Is the travel experience really getting worse?

The world is going to hell in a handbasket, as my dad used to say.

Or is it?

Consider the overall travel experience, which I write about every day, and which my readers experience every day. It’s easy to assume that companies are getting more aggressive about pushing their ridiculous fees, surcharges and other scams on the masses.

But then I hear from Jeff James, a reader from Lee’s Summit, Missouri, about an experience he had a few years ago when he rented a car from National in Denver.

When he returned the vehicle, a representative claimed there was a dent on the bumper.

“I couldn’t see it,” he says. “After arguing with the guy for a few minutes, he suggested if I paid him $20 that he could take care of the problem. I gave him a $20 bill and rushed to catch my flight. I never rented from National again.”

I checked with National, which was understandably concerned about this obvious scam, and learned that the alleged incident took place more than a few years ago. In fact, it happened in 2001.

And that got me thinking: Do we just assume that the travel experience is getting worse?

Is it possible that the “good old days” were actually the bad old days, when it comes to the quality of travel?

Perhaps.

I spent an hour on the phone with an airline publicist yesterday, who tried to convince me that the flying experience had actually never been better. She raved about her carrier’s new lie-flat seats in business class and new aircraft, both of which undoubtedly make for a superior air travel experience.

It’s true, too, that airline tickets are cheap — maybe too cheap for even the airline industry’s own good. (I mean $9 fares? C’mon.)

But the argument that flying is getting better for all of us is absolutely preposterous. For the card-carrying elite-level passengers lucky enough to be sitting in the lie-flat seats, it might be improving. For the rest of us wedged into the steerage-class seats in the back of the plane? Definitely not.

With some travel industry sectors, it’s really hard to figure out if the experience is any better. Hotels are a prime example. A decade ago, many unscrupulous properties were padding their pockets with “energy” fees (a court forced them to stop). Dial it back another few years, and properties were charging outrageous fees to use their in-room phones (thank goodness for cell phones!).

And while hotels have added lots of amenities, like new beds, pillow menus and flat-screen TVs, they’ve made relatively few innovations in the area of customer service and hospitality in recent years. Maybe they think we’ll be wowed by the amenities and not mind if the guy at the front desk just doesn’t care if we’re having a good stay.

And car rental companies? Well, you can rent a late model, low-mileage vehicle the next time you need a car, but it would be a stretch to call the experience “better.” Car rental companies have perfected the art of passing along fees to you, which effectively double or triple the actual rate you pay.

Oh, and that $20 ding scam? It’s been taken to a whole new level by some car rental companies, as regular readers of this column know. Now, instead of pocketing a twenty, they send you a bill for $500, which just happens to be the amount of your insurance deductible. And they don’t even show you proof that the car was fixed or evidence to support their daily “loss of use” fee.

Sigh.

I want to be optimistic. Heck, I’ve even been ordered to be more optimistic. A few years ago, an editor commissioned a story that argued these were the glory days of air travel. It was a journalistic low point for me, and I stopped writing for that news organization shortly after that.

But the longer I cover this industry, the more I wonder if my dad was right.

Maybe this world really is going to hell in a handbasket. And maybe the only thing standing between you and a complete rip-off are a few government bureaucrats and the last consumer advocates remaining.

  • JamesinPhnomPenh

    Legacy air travel = definitely worse. Less room, more fees, crappier food.
    Budget airlines = good deals can still be had if you’re willing to forego all the perks
    Hotels = worse across the board. Hotel rates seem to have gone up exponentially. So much harder to find a great deal nowadays.

    But for world travelers, I think the experience is better. More far flung places are becoming accessible, and the internet means consumers can be much better informed. Living in Asia but traveling the world, I still find travel rewarding. Can’t live without it!

    http://www.dreamtravelblog.wordpress.com

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YNDJAAC7MQACIHVLZD76B6JA5I larry

    Sorry, but I have to disagree that the folks in lie flat seats are in them because they are lucky. This was a hard one to vote on because of all the variables. Hotel fees drive me crazy, but the bedding in particular is way better than the good ole days. Airlines, don’t get me started. If I ran my business like most of the airlines run theirs, I’d be bankrupt. Oh wait, most of the airlines are or have been at one time…….. never mind.  

