Help! Southwest Airlines stranded my puppy in Little Rock

puppyIt was just a matter of time before Southwest Airlines, which started accepting pets as passengers earlier this year, got into a dog-fight with a customer. Actually, this one’s more of a cat fight.

Jonathan Camp’s rescue puppy, Gatsby, had to be left in Little Rock, Ark., after airline employees decided he was too big to fly. Southwest’s policies are clearly spelled out on its Web site, but there is always room for interpretation — and it appears Camp and Southwest didn’t see the policies in the same way.

Camp asked me to intervene after Gatsby was stranded.

Here are excerpts of his appeal:

We need your help! Southwest Airlines made us leave our sweet 15-pound rescue puppy in Little Rock, after they let us fly there. We met all the specifications to get the dog on board, and the main reason he did not get on the plane was because Southwest Airlines hired employees who are supposed to be in charge of checking the dogs, but hate dogs/are deathly afraid of them, and do not know how to follow their own rules.

And now our puppy is in Little Rock, he already has separation anxiety, he had vet appointments today in San Diego, and all because of petty, cruel employees. Also, Southwest does not seem to care enough to respond quickly to the situation, because we are just two nobodies as far as they are concerned, and think it is OK to let our family puppy be away from his loving owners.

OK, let me stop the tape right there. Separation anxiety? I don’t know. Then again, I’m not a dog person, so maybe they do get separation anxiety after being away from their owners for a few hours. But on with the story …

We had sedated Gatsby but Beren, my fiancee, had him in her arms as we waited to check our bags and to purchase the pet boarding pass that we had already reserved. The Southwest lady finished with the passenger ahead of us in line, and so we walked up to her.

She all of a sudden noticed Gatsby in Beren’s arms and freaked out. Freaked out bad, because apparently she was afraid of all dogs, even cute 15 pound puppies that are asleep. She told Beren to put him in the dog crate immediately, and she said that he had to be in his crate at all times, which we know is not entirely true, because you have to take him out to go through security, and the policy said that he only has to be in his crate once you go through security, so she was misinformed.

She calls out her supervisor because she is so freaked that she saw a dog, even though it is part of her job, and so he comes out suspicious and slightly hostile. He then says that the
dog is too big and that he is not getting on the flight. We flew with Gatsby to Little Rock from San Diego and have before, he is under 25 pounds, and meets all their policies regarding dogs, and they let us bring him here.

Beren told him that Gatsby is 15 pounds and not too big. Then the supervisor said that the crate was too small for Gatsby. We put Gatsby in the crate to show that he was erroneous. Then the supervisor said that the dog needs to stand up in the crate.

Southwest policy says the dog must be able to move around comfortably and be able to stand up in the crate (there was a boarding pass on the pet carrier from the San Diego airport showing the dog and the carrier passed inspection there and had flown on Southwest just a week earlier). We have the photos to prove that Gatsby can stand up in the crate and move around, but the man just was not in a good mood and was rude and just kept saying no and no and no, because Beren was crying and telling him that this is ridiculous, the dog had flown several times in that crate, he can stand up, he just wasn’t at that split second because he was sedated to ensure that he was quiet in the plane for the other passengers.

The man tells Beren she needs to calm down and that there is no way that the dog is getting on the flight (which was only half full, and we had reservations for Gatsby, and we had met all their requirements because we had traveled a few times with him). Beren goes outside and calls her stepmother Ashley who dropped us off, and Ashley returns and attempts to talk to them.

Alright, you get the idea. The police are called to the scene. Eventually, the great Gatsby goes home with Ashley the stepmom, but Beren and her fiancee are furious at the airline and are threatening to sue.

I contacted the airline on the family’s behalf. Here’s its response to Camp:

Our policy, as stated on our website, says that Southwest Airlines accepts small domestic cats and dogs, which must be carried in an appropriate carrier. Furthermore, the cat or dog must be completely inside the pet carrier and be able to stand up and move around with ease.

According to our Little Rock Employees, the dog that was with you when you checked in could not stand up, turn around, or fit comfortably in the carrier. For that reason, they could not allow him to travel.

I can understand how frustrating that situation must have been for you – you’re at the airport, you’re ready to travel, and suddenly, your plans are interrupted. So, I can understand why your fiancées temper may have flared, causing the Little Rock Airport police to arrive on the scene.

