoid the agency by using a small airport or flying on a private aircraft.

On the road. TSA is deploying its mobile VIPR teams (that’s shorthand for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response) on some roadways, but you’re more likely to see a UFO than to be stopped by a VIPR team.

At sea. If you’re cruising, you probably won’t see any TSA agents. Screenings and passport control are handled by customs agents and cruise personnel.

On the train. Although some VIPR teams have been spotted in subways, light rail and Amtrak, their presence is random and sporadic. Your odds of seeing an A-list celebrity on the train are greater than being stopped and frisked by a TSA agent.

Do you have to comply with the TSA?
Once you enter an airport screening area, TSA requires you to go through the screening, and judges have consistently supported the agency in that regard. However, it’s important to note that TSA screeners, also referred to as Transportation Security Officers, do not have any law enforcement authority. In other words, they can’t arrest you. They have to call airport police for that.

If you’re not at the airport, the rules are different. If you approach a VIPR checkpoint, you can make a U-turn or walk away, and there is no requirement that you allow your vehicle or your belongings to be searched. In addition, you can deny the agents permission to search you or your car by saying, “I do not consent to a search.” A law enforcement officer can’t search your car without probable cause — in other words, if he sees something suspicious. So technically, it’s possible to pass through a VIPR checkpoint and deny agents the right to search your vehicle. But you are probably better off just leaving.

Should I try to avoid the TSA?
That depends. A vast majority of TSA airport searches are incident-free. The agents are polite, efficient and helpful. But some go horribly wrong. There are disagreements over the safety of the TSA’s body scanners, misunderstanding over prohibited items and, of course, altercations over pat-downs. I know some air travelers who refuse to fly. I know others who believe the TSA is doing a great job protecting us from terrorism.

There are certain air travelers who may want to consider avoiding the TSA. Travelers with disabilities have a higher-than-average incident rate with the agency, and especially passengers with mobility problems. The agency also dislikes shutterbugs, even though taking pictures of a TSA screening is completely legal. If you show up with a video camera on “record” you may be confronted by an agent. In the past, the TSA has automatically given a secondary screening to passengers with certain foreign passports, including Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan. Also, if you’re skittish about being touched, poked and prodded, then TSA screening might not be for you.

How do you get around the TSA?
The best way to steer clear of the agency is to plan a trip that avoids a scheduled airline. If you have to fly, take a chartered flight or use a smaller airport that has no TSA presence. Most business and leisure trips take place by car (about 9 out of 10 do) so you would be in good company if you went by car. A cruise is another way to travel TSA-free. But none of these methods is a guarantee; the agency is aggressively expanding and if it could, it would screen every method of travel, in accordance with its mission statement.

Are you exempt from screening?
The TSA has carved out a list of passengers that do not need to be screened or are given access to special screening procedures. They include:

• Working pilots.
• Flight attendants on duty.
• Senior members of Congress.
• Cabinet secretaries.
• Former presidents.
• Members of the military and their families (by order of Congress).
• Police officers on duty.
• Cargo loaders, baggage handlers, fuelers, cabin cleaners and caterers who work at the airport and are on duty.
• Airport volunteers.
• Foreign dignitaries.
• Members of TSA’s pre-check (trusted traveler) program.

Note: If you’re a frequent traveler, you may want to consider joining the pre-check program in order to avoid some screening procedures. But bear in mind that while they may expedite your screening, they don’t guarantee that you’ll avoid a scan or pat-down.

(Photo: marklyon/Flickr)

  • Anonymous

    In June 2009 a US Airways gate agent in PHL was arrested for bypassing the checkpoint with a firearm and handing it off to someone that boarded a flight. Gate agents in PHL can still bypass the checkpoint.

    In May 2010 a Delta pilot was arrested in ATL after trying to transit the checkpoint with a firearm.

    In May 2010 a suicidal JetBlue pilot was taken into custody in the crew room in BOS; he had a firearm.

    In June 2010 a Delta flight attendant was arrested while trying to transit the checkpoint with a firearm in IND. She had bypassed the checkpoint in ATL the day before with the firearm. Airline employees in ATL can still bypass the checkpoint.

    In September 2011 a JetBlue pilot was arrested in LGA after trying to transit the checkpoint with a firearm.

    Do you still find this “laughable”?

    I’ve seen countless airline employees in the sterile area after they had changed into civilian clothes; I know of none that got in even the slightest bit of trouble.

  • Anonymous

    Pre or post 2007?

    It’s my understanding that a Zippo (and absorbed fuel type) is considered a “common lighter” by the TSA.  However, they don’t seem to have any consistent enforcement.

    Really though – this was maybe 2010 and the TSA screener let me through with that lighter.  I thought it was because I wasn’t a passenger.