  • Raven_Altosk

    If the airline rep was so pleased with her company’s lie flat seats, why didn’t you question why they haven’t improved seat pitch/width for the “normal” people?

    Also, what about their policies on selling “premium economy” seats that they can’t deliver?

    And finally…how do they plan to handle the XXL pax who take up two economy seats, but buy one and make everyone else miserable?

    These are the questions that should be asked of the airlines. Please, cut through the spin the next time you talk to them.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    “For the card-carrying elite-level passengers lucky enough to be sitting in the lie-flat seats, it might be improving.”
     
    Not so much.  I am a card carrying elite.  I have to pay for a higher fare just to be eligible for an upgrade, and still end up flying in the back.  After doing the walk of shame knowing I just paid $500 more out of my own pocket for a coach seat to get an upgradable fare, I decided to just pay for a non-upgradable fare and expect to ride in coach so that I won’t be disappointed.  Some of my co-workers on full-fare (They are higher level and allowed to buy such) still don’t get upgraded.  Lie-flat seats, mean less seats in business and first, which means even less of a chance of an upgrade.  So the experience may be better, but only for the super-rich. 

  • mikegun

    Are the declines just a reflection of our society? We demand cheap goods. Retailers have done away with service in the name of cheap prices. Just try to get advice on paint at K-Mart. Air travel, hotels and car rentals are available to the masses and the masses tend to pick price over quality. 

  • Chris_In_NC

     Travel is neither better or worse. Rather its about the individual experience, and this article is trying to oversimplify a complex equation.

    It’s all about managing expectations… If you’re expecting to pay $9 fares and be treated like royalty, then you’re going to be disappointed. If you’re expecting rock bottom prices, but then nit pick about how your room didn’t have a whirlpool tub, balcony, view or was too small, then you are also going to be disappointed.

    Overall, I think travel is better for the following reasons:
    1) Virtually all flights are “non-smoking” now
    2) Improvement of flight options means (yes, the dreaded hub model) has improved accessibility
    3) Cost, when adjusted for inflation, makes virtually all travel products (flights, hotels, etc) available to the masses
    4) Availability of online resources, that allows travelers to do their own research on previously unknown or exotic destinations

    Unfortunately, the world is also changing. Areas that were once safe, are not so safe anymore (ie Kabul, parts of Mexico), but new opportunities are opening up. Did anyone actually visit China or Tibet 20 years ago as a tourist?

    Frankly, I would like to rephrase the question : “Is the traveling public better or worse?” I believe that travelers were more respectful and civilized in the past. Some of the behavior that routinely makes the news would have never occurred in the past. You would never see travelers complain of tacky, irrelevant complaints demanding a full refund or the whole solar system as compensation.

    Personally, for me, travel is better. My wife and I are in a phase of our life where we have both time off and financial resources to do travel. When there is a will, there is a way and we truly enjoy our trips!

  • Jeanne_in_NE

    My two cents:  I had to travel from the Midwest to the Southeast in late December with my husband and father-in-law.  My father-in-law used to travel a lot; hasn’t flown in a decade, nor rented a car in that time.  He was very surprised in the changes in both experiences and not in a good way.  From his perspective, travel has gotten to be less enjoyable.  My mother had to fly a couple of years ago, after not having flown since before 9/11.  She won’t fly any more.

    It was easy to answer the poll when I put myself in a previous generation’s shoes.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OSW6Y735Q2LBC5CSZUZBVTTYEQ JT

    Hotels – generally better.  There’s more decent competition out there and I find the room conditions/amenities are superior than in years’ past.

    Airlines – far, far worse.  Between the TSA molestation inspections to the cramped cattle cars to the poor attitudes of many flight attendants to not even being fed or getting a drink to the constant lies about why flights are canceled and so on and so forth, airline travel is a much poorer experience than it was 15-20 years ago.