That said, our Employees have an obligation to ensure that all pets and Customers that travel onboard Southwest Airlines can travel safely and comfortably. The fact that Gatsby did not meet our policy requiring pets to fit comfortably in their carriers is the reason that he was denied boarding.

My research also suggests that you had trouble traveling with Gatsby back in September when he was just 14 weeks old, at which time, he was denied boarding after several Customers complained about the noise and our Flight Crew discovered that he was not secured in his carrier, as is required at all times. Nevertheless, our records indicate that our Customer Relations Departments provided you with a $75 gift certificate as a gesture of goodwill and apology for your inconvenience.

Mr. Camp, we added our P.A.W.S program earlier this year as an added convenience for our Customers, and I am truly sorry that this service has been anything less than convenient for you, your fiancée, or your dog, Gatsby. As Gatsby continues to grow and mature, please keep in mind that, having already outgrown the terms of our P.A.W.S. policies, it is unlikely that he will qualify to travel with us moving forward.

Of course, I understand that there is still the lingering issue that Gatsby remains in Little Rock. Please contact me offline so that we can discuss options for getting him home to San Diego.

I think that was an appropriate response from Southwest. And the part about discussing options for getting Gatsby back to San Diego was a nice touch, too.

(Photo: dakotaduff/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Ms Burt

    What a flap! Kudos to Paulette Baker. In my not-so-humble-opinion, children under the age of, say, 3, should be kept in carriers under the seat. Too big? Oh sorry, well, they can go in cargo.

  • AMW

    I love Southwest, and this situation, especially the response letter, is a perfect example of why I love them. They state their rules clearly, they enforce them fairly, and they explain their reasons firmly but politely. That response is a thing of beauty; without being in any way insulting, it says, “You were wrong, you behaved badly, you’ve done so before, and we’re on to you, so don’t bother trying it again. If you don’t want to follow our rules, you can’t fly on our airline.”

    When you read their online policy, it couldn’t be clearer. Southwest has thought of (and explained) everything. They don’t have a weight limit for pets; they have a height limit. The statement that the animal must be able to stand up is in bold face type on the web site, f’ Pete’s sake! There’s no way a 15-pound dog could stand up in a carrier less than 8.25″ high. Most cats are too tall for that. (And you’ll notice that the policy repeatedly refers to SMALL cats and dogs.) And the fact that the complainants apparently had already had an issue with the same dog definitely suggests that they are, indeed, “special little snowflakes” who were basically flouting the rules on purpose because they weren’t told to sit down and shut up the first two times. John has it right that just because they got away with it once (or twice) doesn’t mean they have a right to expect to continue to do so. You don’t get caught every time you run a red light, but I don’t think you’re likely to get out of a ticket by saying, “But Your Honor, I ran that light on the way TO the store and nobody said anything! How dare the officer stop me on my way home?”

    These are people who think they’re special, the rules don’t apply to them, and anyone who tries to enforce the rules is just a hater. Kudos to Southwest for informing them otherwise.

    The sad part is that, as is typical, these special snowflakes have probably ruined it for everyone else. From the website, it appears as if the pet fares were a trial program. Now that poor Gatsby’s people have proven that some pet owners cannot necessarily be trusted to put their pet’s welfare ahead of their own convenience and will (repeatedly) scam the rules intended to protect their animals, how long do you suppose it will be before Southwest “regretfully informs Customers that the PAWS trial program has been discontinued”?

    I’ve got news for you, Snowflakes. Your dog is NOT a child, and you are NOT in France. The pooch stays home.

  • Toni

    I can’t wait for the day when the owner of the “emotional support boa constrictor” gets seated next to the owner of the “emotional support white mouse.”

  • Rebecca

    I loved how the couple pulled the “You can’t be afraid of dogs, it’s your JOB” card. Hey, I’m allergic to many perfumes. How dare I start having a reaction around people who bathe in the stuff. It’s my JOB! /sarcasm.

  • LeeAnne

    I just saw all these posts…I’ve been busy with real life. All I can say is…HAHAHAHA! Great entertainment, everyone…although I don’t think that’s what Christopher was going for.

