Tarmac delays, R.I.P.? Don’t bet on it

By | December 7th, 2010

Did the federal government just kill tarmac delays?

You could be forgiven for thinking so after reading this morning’s news release from the Transportation Department, which declared that for the first time since it began keeping records on tarmac delays, it recorded no delays of more than three hours in October. That’s down from 11 flights in Oct. 2009.

There’s no word on delays of less than three hours, although it seems our attention is likely to focus on them soon.

I’ll skip the Ray LaHood soundbite. Needless to say, the DOT is pleased with itself.

But did it just kill tarmac delays? I wouldn’t be so sure.

An independent survey by aviation analysts Darryl Jenkins and Joshua Marks claims 384,000 more passengers were stranded by cancellations last summer, and an additional 49,600 air travelers experienced gate returns and delays, because of the government’s new tarmac-delay rules.


“The size of the fine is just too punitive,” Jenkins told me in an earlier interview. “The reasons we don’t like the rule is that in order to prevent these long tarmac delays, you’re causing these cancellations that would not happen otherwise.”

LaHood struck back shortly after the study was released, calling it flawed and promising not to retreat on its tarmac rules in his blog.

“Air travelers can be assured – and so can our critics – that the DOT is not going to back down when it comes to protecting flyers’ rights,” he wrote.

But Jenkins and Marks make a valid point. Last summer was unusually quiet, in terms of weather, which is the leading cause of tarmac delays. If next summer’s weather returns to normal, tarmac delays could come back with a vengeance.

Related story:   As airline complaints soar, the government comes to the rescue

All of this also raises the question of the proposed Airline Passenger Bill of Rights championed by some single-issue airline advocates. Will that pass with the FAA Reauthorization Bill if there’s a perception that tarmac delays are dead?

In a Republican-controlled Congress, I wouldn’t bet on it.

So tarmac delays will probably live to see another day.



We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.