    At one time a Zippo that had been filled wasn’t allowed even in checked-in luggage.  Then they required that up to two could be placed in checked-in luggage if stored in a special air-tight container that meets DOT and TSA standards.  I think they still require this for a previously filled lighter in checked baggage.

    I saw a few for sale.  They were all air-tight, which I guess was supposed to be important if one lit u[ by accident.  The rationale would be the oxygen would get used up and it would stop quickly.  Some were like those fancy pencil cases, while Zippo had their “Zippo Air Case” which was just a plastic jar with a foam insert for two standard sized lighters.

    http://phmsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/PHMSA/SPA_App/OfferDocuments/SP14373_2008040661.pdf

    Zippo got some sort of waiver from (I kid you not) the Dept of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to allow for transportation of filled lighters in compliant cases.

  • Anonymous

    Airport volunteers are exempt from screening?  Why?  What background check do they go through?  I’m not against airport volunteers and admit I’ve had very limited experience with them but what are they doing that would exempt them from TSA requirements? 

  • Anonymous

    One incident of abuse is too many.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    “A vast majority of TSA airport searches are warrant-free.  The agents are loud, threatening, and untrained.”  Fixed that for you, Chris. 

    Every single time, every time that an innocent traveler is treated like a criminal, searched and inspected without any individualized suspicion of wrongdoing, the fabric of our country is being ripped to shreds.  Our natural rights and our Constitutional guarantees are being trashed, and our dignity degraded and abused.  Being sniffed and prodded like a maximum-security prison inmate when I am a law-abiding citizen who’s never been suspected of any crime definitely qualifies as an “incident” in my book.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Thank you for clarifying this.  The problem I have is that the rules you describe can not possibly have any security value whatsoever.  What difference does it make whether you plan to board a flight?  

    If there is any instance at all where you’re permitted to access the secured area without passing through screening, then you’d be able to pass a weapon to someone else who was boarding a plane.  (Of course I’m not suggesting *you* would, but someone could, right?)  Why does it matter whether you’re getting on a plane?  The possibility of introducing contraband to the secured area is the same.

    This is just one of an astonishing multitude of gaping holes in TSA’s idiotic security theater. The fact that none of what they do makes us any safer *is* relevant to the whole debate about whether I am willing to give up my rights when I travel. Since none of their pretend magic does any good, then I’m certainly not willing to hand over any of my rights.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    As with airports – choose smaller stations to avoid the police state bullies.

  • Anonymous

    according to all of our directives, Zippos are not allowed whatsoever. we already see how many TSOs know their own directives, though.

  • Anonymous

    that USAir agent was an idiot. as for the rest of them, they are NOT ground crew, which is what i was referring to, clearly.  those you listed are people who have full intentions to board aircraft and take flights. i was talking about gate agents, ticket counter agents, ramp agents, operations agents, etc, WHO DO NOT BOARD AND TAKE FLIGHTS.

    and if you know those people have left the sterile area, changed clothes, and returned without going through security, REPORT THEM.  that’s a major security breach and they need to be dealt with accordingly.

  • Anonymous

    i’m not sure that this is true. i have never seen an airport volunteer NOT go through screening to reach the sterile area, and i’m in my 2nd decade of working at multiple airports.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, Lisa, Sommer, and I go back and forth a lot.  We agree on the basics, but it’s  semantics and our different methods that put us in slightly different quarters.  (Would you agree, ladies?) 

    I think all three of us have had some bad experiences at the hands of TSA, though, so we’re big non-fans.

  • Anonymous

    That’s not what the TSA says.  They have a specific definition of what a “torch lighter” is.  They have an image of one next to a common disposable butane lighter.  It puts out a really thin and long concentrated flame that’s supposed to be able to light a pipe.  It almost looks like the flame from a mini-blowtorch.

    http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/assistant/editorial_multi_image_with_table_0099.shtm
    http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/sop/index.shtm
    http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/prohibited/permitted-prohibited-items.shtm

    “Torch Lighters – Torch lighters create a thin, needle-like flame that is
    hotter (reaching 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit) and more intense than those
    from common lighters. Torch lighters are often used for pipes and
    cigars, and maintain a consistent stream of air-propelled fire
    regardless of the angle at which it is held. Torch lighters continue to
    be banned.”

    Zippo had a press release saying that their lighters were now allowed:

    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tsa-allows-zippo-lighters-back-in-aircraft-cabins-58804587.html

  • Anonymous

    Okay, ground employees then.

    In March 2007 a Delta ground employee was arrested after he bypassed security to get a duffel bag containing 13 handguns and a rifle aboard an aircraft.

    In February 2008 a United ground employee was arrested in SFO for possessing a firearm at work. Police were tipped off by
    coworkers that had noticed the employee previously had been seen with a set of brass knuckles.