    Car Rentals – About the same.  The fake-damage-insurance-scam was around 20 years ago.

  • jikinn

    I have read this before – that the consumers got what they asked for. We don’t want lower prices because we’re cheap. We NEED lower prices for all sorts of things to be able to pay for what we need. For my family, travel doesn’t fall into that category, unfortunately, and I haven’t been able to see my family on the other coast in years. I really wish I could book a flight to visit, but I just can’t afford it, even with the “cheap” fares.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/5KOZI6MFVHYMCJDSDVVZR4ZVNE JessicaJ

    As soon as you factor price into your argument (for flights at least), travel is getting better. Even with the oil prices as they are, for the most part, fares are very low. Adjusted for inflation, ticket prices are much lower than 10-20 years ago, and since the primary goal of air travel is to get you from A to B, I’d say that low prices counts as a huge benefit. And again, passengers have shown airlines that low prices is pretty much all they care about, and the airlines have met those demands.
    And that is the reason that service ‘suffers’ if you want to argue that. There are still plenty of improvements too, such as airlines installing personal TVs on long-haul flights, being able to do almost everything with your booking online (time saved, convenience), as well as many airports getting improvements.

  • BillCCC

    I think that I get the travel that I am willing to pay for. The experience at an airport is a little worse due to the security requirements but you can’t blame the airlines for that. Other than the mandatory resort fees I am generally happy with hotels. I always get a clean room at a price I am willing to pay. As for car rentals I consider myself lucky, I have never been subjected to the ‘dent found after you left’ issue. I always make sure that I inspect the car completely when I take it and hand in the insopection sheet before I leave. It is usually pretty filled out.

  • Kotch11

    I think traveling is worse, but not because of airlines, rental cars, etc.  I think it’s the traveling public that makes us all cringe.  Unclean people and people dressed in pajamas boarding flights and rudeness just make me want to drive everywhere. 
    Granted we don’t like the little seats and the crowded overhead and all the fees, but we get to see the world now.  What a blessing.

  • ClareClare

    “I want to be optimistic. Heck, I’ve even been ordered to be more optimistic.”

    Okay, Chris, you’ve made a valiant effort here so your superiors should be content for at least a while!  BUT if they accuse you of usually being unduly negative (which incidentally I don’t think you are), you can just remind them of three little letters, which completely encapsulate the sheer misery that travelling in/out of the US has now become:

    TSA.

  • BlondieDC

    I feel so badly for my passengers that have to sit in cramped seats for 5, 6, 7, even 14 hours with minimal amenities available.  It’s not good!

  • BlondieDC

    larry–I’m gonna disagree on one of your points.  The folks in the lie-flat seats are NOT lucky.  They are loyal and frequent or pay the full fare, not lucky.

  • mikegun

    I believe this kind of illustrates my point.

    Not knowing your origin and destination it’s hard to estimate a fare, but NYC to LAX are around $300 round trip. How cheap would the fare need to go? 

    Would you accept a more crowded plane and less “free” services in order to snag a cheaper ticket? The masses will and have. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    You need to change airlines.  American lets you upgrade on nearly every fare.

  • mikegun

    Don’t forget TV and wifi on board!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    I couldn’t have said it better myself!
     
    It’s annoying that people demand to pay the least, and then complain about the cheap quality.  It’s like the Wall Mart effect.  I used it live in a small town, under 30K people.  Wall Mart came in and everyone flocked there for the low prices, meanwhile all of the local business went out of business, and then people lost their jobs, and then no one had money, even for Wall Mart.
     
    People often argue that they can’t afford to pay more, and that’s why they shop at Wall Mart, but I think its self-fulfilling, by shopping ta Wall Mart, they put the local companies out of business, the economy suffers, they make less money, and then can’t afford as much. They could afford other stores before Wall Mart came.
     
    I have a friend who always says, “Higher price or buy it twice.”  It’s so true, when I buy the lowest cost items it is usually inferior quality and breaks really quickly. 
     
    This also spills over into travel.  LCC come along, and people only care about the lowest price, and airlines cannot longer afford to provide quality service.  Hotels too!
     
