Ridiculous or not? Responsible travelers vacation with their pets

Over the toyears, my incendiary writings have offended everyone from airline pilots to card-carrying frequent fliers to travel agents. I make no apologies for ticking them off.

But nothing — nothing! — comes close to the bite of angry pet owners.

Here’s what happened: A few weeks ago, in preparation for a lengthy roadtrip I’m taking with my family, I asked readers to help me after I hit an unexpected snag. Our plans to send our three Bengal cats to live with a relative had fallen through, and now we had to make a difficult choice about the kitties. We could board them in a kennel, find a pet sitter, hire a housesitter, or find a new, temporary home for them.

It was a quiet Sunday in August and I expected a few polite suggestions from my readers. Instead, within seconds of posting the article, someone on Twitter who I’d never heard of said she’d “unfollowed” me because of the “sad” post. Within hours, I had more than a hundred comments — many from foaming-at-the-mouth pet fans.

My crime? I’m still trying to figure that out, to be honest.

I’ll try to summarize the pro-pet side without quoting anyone, since I love all of my readers and don’t want to embarrass them. The mainstream critics said I was behaving as if my pets were disposable, and that, if nothing else, I was setting a bad example for my kids by “abandoning” the felines. Others took a more extreme view. They described the bond between animal and human as almost holy, that I was bound to either stay home or take the cats along, and that by leaving, I had broken a sacred trust.

Some of the commenters were downright nasty about it. I decided to keep their rants on the site because, as always, they say more about them than about me. Plus, they’re highly entertaining. Oh, you’ll find a snarky rebuttal from yours truly here and there, but only because you demand it.

The question this catfight raises is the following one: At a time when many otherwise rational people feel that dogs and cats are equal to people, am I obligated to take my pets on vacation?

If you’re as surprised as I am that people exist who hold these views, who would even try to suggest that responsible pet owners must include their animal companions in their travel plans, let me connect a few dots for you.

We’ll start with the “enormous brown honking” pig that terrorized passengers on a US Airways flight 11 years ago. Why? Because it was a therapy animal for one of the passengers.

See, the cruelty-free crowd think their animals love them and can’t live without them. That may or may not be true. But there is no doubt that the pet owners can’t live without their pigs. Or dogs. Or cats. So they bring them along. They feel it is a higher calling, even when it inconveniences other travelers. And even when it’s obvious the pet would be far happier wallowing in mud.

Fast-forward to 2004: A gray cat named Gin escapes from his cage on a flight from Vienna to Brussels about 20 miles after takeoff. Although Gin was a show cat, he apparently also had some training as a jihadist. He promptly scurried up to the flight deck, where he attacked the pilot. The plane had to make an emergency landing.

Another dot to connect is the 2010 incident in which a small dog on a flight from Newark to Phoenix broke loose and bit a flight attendant and another passenger. The flight was diverted to Pittsburgh, where the victims were treated and released.

Although the airline had reportedly asked the dog owner to leave her canine in a cage under her seat, per airline policy, she decided to take it out to play with it. (I’m sure she felt it needed her.) Which is when it took off.

What all of these incidents suggest to me is that these well-meaning but somewhat misguided animal “guardians” are far more common than anyone thought.

Also, they do not tolerate dissent. These anthropomorphizers believe they have the moral high ground, and that by shouting down anyone who disagrees with them, they can win.

Fortunately, my cat problem had a happy ending. One charitable reader, who also happened to be a neighbor, agreed to look after the cats while we were away. (Take a bow, Joyce!)

My views on pet ownership haven’t changed as the result of this tussle. I love my cats, but I love my kids even more. I remain a proud carnivore (burgers, mmmmm!). I don’t believe cats, dogs or pigs belong on a plane, in a hotel, or a rental car unless maybe you’re moving somewhere, and even then, they should be safely confined to a carrier.

Incidentally, I think this represents the view of the average American.

As for the “pets-are-people-too” argument — I’ll believe that when my cats ask to join us on vacation.

(Photo: kevind ooley/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Linda Bator

    Well, I have a real PHOBIA about snakes, and that makes it a matter of MY RIGHTS at that point!  Service animal my @##!

  • zt

    I’d rather travel with pets than kids!   I have no use for anyone’s out of control, mannerless brats.  (Not saying yours are…but unfortunately, many people in today’s society are sorely lacking parenting skills.)