    In June 2008 an American Eagle ground employee in MIA was arrested after trying to transit the checkpoint with a firearm.

    In May 2011 an American Airlines ground employee was caught after trying to take a loaded firearm through the checkpoint in SNA.

    Everyone should go through the same common sense screening to access the sterile area.

  • http://tsanewsblog.com/214/news/history-repeats-itself-with-tsas-strip-search-tactics/ Lisa Simeone

    flutiefan, Yeah, you’re right.  I just woke up on the wrong side of the bed one morning and decided to make sh*t up.  And anyway, as you point out, the fact that only a minority of passengers are getting abused means it’s okay!

  • Anonymous

    I’ll take my chances with the crazies, then.  I’m under no illusions about the world being a magical safe place full of rainbows and fairy farts and I’m more than willing to take the matter of my physical well-being into my own hands, especially considering that the TSA has done such an unwaveringly abysmal job of protecting it for me.

    TSA talks a fair game about stopping terrorists and securing flights and protecting American safey-safey-safety but they conveniently neglect to mention the potential implications of their actions upon the individual liberty of the citizens they claim to be “protecting.”  They elide the inconvenient (for them) reality that the USA was never founded to be a nation of safe people, but rather was meant to be a nation of free people.  Remember Franklin’s words: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    I’m a trained martial artist.  I know how to disarm someone who’s brandishing a knife or a gun.  I’m sufficiently confident in my abilities that I would make the effort to disarm a gun-wielding crazy and protect my fellow citizens without infringing on their civil rights.  Maybe I’ll succeed, maybe I’ll fail and get shot.  If the latter happens, I would hope that the crazy would be distracted long enough for other travelers to swarm and subdue them.  If I fail and get shot, will it kill me?  Maybe, yeah.

    But liberty is worth my life.  It’s worth yours, mine, Susan’s, Lisa’s, Chris’s, and anyone else’s.  Freedom is the noblest pursuit of all, and it is time we stopped letting TSA puke all over it.

  • Anonymous

    I’ll take my chances with the crazies, then.  I’m under no illusions about the world being a magical safe place full of rainbows and fairy farts and I’m more than willing to take the matter of my physical well-being into my own hands, especially considering that the TSA has done such an unwaveringly abysmal job of protecting it for me.

    TSA talks a fair game about stopping terrorists and securing flights and protecting American safey-safey-safety but they conveniently neglect to mention the potential implications of their actions upon the individual liberty of the citizens they claim to be “protecting.”  They elide the inconvenient (for them) reality that the USA was never founded to be a nation of safe people, but rather was meant to be a nation of free people.  Remember Franklin’s words: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    I’m a trained martial artist.  I know how to disarm someone who’s brandishing a knife or a gun.  I’m sufficiently confident in my abilities that I would make the effort to disarm a gun-wielding crazy and protect my fellow citizens without infringing on their civil rights.  Maybe I’ll succeed, maybe I’ll fail and get shot.  If the latter happens, I would hope that the crazy would be distracted long enough for other travelers to swarm and subdue them.  If I fail and get shot, will it kill me?  Maybe, yeah.

    But liberty is worth my life.  It’s worth yours, mine, Susan’s, Lisa’s, Chris’s, and anyone else’s.  Freedom is the noblest pursuit of all, and it is time we stopped letting TSA puke all over it.

  • Anonymous

    One is too many, flutiefan.  “Inalienable rights” means that there is ZERO justification for ever depriving a person of their rights.  This includes safety/security/catchin’ turrrrists.

    The fact that there are so many flights is utterly immaterial to the fact that TSA is making a mockery of the Constitution every time it performs an irradiating virtual strip-search or a sexual-assault (now more easily legitimately called RAPE, thanks to the FBI’s new standards) gropedown as a prerequisite for exercising one’s right to freedom of movement within the US.

    Every time Congress has raised concerns, John Pistole has either declined to testify or spun a yarn about “just the way things are” and “just the reality of the situation.”  “Just just just just just,” used constantly as a disarming word, a means of implying that Congress and the People have no choice but to let him and his merry molesters have their way. 

    And each time the people, either via Congress or acting alone, try to push back against TSA, TSA responds by making their procedures even more draconian and offensive.  Recall the case of the retired military officer who was arrested for reciting the 4th amendment at the checkpoint.  We have a right to free speech in America, and she was reciting part of the very document that guarantees that right – a series of words that no American should ever find offensive or objectionable.  And yet TSA saw fit to summon airport police and have her arrested for the “crime” of interfering with the high-and-might screening process.  Can’t fight the process.  Can’t go against the process.  No sense arguing with it, it’s not human, it has no face, it hears no pleas, it’s THE PROCESS.  How dare she interfere with it by exercising her Constitutional right to recite the Constitution itself.

