Swimsuit models have rights, too (and so do you)

shutterstock_237388030
By | January 16th, 2016

When I edited Jessica Monsell’s follow-up story about a Beaches Turks and Caicos guest whose vacation had been ruined by a disruptive photo shoot, it was accompanied by an unusual request: Don’t forget to post a picture of the swimsuit models.

Being a guy, I would publish a picture of a swimsuit model with every story on this site, but on this particular story, it was appropriate.

To say this guest did not have a good time would be an understatement. Lounge chairs were removed, chained and locked, beaches and restaurants were closed, and helicopters buzzed overhead while swimsuit models occupied the property and floated in the pools.

Of course, I posted a photo of a swimsuit model with the story. And, of course, it was our most popular post of the week.

I’d like to think Jessica’s advocacy skills lured all the readers. She did an incredible job of persuading Sandals and TripAdvisor to reconsider the case and address the problem. But a picture of a model on the beach can’t hurt, either.

We all have rights

As I reviewed her case and the photo selection I made for the article, I thought: “You know, it’s easy to trivialize this, but everyone has rights. Even swimsuit models.”

That’s easy to forget, especially if you work on the other side of the counter.

Everyone has rights, no matter how much you paid, regardless of the color of your loyalty card, or whether you purchased insurance or not.


But how often do you read the comment on this site (or even hear it muttered under the breath of a ticket agent): “You get what you pay for.”

Related story:   A happy ending from our A-Team, thanks to these United executive contacts

How often do you tacitly agree with someone who claims the shabby treatment a reader got at the hands of a company was deserved? That if you pay chicken scratch for your airline ticket, you should sit in less than humane conditions? And indeed, that if you don’t pay for something you use — like a Facebook account — you deserve to be the product?

Perhaps George Orwell said it best in Animal Farm: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

Who benefits the most?

Segmenting customers is great if you’re part of the 1 percent. Who wouldn’t love to be a platinum VIP with a private butler and late checkout privileges?

But you have to wonder: Who is benefiting the most from an industry that obsessively divides its customers into “haves” and “have-nots”? And when everyone buys into this warped system, where only the folks with metal-plated cards get treated with any amount of respect and decency, who is the biggest beneficiary?

If you guessed the elites, you’re wrong.

No, when everyone concurs that the “gate lice” and cheapskates deserve next to nothing and have fewer rights than the best customers, then the company benefits the most. They fall back on their adhesion contracts, the laws passed by the paid-off legislators, and a public deceived by loyalty program propaganda and proceed to give their customers the least amount of service possible while charging them the most they can.



  • MF

    Chris, your paragraph above referring to ‘gate lice’ is pure poetry!

  • Molly

    Maybe not totally on topic, but sometimes I feel like finding the poster(s) and slapping them when I see the phrase: “first world problem” written dismissively. I’m sorry, did I manage to miss the worldwide referendum that determined that only life and death complaints were valid? Or only complaints from third world countries? That we should allow businesses to rip us off solely because we “can afford it”? And then, when people feel compelled to explain why that overcharge mattered to them, why that cancelled flight mattered, why being double-charged for something mattered, that they weren’t complaining just on “principle”… then they get jumped on for even going there, told that their financial situation should have nothing to do with the validity of the complaint. Well, which is it, you naysayers? Do people who live in a first world country only have the right to complain if it has serious impact on them? But then we need to explain how it impacts. You can’t have it both ways.
    Please try to understand that any valid complaint about anything has the potential to help all, no matter the individual circumstances.