    I think some of these problems also comes from the Now! Now! Attitude in the US.  People can go to Wall Mart and buy a fancy TV for $299 on their credit card, and 4 months later when it breaks they buy another.  Back in the day, people would save up for a long time to buy a TV, and get a more expensive one because the cheap one didn’t exist.  The more expensive one was much higher quality, and it lasted much longer.
     
    If people demand cheap, they are hurting themselves and hurting the industry.  But that’s how society has become, and that’s why people want the world. Or at least a refund of the world over a small nit pick.

  • Rob_D3

    I feel sorry for all those poor passengers who have to travel in economy.

  • TonyA_says

    If we are simply talking experience (and not price or value), then it’s worse. With more and more travelers and without larger and newer airplanes and airports we overuse or compete for the same amount of resources – making travel less comfortable.

    To me the mere perception of TSA security lines are so dreadful that it detracts from the positive experience of traveling.

    To some extent, the Internet has had (negative) unintended consequences on travel. There is too much hype and over-marketing of travel products (i.e. hotel, cruises, tours, etc.) that unseasoned travelers (especially American Prince and Princesses) expect too much.

    I have traveled to many corners of the world. If you really expect a stay in foreign city to be as comfortable as your room or couch, then you have the wrong assumption. We spend a lot of money and go through a lot of hassle to go to a place where we have friends and family or to see a place as say “Wow, I wish you were here”. So worse or not, I’ll still travel.

  • TonyA_says

    Problem is AA does not fly [non stop] from a lot of origin and destinations. And, AA has its own nightmares, too. My last flight JFK-ROM and back had inedible [so-called] food. I hope it is the last.

  • LFH0

    Air travel used to be special, and passengers were treated accordingly. On the luxury side, the private roomettes and dining rooms on the Clippers flown by Pan American World Airways have never been surpassed. But through the 1970s, coach travel buy air was a special experience, perhaps because the carriers realized that passengers have many viable alternatives to flying. But today, commercial aviation is so routine, and most passengers will not consider any alternatives, that indignities can be hurled at passengers, told to enjoy them, and the carriers can exploit their de facto monopoly over long-distance transportation. I gave up commercial air travel a decade ago, and since then I now travel by railroad, ocean liner, and motor bus. Although not always perfect, most often I am treated with dignity and respect, and my journeys are pleasant and comfortable.

  • Joel Wechsler

    The international carriers, especially to Asia and the Middle East, are as good or better than they ever were. On the other hand the domestic airlines are much worse. I’d trade all the TV, WiFi etc. for a seat with decent pitch and width, an occasional drink or snack and a pleasant attitude. I think those who think travel, or least airline travel, is better, never flew in the days before it became a form of airborne mass transit.

  • http://www.facebook.com/asiansm Dang Ph

    Totally agree. Before Year 2000, the journey to destination were also a pleasure with the Airlines, the Inflight Foods served … or the Trucks Stop Diners on the highways… Now the US Airports is worse than the Soviet Stalinist era. The taxes and the Airport fees were rarely more than 5% of the ticket, now it’s 200% of the ticket price and if you flight to London LHR it’s at least 300% the ticket price. And lot of destination are plagued with violence, by drug problems or religion war related conflicts: Mexico, Bali, and now even Bangkok
    I wonder if any of you old enough to travel to the Soviet Union in the 80′s, it was irrationally paranoiac like the US Airport today. Today, make a trip to Cuba or Vietnam, it’s the total reverse, it’s take less than 10 seconds to pass Immigration and Customs.

  • bodega3

    Having been in the travel industry for 3 decades, I think you are correct that there has been a dumbing down in the travel experience.  Why shouldn’t checked luggage be a part of the airline ticket cost?  Why shouldn’t maid service be a part of the hotel stay? 