    But I keep my cats at home when I travel, and have family check in on them…they are happier there.  However, I usually travel for a week at a time…guess I’m not lucky enough to get a year’s vacation time. 

  • zt

    No, my cats are not like children…they are better than children!

    The majority of kids today are brats…no manners, no discipline…ooh, let the kid do whatever he wants or it will damage his self-esteem, wah wah.   Oh, I could live a happy life if I never saw another kid again.

  • Linda Bator

    As a pet owner AND asthmatic – BS!  If you have allergies to pet dander, or your asthma is affected by it (as mine can occasionally be), then it is YOUR resposnibility to have your mediation.  You want PRISTINE conditions everywhere you travel, live in a plastic bubble!  This whole I AM SSOOO IMPORTANT and you’re not attitude is retarded – its a big world, with a whole lot of people.  DEAL WITH IT!

  • kadu

    Keep your stinking tick infested flea bags at home folks..just like those flying with whiney crybaby children … eeekk.. little snots bawl..kick the back of your seat..can’t sit still or shut their yaps..yes .. animals and children..both belong at home..not on an airplane..

  • Joyce

    What an attitude.  Hopefully, I will never meet or fly with you!  Chris’s pets are adorable!  Joyce

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4OUPLCINOL723CGHVR53CQ72Y Kevin

    Considering that Chris is going to be traveling for (as I understand it) an entire year, a permanent adoption might have been the best option if he hadn’t been able to find someone to take them for a while. I’ve had pets in the past that, when I had to move, I had to find new homes for. It’s sad, but it happens. Even with people: my grandmother was raised for several years with a cousin as a sort-of sibling because the cousin’s parents weren’t in a position to care for their kids–sending them to live with friends or relatives was, at one time, an accepted (if not beloved) solution.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4OUPLCINOL723CGHVR53CQ72Y Kevin

    And if you had given the cat to someone else, it would have been just as traumatized at being in a new, strange household – only add in people it didn’t know, either. I’m not saying one should never find a new home for a pet – of course you have to, sometimes – but simply moving isn’t a reason to do so, as long as there’s a place for the pet at the other end of the journey.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4OUPLCINOL723CGHVR53CQ72Y Kevin

    I have three words for you, with regards to your sister: Child Protective Services.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4OUPLCINOL723CGHVR53CQ72Y Kevin

    And how is that different from, say, a person who “voluntarily” takes a job requiring him to travel all week, each week, and who decides that under the circumstances, it’s not fair to keep the pet(s) he has?

    Your response reveals your own bias: you disapprove of a choice Chris has made for the betterment of the *humans* in his family because it means that the *pets* of his family are having some mythical lifelong guarantee of no change in custodial status revoked.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4OUPLCINOL723CGHVR53CQ72Y Kevin

    Yes, we do. But sometimes the circumstances of our lives change. Jobs change – we have to travel more, or less, than we did. One spouse loses a job and we have to downsize our housing, and no apartment we can afford will accept pets. Those are facts of life.

    Certainly I think having Joyce care for them with her own pets, and letting Chris have them back when he’s back for good, is about the best option I can think of. But if that option wasn’t available, a house-sitter or adopting the cats out to someone else would be INFINITELY better than taking them “on the go” for weeks on end, from place to place. A cat would likely go nuts in that situation.

  • Sadowski

    I use a wonderful boarding kennel when I go on vacation. I’ve sent both my puppies there for the last 14+ years. They have been safe and well taken care of. I can’t imagine dragging my canine family on a long car trip or sending them on an airplane, unless it was an emergency. You just need to budget this expense into your travel plans.

  • Sadie Cee

    Take your cats with you by all means.  I just don’t want to be on the same plane nor do I want to have to lose money on my non-refundable ticket when I do refuse to travel with them.

  • Summer

    I love my pets. “I don’t have kids, I have dogs/cats” I tell people when the ask about children. But I don’t vacation with them. Why would my animals want to spend all day in a hotel room when we go to Chicago? Especially the cat who hates people? Or the cat who is terrified of the outdoors? And my dogs, big friendly things that they are? Why should they be stuck in a room all day? Since they can’t really be left all day, then I am breaking into our vacation time to return to the hotel to walk them, and then turn around and leave them again. Responsible pet owners provide for their pets when they have to be gone from the home. Since I have cats and dogs, I get a pet sitter to come by throughout the day and feed, play and walk. On behalf of all pet owners, I’m sorry you were targeted. It sounds to me like you were looking for options and solutions in a responsible way.