    TSA and everything it does is thoroughly inexcusable.

  • Anonymous

    Fortunately, they’ve been PNG’d from larger Amtrak stations twice in the past year by Amtrak’s police chief.  Hopefully Amtrak PD will maintain their integrity and not cave to backroom pressure that I’m sure is being applied right now by DHS, and keep frog-marching them out.

    The most recent one involved a great exchange between the Amtrak PD and the TSA’s clerks-not-agents-not-officers.

    http://www.travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/biggest-ridership-in-amtrak-history.1587/#post-16157

    “What is this?”
    “We’re here to conduct passenger screening.”
    “No.  You don’t have the jurisdiction.”
    “We insist.”
    “No, –I– insist.  You’re leaving the building.”

    Reading that one made my day.

  • Anonymous

    Airline employees are routinely arrested in theft and smuggling rings, and by allowing them to bypass common sense screening, this makes it even easier, as do the so-called “TSA approved locks” on checked bags.

  • Anonymous

    Would someone please clarify for me two points:
    1. How do the military personnel and their families go about claiming this awesome exemption from screening?

    2.  Do retirees and those with DoD ID cards have the same right to avoid screening?

    I am facing a trip to Spain soon, and I simply have no way of getting around flying, and as a military retiree, I would LOVE not to have to deal with the TSOs.

  • Anonymous

    Going to disagree with you Sommer. (Shocker ;) )

    With fewer passengers and fewer searches to do, some of these smaller airports are more aggressive.

    I have a small, regional airport where I live.  While increased fares have made us prefer to drive to MSP instead, the TSA process didn’t exactly make the decision a difficult one.  While we don’t have AIT, the pretty bored TSO’s are obnoxiously thorough.

    I’ve had my carry-on emptied multiple times, because they didn’t like the look of a book light I had placed right on top, or the jewelry that I usually keep deeper in the bag to avoid easy theft.  They even opened the jewelry case once and dug around in it, which really pissed me off. (Nothing was removed, but I consider jewelry to be intimate, as it touches skin – I washed it all when I got to my destination.)

    Before they remodeled the terminal a few years ago, there was no bathroom in their small secure area.  My late mother – who was on a diuretic at the time – went through the screening and then politely asked where the bathroom was.  The TSO’s barked at her it was in the “non-secure” area (of the tiny, tiny terminal).  So she could hold it or go out to the one bathroom.  And if she went out, well, she would have to be rescreened.  And she COULD MISS HER FLIGHT. (Still 30 minutes from takeoff).

    A native NYC’er who was not easily cowed, she just said, okay, left all her bags with my father, spent a total of 2 minutes in the bathroom and got back in the TSA line, because they still weren’t finished.

    They made her take off her shoes (instead of using the little foot-detector sniffer thing they had at the time), and patted her down before she even hit the metal detector.  And then gave her the stink eye until she boarded the flight.  (She just gave it to them right back.)

    Smaller usually means no AIT – it doesn’t always mean nicer TSO’s.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Congress gave TSA six months to deal with its mandate.  I think the bill only passed a month or so ago.  Also, the bill wasn’t very specific about what the screening process for military members should look like. TSA has made no announcements about how (or whether) it plans to comply with the law.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    Agreed that screeners (I never use the deliberately misleading “officer” title, as abbreviated in TSO) in smaller airports aren’t uniformly nicer or more laid back.  Manchester Airport is small and has some of the surliest and most barking screeners I’ve ever suffered. 

    Often smaller airports are the scanner-free airports.  You can check on tsastatus.net to know for sure.  Also, please report to tsastatus.net when screeners are rude and bullying, so we know what to expect. 

    It’s a virtual certainty that you will avoid TSA on Amtrak by choosing tiny stations, the ones with barely a platform and a parking lot.  If I ever walked into an Amtrak station and saw TSA, I’d turn around and walk out and catch a cab or a bus to the next station down the line.  It would cost hundreds of billions of dollars for TSA to abuse train passengers with the frequency and intensity that they abuse flyers, and I don’t think that money will be allocated soon.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

    If it were your loved one getting strip searched in the back room, coated in their own urine, or suffering a rape-trauma flashback from unwelcome sexual touching, maybe that would change your tune.  As others said: one innocent person violated is too many.  A TSA screener raped me, penetrating my body with a foreign object.  They sent me a letter emphasizing how not sorry they were for raping me.  I’m not “creating this stuff”.  I was raped by the TSA, and neither I nor any of their other victims are going away.  It doesn’t matter whether it was 1 or 1000 or 1,000,000 people: it’s disgusting and inhumane to hire government thugs to physically abuse people like this.