  • Chasmosaur

    Actually, you kind of can blame the airlines for TSA.  

    http://tsanewsblog.com/1625/news/is-tsa-just-another-airline-subsidy/

  • http://www.facebook.com/asiansm Dang Ph

    Totally agreed, I try to book on Asian or European when flying internationally. Nevertheless, american airlines try hard to catch up on Asian and European routes. I was pleasantly surprised by First Class United New Seat, Food Menu and Service on ORD-NRT and CDG-ORD route, I can tell it match international standard. Of course it’s very hard to beat SQ, TG or CX on first class services. Now we have other Middle-East airlines do the good job even better than the Asian and European: Qatar, Ethiad, Emirates and Turkish Airlines… but I just don’t like a stop in the Middle-East.

  • http://www.facebook.com/asiansm Dang Ph

    Totally agreed, I try to book on Asian or European when flying internationally. Nevertheless, american airlines try hard to catch up on Asian and European routes. I was pleasantly surprised by First Class United New Seat, Food Menu and Service on ORD-NRT and CDG-ORD route, I can tell it match international standard. Of course it’s very hard to beat SQ, TG or CX on first class services. Now we have other Middle-East airlines do the good job even better than the Asian and European: Qatar, Ethiad, Emirates and Turkish Airlines… but I just don’t like a stop in the Middle-East.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Aaron-Gold/1015584383 Aaron Gold

    New planes making things better? Bleaugh! One of the reasons I switched from American is that they are dumping the old MD-80s, which have a decent exit-row seat, for 737s, in which the exit rows feel like a restraint chair. So what few decent seats us frequent fliers could nab, are gone. If only they’d go back to 34″ seat pitch and raise the ticket prices a few bucks to cover the lost revenue! This is why, when I fly for leisure, I spend my own money on Jet Blue. I’m willing to pay extra for a seat that’s suitable for human occupancy.

  • travelagentman

    Travel for the richest regular travelers is getting better in all ways except car rentals. After 3,000,000 miles 40+ cruises, 1,000 hotel nights, I feel that for the average custom, that “hell in a handbasket” would be a real improvment. Watch Pan AM on Sundays just to feel what it truly was at the prime time of the airline industry. Watch re-runs of Hotel, to see what the average person could have had in the past, and even google OJ and see what Hertz wanted to do for its customers. Travel is hideous when you begin your trip with John Q Moron at TSA, and it does not get better.

  • TonyA_says

     I completely disagree. The government took away security from the airlines/airports after 9/11. So this is NOT a subsidy to the airlines as the article is saying. The airlines/airports could do it themselves if needed (and they can charge passengers for it, too). Just go overseas and find out.

  • TonyA_says

    This begs the question – is air travel more affordable nowadays?

    While an airline can always re-invent itself by going through bankruptcy (and reboot labor costs), the high cost of oil and CEOs is unavoidable.

    That said, the cost of airfare in highly competitive routes and during off-season is quite cheap. And note, if it ain’t affordable then how come the flights are almost always full?

    Unfortunately if you live in a place like Little Rock, Arkansas; you will pay twice the fare to go to the East Coast compared to one who is flying out of LAX to go to NYC. Supply and Demand, I guess.

  • DavidYoung2

    The airline experience is a reflection of the general trend in American society.  As the middle class disappears, the relatively few ‘wealthy’ are enjoying far greater wealth whilst the rest are actually suffering income adjusted declines.

    Now, the airline industry reflects that.  Better amenities for the ‘wealthy’ — business and first class.  Worse for the ‘average joe.’  The airline industry is simply reflecting and responding to a general trend in American society — the bifurcation into rich and struggling, and the disappearance of the middle class.

    Oh, before the hate mail starts to fly, this isn’t an opinion as to whether such trends are good or bad, just an observation of what is happening.

  • bodega3

    My take on a lot of this is that you use to be treated like a guest, especially on a filght.  When you have a guest in your home, you do extra for them to make sure they are enjoying their stay.  You don’t expect them to buy their own food and make their own meals.  You don’t expect them to clean up your house because they are staying with your for a few days.  You do expect them to repect your home….ever look at a flight as you are deplaning and see how trashed it is?  You don’t charge them to wash their clothes.  If you lend them your car for a day, I would hope you make sure it is clean, safe to drive and has gas in it.  I would hope they bring it back in one piece, fill the tank up and tidy it up.  The respect goes both ways!