    Lianne, sorry people are mistaking you for me, or me for you, or some such confusion…at this point I’m not sure. Perhaps I shouldn’t have mentioned that I liked your “snowflake” line…somehow this seems to have blurred the lines between us. Spelling does seem to be a big topic on this site lately…if it’s not somebody harassing ME for MY misspellings, or accusing YOU of harassing somebody ELSE for THEIR misspellings, it’s somebody not paying attention to how we spell our names and thinking we’re the same person! Yeesh, now my head is spinning. ;-)

    In any case, I do hope your grammer is doing better. Mine used to drink warm milk when she wasn’t feeling well. Helped her sleep.

    @RegularJane…wow! Maybe you should drink some warm milk? It always helped my grammer when she was feeling grumpy…my gramper too.

    As for the snowflakes and their kid…I mean dog…now that I’ve read more of the comments in here, I realize that my earlier suggestion that they just buy a larger carrier wouldn’t work. I now agree with the folks who think they were just pushing the envelope by bringing a borderline too-big pooch, and should have just left him home. Kennels work great. Or dog sitters.

  • Ames

    Chris,

    IF you ever hear from the passengers again, please let us know how the puppy got home. The not so little pooch is the inoocent, but very inconvenienced, one in this whole story.

  • Bela Fleck

    Yes, dogs do get separation anxiety and develop all manner of bizarre coping behaviors as a result. I’ve had some…ahem…interesting cleanup duty because of some early separation anxiety on the part of one of mine. Call it clearly targeted. Luckily, she has “grown out of it.”

    In this case, however, I’d say the separation anxiety is on the part of the pet owners. They need to learn to leave the puppy at home when the travel or stop traveling so much. Pets do not belong on airplanes.

  • kara

    I dont understand why southwest even allows pets on the planes if they are supposed to stand at only 8 inches….its insane, I have a very small puppy, I am taking a very quick flight in a few days from san diego to san jose and we are going to try to take our dog. Our dog only weighs 10 pounds, and is really small…but even he stands at about a foot. We got a carrier and he lays comfortably in it, he has plenty of wiggle room, plenty, he could probably turn around if he wanted too…but I am affraid southwest is going to be uber particular about it. I think they should be a bit more flexible…I mean my flight is only an hour, my vet gave us something to relax my dog. So I hope there are no problems.

    Since it is such a short flight I would have put him in cargo, but apparently southwest no longer allows pets in cargo…so how is anyone supposed to fly with a dog?? My dog comes everywhere with me!! Everywhere! And I want to take him on vacation…we booked everything pet friendly, now Im worried that I will get stuck at the airport with the dog. Grr…so frustrating…

    I dont think southwest should even allow pets at all it is very misleading to say we accept small pets, but they need to be 8 inches tall…I mean really…8 inches!! Get out a measuring tape and look at 8 inches and show me a dog or cat that stands at 8 inches. Very misleading, either accommodate the small pets or dont offer them flights, I would have bought an extra ticket and put him on the seat next to me or flown him in the cargo hold.

  • RDS

    I have to disagree with the concept that SWA enforces their rules fairly or evenly. We had a somewhat similar situation this past week. I got into a “discussion” with a flight attendant concerning my dog’s carrier size was not fitting fully enough under the seat (of course the other guy in the row had his bag sticking out about the same amount). The carrier could not fit under the seat to this attendant’s satisfaction. It was finally resolved when I suggested that maybe we should return to the gate and resolve it there (but I had to endure a lecture). Ok, but this was the fourth of four flights on this trip. So 2 ticket counters(including the first which actually took a tape measure and measured the carrier) and 3 other sets of flight attendants had been ok with the size and manner in which the carrier was stored under the seat.

    My concern is that SWA’s inability to be consistent in there enforcement of rules. This is what gets them in trouble and looking stupid for things like someone’s skirt being too short or someone’s kid being too loud. My concern is if there is that much interpretation available to the employees, then are we running the risk of the pilots having too much room to interpret the rules.

  • Brooklyn

    It sounds as if these people did learn from past experience; this time, they sedated their dog so he wouldn’t annoy the other passengers and then were punished because they couldn’t demonstrate that he could stand up in his crate. And if the airline accept pets, the people at the counter should be willing to deal with them. If not, they should find a different job. Now if only the people with annoying children could be made to sedate them!

  • edward wong

    If this is true – I will never fly sw again. Unless they fire this person.