  • kadu

    Lordy Joyce ME TOO!! Especially if you’re flying with the flea bags & or snotty kids!

  • Sylviaguarino

    Kevin, the same thing happened in my family in the “old” days, too many kids for the parents to care for.  But kids understand better than do pets why they must be “transferred” from one loving family to another.  And with that, all pets are different.  My cats are/were rescued ferals, quite skittish and with health issues.  Honestly, not only could I not have found a better home, I most likely would not have found any home at all.  Short of a life threatening or death situation, I would not give up permanently any cat I ever KEPT (I adopt almost all out), but that’s me.  I don’t think they are human, but people can sure learn a lot from them….

  • Merryl Gross

    I used to travel with my pet cat.  Not because I felt she would pine away without me (though eventually I think she DID but with a kitty that old, you never really know), but because she was diabetic and really ornery about letting anyone but me give her insulin.

    I’m sure some pets love to travel.  But many MANY do not.  I’m sure that if you are owned by some cats, you are the best judge of whether it’s a good idea to take them along, or to find other arrangements for them.

  • Jlj9675

    I only take road trips and cruises. For the former, I always take my small dog with me as I would miss her and vice versa. For cruises, I must kennel her, which she hates. When I travel to various relatives with allergies I must kennel her or find doggie daycare so I search out the best and I have found some, honest. I took my cat (years ago before my own allergies nixed having one) on road trips and he was fine too. I never expect others to make allowances or be inconvenienced by my pet. Unfortunately I can’t say the same for parents of small children, who are often the most horrible of challenges when I travel. It all comes down to respect for one another and elimination of the “ME” attitude.

  • Elpasinato

    I have a dog and 2 cats. I just returned from an extended weekend away (AZ to CO) where I flew on a pet friendly airlines. I made arrangements for someone to watch the cats at the house and took the dog to a friend’s house. I would not take my cats on vacation — EVER! As for the dog, I would love to take her with me, but it all depends on the mode of transportation, where I will be going, and what I will be doing. Not all towns or hotels are pet friendly. Also, not all airports have a convenient dog run area for pets to relieve themselves.

  • Jpicurro

    The point is do not adopt in the first place.  If you cannot live up to the responsibility of being a pet owner due to what may be very legitimate reasons, then do not have them.  Very simple.

    Pets may not be equal to humans, but they are living things and should not be treated as convenient accessories to one’s life.

    You chose these cats and assumed the responsibility for them. I would suggest in the future to remain pet free.  Thus freeing you in the future from an avoidable choice.

    I am a fan of your newsletter but was a bit appalled by this particular article. 

  • Stereoknob

    You did the right thing leaving them at home and many of the pro-pet flyers are crazies. 

  • Amanda

    “Pets” is a vague word. Dogs and birds are quite different- as demonstrated in the comments. Sitting next to a snake is quite different from sitting next to a cat. Moveover, just as you’ve suggested there are varying degrees of good parenting, there are various degrees of good pet ownership. 

    To fault all parents because of the ones who are terrible is unfair. The same is true of those who travel with pets. 
    The provisions made to allow animals who are working on flights took years to enact and those I’ve encountered with working animals have been concerned for being a bother, concerned with other travelers and are basically attempting to go about their lives the same as anyone else, not fight for some odd right. These can and have included those who have emotional support animals. These are not people taking their pets on vacation- they’re trying to function. 
    The problem is that even when you’re trying to function, you need to balance your rights against everyone else’s… a parent may feel strongly their child should be able to scream and in their own home its fine. In an airplane, they should account for the comfort and fairness to everyone else. If you need to travel with a trained, behaved working animal, great. If you need to travel with a snake, you may consider taking alternative modes of transportation just to be fair to those around you. 

    As for taking your pet on vacation- most pets would not enjoy it and yet there are some that would. Knowing which your pet is depends on how in tune you are to your pet, and how good a pet parent you are. The best pet parents would recognize when they’re making demands of a pet purely out of selfishness. 

    Pets, like children are an investment. If you get a pet, realize that much like you should hire a babysitter to go to the movies (rather than drag a child to a movie theather) you’ll need to be able to afford pet sitters.