  • http://www.pipdigital.com Nancy Dickinson

    As miserable all this has become, my angst starts at security given it’s such a crap shoot as to what kind of TSA agent you’ll get.

    I just started a new medication for my RA yesterday that is a syringe I will need to carry in a small hand-held cooler with an ice pack.  This is a really expensive drug that would appeal to someone who couldn’t be bothered to read the labeling that it’s not a narcotic.  Packing it in my suitcase leaves it open to theft (and a hard explanation to my insurance company as to why it was in my checked bag) so I didn’t have to explain it all to a minimum wage TSA agent.  Carrying it with me in my computer bag now has me spending more time that should be necessary because they’ll want to take away the ice pack (which is necessary so the medicine stays cold).

    I’m so used to the fees it doesn’t even surprise me any more and it started with the government showing all the businesses and corporations they could do it and do it successfully.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    I remember the flight experience from the 70s.  What I remember is that my family could fly exactly once a year. Sure, I wore a suit to fly, as did my father. I remember the happy employees and getting “free” playing cards, meals, snacks etc.  But it was hella expensive to fly and in my entire time growing up, I flew twice a year exactly once.

    I too am happy to pay for for good quality and service.  I’m not sure what the problem is.  At least within the hotel and car industry, that option is available to you.  You can book a chain that has clearer rooms.  I won’t stay at a hotel that uses bedspreads instread.  After repeated bad experiences, I don’t rent from Alamo or National.

    As far as booking online, you don’t have to book the cheapest room/flight/car.  I regularly book a higher airfare that comes with flexibility when traveling for business when my schedule requires flexibility.

    At the LAX airport where I frequent, Alama, budget, and National have lower prices.  But I choose Hertz because it has a better customer service experience, particularly then the others.

    So travelers aren’t stupid or naive.  They vote with their wallets based upon their values.

  • http://twitter.com/VagabondList Vagabond List

    Yes, it most probably is. Or at least travel-related services are getting worse. Seems that everyone is out to gouge you. Although there has been a bit of good news lately – a couple airlines are discounting their baggage fees. Admittedly, it’s a small step.
    Great stuff. We added this to our morning links: http://www.vagabondlist.com/dailylinks/item/64-coffee-links-22212

  • whatpop

    AMTRAK: the last “great” travel experience…friendly and efficient phone service, pleasant train staff, best scenery in the country! (OK, admittedly better if you’re not on a rigid schedule…but that’s really the fault of the “host” railroads)

  • bodega3

    This isn’t necessarily voting by your wallet, it is the dumbing down of the industry with cuts they have made to be competitive.  Hotel housekeeping in 5 star hotels isn’t what it should be

  • dsliesse

    There are many factors that go into a subjective topic such as this one, and different people see it differently.

    Yes, air travel is more affordable now.  But that means the entire travel experience has dropped.  Planes are crowded, passengers and employees (to a lesser extent) are more uncivil, the food — when it can be found — is much worse (believe it or not, once upon a time airline food was good, but I can say that because I’ve been flying longer than most readers of this column seem to).

    Then there’s TSA, which is now starting to insinuate itself in other forms of transportation.  ‘Nuff said on that one!

    The problem stems partly — and I emphasize partly — from our (Americans’) feeling of entitlement to do whatever we want whenever we want for whatever we want to pay.  But there is no constitutional right to affordable air travel for the masses.  If you can’t afford it, you don’t do it.  That’s the way it’s always been, but now people call a $300 coast-to-coast flight expensive.  Come on, you can’t even drive for that, unless you have a half-dozen or so passengers over which to allocate the costs!

    Another part of the problem is that the airlines (a) don’t want to compete with each other, (b) don’t understand that there are more than two types of passengers, and (c) despite (b), try to be all things to all people.  I’ve long maintained there is a market somewhere between first class and steerage, but as far as the airlines are considered the only difference among back-of-the-plane travelers is whether they want a refundable ticket.

    Then there’s the problem of our national transportation policy (which is basically unchanged regardless of which party is in power; this is not a comment aimed at anyone in particular).  The government “invests” in highways, the government “invests” in air travel infrastructure, but the government “subsidizes” rail travel.  I wonder what kind of return the government gets on its “investments” in the first two modes!

    Sorry for the long-winded post, but this is a highly complex subject.

  • fedupgerry

    I am a “Super Elite” (Star Gold) Member of Air Canada & have been so since Frequent Flier Programs started. I refer to this as “Super Abused” now.
    AC used to allow SE Members to Upgrade, regardless of the Fare paid. Last September, they changed the policy (Unannounced of course). When buying their “Lowest Fare” Tickets now, one only gets 50% of the miles credited to one’s account.

    Earlier this month I returned to Tampa from Lyon (France) via London, thru Totonto. I use BA from Lyon to Heathrow. BA refused to check my bag thru as I was using AC from London to Toronto & onto Tampa. I had to clear UK Customs, retrieve my bag & go thru the process of checking in again. It will be a long time before I use BA again, for any flights.

    In Toronto, one must retrieve their baggage to go thru US Customs/Immigration. I had 90 minutes to catch my Tampa Flight. It took AC Baggage handlers 70 minutes to get my bag from the incoming flight to the Baggage Carousel. It was only because I have a Nexus Card that I was able to clear Customs/Immigration quickly. I dropped my bag off & then, thanks to the understanding of other passengers in the Security Line who allowed me to go to the front of the line, I was able to catch my flight as the last passenger boarded.
    No help at all from AC !!!Better or worse??? Worse by a long shot.

  • joe_c_c

    In general, it’s clearly worse.

    I’ve wasted many, many hours waiting in line at airport security over the past year.  Security delays were never this bad in the pre-TSA days.

    Direct flights from the two local airports I’m able to use are way down — it seems like my friends at United are hell-bent on making every single US traveler fly through Chicago.  Has anyone in their management team ever tried to make a 45 minute connection from gate F19 to the C terminal?  It’s do-able, but just barely.  God help us if there’s a thunderstorm or some snow/ice in Chicago.  I envy my friends that live in major cities who don’t have to endure the rush to change planes in over-crowded hub airports.

    The rental car I’m currently driving has 62,000 miles and has moderate/severe hail damage on the roof and hood.  Of course, I had to take the time to go back to the terminal and get the damage-slip marked, then take the time to move the car to a sunny area to photograph the damage. 

  • Joe_D_Messina

    I’m with you on the observation of society as a whole,  but don’t think it really applies to the airline industry as you are trying to portray it.

    The infrequent flyer makes up a big percentage of the total and they have no loyalty to any airline beyond price. That’s the group I’m in. I’ll pay extra for a direct flight or if the time happens to be far superior for my schedule, but if I buy by price I can generally save enough for one of our tickets to be free, which I really like.  That means the airline knows the coach seats will be full if their price is competitive and, conversely, they also know that even if they put extra dollars and effort into making the flight more enjoyable they’d still lose most of those passengers on a future flight if somebody else had a cheaper fare.

    Business and first class are quite literally the best customers. They either pay more outright for the tickets or they’re frequent flyers who get upgrades because of the volume of business they bring to the airline. Next time you fly, check out the front of the plane. You won’t see many people who are obviously rich, you’ll see lots of people enjoying the perks of spending a whole lot of time on airplanes, usually because of their demanding jobs.

    The biggest thing to change air travel is Sept. 11. The increased security including the nonsense with plastic bags, taking off shoes, etc. makes everything about the experience feel worse. Yes, food is pretty much completely gone from airplanes, but people ridiculed airplane food back when you got complete meals with real silverware on the plane. And tickets were way more expensive back in those days.

  • TonyA_says

    I’m sorry but being “Super Elite” does not mean that you can dispose of “Common Sense”. Why would anyone cross or mix Airline Alliances to travel between Tampa an Lyon, France? All you are going to get is misery (like you did).

    Next time choose to travel within ONE alliance only. A “Super Elite” in AC should stay with the Star Alliance, and this is the default flight routing from Lyon to Tampa via Toronto.

    1  #AC9407  LYSMUC- 900A1020A   0
    2  #AC 847    YYZ-1150A 255P   0
    3  #AC 904   TPA- 430P 722P   0 16.22
        AC9407 OPERATED BY LUFTHANSA OR LH CITYLINE

    YYZ on AC allows CAN Customs Bypass and you MIGHT be able to pre-clear US Customs there also.

  • Steve_in_WI

    I think there are so many variables at play that it’s hard to say whether “the travel experience” is getting better, worse, or staying the same. I think one also needs to separate aspects of the travel experience that are the creation of travel companies (like resort fees and charging for checked bags) and those that are the creation of the government (the TSA and room/rental car taxes that can be a huge percentage of the rate).

    I think one aspect of travel that has gotten better is hotels. Frankly, the level of comfort that’s expected nowadays in a standard Holiday Inn Express/Courtyard by Marriott type of room is pretty impressive. And while I’m as big a complainer about mandatory resort fees and other “gotchas”, I don’t find that it’s hard to avoid them depending on where you choose to stay. I also think things have gotten a lot better for the budget traveler thanks to the online review sites that help you separate the good deals from the fleabags – I’ve stayed at Super 8s and Motel 6s for well under $50 a night and found some of their properties to be great deals. (Dollar for dollar, one of my best room purchases ever was a $24.99 a night rate at Motel 6 in a newly renovated property that was clean, safe, and perfectly adequate for my needs). The caveat with the budget chains is that some of their properties are awful, but online reviews help travelers determine which ones are worth risking.

    As for flying, there are certainly plenty of things to complain about but given how cheap it is to fly across the country these days (and how historically cheap – prices from 30-40 years ago were often higher in real dollars, and much higher when adjusted for inflation), price needs to be factored in, too. I just went from ORD-LAS a couple weeks ago for $198 w/taxes round-trip on United, and am going ORD-SFO next month for $297 round-trip. Do I wish the seats were larger and more comfortable? Absolutely. Would I want to pay twice as much or more? Nope. (I would like to see more of an effort to create an affordable upgrade, similar to United’s Economy Plus but perhaps with more width as well as extra legroom. If Economy Plus had one fewer seat per row – and I realize it would have to cost more if it did – that would be pretty good to me).

  • TonyA_says

     @Kotch11:disqus  Since 1960s-70s, I was already able to see the World. Airline jet travel (and rental cars and hotels)  is not new. What is new is the extreme rudeness [or selfishness] of people and the lengths they would go to finagle a way to game the system.

  • TonyA_says

     Travel is now a commodity, not a luxury.

  • SoBeSparky

    Sadly, travel is no worse than other general aspects of life.  People are less civil.  They are more self-centered.  They have lost common courtesies.  

    A passenger was barking yesterday upon entering a MIA-LAX flight that the flight attendant must tell a customer to move, because her injured mother needed to sit next to her, doctor’s orders.

    Flight attendant said she would try and ask.  Passenger said, “Just tell them.”  Attendant very politely asked the passenger, when he arrived, if he would move to an equivalent seat because of the obviously injured passenger.  Of course, the passenger readily agreed.  FA said to barker, “See what happens when you are nice and ask politely?”  No comment back from barker.

    “Please, excuse me, may I, pardon and I’m sorry” are disappearing in common discourse.  Instead many just are just rude.  So this is not an attitude problem just in travel.  It is a daily problem of dealing with others.  It is as if people are speaking as they text, and the result is simply uncivil.

  • TonyA_says

    Next time you fly, check out the front of the plane. You won’t see many people who are obviously rich, you’ll see lots of people enjoying the perks of spending a whole lot of time on airplanes, usually because of their demanding jobs.

    I agree. Lots of people in the front want to “feel” rich. Many of the real rich fly private jets or netjets. They do not want to sit with the wannabees.

    For the most of us, lie-flat are irrelevant. The cost or sacrifice is too high to bear.